FLOOD • C.F. KLASSEN • EARTHQUAKE * DAVID TOEWS • LIGHTEN AU DEPARTURE
EDUARD WUEST • GNADENFELD MERCY • JOHANN CORNIES
Events
Events In
Russian Mennonite History
And The People
That Made Them Happen
Helmut T. Huebert
• BERNHARD DUECK • BIBLE CONFERENCE • BENJAMIN UNRUH •
BERLIN ESCAPE • JAKOB REIMER • SAENGERFEST • ARON SAWATSKY • THE PURGE
*
Events
reopie
Events In
Russian Mennonite History
And The People
That Made Them Happen
Helmut T. Huebert
SP
SPRINGFIELD
PUBLISHERS
Springfield Publishers
Winnipeg, Canada 1999
Published by Springfield Publishers of Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data
Huebert, Helmut T., 1935-
Events and people
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 0-920643 -06-X
1. Mennonites-Russia-History. 2. Mennonites-Soviet
Union-History. I. Title.
BX8119.R8H84 1999 289.747 C99-920210-3
Some of the maps were originally drawn by William Schroeder. These are labeled “WS.”
Some of the maps were drawn by the author, Helmut T. Huebert, and are labeled “HTH.”
All cartography is by Helmut T. Huebert, with the second initials on the maps being “HTH.”
Cover design is by Fred Koop
EVENTS AND PEOPLE: EVENTS IN RUSSIAN MENNONITE HISTORY AND THE
PEOPLE THAT MADE THEM HAPPEN
Copyright © 1999 by Springfield Publishers, 6 Litz Place, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
R2G 0V1, E-mail Huebertz@ escape. ca
All rights reserved. With the exception of brief excerpts for review or very limited copying for
strictly private use, no part of this book may be reproduced without written permission
by the publishers.
International Standard Book Number 0-920643-06-X
Printed in Canada by Christian Press, Winnipeg, Manitoba
PREFACE
Events and People is meant to portray history, but with a twist. Many history books
present the story of mankind as broad sweeping developments or trends, which the people
involved likely never recognized themselves. I would contend that more people would
recognize the story more precisely if it were tagged to specific events and people.
Mennonite history, because Mennonites are a religious group, of course almost by
definition, involves theological issues and struggles at its core. Not being a professional
historian, but all my life having been a human being, I often wondered what the actual day
to day life of the ordinary people was really like. My feeling is that often they were
concerned less with what happened at important meetings of church leaders and theologians
and more with the Czars that visited their colonies, the floods that destroyed their houses,
and the epidemics that killed their children.
We do actually have valuable precedent in presenting history and great truths by this
method in the Bible. The reign of King David is vivid in our minds because of his dramatic
encounter with Goliath and the accounts of his personal story. Elijah is remembered as a
great prophet in part because of his confrontation with the priests of Baal on Mount Carmel,
and the other personal aspects of his life which are recounted. Even the message of Jesus
Christ is most often rendered through detailing of events and personal encounters.
My specific interest in “events” was piqued by reading the account of the dedication
of the Mennonite Brethren church building in Lugovsk, Neu Samara Colony, an event
which occurred in 1901. First of all the scale: there were three thousand [3,000] guests.
That is a lot of people, in a little out of the way Mennonite colony somewhere on the broad
steppes of Russia! The visiting choir from the Ufa Colony concluded the celebrations by
singing the Hallelujah Chorus from Messiah by Handel. How would the Hallelujah Chorus
have reached these same broad steppes of Russia? Specific interests such as these underlie
many of the events in which Mennonites in Russia were involved. Added to this is my
historical theory that trends do not just occur out of the blue: people make things happen.
So a logical extension to studying specific events is to look into the lives of the people who
made them happen. I have therefore included many mini-biographies as part of the
historical survey.
In this review of events there are obvious limitations. No attempt has been made
to fashion a comprehensive history book. To be included there had to be a reasonably well
defined “event.” It needed to be documented with fairly precise detail. Because of this
limitation more events have been included during times when newspaper reporting was
available. Friedensstimme, Zionsbote, and Mennonitische Rundschau have been
particularly helpful. Even so there are peculiar gaps in the stories. In the report of the
Saengerfest held in 1894, a report written by a musician, the texts of the interspersed
sermons are listed, but not one word about which songs were sung! While to my mind this
is regrettable, it is still an intriguing historical comment on values as thought of at that time.
The Bible Conference held in Halbstadt in 1 909 was well advertised, but there was no
official report of proceedings in Friedensstimme, even though the planners of the event
had ready access to the publication, one being a part owner of the publishing house, another
even being an editor!
The events in this book are listed chronologically, not by subject matter. It is hoped
that the accurate and detailed index can help those seeking specific information. All
sources of information are listed at the end of each article, but since this is not intended to
be a scientific dissertation, specific footnote numbers have not been used. Readers may be
intrigued by the variation in size of print. The major “Event” article is in 12-point,
subsequent “Background Information”, including the biographies is in 1 1 -point. Those who
wish to read the source material, and presumably have excellent vision, will find this listed
in space saving 10-point type size. The index, to further save space, is in 9-point type.
All biblical references used are from the New International Version, 1978. In most
instances this appeared to accurately reflect the meaning of the text which was used for
German sermons. There was one notable exception, used at the dedication of the Lugovsk
church, where the German translations suit the theme of the sermon, but the English
versions do not.
There is some repetition because an attempt has been made to make each story and
each biography a complete unit. The specific event may therefore mention an occurrence
which will also be included in the biography of the people concerned. It will also be noted
that very seldom is there more than one article on the page; this is to help those who may
wish to duplicate certain articles or biographies without including extraneous material.
The computer is a wonderful, but sometimes most exasperating instrument. It scans
some things wonderfully well, but other things suffer. As a whole the photographs have
turned out reasonably well, although there is some loss of quality both in the scanning, and
then the printing. With a number of pictures, for example that of Aron Sawatzky and
Walter Jack, the originals are already very poor. In reviewing the pages at this point I
would much prefer to have used two columns per page, but am not smart enough, certainly
not knowledgeable enough in Word Perfect Eight to convert without jeopardizing the whole
manuscript.
I would like to thank those who have freely given of their time and effort to make
this book possible. Dr. Abe Dueck, Director, and Alfred Redekop, Archivist, at the Centre
for Mennonite Brethren Studies in Winnipeg, have with enthusiasm answered innumerable
telephone calls and looked up many references. Ken Reddig, Archivist, and Lawrence
Klippenstein, now retired, but still active, have been helpful at the Heritage Centre in
Winnipeg. Even retired friends such as Dr. Harry Loewen and Dr. Victor Doerksen,
although banished to British Columbia, have patiently made suggestions for improvements.
It must be said, however, that this was not a book written by a committee. Opinions
expressed are those of the author, not necessarily in agreement with expert advice.
It is hoped that Events and People : Events in Russian Mennonite History and the
People that Made Them Happen will help some people to better understand their heritage,
and that it will give this understanding human faces.
Helmut T. Huebert
Winnipeg, Canada
October 31, 1999
IV
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Preface . iii
Table of Contents . v
List of Biographies . viii
List of Maps . ix
Commonly Used Sources . x
Glossary and Abbreviations . xi
The Old Oak Tree . xiii
Map: Mennonite Colonies in Ukraine and Russia . xv
Map: Mennonite Colonies in South Russia . xvii
1. The Trip of Hoeppner and Bartsch [1786 - 1788] . 1
Map: Trip of Hoeppner and Bartsch . 6
Jakob Hoeppner . 7
Johann Bartsch . 9
2. The Kleine Gemeinde and Klaas Reimer [1812] . 10
3. Visit of Czar Alexander I to the Molotschna [1818] . 14
Map : Route taken by the Czar Alexander 1 . 18
Czars of Russia during the Mennonite Period . 19
4. Meteorite in 1832 . 20
5. Crop Failure in 1833 . 21
6. Earthquake in 1838 . 24
7. The Death and Funeral of Johann Cornies [March, 1848] . 25
Johann Comies . 27
8. 130 Horses [August, 1848] . 30
9. Birth of the Mennonite Brethren Church[1860] . 32
Pfarrer Eduard Wuest . 37
Elder August Lenzmann . 40
Johann Claassen . 42
Jakob David Reimer . 45
10. Inter-Mennonite Faith Conference in Rueckenau[1875] . 49
Bernhard Harder . 50
11. Parting of Ways [1879] . 53
Elder Abraham Schellenberg . 56
12. Journey to Central Asia [1880 - 1882] . 59
Map: Claas Epp Journey to Central Asia [Map 1] . 62
Map: Claas Epp Journey to Central Asia [Map 2] . 63
13. Epidemic in South Russia [1888 - 1889] . 64
Worldwide Epidemics . 65
v
Diphtheria . 65
Scarlet Fever . 67
14. Saengerfest in Rueckenau [May, 1894] . 68
Friedrich Schweiger . 71
Aron Gerhard Sawatzky . 73
15. Choral Conductors’ Workshop in Friedensfeld
[December, 1894] . 77
Bernhard B . Dueck . 81
Johann J. Loewen . 84
The Friedensfeld Mennonite Brethren Church . 87
16. Dedication Service at the Lugovsk
Mennonite Brethren Church [1901] . 92
An Architect’s Appraisal - Rudy P. Friesen . 95
Neu Samara Colony . 97
Map: Neu Samara Colony . 98
Elder David Gerhard Duerksen . 99
Elder David Schellenberg . 101
Elder Komelius A. Fehr . 103
Komelius Gerhard Neufeld . 104
Liederperlen and the Hallelujah Chorus . 106
17. Fires in 1904 . 107
Map: Western Molotschna Colony and Halbstadt . 109
Weather in the Molotschna Colony . 110
Fire Insurance . 110
18. Exposition in Halbstadt [August 14 - 16, 1909] . Ill
Advertising in Friedensstimme . 1 13
Johann Heinrich Janzen . 114
19. Bible Conference in Halbstadt [August 20 - 23, 1909] . 117
Heinrich Jakob Braun . 1 19
Heinrich Heinrich Unruh . 122
Jakob Johann Kroeker . 125
Harry Percy Grubb . 128
Adam K. Podin . 129
Johann Huebert . 131
20. Dedication of the Deaconess Home Morija [1910] . 132
Dr. Erich A. Tavonius . 137
Walter L. Jack . 141
21. The Flood of 1912 . 144
Map: Northwestern Molotschna Colony . 147
22. Dedication of Reservists [1914] . 148
Elder Heinrich Peter Unruh . 150
23. Gnadenfeld Mercy [March, 1919] . 152
vi
Chronology of Events [February 1917 to March 1919] . 152
Gnadenfeld Mercy . 1 54
Komelius Martens . 155
24. Massacre in Muensterberg [November - December, 1919] . 158
Map: Sagradovka Colony . 161
Nestor Ivanovich Makhno . 1 62
25. Molotschna Battle [June, 1920] . 163
Map: Molotschna Colony June 20, 1 920 . 1 66
26. Lichtenau Departure [1924] . 167
Behind the Scenes . 172
Map: The First Molotschna Group Travel in the USSR . 173
Map: The First Molotschna Group Travel by Sea . 174
Benjamin B. Janz . 175
David Toews . 180
Emigration of the Mennonites from the Soviet Union . 1 83
Trachoma . 184
Canadian Pacific Ships . 1 85
27. Murder at Midnight [1926] . 186
28. At the Gates of Moscow [1929] . 192
Benjamin H. Unruh . 197
29. Amur Crossing . 201
Map: Amur Mennonite Colonies including Escape Route . 208
Map: Escape over the Amur to Harbin . 209
30. The Purge [1936 - 1938] . 210
Joseph Vissarionovich Djugashvili . 212
Nikolai Loewen . 2 1 3
Franz Teichrieb . 2 1 4
Nikolai Huebert . 2 1 6
Map: Dnepropetrovsk Oblast . 217
Map: Central Crimea . 217
Map: USSR . 217
31. Stulnevo [1941] . 218
Map: Northeastern Molotschna . 22 1
32. The Great Trek [1943 - 1945] . 222
Map: The Great Trek 1943-1945 . 227
33. The Berlin Escape [1947] . 228
Cornelius F. Klassen . 237
“ Nun Danket Alle Gott” . 242
The Red Gate . 243
Index . 245
vii
LIST OF BIOGRAPHIES
Jakob Hoeppner . 7
Johann Bartsch . 9
Johann Comies . 27
Pfarrer Eduard Wuest . 37
Elder August Lenzmann . 40
Johann Claassen . 42
Jakob David Reimer . 45
Bernhard Harder . 50
Elder Abraham Schellenberg . 56
Friedrich Schweiger . 7 1
Aron Gerhard Sawatzky . 73
Bernhard B. Dueck . 81
Johann J. Loewen . 84
Elder David Gerhard Duerksen . 99
Elder David Schellenberg . 101
Elder Komelius A. Fehr . 103
Komelius Gerhard Neufeld . 1 04
Johann Heinrich Janzen . 114
Heinrich Jakob Braun . 119
Heinrich Heinrich Unruh . 122
Jakob Johann Kroeker . 125
Harry Percy Grubb . 128
Adam K. Podin . 129
Johann Huebert . 1 3 1
Dr. Erich A . T avonius . 137
Walter L. Jack . 141
Elder Heinrich Peter Unruh . 150
Komelius Martens . 155
Nestor Ivanovich Makhno . 162
Benjamin B. Janz . 175
David Toews . 180
Benjamin H. Unruh . 1 97
Cornelius F. Klassen . 237
LIST OF MAPS
Mennonite Colonies in Ukraine and Russia . xv
Mennonite Colonies in South Russia . xvii
Land chosen by Hoeppner and Bartsch . 2
Trip of Hoeppner and Bartsch . 6
Route taken by the Czar Alexander 1 . 18
Claas Epp Journey to Central Asia [Map 1] . 62
Claas Epp Journey to Central Asia [Map 2] . 63
Neu Samara Colony . 97
Western Molotschna Colony and Halbstadt [Fires] . 109
Northwestern Molotschna Colony [Flood] . 147
Sagradovka Colony . 161
Molotschna Colony June 20, 1920 [Battle] . 166
The First Molotschna Group Travel in the USSR . 173
The First Molotschna Group Travel by Sea . 174
Amur Mennonite Colonies including Escape Route . 208
Escape over the Amur to Harbin . 209
Dnepropetrovsk Oblast . 217
Central Crimea . 217
USSR . 217
Northeastern Molotschna [Stulnevo] . 221
The Great Trek 1943-1945 . 227
ix
COMMONLY USED SOURCES
Friesen, P. M., Die Alt-Evangelische Mennonitische Bruederschaft in Russland
[ 1789-1910 ], im Rahmen der mennonitischen Gesamtgeschichte,
Raduga, Halbstadt, Taurien, Russia, 1911
Referred to as:
Friesen, P. M.
All references are from the original German printing. All passages in English
have been translated by the author
Mennonite Encyclopedia
If a reference has been used from Volumes I - IV, no specific volume or page
number is given. For Volume V specific pages are listed
Schroeder, William, and Huebert, Helmut T., Mennonite Historical Atlas,
Springfield Publishers, Winnipeg, Canada, 1996
Referred to as:
Mennonite Historical Atlas
All references, unless otherwise stated, are from the second edition
Toews, J. A., A History of the Mennonite Brethren Church, Board of Christian
Literature, General Conference of Mennonite Brethren Churches,
Fresno, USA, 1975
Referred to as:
Toews, J. A.
All references are from the first edition, printed in 1975
Genealogical Registry and Data Base of Mennonite Ancestry, produced by the
California Mennonite Historical Society of Fresno, USA, has been used
frequently in establishing family trees in this book. Research done by the
author has also on occasion contributed to this data base.
x
GLOSSARY
Bruderschule - Brotherhood School
Dorfschule - village primary school, usually six years, with children
beginning at the age of six or seven
Fuersorgekomitee - Russian government agency supervising foreign colonists in
South Russia, first based in Kherson, then Ekaterinoslav, thereafter in
Odessa until it was abolished in 1871
Gebietsamt - civic office or administration of a Mennonite colony
Gymnasium - German equivalent of high school
Kirchliche - a Russian Mennonite denominational designation, meaning the
traditional Mennonite Church, later roughly the equivalent of the General
Conference Mennonite Church
Oberschulze - chief administrator of a Mennonite colony
Reiseschuld - travel debt, usually referring to the debt owed the Canadian
Pacific Railway by the 1923-1930 immigrants
Scheune - machine shed, usually behind the bam in the typical farm, often
quite large and used for public gatherings, such as church services,
weddings or funerals
Wirtschaft - a typical Mennonite farm, consisting of a house, with attached
bam and machine shed, often a summer kitchen, an extensive
garden, a small forest, and about 65 dessiatines of land. Also
called Vollwirtschaft
Halbwirtschaft - half a farm, a farmyard with 32 dessiatines of land
Kleinwirtschaft - a small farm, a farmyard, sometimes with up to
16 dessiatines of land, sometimes without land
Zentralschule - school above the level of the village elementary school, best
translated as high school. “Central” school would be the direct
translation, but conveys none of the actual meaning of the term
ABBREVIATIONS
AMLV - Allrussischer Mennonitischer Landwirtschaftlicher Verein
[All-Russian Mennonite Agricultural Union]
GPU - initials of the Russian name of the secret police after 1922. Name
changed to NKVD in 1934
MCC - Mennonite Central Committee, the relief agency based principally
in North America which has provided relief and help
to Mennonites and others since the early 1920s
UNRAA - United Nations Relief and Rehabilitation Administration
VBHH - Verband der Buerger Hollaendischer Herkunft [Union of
Citizens of Dutch Lineage]
xi
xii
“The Old Oak,” five hundred years old when the first Chortitza settlers
camped under its branches in 1789
xiii
xiv
XV
Mennonite Colonies in Ukraine and Russia
[Not all of the smaller colonies shown]
xvi
BORJSSOVO^^ Konstantinovka
Mennonite Colonies in South Russia
xvm
1. THE TRIP OF HOEPPNER AND BARTSCH
OCTOBER, 1786 TO NOVEMBER, 1787
With more stringent restrictions in the Vistula Delta, particularly regarding the
increase of land holdings, the Mennonites started to look elsewhere for expansion. Czarina
Catherine II of Russia, in the meantime, had published a manifesto in 1 763 inviting foreign
colonists to help settle newly acquired lands in southern Russia. Catherine dispatched a
special envoy, Georg von Trappe, to visit the Mennonites in the Danzig area in the summer
of 1786. He challenged them to make Russia their new homeland.
* * *
August 7, 1786
[Gregorian] An invitation to settle in Russia was read in the two Mennonite churches in
Danzig
Elder Peter Epp of Danzig became an enthusiastic supporter of migration
August, 1786 On a Monday towards the end of August, Georg von Trappe, Russian
immigration agent sent by Czarina Catherine II, stopped for lunch
at an inn at Bohnsack. He was greatly impressed by his host,
Jakob Hoeppner
August, 1786 There was widespread interest in migration to Russia, to the extent that
the mayor of Danzig opposed some of the actions of von Trappe
September 14, 1786
Under the supervision of Elder Epp three delegates were elected to visit
Russia, for the purpose of finding an appropriate site for
settlement, and arranging suitable conditions. Jakob Hoeppner,
Jakob von Kampen and Johann Bartsch were chosen
September 22, 1786
Georg von Trappe signed a contract and wrote a covering letter for the
delegates. All expenses were to be covered. Von Kampen had
decided not to go because his parents did not wish it
October 31, 1786
Hoeppner and Bartsch boarded a ship in Danzig and sailed for Riga
October 27,
[Julian]
1786
Arrived safely in Riga after an eight day voyage. They had encountered
some stormy weather
1
November 17, 1786
Departed by sleigh from Riga to Dubrovno
November 29, 1786
Arrived in Dubrovno. Received cordially by Baron von Stahl
December, 1786
Departed by sleigh for Kremenchug
Via Kremenchug further south on to Kherson
Prince Grigory Potemkin, then governor general of New Russia,
appointed Major Meier to assist the delegates
As soon as weather permitted, despite encouragement to rest during the
winter, they used Kherson as a base to inspect the southern
part of Potemkin’s domain
After several months work they selected a site south of Berislav, on the
lower Dniepr River. This area had good soil, excellent pasture
and water supply, and access to nearby markets
Land chosen by Hoeppner and Bartsch, south of the Dniepr River
opposite Berislav
April 22, 1787
Hoeppner and Bartsch submitted a special petition to Grigory Potemkin
in Kremenchug. Mennonites wanted recognition of their
religious freedom, no military service or quartering of troops.
Each family was to receive 65 dessiatines of arable land. They
were to have some wood, hay and fishing rights in the area
selected. The land was to be properly surveyed, and there was to
2
be guaranteed government protection for the area. Initial start-up
funds were required, as well as a ten year exemption from taxes
Potemkin did not have time for the delegates, being busy with a trip
Czarina Catherine had planned for the Crimea
May 1, 1787 Catherine and her entourage departed from St. Petersburg January 7,
travelling over the snow on 200 gilded coaches mounted on
runners. This tour celebrated her quarter of a century on the
Russian throne, but also set the seal of sovereignty on Russia’s
latest southern conquests. May 1 Catherine departed from Kiev
on a flotilla of thirty barges
May 13, 1787 Hoeppner and Bartsch were presented to Catherine when she arrived in
Kremenchug. They respectfully kissed her hand and made a brief
presentation. She verbally assured them of her support for their
plans. She invited them to go with her to the Crimea. They
accepted the offer
They stayed one night on Potemkin’s estate at the site of the future
Chortitza-Rosenthal
May 29, 1787 Departed from Kherson for a rapid tour of the Crimea, designed to
impress Joseph II of Austria, who was also a travelling guest
May 31, 1787 The caravan arrived in Bachtchi-Sarai
Catherine’s coach went out of control
as it descended into a ravine
They went as far as Sevastopol and
Feodosiya
June 16, 1787 The caravan returned to Kremenchug
Hoeppner and Bartsch released to
pursue their own projects
June 17, 1787 Hoeppner and Bartsch wrote a letter to
Potemkin requesting a response
to the petition of April 22
June 18, 1787 Catherine departed from Kremenchug,
reaching Moscow July 4
July 5, 1787 Potemkin gave approval to the petition presented by Hoeppner and
Bartsch. The Mennonite delegates also wanted the approval of
the Czarina and proceeded to St. Petersburg
3
July 22, 1787 Catherine back in St. Petersburg, having been away for over six months
August 2, 1787
Hoeppner and Bartsch arrived in St. Petersburg. Shortly before arrival
their carriage tipped, and Hoeppner injured his leg. He was given
prompt medical attention. It took several weeks until he could
be up well enough to appear in court. Protocol was on his side
since it demanded that people wear socks or shoes while being
presented to the Czarina. Hoeppner’ s leg was so swollen that he
could not get on his boot in any case!
August 27, 1787
While waiting for Catherine, von Trappe introduced the delegates to Paul
and Maria Feodorovna. They kissed Maria’s hand and Paul
kissed them on both cheeks, Russian style. The deputies gave
the royal couple a gold embroidered copy of a Mennonite
Confession of Faith. Paul later, as Czar, gave the Mennonites
additional privileges in the Privilegium of 1 800
September 7, 1787
Hoeppner and Bartsch had an audience with Czarina Catherine II. She
agreed to the terms proposed by the Mennonite delegates. The
decree was drawn up and signed by the Russian chancellor,
Count Alexander Bezborodko. The decree was then made public
Hoeppner and Bartsch headed for home, accompanied by von Trappe.
October 7 were in Riga
November 10, 1787
[Gregorian] Hoeppner, Bartsch and von Trappe arrived back in Danzig. The trip had
taken one year and eleven days. They were greeted with
enthusiasm. A group of five families had departed for Russia
even before the delegates returned home
December 29, 1787
Georg von Trappe distributed printed invitations among the Mennonites
in Danzig, inviting them to Russia
January 13, 1788
Von Trappe hired two men to distribute pamphlets in Danzig after the
morning church service. The pamphlet briefly described the
visit of the delegates to Russia and the special agreement which
had been reached. Those interested in emigration were to attend
a meeting at the Russian Embassy
4
February 23, 1788
Four families left Danzig for Russia
March 23, 1788
At 9 AM, Easter Sunday morning, after a short farewell service in front
of the church in Bohnsack, seven families led by Hoeppner
started on the long journey to South Russia. Hoeppner eventually
settled on Chortitza Island. The Bartsch family was also in the
first wave, settling in Rosenthal
Sources:
Alexander, John T., Catherine the Great; Life and Legend, Oxford University Press,
New York, USA, and Oxford, UK, 1989, pp 256-270
Epp, D. H., Die Chortitzer Mennoniten, Originally published by the author, Odessa, 1889,
Republished by Die Mennonitische Post and Delbert F. Plett, Steinbach, Canada, 1984,
pp 4-36
Hildebrand, J. J., Hildebrand's Zeittafel, Winnipeg, Canada, 1945, pp 146-149
Hildebrand, Peter, Erste Auswanderung der Mennoniten aus dem Danziger Gebiet nach
Suedrussland, Published in Zwei Dokumente, Edited by Victor Peters, Echo Verlag,
1965, pp 11-46
Klippenstein, Lawrence, The Russian Mennonite Bicentennial : Some Pertinent Dates,
Mennonite Historian, March 1987, p 3; June 1987, p 7; September 1987, p 7
Mennonite Historical Atlas, First Edition pp 14, 90; Second Edition p 1 16
Mennonite Encyclopedia
Schroeder, William, From the Vistula to Chortitza: A Chronology, Unpublished document;
This is the main framework used for the chronology presented here
It should be noted that not all the dates and numbers in the various accounts agree exactly. The
specific dates mentioned for the Crimean trip of the Czarina, for example, vary. The exact
number of families leaving Danzig for Russia and the dates they left are not the same in
different accounts.
The name of Catherine’s special envoy to the Mennonites is not certain. Traditionally he has
been called Georg von Trappe; it is now thought that the “von” might be superfluous.
Background Information:
Map: Trip of Hoeppner and Bartsch
Jakob Hoeppner
Johann Bartsch
5
Helsinki
Trip of Hoeppner and Bartsch, Oc
6
JAKOB HOEPPNER
[1748 - 1826]
Mennonite Delegate sent to Investigate Russian Emigration
Jakob Hoeppner was bom January 3, 1748, the son of Jakob and Christina [Bentz]
Hoeppner. He married Sara Dyck, and the couple eventually had seven children, of whom four
were bom in Prussia, three in Russia.
The Hoeppners lived in Bohnsack, Vistula Delta, where they rented a store, cafe and inn.
They supplemented their meagre income by collecting amber and fishing on the shore of the Baltic
Sea. They were members of the Flemish Mennonite Church.
Having impressed Georg von Trappe with his service at the inn in Bohnsack, von Trappe
suggested him as a delegate when the time came to choose representatives among the Mennonites
of Prussia to investigate emigration to Russia. Under the supervision of Elder Peter Epp of Danzig,
Jakob Hoeppner, Johann Bartsch and Jakob von Kampen were elected. Von Kampen withdrew
from the trip, but Hoeppner and Bartsch spent an arduous year inspecting various sites and
negotiating with Grigory Potemkin and other officials. They eventually chose an area near
Berislav, and carefully outlined the rights and privileges Mennonites would require to consider
emigration. Nearing St. Petersburg on the way to meet the Czarina Catherine H, the carriage
carrying the delegates overturned, and Hoeppner hurt his leg. Historians say the leg was broken,
but the quick recovery makes this highly unlikely; Xrays had not yet been discovered, so the
diagnosis was strictly clinical [on the basis of physical examination]. Even so, in pain and despite
considerable swelling, he carried on his duties. A satisfactory agreement was verbally agreed to
by Catherine, and signed by the Russian chancellor, Count Alexander Bezborodko. Both delegates
then returned home, where they were received with great enthusiasm in November of 1787.
The first trickle of Mennonite families left for Russia in late 1787, but then the trickle
became a torrent. Easter Sunday, March 23, after a short early morning farewell service in front
of the Bohnsack church, seven families led by Hoeppner embarked on the long journey. After five
weeks of plodding along muddy roads and camping, they reached Riga. By the autumn of 1788 a
total of 228 families arrived in Dubrovno, where they spent the winter.
With spring the journey continued southward. At Kremenchug Potemkin informed
Hoeppner that the Mennonites would not be able to occupy the land previously chosen near
Berislav. It was too dangerous, new hostilities having again broken out with the Ottoman Empire.
They would have to settle in the Chortitza River area, on land which just happened to be owned by
Potemkin himself! This land was much dryer, not as fertile, and not as near to market centres. A
daughter, Maria, was bom to the Hoeppners in Kremenchug.
The unhappy settlers arrived at Chortitza in July, 1789. They first camped around a large
oak tree near the Dniepr River, spent the winter in Alexandrovsk, then gradually moved out to set
up villages. The Hoeppner family settled on Chortitza Island.
When the Mennonites first settled many followed the pattern they had used in Prussia, on
individual farmsteads. One day the Hoeppner household was robbed and the family tied up.
Hoeppner and two companions had been away on business, and arrived home that evening. He and
one of his companions were attacked and beaten, the other managed to run for help. When the
bandits heard the approaching help they gathered up the most valuable things and fled. The
bandits, who turned out to be merchants from the nearby town of Alexandrovsk, were later
apprehended and brought to justice. This episode showed the value of living in more compact
villages, and led the colonists to ask the government to provide better protection. The government
7
assigned a group of Cossacks to provide this “protection.'’
On one occasion the Cossack officer and some of his men came to visit the Hoeppner home.
While he and Hoeppner were visiting in the living room the other Cossacks were stealing from the
rest of the house. Confronted with this fact the officer laughed and did nothing. Hoeppner
suddenly took the officer’s sabre, locked it up in a chest, and threatened to report him. Only when
additional people arrived, and one of the Cossacks was knocked of his horse with a plank, did they
relent. The officer apologized, he promised the return of the stolen articles, and he received his
sabre back.
Resentment of the settlers on being refused their originally chosen site, and for the
unfulfilled government financial aid, was heaped upon Hoeppner and Bartsch. They were accused
of negotiating in bad faith, and of embezzling funds. Hoeppner was expelled from the Flemish
congregation. Even worse, he was imprisoned in Ekaterinoslav and was to be deported to Siberia.
When Czar Paul I died in 1801, and was succeeded by Alexander I, Hoeppner was released in the
general amnesty after having been in prison for one year. Unfortunately his property had been sold
in the meantime, and was not returned to him.
Hoeppner was eventually received into the Frisian Church in Kronsweide, where he quietly
spent the last years of his life. He died March 4, 1 826, and was buried on Chortitza Island. His
wife Sara had predeceased him by a few days, having died on February 27, 1826.
The vindictiveness with which Hoeppner was treated, and the mean-spirited way in which
he was dealt with even after his release from prison are sad reflections of the spiritual state of much
of the Mennonite church at that time. Very much later the Mennonite community reconsidered the
role of these first two adventuresome delegates. In 1890, as part of the centennial celebrations of
the Chortitza Colony, a beautiful monument was erected in his honour on the Island of Chortitza.
This marble obelisk has now been moved to the grounds of the Mennonite Heritage Village, in
Steinbach, Canada.
Sources:
Friesen, P. M., pp 72, 73, 95, 96, 97
Hildebrand, J. J., Hildebrand’s Zeittafel, Winnipeg, Canada, 1945, pp 147-149
Loewen, Harry, No Permanent City, Chapter 24, In the Face of Death, Herald Press,
Waterloo, Canada, Scottdale, USA, 1993, pp 116-118
Mennonite Encyclopedia
Schroeder, William, From the Vistula to Chortitza: A Chronology, Unpublished document
8
JOHANN BARTSCH
[1757- 1821]
Mennonite Delegate sent to Investigate Russian Emigration
Johann Bartsch was bom in Prussia on September 6, 1757, the second child of Jakob and
Christina [Philipsen] Bartsch. He married Susanna Laemmert in 1779; the couple had three
children. They lived in Nobel, near Danzig, and were members of the Frisian Mennonite Church.
Along with Jakob Hoeppner and Jakob von Kampen, Johann Bartsch was chosen as one
of three delegates to represent the Prussian Mennonites on a trip to investigate the possibility of
migration to Russia. Jakob von Kampen did not go, but Hoeppner and Bartsch spent an arduous
year, beginning in October of 1 786, inspecting various possible sites and negotiating with officials.
Bartsch must have had a flare for writing, or he missed his wife and family very much, since at least
four of his letters home are mentioned in a chronology of the trip. Hoeppner is not mentioned as
writing at all. After having selected a possible site for settlement, Bartsch and Hoeppner travelled
to St. Petersburg, where a satisfactory agreement was verbally agreed to by Czarina Catherine II,
and signed by the Russian chancellor, Count Alexander Bezborodko. Both delegates then returned
home, where they were received with great enthusiasm in November of 1787.
The first trickle of Mennonite families left for South Russia in late 1787, but then
increasing numbers followed. Hoeppner left Bohnsack on March 23,1788. The Bartsch family also
emigrated with the first wave, settling in Rosenthal. Soon after arrival wife Susanna died, on
November 15, 1790.
Johann Bartsch remarried, in 1791, to Magdalena Laemmert. The couple had a total of
nine children, of which two died in infancy. Son Jakob served as Oberschulze[ reeve] of Chortitza
Colony from 1832 to 1838, and again from 1841 to 1852.
Bartsch was not spared the recriminations which were levelled at Hoeppner. Anger and
the frustrations of disappointment were heaped on the two delegates. The land assessed by the
delegates and promised by the Russian government was now declared to be in a war zone due to
recently resumed hostilities with the Ottoman Empire, and therefore was not available for
settlement. The region where the Mennonites were forced to settle was much inferior to the
original region selected. The delegates were accused of negotiating in bad faith. The Russian
government defaulted on promised funds; the delegates were accused of embezzling this non-
existant money. Johann Bartsch was excommunicated by his church, but was later reinstated at his
own request. He died on December 16, 1821.
Much later the Mennonite community reconsidered the role of the first two delegates. In
1890, as part of centennial celebrations, a beautiful monument in his honour was erected. This
marble obelisk first stood in the cemetery at Rosenthal, but now has been moved and stands on the
grounds of the Mennonite Heritage Village , in Steinbach, Canada.
Sources:
Friesen, P. M., pp 72, 96
Hildebrand, J. J., Hildebrand's Zeittafel, Winnipeg, Canada, 1945, pp 147-149
Klippenstein, Lawrence, Johann Bartsch [1757-1821], Modem Encyclopedia of Religions in
Russia and the Soviet Union , Editor in Chief, Paul D. Steeves, Academic International
Press, Gulf Breeze, Florida, USA, Volume III, April 1991, pp 221-224
Mennonite Encyclopedia
Schroeder, William, From the Vistula to Chortitza: A Chronology, unpublished document
9
2. THE KLEIN K GEMEINDE AND
KLAAS REIMER
The story of the beginning of the Kleine Gemeinde and the life of Klaas Reimer are
so inexorably intertwined that no attempt will be made to present them separately. There
is little doubt that the initial developments were not a general groundswell, but rather the
result of the vision of one man, Klaas Reimer.
Klaas Reimer was bom October 16, 1770, in Petershagen, a village about 40
kilometres east of the city of Danzig. His parents were Heinrich and Agatha [Epp] Reimer.
In his autobiography he admits to no formal education, although he obviously could read
well, and had enough facility with languages to translate Anabaptist documents from Dutch
to German. In his youth he worked on road gangs and as an apprentice carpenter. He came
under the influence of pleasure seeking fellow-workers, commenting “...only perishable
vanity was evident...”
At the age of 20 Klaas was baptized and accepted into the Danzig church, although
he still admitted to some personal lack of proper behaviour and commitment. In 1792 he
moved to Neunhuben, a village just east of Danzig, where he joined the quite conservative
rural Werder Church.
In 1798, at the age of 28, Klaas married Maria Epp, who was ten years his senior.
She was the daughter of Elder Peter Epp of Danzig, who had died in 1 789, and the niece of
Komelius Epp, assistant elder of the rural church Klaas had joined. The couple was able
to buy half of Komelius Epp’s farm, and for the next years did quite well financially. Only
one child was bom to the couple, Aganetha. She was bom in 1801, and unfortunately died
in Russia, some time after 1808.
On November 6, 1 806, Maria died at the age of 46. Klaas was married again soon
after, January 9, 1 807, to Helena van Riesen, who was 1 7 years his junior. The home seems
to have been peaceful and harmonious. From 1 808 to 1 829 the couple had a total of ten
children, four of whom died in infancy or early childhood. Surviving to adulthood were
Abram [who died in Blumenort, Manitoba in 1 892], Klaas, Helena, Margaretha, Heinrich
and Peter. Son Klaas actually got his father into a bit of trouble by inventing a pedal
powered wagon. The brotherhood felt that the family of the elder could spend its time more
profitably. Reimer himself confessed that he himself was “too interested in such matters.”
Klaas was, somewhat to his surprise, elected minister of his congregation on
September 1, 1801. Once elected he took his position seriously, and early showed
dedication, independence and firmness of character. He read extensively - the Bible,
Martyr’s Mirror, the writings of Menno Simons, Dirk Phillips, Peter Peters and other
Anabaptists. His interpretation of Scripture and the teachings of the Anabaptist forefathers
helped shape his vision of the church. While he read sermons from the pulpit, he actually
wrote them himself. From his new perspective he was distressed by the immorality and
lack of church discipline he observed in his own congregation.
On August 23, 1804, having had enough of the “sinful Babylon” in the Vistula
Delta, he led a group of 30 followers from the Werder Church to settle in Russia. He took
10
with him the vision of a new start, of a pure church. At first the group settled in the
Chortitza Colony, where Klaas became acquainted with the like-minded Cornelius Janzen,
who was elected minister in Chortitza in 1 805 . Then in the spring of 1 805 the group moved
to Petershagen, a new Flemish village being established in the Molotschna. Klaas Reimer
was to discover that the imperfect world he had thought to leave behind in Prussia followed
him to Russia. He was soon at loggerheads with the newly elected Elder Jakob Enns of the
Molotschna congregation. One of the basic conflicts was over who had final authority in
the community, the church or civil leaders. Elder Enns routinely allowed miscreants to be
given corporal punishment at the civic offices [Gebietsaml]. Reimer felt that imposing the
ban was the only punishment consistent with Anabaptist tenets of faith. The situation was
not made easier by the quick tempered, often irascible and high handed Elder Enns.
Reimer’ s hopes for reform of the church from within were dashed. The matter
finally came to a head in 1 8 1 2 when Reimer and his small group of followers began to hold
their own meetings in private homes. Elder Enns promptly banned the reformers from the
mother church, but also continued to harass them. Reimer was convinced that he was
acting on spiritual grounds, and that to give in at this point would be hypocritical. Enns in
the meantime threatened dire consequences, including exile to Siberia.
The small group had two ministers, Klaas Reimer, and Cornelius Janzen, who had
followed Reimer from the Chortitza Colony. In 1 814, under the supervision of the Frisian
Elder Heinrich Janzen of the Schoenwiese church of Chortitza, Klaas Reimer was chosen
as elder by lot. Heinrich Janzen, however, hesitated to formally ordain him. Reimer,
nonetheless, assumed the functions of elder. In 1816 Cornelius Janzen, his co-minister,
preached an installation sermon, so the group of 1 8-20 members considered itself to be
organized as a church.
Elder Enns died the following year, and was replaced by Jacob Fast of Halbstadt.
Fast was “friendly and accommodating,” but by welcoming new religious teachings
emanating from Prussia, especially pietistic tendencies, Reimer considered him to be an
even greater threat to the teachings of the new church than Enns had been.
Klaas Reimer had very strong ideas of nonconformity, humility and church
discipline. The group was very diligent in reading the Bible and other Anabaptist writings.
They practiced foot washing, strict discipline and honesty, condemning card playing,
smoking, drinking, higher education, musical instruments, mission work and marrying
one’s sister-in-law. Reimer also strenuously opposed support of the Russian war effort
against Napoleon, likely as part of the total non-resistant lifestyle. Any worldly act was
punished by excommunication, then shunning.
With this very narrow and essentially joyless interpretation of the Christian life the
movement remained small for almost a century, being called the “ Kleine Gemeinde ” [Small
Church], as opposed to the “ Grosse Gemeinde ” [Large Church], which constituted the rest
of the Molotschna population. The principal base of support for the Kleine Gemeinde was
in Petershagen and Muensterberg, with some members in Blumstein, Lindenau and Fischau,
all in the Molotschna Colony.
Cornelius Janzen left the Kleine Gemeinde in 1 822, taking a segment of the church
with him, back to the Grosse Gemeinde. “This secession almost finished us,” concluded
11
Klaas Reimer. Later, however, three other ministers joined the church, Heinrich Wiebe in
1830, Heinrich Balzer in 1834 and Peter Penner in 1835.
Even more dangerous was the “false humility” movement of 1828-29, which
threatened the leadership of Klaas Reimer and almost destroyed the Kleine Gemeinde . This
faction morbidly dwelt on guilt and fear, and tried to follow a daily routine of extreme
asceticism and self-inflicted punishment. Reimer himself was subjected to “scorn and
mocking” by this group. He finally delivered a powerful admonitory sennon against this
fanaticism, only to have much of the congregation walk out of the meeting in disapproval.
At a special meeting his leadership was challenged, and he barely survived a vote of
confidence. After this Reimer gradually regained control of the Gemeinde, and the false
humility movement faded from the scene. A number of sermons he preached after this
episode demonstrated his positive approach to this most trying time. “A Sermon on Love
and Brotherhood,” preached in 1 832, showed his deeply felt message of “following Christ
through a meek, loving and sanctified way of life.”
Klaas Reimer’ s death occurred while he was on a journey visiting the flock on
horseback. On Monday, December 28, 1837, he stayed at the home of Peter Kroeker in
Lindenau. He spoke until 1 1 PM, and when the brethren had departed, lay down to sleep.
Shortly thereafter he had sharp pains in his chest; his condition gradually worsened until
he died soon after 4 AM. It is said that when he had died the first message sent to his
family was that Klaas was seriously ill, followed by another message that he had died.
Klaas Reimer was buried on Tuesday, January 4, 1838, likely in the cemetery at
Petershagen. He was 67 years, two months and 1 3 days old when he died.
Abraham Friesen was elected to be Klaas Reimer’s successor on April 3, 1 838. At
the time there were 61 members entitled to vote. Again with Friesen the question of
ordination arose, the Molotschna elders not being willing to perform this task under the
conditions acceptable to the Kleine Gemeinde. Through the influence of Johann Comies,
however, a decree was issued on January 28, 1843, whereby the Fuersorgekomitee [the
government committee responsible for foreign immigrant affairs] compelled the elders to
recognize the Kleine Gemeinde and the functions of its elder as valid.
Johann Friesen was elected elder on June 10, 1847, succeeding Abraham Friesen,
who died soon thereafter. At this time there were 9 1 voting members. From 1 865 to 1 867
about 120 Kleine Gemeinde families from the Molotschna purchased 6,137 dessiatines of
land near Nikopol in Ekaterinoslav province for 1 84, 1 00 rubles. They formed five of the
villages of the Borozenko Colony. Together with other smaller settlements in the area, such
as Gruenfeld and Friedensfeld, Borozenko replaced the Molotschna as the centre of Kleine
Gemeinde activities.
In 1874 and 1 875 almost all of the Kleine Gemeinde emigrated to North America,
settling in Manitoba, Nebraska and Kansas.
Sources:
Friesen, P. M., pp 75, 76, 106-1 13
Mennonite Encyclopedia
Mennonite Historical Atlas, pp 18, 118
12
Plett, Delbert F., The Golden Years: The Mennonite Kleine Gemeinde in Russia [1812-1849],
D. F. P. Publications, Steinbach, Canada, 1985, ppl45-157
Plett, Delbert F., Saints and Sinners: The Kleine Gemeinde in Imperial Russia 1812 to 1875,
Crossway Publications, Steinbach, Canada, 1999, pp 33, 47-54, 67-70
Reimer, Al, Biographical Sketch, Aeltester Klaas Reimer [1770-1837] in Leaders of the
Kleine Gemeinde in Russia, 1812 to 1874, Crossway Publications, Steinbach, Canada,
1993, pp 113-120
Reimer, Johann C., Familienregister der Nachkommen von Klaas und Helena Reimer,
Winnipeg, Canada, 1958, pp 7-24
Reimer, Klaas, Ein kleines Aufsatz, in Leaders of the Kleine Gemeinde, pp 121-156
Reimer, Klaas, A Sermon on Love and Brotherhood, in Leaders of the Kleine Gemeinde,
pp 204-221
Smith, C. Henry, Smith 's Story of the Mennonites, Faith and Life Press, Newton, USA, 1981,
pp 274-277
13
3. VISIT OF CZAR ALEXANDER I
TO THE MOLOTSCHNA MAY 21, 1818
It is the habit of rulers to tour their empires, particularly if they are far-flung and
diverse. This hopefully serves to consolidate the population, all of course filled with
admiration for the ruler, and allows the monarch to be informed about the various parts of
the kingdom. There is the added benefit that it is cheaper to eat out, particularly if others
are footing the bill.
On a trip from the Crimea back to St. Petersburg, Alexander I and his entourage
chose to travel through a row of western Molotschna villages, likely because the new
Mennonite settlements were considered to be success stories. The Molotschna tour began
on the morning of May 21 when the procession entered Altonau, the most southern village
on the royal path. Here the Czar stopped briefly at the home of Elder Jakob Warkentin. The
visit was described later as being such a rare moment in the life of a person that it was too
overwhelming to actually perceive, the tongue became silent and the hands automatically
folded in prayer. Then the entourage continued northward, stopping briefly at a house in
Blumstein. The Czar was going to stop for breakfast in Lindenau, the second village down
from there, at the home of Minister David Hiebert.
The visit was described in the 1848 Molotschna
village reports as a major event in the history of
Lindenau. It was also recounted in some detail in
the Christlicher Familienkalender of 1900, a
publication edited by Abraham Kroeker, who was
Hiebert’s great-grandson. Both of these accounts
were likely based on the notes made by David
Hiebert himself.
Preparation for the Czar’s visit began four
weeks in advance, when an officer from Orechov
appeared and announced to Mrs. Agatha[David]
Hiebert “The Czar will have breakfast at your
house.” This seemed absolutely unbelievable! Yet
after eight days the same officer reappeared with
orders to prepare 400 horses. A command came
through the municipal offices to improve the roads,
to clean and decorate houses, yards and gardens.
In another week all the Molotschna village reeves
gathered at the Hieberts for an update. Almost 100 horses had been collected, the best were
selected and trained daily. Everyone in the villages was busy. Streets were swept, and
decorated with new sand, grass and flowers. Guards were posted at each end of Lindenau
to prevent anyone from driving or even riding down the street before the Czar had passed
through.
On May 21 the weather was beautiful, and a large crowd gathered to see their
monarch. Mennonites were lined up on the left side of the village street, all in a row,
14
Lutherans and their friends were on the right. The Czar’s entourage consisted of 19
vehicles, the Czar himself riding in the sixth. The royal coach was pulled by six horses,
and was travelling with the canopy down. The whole procession slowly entered the village
at about 1 0 AM. The Czar greeted those to the right and to the left by nodding; the crowd
responded by bowing deeply.
David Hiebert continued the narrative “My wife and I were standing in front of the
door of our house in order to greet our great guest. The coach stopped opposite our house,
the Czar got out, and with rapid strides approached the door. When he stood before us my
wife said ‘ If I have found favour in the eyes of your Imperial Majesty, I would like to
present you with a small gift.’ She presented him with a bouquet of flowers on a platter,
which his majesty graciously accepted.”
“When we invited him into our house the Czar remarked ‘ My hostess and host
must enter with me.’ In our sitting room \grosse Stube ] was a large table with two candles
and covered with flowers. In the comer by the closet a second table was spread with bread,
butter, onions and ham. The Czar paced back and forth a number of times, then said ‘Oh,
here is something to eat.’ ‘Yes,’ my wife replied, ‘ if I can serve you this humble fare, I
would ask you to eat.’ He answered ‘Yes, dear child, I will eat here.’”
“We quickly moved the table and placed the chairs. But the Czar would not accept
the place of honour at the head of the table, he took an ordinary chair and sat down along
the side. I asked him to accept a better chair, but he insisted ‘ No, my hostess will have the
place of honour.’ We were somewhat flustered by these words, so my wife said ‘ I am far
too humble a servant to sit next to the Lord’s anointed.’ ‘No, dear child, ’said the Emperor,
and he took her by the hand, and led her to the place of honour. Then he continued ‘Sit
down next to me, for we are all just humans, created equal by God.’ I myself was placed
across the table from the Emperor.”
“During this time I thought of the words of Psalm 144:3, ‘O Lord, what is man that
you care for him, the son of man that you think of him?’ At this point the General
Gorchakov and the elderly Kontenius were invited to the table.”
“His Majesty ate with a hearty appetite, drank beer and coffee, and during the meal
enquired about our circumstances; how long had we lived in his empire, how we liked it,
did we have anyone to complain about? My wife answered ‘No, instead we thank your
Imperial Majesty for the mercy shown us and the kind reception we have received. We ask
for further mercy and protection from your Imperial Majesty, not only for ourselves, but for
our co-religionists in Prussia, who through the great and terrible war are in dire
circumstances. We ask that they might find acceptance and support.’ Thereupon the Czar
answered my wife ‘Yes, dear child, it shall be done.’ He struck his breast twice, and
remarked ‘You, your children and grandchildren will experience my beneficence.’ Upon
leaving, the Emperor presented my wife with a magnificent diamond ring as a memento of
this very important day.”
It was felt by the citizens of Lindenau that such a remarkable day, when the anointed
of the Lord had been in their midst, would never be forgotten.
After his breakfast with the Hieberts Alexander continued his trip, eventually
reaching Fuerstenau by the afternoon. Here, it was said, he came not as a ruler, rather as
15
a guest and a much beloved father. In the middle of the village Alexander stepped out of
his carriage and walked down the street on foot. He stopped at two rather humble farm
houses, inspected the buildings, and asked the owners how they were doing. These people
were so astonished and excited that they could hardly answer.
* * *
This brief trip of Alexander through the Molotschna also had its impact somewhat
later. A group of Mennonites from Prussia was migrating to southern Russia in 1 820 when
they stopped to rest a few days south of Warsaw. Alexander I happened to be in that city
and travelled out to inspect some troops. Warned that the Czar might be passing, the
leaders of the group stood at attention on the roadway. When the Czar came by he stopped
his carriage and beckoned to the men. He asked them where they were from, and where
they were going. They said they were going to the Molotschna in southern Russia. The
Czar answered “I wish you well for your trip. Greet your brothers, I have been there.”
When the settlers arrived in the Molotschna and told their story, the judge Fadejew said that
they should name their newly founded village “Alexanderwohl”, for, he said, Czar
Alexander has wished you well [wohl gewuenscht\.
When another village was established right next door the following year Johann
Comies suggested “You have also, just as your neighbours, received favour through the
great Father of this land, so you should name your village “Gnadenheim” [home of favour
or mercy]. When Johann Comies made a suggestion it was better to follow it.
* * *
Royalty must have enjoyed travelling through the Mennonite colonies, Alexander
himself repeating his visit on October 22, 1825, even staying over night at the home of
Elder Jakob Warkentin in Altonau. Other members of the royal family visited Lindenau
on at least three occasions. When Mrs. Katharina [Gerhard] Neufeld prepared breakfast for
Count Konstantin Nikolajevitch on August 20, 1845, she received two diamond earrings
as mementos.
The Mennonites in Russia tended to venerate the Czars. From the repeated
references to “the Lord’s anointed” it appears that they bought wholeheartedly into the
theory of the “divine right of kings.” From some of the reports one might wonder where the
ultimate loyalty would lie - with God or the Czar. Mennonites considered the invitation to
enter the country in the first place to have been a personal request by Catherine the Great,
then reinforced by the succeeding Paul. Some seemed to think that although they might on
occasion be stymied by inefficient or corrupt bureaucrats, that everything would be in order
if they could only communicate directly with the Czar.
A fair number of Mennonites, such as Abraham Kroeker, one of the publishers of
the Christlicher Familienkalender, were unabashed admirers of the royal family. This
almanac contained two full pages every year listing and describing the entire royal family,
including all the cousins, uncles and aunts. A brief list of major Mennonite historical
events in this publication includes the two visits by Alexander I, right along with the
16
founding of the Molotschna Colony and the
establishment of the Mennonite Brethren Church.
Many Mennonites had hung up pictures of the Czar
and his family in their homes, some taking along
post card size photographs when they migrated to
Canada in the 1920s.
Historian P. M. Friesen, in his massive
history of the Mennonite Brethren Church, includes
four separate royal pictures. Czar Nicholas II is on
the frontispiece, the Czarina Alexandra on the
following page, then Catherine the Great and
Alexander II appear later in the book. Whether this
was true patriotism, or perhaps also a touch of
political astuteness is left for us to ponder.
Czar Nicholas II
[picture from P. M. Friesen]
Sources:
Friesen, P. M., Frontispiece and following page, pp 70, 482
also pages 143-144
Goerz, H., Die MolotschnaerAnsiedlung, Echo-Verlag, Steinbach, Canada, 1950\1951, pp 20, 21
English Translation, 1993, pp 20, 21
Kroeker, Abraham, Ein Hoher Besuch, Christlicher Familienkalender filer das Jahr 1900, Odessa,
1899, pp 112,113
Kroeker, Abraham, Editor, Christlicher Familienkalender juer das Jahr 1900, Odessa 1 899,
pp 32-34; also 1905, p 36
Loewen, Harry, No Permanent City, Chapter 25, Visits from the Tsar, Herald Press, Waterloo,
Canada, and Scottdale, USA, 1993, pp 1 19-122
Russian 1835 Census of the Molotschna Villages, Genealogy Committee of the Manitoba
Mennonite Historical Society, November, 1995, pp 75, 76
Unruh, Benjamin Heinrich, Die niederlaendisch-niederdeutschen Hintergruende der
mennonitischen Ostwanderungen, Selbstverlag, 1955, p 315
Stumpp, Karl, The Emigration from Germany to Russia in the Years 1 763 to 1862, American
Historical Society of Germans from Russia, Lincoln, USA, 1978, p 182
Village Reports, 1 848, published in Odesser Zeitung, 1904, Lindenau plOO, Blumstein p 102,
Altona[Altonau] p 1 15, Fuerstenau p 127, Alexanderwohl p 131, Gnadenheim p 144
Background Information:
Map: Route taken by the Czar Alexander I on his trip through the Molotschna
Czars of Russia During the Mennonite Period
17
Route taken by the Czar Alexander I on his trip through the Molotschna
on May 21, 1818, labelling villages where actual stops are recorded
18
CZARS OF RUSSIA
DURING THE MENNONITE PERIOD
Catherine II
[The Great]
1762-1796
Conquered the Crimea and opened southern
Russia for settlement. First invited the
Mennonites to Russia
Paul
1796-1801
Confirmed Mennonite privileges. Murdered
Alexander I
1801-1825
Allied with, then later fought against
Napoleon. Policies varied, depending
on who had the Czar’s confidence at
the time. Died suddenly while on trip
in southern Russia
Nicholas I
1825-1855
Autocratic, police state, but some economic
progress
Alexander II
1855-1881
Introduced many reforms. Start of
Russification of minorities, including
Mennonites. Assassinated
Alexander III
1881-1894
More authoritarian, although industry did
well
Nicholas II
1894-1917
Politically weak and unreliable, abdicated
in 1917. He and most [all?] of his
family shot in 1918
Sources:
Dmytryshyn, Basil, A History of Russia, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey,
USA, 1977, pp 328-342
Huebert, H. T., Hierschau: An Example of Russian Mennonite Life, Springfield Publishers,
Winnipeg, Canada, 1986, p 382
19
4. METEORITE IN 1832
There are two reports of what was likely a meteorite, seen in the Molotschna in
1 832. Both appear to have been mentioned as a bad omen for the “ schreckliches Notjahr ”
[terrible year of suffering] which followed in 1833.
One observer described ominous weather, with continuous dust clouds and smoke.
This, he felt, produced an extraordinary phenomenon, which was an astonishing and
magnificent sight. The night of October 31,1 832 was calm. Beginning approximately at
2 AM and until daybreak “the whole sky was engulfed in brilliant flames of fire in the form
of balls or in long narrow or wide flashes.” These flashes shot down from the sky, and
seemed to be accompanied by distant thunder. This continued all day, and according to the
reporter, was visible in many parts of Europe.
In the 1 848 Village report from Sparrau, likely written by teacher Peter Friesen, an
equally spectacular episode is described which was likely the same event. On an autumn
night of 1832 [specific date not mentioned] a light occurred in the northern sky which
looked like a ball of fire. This unusual fireball seemed to open up so that one could look
into it, then it closed again. The fireball then vanished, but was replaced by the appearance
of innumerable falling stars.
A meteorite, coming into the earth’s atmosphere, could appear as a fireball. With
disintegration it would be broken into countless smaller fragments, which would heat up
in the atmosphere and appear as falling stars.
The Leonid Meteorite Shower is the tail of Comet Tempel-Tuttle. This shower
peaks every 33 years when the comet comes closer to the earth, and can be seen world wide.
One of the record setting showers was seen in North America between November 1 0 and
14, 1833. Transposing the 12 days to the Julian Calender, this would be the end of October
or the first days of November in Russia.
Meteorite showers sometimes build up a number of years to a peak, occurring at the
same time every year. This has happened on a number of occasions with the Leonid
Meteorite Shower. It is quite probable that the Mennonite reports from 1832 represent a
build-up year to the most spectacular showers of 1 833.
In North America some people also assumed that the events in the skies had religious
significance - they were a sure signal of the imminent return of Jesus Christ! It is
interesting to note that the same event can have such diverse theological interpretations in
different parts of the world!
Sources:
Unknown Author, possibly Johann Comies, Edited and Translated by John B. Toews
The Good Old Days: A Russian Mennonite Document from 1835, Mennonite Life,
January, 1968, p 32
Village Reports, 1848, published in Odesser Zeitung, Sparrau, p 153
Young, Scott, Manitoba Planitarium, Winnipeg, Canada
20
5. CROP FAILURE IN 1833
In 1830, with continuous early summer drought in the Molotschna, and constant
strong east winds, crop failure was a threat. A few showers finally arrived, giving a meagre
harvest. During the summer of 1832 there were high temperatures; rains and dew
completely disappeared; winds withered all vegetation, and everything was wrapped in an
atmosphere of dust. When fall arrived the winter wheat was planted at the usual time, but
into completely dry soil. It did not germinate.
The winter of 1 832 to 1 833 did not have the usual snowstorms of the steppe region.
The moderate night frosts pulverized the loose topsoil even more, so the air was filled with
clouds of dust. The grainfields, pastures and hay fields, as well as farmyards were covered
with dust. It piled up along the roads, sometimes reaching the height of the fences. Dust
penetrated through windows and small cracks in the houses, covering the furniture in thick
layers.
In the spring of 1833 grain was planted in the colonies and the surrounding areas,
again into dry ash-like soil. Despite the lack of germination, the farmers did not despair.
Early in May, after ten months of drought, a gentle rain fell, and the seed did germinate.
Hopes were soon dashed, however, when the destructive east winds resumed, and the
temperature reached 28 °Reaumur [33.6°C] in the shade. This combination soon withered
the newly germinated plants. A second rain fell on May 21, but again its benefits
disappeared with a repeat of even higher temperatures, up to 29.5 °R [35.4°C]. All crops
and grass of pastures and hay fields were burned to a crisp.
Only the fruit trees seemed to defy the onslaught of wind, heat and dust! They
certainly suffered, but survived to provide somewhat small, prematurely ripened fruit. The
forest plots, recently planted near many of the villages, also survived.
By the end of May, because of the absence of grass on the pastures, the cattle and
horses were suffering severely. Attempts were made to graze cattle in other less stricken
areas, but they were too far away to be practical. Eventually the choice was made to keep
only a few milking cows per family; the limited supplies of hay would just barely keep the
essential cows alive, thereby also providing milk for the community. Dried out beds of
rivers, creeks and ponds, normally disregarded, now also provided some additional hay.
Fortunately on July 1 “He [God] provided us with a beneficial rain.” It did not produce
crops or revitalize the grass, but gave enough moisture to allow a somewhat prickly weed
to grow [kurai]. The weed, harvested before it was over-ripe, dampened with a little water
at feeding time, and mixed with a few stalks of wheat or barley, provided surprisingly
nourishing feed for the cattle. This even allowed provision of some feed to be stored for
the coming winter. Even so, the relatively poorly fed cattle sometimes could not stand
upright on their own, and gave very little milk. Towards the end of January of 1 834 a dip
in the temperature to -20 °R [-24 °C] penetrated into the almost empty bams, killing the
weaker cattle. Of the 9,032 head of cattle in the Molotschna at the start of 1 833, only 5,0 1 1
survived to the spring of 1834.
Horses were even more severely affected than the cattle. The practice had been to
21
pasture many of the horses in areas well south of the Molotschna for the winter. With the
severe weather conditions, the initial heat and drought of the summer, and then the
subsequent cold of winter, it was discovered that many of the horses were dying. They
were therefore brought back to the farms in the Molotschna. It was decided to keep only
the best draught horses, to try to maintain some stock that was reasonably fed. Initially
there had been 7,348 horses, reduced to 4,986 by May 1 , 1 834.
The sheep seem to have withstood the extremes of weather somewhat better. On
May 1 , 1 834 there were 98,892 sheep in the Molotschna which could be sheared. This wool
brought in 259,880 rubles in cash, much needed to help pay for some of the other
necessities of life.
But the people also suffered, not only the crops and animals. “Only a few families
were able to fatten their pigs for butchering so as to use them for lard and the meat for
salting and smoking. The poorer families had to substitute beef...” How tastes do change!
But there were also true desperate shortages “A great shortage of bread existed, and some
families were near famine...”
Efforts to obtain grain for the entire community, especially those near starvation,
were fraught with difficulty. The drought was quite widespread and involved a total of 21
districts, so freight wagons did not go through the area because they could not feed their
horses. Drivers from the Molotschna therefore had to travel considerable distances to
obtain grain.
The district office was assigned the care of the destitute and starving people. A fund
was established to finance the purchase of food; 46,000 rubles was provided by wealthier
local citizens, but the government also contributed 357,000 rubles. Once the food supplies
arrived a four-man commission was set up to distribute them. Investigation showed that
535 families, consisting of 3,163 individuals, had some degree of need. It appears that no
one in the Mennonite colonies actually died of starvation.
Thirteen of the Molotschna village reports written in 1 848 specifically mention the
drought of 1833, often referring to it as “das schreckliche Notjahr” [the terrible year of
need]. The Muntau correspondent recorded various disasters, but concluded “In the years
1 833 and 1 834 the suffering exceeded all that had gone on before.”
Hopes were high for 1 834, but unfortunately the weather was again unfavourable.
Crops were meagre, more or less providing only enough for seed grain. There were severe
epidemics in the population of the neighbouring villages in the spring of 1834. The
Mennonite villages were spared this additional plague.
But finally the circumstances changed. In 1 835 the weather was excellent, and each
carefully tilled field seemed to promise a rich harvest. One observer drew spiritual lessons
from the dire time of need. “When all the land is plagued and God’s judgement comes, God
chastises for the betterment of the human race. Man is obligated to place his courage and
trust in gracious providence and to continue steadfastly in the profession God has given
him. In the end he will be crowned with heaven’s blessings, according to the promises so
clearly contained in the Word of God.”
The Mennonites continued “in the profession God has given,” which presumably
meant farming.
22
Sources:
Epp, D. H. [from old papers], Historische Uebersicht ueber den Zustand der Mennoniten-
gemeinden an der Molotschna vom Jahre 1836, UnserBlatt, March 1928, pp 139-143
Hildebrand, J. J., Hildebrand’s Zeittafel, Winnipeg, Canada, 1945, p 186
Isaac, Franz, Die Molotschnaer Mennoniten, H. J. Braun, Halbstadt, Russia, 1908, pp 19, 20
Unknown Author, possibly Johann Comies, Edited and Translated by John B. Toews, “The
Good Old Days: A Russian Mennonite Document from 1835, Mennonite Life,
January 1968, pp 31-34
Village Reports, 1848, published in Odesser Zeitung, Halbstadt, p 91; Muntau p 95;
Lindenau p 100; Petershagen p 108; Ladekopp p 1 12; Muensterberg p 1 16;
Alexanderwohl p 132; Franztal p 134; Mariental p 138; Alexandertal p 143;
Wemersdorfp 150; Friedensdorf p 151; Sparraup 153
23
6. EARTHQUAKE IN 1838
On January 11, 1838 at 9:30 PM an earthquake was recorded in the Molotschna
Colony. It apparently involved an extensive strip across southern Russia, since it was felt
in the German settlements of the Mariupol region south and eastward, as well as in
settlements west of the Molotschna. Houses in the Molotschna did not collapse, but
pendulum clocks were stopped, cups and drinking glasses rattled, pets and chickens were
very uneasy. Wells which prior to the earthquake gave only a meagre supply of water
became abundant sources.
In 1 848 the Molotschna villages were asked to write brief histories, including their
establishment, and any significant events that had occurred. A number of these reports
mention the earthquake of January 11, 1838. Halbstadt and Ohrloff mentioned a strong
earthquake, but no significant damage. In Muntau the quake was called “terror inspiring”
[Schrecken erregende ], but the only long term effect was a rise of the water level in the
wells, as was the case in Franztal. In Mariental deep wells actually caved in, but later the
benefit of a ten foot higher water table was noted. In both Grossweide and Konteniusfeld
the water level also rose, but the water became bitter, and in Konteniusfeld actually
unusable by humans. It was said that in hot summer days not even the horses in
Konteniusfeld could drink the water.
This earthquake has been documented scientifically, with specific information
available from the United States National Earthquake Information Center. It is recorded as
occurring January 23 at 18:36 Greenwich Mean Time. Correcting for the Julian calendar
and the different time zones, this is exactly the correct time as recorded historically! The
epicentre was at 45.7°N Latitude and 26.6°E Longitude, which is about 750 kilometres
west and slightly south of the Molotschna. It was centred 150 kilometres below the earth’s
surface, and measured 6.9 on the Richter Scale. This is of the same magnitude as the quake
at Kobe, Japan, of January 16, 1995, and only slightly less than the 7.1 of the 1989 Loma-
Prieta earthquake which centred around Santa Cruz and San Francisco on October 17,1 989
[during a World Series baseball game]. According to a geologist the 1 838 earthquake was
certainly strong enough “to give the whole area a good jolt.”
Sources:
Brisbin, Dr. W. C., Professor of Structural Geology, University of Manitoba, Canada, personal
communication
Hildebrand, J. J., Hildebrand’s Zeittafel, Winnipeg, Canada, 1945, p 189
United States Geological Survey, National Earthquake Information Center
Village Reports, 1848, published in Odesser Zeitung, Halbstadt p 92, Muntau p 95, Franztal p 134,
Grossweide p 136, Mariental p 138, Konteniusfeld p 155, Ohrloff p 162
World Almanac and Book of Facts 1998, World Almanac Books, Mahwah, USA, 1998, p 270
24
7. THE DEATH AND FUNERAL
OF JOHANN CORNIES
The wife of Johann Comies, Agnes, became ill and died on the fifth day of her
illness, on March 30, 1847. At the time Johann Comies [junior] was travelling in Prussia,
in part to overcome depression because of the death of his first wife, in part to look for
another. Father Johann Comies wrote his son the bad news, but urged him to continue his
travels in Prussia.
In time the son Johann did find a potential wife, and planned to get married in
Prussia. He asked that his only sister Agnes and her husband Philipp Wiebe come to
Prussia for the wedding. Father Johann readily agreed to this. It was a difficult parting for
all concerned, with a premonition that this might be a final farewell.
After the Wiebes left, Johann moved his bedroom to the Eckstube [comer room].
He increasingly withdrew to this room even during the daytime, highly unusual for Johann.
Even a meeting of the Agricultural Society together with the civic officials was held in the
Eckstube, little realizing that this would be Comies’ last participation.
Johann’s zest for work had left him; he looked sick. This had not come upon him
suddenly - he had become less talkative and more introspective for some time. Shortly
before his illness he had spent some evenings, after his cup of tea, dictating to his secretary.
He would take a large number of loose papers out of his desk, and using them as notes,
dictate his thoughts. But this became increasingly difficult. Sometimes they sat far into the
night, often accomplishing very little. He would sit for long periods, then admit that he
could no longer recollect his previous thoughts.
On February 29, 1848 Comies was laid up in bed, succumbing to a serious throat
infection [probably quinsy, an infection behind the tonsils]. His brother David had him try
some powerful inhalants, which improved the condition enough to allow Johann to get out
of bed for several days. Then he relapsed. Gradually his strength seemed to ebb away.
Suddenly one day, when Johann was already quite weak, with the help of his
secretary, he dressed completely, including his boots. He got up, and without help briskly
walked out the door. There he halted, and quietly looked out into the distance. He sighed,
waved his hand as if to dismiss everything, then turned back to his bed.
Comies was quiet and patient in his illness. Generally he preferred to be alone. A
physician was called in on two occasions, but could provide no help. His good friend and
spiritual advisor, Minister Peter Neufeld, often visited him, and was with him when the
hour of death approached. Johann Comies died, slipping away as he lay quietly with his
eyes closed, on March 13, 1848.
The funeral was on March 16, at the Comies residence in Ohrloff. The only one of
his off-spring present was the young daughter of his son Johann, but this was more than
compensated for by the widespread participation of many people. It was said that never
before had there been an occasion in the colonies with such a diverse representation of
nationalities and religions. There were of course Mennonites, but also other Germans,
Russians, Nogaies, Molokans, Dukhobors and Jews, all coming to pay last respects to their
25
friend and helper.
After the simple traditional funeral oration by Elder Bernhard Fast of the Ohrloff
church, the coffin was taken out onto the yard because the house could impossibly hold all
those who had come. It took a long time until everyone had come by and paid their last
respects. Johann’s face
was peaceful, even in
death. The body was
then taken to the
Ohrloff cemetery; the
procession snaked all
the way from the house
to the grave site. There
his earthly remains
were placed next to his
wife Agnes.
A black marble
monument was erected
at his grave in 1 849 in
his honour. It was a
broken off pillar, signifying that his work had not yet been completed.
A friend of his, Baron Fedor von Rosen, president of the Fuersorgekomitee, the
government agency that regulated the affairs of the Mennonites, summed up Johann’s life
“In thankful remembrance, the prematurely departed Comies continues to live for us, his
life and work were models for us. He was in the true sense of the word a Christian...”
Rosen also took the opportunity to encourage other Mennonites “May the picture of the
unforgettable Comies always remain in your memory... may you gladly follow his
example...”
Former Johann Comies residence in Ohrloff, later owned by
Johann Wiebe
Sources:
Epp, David H., Johann Cornies, Echo-Verlag, Rosthem and Steinbach, Canada, 1946,
pp 142-147
Gavel, Johann Cornies, Unterhaltungsblatt, October 1 848, Beilage, after page 80, pp 9-18
Goerz, H., Die Molotschnaer Ansiedlung, Echo-Verlag, Steinbach, Canada, 1950/51, p 38
Hildebrand, J. J., Hildebrand’s Zeittafel, Winnipeg, Canada, 1945, p 196
Isaac, Franz, Die Molotschnaer Mennoniten, H. J. Braun, Halbstadt, Russia, 1908, p 19
Background Information:
Johann Comies
26
JOHANN CORNIES
[1789- 1848]
Johann Comies was bom June 20, 1789 in Baerwalde, near Danzig, in West Prussia. He
was the eldest of four sons of Johann and Maria Comies. The Comies family emigrated to Russia
in 1804, and after spending two years in the Chortitza Colony, settled in the newly established
village of Ohrloff in the Molotschna. Originally a sailor, the senior Comies now took up herbal
medicine, and was soon treating patients from far and wide. The family, which had required
government assistance to emigrate, now became quite affluent. Meanwhile the son Johann worked
a year as a labourer for a miller, then purchased a Russian cart and began selling Molotschna
agricultural products in the cities of the Crimea.
In 1 8 1 1 Johann married Agnes Klassen. The couple had five children, of whom the eldest,
Johann [bom 1812], and the youngest, Agnes [bom 1819], were the only ones to survive to
adulthood. In 1 8 1 2 the young Comies family is listed as Eimvohner [occupants] in the home of his
father, but soon thereafter he bought his own Wirtschaft [farm] in Ohrloff.
Johann purchased a small flock of sheep, and in 1 8 1 2 leased some unoccupied crown lands
for his operations. Even at this time his plans and vision reached well beyond the confines of his
own village, and certainly included many aspects of agricultural development well beyond the
experience of his compatriots.
In 1816 Comies established a stud farm, he himself visiting the Don region to select
suitable horses. Soon thereafter he also started to improve the breed of cattle by the use of
imported bulls. By 1817 government officials had obviously noted the prodigious activities and
wide interests of Johann Comies; he was appointed life-long chairman of the Society for the
Effective Promotion of Afforestation, Horticulture, Silk Industry and Vine Culture. This position
ushered Comies into public life and assured his influence in Mennonite colonies as well as beyond
into the surrounding population.
An agronomist, Gavel, writing about Comies, felt that the well-spring of his career was an
ardent desire to secure the future well-being of the Mennonite settlements by ensuring that they
would flourish and gain for themselves a highly favourable reputation. This would be achieved by
a “system of rational, market oriented agriculture, resting on experimentation... It would secure for
a growing population a greater enjoyment of life, morally, spiritually, and materially, under the
aegis of a gentle but strict leadership.” Also of basic importance to Comies, according to Gavel,
was to live a Christian life. But he also wished to demonstrate devotion to his monarch, the Czar,
and to his new Fatherland. This could best be done by ensuring the well being of the Mennonite
colonies and their neighbours on the steppes of South Russia, thereby enriching the land and
serving as ideal examples to follow. While the expression of devotion to royalty was likely
motivated by pragmatic politics, there is ample evidence that Comies did often receive advice and
direction from government agencies, but was also in a position to give advice and influence
government policies. He obviously had the complete confidence of officials such as the chairman
of the Fuersorgekomitee [committee supervising foreign colonists], and was often consulted on
agricultural matters well beyond the confines of the Mennonite colonies.
In 1830 Comies leased a large tract of government land along the Juschanlee River, and
over the years developed this area into a model and experimental farm. Many of the innovations
instituted by Comies were first tried on his own land or on Juschanlee. Eventually a complex of
agricultural and business buildings was erected, extensive gardens were planted as well as tree
nurseries and a forest of 68,000 trees. Comies later purchased a number of large estates near
27
Melitopol, and also had his own brickyard and manufacturing operation.
Also in 1 830 the Landwirtschaftliche Verein [Agricultural Society] was introduced in the
Molotschna. Johann Comies was its Vorsitzer [chairman], appointed to that position for life by
General Inzov, chairman of the Fuersorgekomitee. Initially the powers of the Society were limited
to the giving of advice, and that within a well defined sphere. This sphere was in agriculture,
horticulture, afforestation, silk production and the planting of vineyards. Partly because of its direct
links with the authorities, partly because of the character of the chairman, the suggestions of the
Society tended to become compulsory. The terms of reference also widened considerably until
there was very little in the lives of the Molotschna residents which was not in some way regulated.
With vigour which knew almost no bounds, with knowledge gathered from extensive
reading, from a wide circle of contacts and from experimental trials, and with a vision which in
many instances was uncannily accurate, Comies proceeded to improve the circumstances in the
Mennonite colonies. To implement change in a relatively conservative society seemed at times to
require despotic means. Separation of civil and religious spheres was often blurred. The traditional
personal responsibility, community leadership and prohibition of the use of force between believers
sometimes became casualties of expediency.
Afforestation was a long term project of Johann Comies. He was convinced that the well¬
being of the agricultural communities on the bald steppes of South Russia could be improved, even
the weather modified to some degree, by the massive planting of trees. As was his practice, Comies
first modelled this concept on his own farms, starting in 1831. Eventually sections were set aside
in each village for forests; it became mandatory to plant hedges between the Wirtschaften ; every
farmer had to plant a certain number of fruit trees each year; alleys of trees were planted along the
roads between villages. Meticulous records were kept to document the progress of the project. On
January 1, 1844, for example, there were 2,710,434 trees in the Molotschna, of which 250,342 had
been planted in 1843.
Animal husbandry was also a continuing concern of Comies; he worked on breeding
Merino sheep for the production of wool, as well as improving the stock of horses and cattle. With
the dry conditions of southern Russia, the traditional Mennonite swampland methods of agriculture
needed to be modified to adjust to the new conditions. Feeling that more land should be devoted
to cereal crops, partly to take advantage of world market demands, Comies experimented with and
kept records of crop yields using various new innovations. By 1835, on the basis of proven
increased yield, a four field system of farming was introduced, with rotation of crops leaving one
part in summerfallow at all times. The use of manure as fertilizer was also advocated. Building
of artificial ponds was initiated by constructing earth dams on the small rivers that ran through the
area. This would assure a constant supply of water for flocks and herds, and allow for irrigation
of low lying hayfields.
Comies’ interests and influence did not long remain confined to agriculture. He
encouraged many industries and crafts, and even established Neu-Halbstadt as an industrial suburb
of Halbstadt. Since the government was interested in the silk industry, Comies promoted the
planting of mulberry trees and hedges and the production of silk.
In 1843 the Agricultural Society was given jurisdiction over the schools in the Molotschna,
and Comies approached this task with his usual vigour. Primary education became compulsory.
Attempts were made to improve instruction by upgrading teachers, standardizing the curriculum
and by regular school inspections. Comies published “General Guidelines for Instruction of and
Dealing with School Children, for the Teachers of the Molotschna District” in which 87 specific
suggestions were made to improve the quality of education. New and more functional schools were
built in many villages to help this process.
The influence of Comies soon spread well beyond the borders of the Molotschna Colony.
28
Chortitza, while officially not under the jurisdiction of the Agricultural Society, nevertheless
implemented many of the programs. Comies was asked by the government to help in the settlement
of the nomadic Nogaies; he worked with the Hutterites as well as the Molokans and Dukhobors.
He established an agricultural internship program for young Russians and helped them to develop
model villages. He tried to improve the agricultural status of the surrounding Jewish settlements.
Comies’ work was obviously recognized and appreciated by the government. He received a
number of royal family visits as well as gifts of land, but also continuing authority to allow him
to enforce his plans.
It was under the tutelage of Johann Comies that the concept of Musterwirte [model
farmers] came to be virtually a tenet of faith in the Mennonite settlements. The concept dated back
to the establishment of the colonies, but was gradually refined and regulated until it came to
constitute a large part of the Mennonite philosophy of life. The Mennonites were actually held up
by those in authority as models of progress, examples of achievement and industry. Witness to
their faith could best be expressed in excellence - in the establishment of Wirtschaften that were
neat and orderly to a fault, that complied with every regulation set down by the Agricultural
Society, and that exemplified the most modem agricultural techniques and innovations.
During his years as chairman of the Agricultural Society, Comies, by virtue of the fact that
the Society controlled land allotment and development, planned the establishment of a number of
villages in the Molotschna. Konteniusfeld, named after Samuel Kontenius, the tireless and devoted
chairman of the Fuersorgekomitee in Odessa for many years, was founded in 1832. Fischau was
also moved to a better site that year. Gnadenfeld was established in 1835, Waldheim in 1836 and
Landskrone in 1 839. In 1 843 Neu-Halbstadt was begun, and that same year Comies also planned
Huttertal and a few years later Johannesruh for Hutterite settlers.
In 1848 Johann Comies planned the establishment of a model village, Hierschau. He
planned it, but was not able to cany out the plans. Late in February he became ill, eventually
becoming bedridden. He died March 13, 1848, of a severe throat infection. The funeral was held
on March 16. According to reports “people flocked from far and wide to accompany the mortal
remains of the departed benefactor to their final resting place...”
Johann Comies was predeceased by his wife Agnes, who died March 30, 1847, and
survived by two children, Johann and Agnes. A memorial was erected in the cemetery at Ohrloff
in his honour, a broken marble column, signifying that his work had not been completed.
Sources:
Epp, David H., Johann Comies, Echo-Verlag, Rosthem and Steinbach, Canada, 1946,
pp 1-148
Gavel, Johann Comies, Unterhaltungsblatt, October 1848, Beilage, after page 80, pp 9-18
Goerz, H., Die Molotschnaer Ansiedlung, Echo-Verlag, Steinbach, Canada, 1950/51, pp 40-53
Huebert, H. T., Hierschau: An Example of Russian Mennonite Life, Springfield Publishers,
Winnipeg, Canada, 1986, pp 32-36
Mennonite Encyclopedia
Molotschna Report, Mennonitische Blaetter, March 1855, p 19
It should be noted that the name of Johann Comies’ wife and daughter is in some doubt. Many
documents refer to Agnes, but there are some sources that list them as Aganetha.
No picture of Comies has been included in this biography. Our assumption is that the picture
commonly used has little resemblance to the real man, and was certainly not drawn by an
admirer of his!
29
8. 130 HORSES
1 848 was an interesting year. Sparked by a revolution in Paris on February 24, in
which Louis-Philippe was overthrown, a series of uprisings erupted across Europe, all the
way from Ireland to Hungary. The flames were fanned in part by famine from recent crop
failures, by economic downturn, but also by a common desire for the people to have a
more meaningful input into their governments. In some regions the revolutions were
relatively mild and gentlemanly affairs, but in some areas, such as northern Italy and
Berlin, they turned bloody.
There had been revolt in Russian Polish territory on a number of occasions, in 1 830
and 1 846, but not specifically at this time. Czar Nicholas I, however, was not amused by
the turmoil which was bubbling over so close to his borders. Apportioning to himself the
role of “international peace-keeper”, he ordered 400,000 men to prepare for a westward
drive, but later downgraded this scheme. In July, 1848, Russian forces invaded and
occupied the neighbouring principalities of Moldavia and Walachia to quell revolutions.
In agreement with Turkish authorities the political structures of these regions were altered.
It was more difficult for Nicholas to help Austria, where a number of social and
“nationalist” revolutions broke out, for example in Prague, Vienna, northern Italy and
Galicia. Eventually a Russian army of 1 70,000 men entered Hungary in June of 1 849 to
help the Austrian army quell a serious revolution.
The Mennonites, while safely isolated on the wide steppes of South Russia, were
not totally unaware of the trends sweeping through Europe, and likely were also cognizant
of the attitude of their own government, particularly that of Nicholas I. They wished to
assure the Czar that they had no aspirations similar to those of the revolutionaries, that
they were humble and grateful citizens of their chosen homeland, and dedicated servants
of his illustrious majesty.
In August, 1848, the Molotschna Mennonites presented Czar Nicholas I, through
his officials, with 130 excellent horses as an expression of their allegiance to the crown.
*
*
*
A letter was directed to Baron Fedor von Rosen, chairman of the committee
responsible for foreign settlers [the Guardians Committee] in South Russia. It read as
follows [translated from Russian to German to English] :
“In the present unhappy and serious time, where in all countries with the exception
of Russia the subjects have revolted against their legally constituted governments, and
during which time the enemy of all good and orderly things is showing his might, we feel
it necessary to let our attachment to Crown, Fatherland and to law and order, be known.
We know with which efforts and great sacrifice his Majesty the Czar, our most
gracious national father tries to keep the destructive elements and disturbers of the peace
30
outside of our borders, in order to assure us security and peace. Acknowledging the sincere
and deep felt wish of many of our brothers, we have, totally as a free-will offering, collected
from each as their own desires directed, in recognition of the above mentioned sentiments.
The Mennonites of the Molotschna district therefore wish to make a gift of 1 30 excellent
and useful horses.
Recognizing that the actual number is relatively small, we none-the-less... humbly
ask your excellency to accept this small and insignificant gift as a symbol of our steadfast
belief in the legally constituted order, and as proof of our dedication to the Crown and our
Fatherland, also as a sign of our deepest thanks for the protection and many other benefits
we have, through your mercy received...
The Lord our God allow that we and our descendants may long live under such
protection within the borders of Russia.”
The letter was dated August 16, 1848, and was signed by Elders Bernhard Fast,
Benjamin Ratzlaff, Peter Wedel, Abraham Friesen, Heinrich Toews and Dirk Warkentin,
as well as District Chairman Abraham Toews and district representatives Braun and
Neufeld.
*
*
*
Through His Excellency Baron von Rosen the gift of 130 horses and the
accompanying letter were accepted. A letter of thanks, assuring the Mennonites of the
gratitude of the Czar was written by Count P. D. Kiselyov, Director of the First Department
[Minister of State Domains].
“This letter of thanks is to inform you of the extreme thankfulness of his Majesty
the Czar. May this expression of best wishes be an example to you and you descendants
of the beneficence of his Royal Majesty to those who are his faithful servants...”
Sources:
Announcement, Obrigkeitliche Anerkennung, Unterhaltungsblatt, April 1848, p 25
Dmytryshyn, Basil, A History of Russia, Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, USA, 1977,
pp 358-359
Isaac, Franz, Die Molotschnaer Mennoniten, H. J. Braun, Halbstadt, Russia, 1908, pp 23-25
Letter, Unterhaltungsblatt, November 1848, pp 81, 82
Seton- Watson, Hugh, The Russian Empire 1801-1917, Oxford at the Clarendon Press, 1967,
pp 311-319
31
9. BIRTH OF THE MENNONITE BRETHREN
CHURCH
JANUARY 6, 1860
Having left the confining spirit and constrictions of the Vistula Delta, the
Mennonites had an opportunity to build their own ideal society on the broad steppes of
South Russia. Being human beings, they unfortunately drifted into religious decline, dead
orthodoxy and a spirit of secularism and worldliness.
There were a number of attempts at renewal; the Kleine Gemeinde, starting with
Bible studies in the homes in 1812, finally achieved full recognition in 1843. This group
emphasized the return to the concepts of the Bible and the early Anabaptists, particularly
criticizing lax church discipline.
The Ohrloff Mennonite Church, under the progressive leadership of Elder Bernhard
Fast, brought new vision to the region. A Vereinsschale [private school] was established
in Ohrloff in 1 820 through the influence of Johann Comies. The first teacher was Tobias
Voth, a gifted man who was also concerned about the spiritual life of the community. He
organized a literary society [Lesevereiri] and sponsored mission circles.
In the 1 840s and 1 850s the Gnadenfeld congregation became the centre of spiritual
renewal in the Molotschna. A group of Mennonites led by Wilhelm Lange migrated from
Brandenburg in Prussia to establish the village of Gnadenfeld in 1835. There was active
participation in two Sunday services, there were midweek meetings, mission festivals and
home Bible studies. The church produced and distributed tracts renouncing drinking.
August Lenzmann was ordained elder of the congregation in 1854. He was cautious and
conservative by nature, but certainly well meaning, and thought of as humble, and basing
his faith and hope on Jesus Christ. At first he seemed sympathetic to those wishing reform,
though later he became a staunch foe.
A strong influence on the Mennonites in South Russia in the mid nineteenth century
was Pfarrer Eduard Wuest, a pietistic pastor of a Lutheran church in Neuhoffnung, a village
near Berdyansk. He was bom in Wuerttemberg, and studied in Stuttgart and Tuebingen.
After graduation, while already an assistant pastor he came to understand that he needed
genuine forgiveness of sins and assurance of salvation. This became his message. He
developed into a powerful, zealous speaker. In 1845 Wuest was invited to be the pastor
at Neuhoffnung. Presenting “Jesus Christ, the Crucified” was his central theme as he
preached to his own members, and soon well beyond the confines of his own congregation.
In 1 846 he was invited to speak at a missions festival in Gnadenfeld, beginning a time of
frequent involvement at festivals and other meetings especially in the Molotschna Colony.
Apparently Wuest’ s popularity aroused envy among the surrounding Lutheran
pastors and the elders of the Mennonite churches, so that he was forbidden to preach from
many of the pulpits. However, he continued to play a part in devotional meetings where
he did not preach, but freely responded to questions. Jakob Reimer, a prominent leader in
the early Memionite Brethren Church, commented that the purpose of these meetings
was “to exhort each other to walk and work worthy of our position as members of the body
32
of Christ.” Wuest died prematurely on July 13, 1859. Some who disagreed with him
interpreted this as a judgement of God, while his friends felt it was a deliverance from
tribulation.
While Wuest had inspired many, not everything was ideal. He had, for example,
continued with infant baptism, and for communion had not separated true believers from
apostate members. A certain Kappes, formerly teacher in the Mariupol area, led a group
who felt that Wuest did not take “joyous justification” far enough. They considered the
Bible to be their only guide, and strongly emphasized the emotional life, particularly
“Christianjoy.” At a missions festival held in Rosenfeld in 1 858, Kappes and his followers
walked out of the meeting, singing and shouting, in protest against Wuesf s more moderate
position. Mennonites such as Johann Claassen, Jakob Reimer, Jakob Becker and Wilhelm
Bartel initially participated in some of the meetings, which consisted largely of Bible study
and singing. Claassen and Reimer soon noted some imbalance in the emphasis, but
Wilhelm Bartel later took this tendency into the fledgling Mennonite Brethren Church.
Fellowship meetings and Bible studies continued in a number of Molotschna
Mennonite villages. With numerous conversions, and a search for deeper life, more
frequent communion, administered by an elder, seemed to be the natural progression.
According to Jakob Reimer “As our fellowship based itself more and more upon the Word
of God, there arose among us the desire to observe the Lord’s Supper more frequently and
so we asked our Elder Lenzmann to break the bread more often for us - also in our private
homes, according to Acts 2:46-47.” Lenzmann denied the request, later stating that such
a request was without historical precedent, it would foster spiritual pride and could cause
disunity in the church. Having asked the elder for this concession does show that the initial
objective of those concerned was not separation.
Without the consent of Elder Lenzmann a group of believers met and had
communion in late November, 1859, in Elisabetthal in the home of Komelius Wiens.
Abraham Comelsen, a school teacher, was in charge of the proceedings, which were carried
out according to the principles outlined by Paul in 1 Corinthians 1 1 . Several members of
the Flemish Church were present, and six members of the Gnadenfeld church.
When news of the event spread, it caused consternation and considerable
displeasure. Those who were members of the Flemish Church were immediately put under
the ban. The six Gnadenfeld members appeared before the ministers of the church, were
reproved, and asked to promise that “they would submit to all things not contrary to the
Word of God and their conscience.”
It is quite possible that this would have been the end of the episode if it had not been
for an extremely critical and quite vocal element in the Gnadenfeld church. At membership
meetings held on December 19 and 27, 1859, the whole new movement, and particularly
Jakob Reimer and Johann Claassen were attacked. The December 27 meeting was
particularly stormy, with some members shouting “Away with them, they are no better than
the others.” Jakob Reimer slowly walked up to the front, and asked Elder Lenzmann if he
could leave. Lenzmann reluctantly gave his consent. Both Reimer and Claassen prepared
to leave the meeting, but they were challenged by Heinrich Franz, who earlier had been in
conflict with Claassen regarding school matters. Addressing Claassen he said “You are
33
otherwise such a courageous man; why don’t you call on your associates to follow you?”
Claassen turned and said “Well brethren, whoever is like-minded, come along.” About ten
brethren arose and left the meeting with Reimer and Claassen.
The Gnadenfeld Mennonite Church, where the meetings of
December 19 and 27, 1859 would have been held
After consulting with others, Claassen asked Comelsen to write a letter of secession,
he himself would call a meeting of the brethren.
*
*
*
The meeting called by Claassen was held on Epiphany, January 6, 1 860, in the home
of Isaak Koop in Elisabetthal. Comelsen’ s letter was scmtinized carefully, and accepted
as the basis for further action. The entire afternoon and on into the evening was spent in
prayer, after which the document was circulated for voluntary signatures. Eighteen heads
of families signed that day, another nine on January 1 8.
The document, basically a letter to the elders of the Molotschna Mennonite Church,
is not a true complete confession of faith, rather an outline of the causes of secession. A
brief summary of the contents is:
[a] We have, by the grace of God, recognized the decadent condition of the Mennonite
Brotherhood, and can for God’s and conscience sake no longer continue therein...
[b] We herewith completely dissociate ourselves from the decadent churches...
[c] We speak here of the entire Mennonite Brotherhood, because the supreme government
authorities consider it one true brotherhood
[d] ...we are, according to our conviction from the Holy Scriptures, in agreement with our
dear Menno
[e] We confess a baptism on faith
[f] ...communion... serves to strengthen the faith of true believers... not as a sign of the
34
fellowship of believers and unbelievers...
[g] ...footwashing.. .to be practiced among one another
[h] Teachers may be called in two scriptural ways.. .by God alone. ..Others are called
through the instrumentality of true believers
[i] ...all carnal and reprobate sinners must be banned from the fellowship
0] In all other articles of confession, we are in full agreement with Menno Simons
In a footnote the Mennonite elders were informed that if they wished to
communicate with the group, Abraham Comelsen, Isaak Koop and Johann Claassen were
appointed as representatives.
Separation of church and state became a casualty in the reaction to this document.
The Molotschna elders met in Alexanderwohl on January 1 8, 1 860. David Friesen, colony
Oberschulze was also invited. Five of the six elders, likely at the strong suggestion of
Friesen, insisted that the seceding members be turned over to the district court for
disciplining. Only Bernhard Fast of the Ohrloff-Halbstadt church objected. The feeling of
the majority was that an independent church could not be tolerated, and the colony
administration should dissuade the dissidents from their erroneous ways. It was later
explained that the elders had already exhausted all means to cajole the erring members with
“love and earnestness,” a blatant misrepresentation, since there had been insufficient time
to even begin such negotiations.
The reaction of the colony administration was swift; David Friesen, who had no
sympathy for the dissidents, demanded an explanation from the three representatives. They
explained that they would have preferred to stay in their own congregations, but since their
ministers were not acting in accordance with God’s word, felt, for conscience sake, that it
was necessary to form their own church. Friesen obviously disagreed, since four days later,
on January 27, a letter went out to village offices prohibiting all religious gatherings - using
a provision of the law meant to curb secrete societies and political agitation. When
intimidation did not work the three representatives were ordered to appear before Inspector
Andrea, a member of the Fuersorgekomitee in Odessa.
Thus began a long and frustrating process of obtaining recognition as a separate
church, yet within the Mennonite fold, with all the rights and privileges of Mennonites.
This involved negotiations with government officials in St. Petersburg, Johann Claassen
spending much time and effort in the capital city, but also continued discussion with various
leaders in the Molotschna. While receiving verbal assurance of support by the Czar in
March of 1862, confirmation of full religious and civil privileges for the Mennonite
Brethren did not come until May 30, 1866. In the meantime, some felt that a tenable
solution for the Mennonite Brethren was to settle elsewhere. “Heinrich Huebert and
Associates” received permission to establish a settlement in the Caucasus area in the Kuban.
On a tract of 6,500 dessiatines two villages were established, first Wohldemfuerst, then
later Alexanderfeld. Substantial numbers of Mennonite Brethren, however, still remained
in the Molotschna and Chortitza colonies.
Eventually, although very grudgingly, the Mennonite Brethren obtained full
recognition by, though certainly not the support of, the five Molotschna Mennonite elders
who had initially opposed them.
35
Sources:
Bekker, Jacob P., Origin of the Mennonite Brethren Church, Translation by D. E. Pauls and
A. E. Janzen, The Mennonite Brethren Historical Society of the Midwest, 1973,
pp 17-185
Friesen, P. M„ pp 173-221
Mennonite Encyclopedia
Mennonite Historical Atlas, pp 19, 119
Smith, C. Henry, Smith 's Story of the Mennonites, Fifth Edition, Faith and Life Press, Newton,
USA, 1981, pp 277-282
Toews, J. A., pp 26-46
Background Information:
Pfarrer Eduard Wuest
Elder August Lenzmann
Johann Claassen
Jakob Reimer
Spelling of names in the various historical documents is not consistent.
‘"Becker" is the spelling chosen by historian J. A. Toews, but Jakob P. Becker also spelled
his name Boecker and Bekker. His brother Benjamin seemed to favour Bekker
Johann Claassen's father spelled his name Klaassen. Elizabeth Suderman Klassen, in her
biography of Johann, uses the spelling “Claassen," which he himself used at the signing
of the “ letter of secession."
36
PFARRER EDUARD WUEST
[1818 - 1859]
Eduard Hugo Otto Wuest was bom in Murrhardt, Wuerttemberg, Germany on February 23 ,
1818. He was the son of Johann Jacob and Katharina Friederike Wuest, his father being an
innkeeper and baker. Eduard was the youngest of five children, having three brothers and one
sister. At the age of seven he prayed on his knees for the first time, together with his sister at the
bedside of their sick father. When his father died Eduard’ s eldest brother, together with his mother
tried to continue on with the family business. Early on his mother determined that he should enter
the ministry, in preparation for which he went to the Latin school in Murrhardt.
From 1832 to 1835 he attended the Gymnasium in Stuttgart. At first he studied hard, and
prayed regularly, especially that he would be accepted into the seminary at Tuebingen, with good
enough marks to go at government expense. Unfortunately he soon came into bad company, and
with his friends led a rather irresponsible life, where little was learned. When he was examined
after three years he did not qualify for the scholarship. His family nonetheless sent him to
Tuebingen, feeling that they did not wish to waste the funds they had already invested in his
education. So he went to seminary in 1835.
Any hopes, however, that his behaviour would improve in Tuebingen were disappointed.
Opportunities to avoid studies abounded, Eduard occupying himself with riding and travelling,
drinking and playing. When the eldest Wuest son and daughter married, the mother was forced to
give up the family business. Eduard had to return
home because of lack of funds, without having written
his examinations. He was initially taken in by his
brother, who was Pfarrer in Mergentheim, then turned
over to a Pfarrer Biermann in Elgersheim, under whose
auspices he actually did some studying.
Early in 1841 Eduard was called to Tuebingen
for his theological examinations. Although his
preparation was poor, he unexpectedly passed. The
Biermann household had a serious Christian
atmosphere, and before departing for his examinations
the Pfarrer, among other advice, suggested that Eduard
pray. This he did, for the first time in six years.
After passing his examinations he did not
immediately receive a posting, so he stayed with his
brother in Mergentheim. In the autumn of 1841 Wuest
was offered a position as assistant Pfarrer in
Neunkirchen, near Mergentheim. Here his life
underwent a complete change; he devoted time and
effort to serious study and to preparation of sermons.
He actively participated in the associated school,
counselled the healthy, and visited the sick. In the
autumn of 1843 he became assistant in his home town
of Murrhardt, where he began associating with Pietists from Wuerttemburg. In 1844 he was
appointed assistant minister at Rietenau, near Backnang. That same year he came to experience,
through grace, forgiveness of sins and assurance of salvation. This, of course, directly affected his
Pfarrer Eduard Wuest [1818-1859]
37
message. He developed into a fiery preacher, espousing repentance and God’s free grace, and
deploring the lifestyle which had earlier harmed his own life. His pietistic zeal and his opposition
to some practices of the church, together with his willingness to counsel and preach well beyond
the specific borders of his parish, led to dismissal from his position at Rietenau. He moved to his
mother’s home in Stuttgart, and continued to serve in Pietistic circles of the region. He met a
Methodist minister, Wilhelm Nast from Cincinnati, Ohio, and for a time considered emigrating to
the United States.
Some of the Pietists from Wuerttemberg had moved to Ukraine in 1816 - 1822, settling
north of the Sea of Azov, along the Berda River. They established the villages of Neuhoffhung,
Neuhoffhungstal, Neustuttgart and Rosenfeld. In January of 1 845 the Neuhoffnung congregation,
a separatist Lutheran brotherhood, invited Wuest to be pastor, and he accepted. After some delays
and an arduous trip he delivered his inaugural sermon on September 28, 1 845. He presented Jesus
Christ the crucified, and emphasized repentance, with a personal commitment to the truth. The
church was packed. Among the many listeners were a number of Mennonites; they were impressed
by Wuest’s scriptural and authoritative preaching.
Wuest was in many ways a very talented man. He was tall and imposing, and quite
corpulent. He had a resonant, booming voice. He was friendly, and those who dealt with him
generally liked him. To his parishioners he was not the high and mighty Pfarrer, but a brother
among brothers. His sermons were fiery and lively, he often spoke loudly and pounded on the
pulpit. He used stories in his sermons, and at times asked the congregation to sing a verse or two
of a hymn. He frequently used humour, and was a master at getting the immediate attention of the
listener.
When Wuest travelled to Russia he was already engaged to a young lady from Stuttgart,
Pauline Liesching. She followed Eduard to Russia in 1 847, after which the couple was married.
Pauline was a pious woman, very much of the mindset of her husband. It was after her arrival that
the congregation sang in four part harmony, and mixed voice choirs were established. The couple
had one child, a boy, who died at an early age. Pauline, even to her last days, defended the efforts
of her husband. Despite being sickly for years, she died at a ripe old age, on Decemberl3, 1902.
The powerful Christian convictions of Wuest made either good friends or strong enemies
of those who came in contact with him. He exerted a strong influence on the surrounding
Mennonites, particularly in the neighbouring Molotschna Colony, and those living in Berdyansk.
As early as 1 846, and a number of times subsequently, he was invited to speak at missions festivals
in Gnadenfeld. These festivals drew not only the Gnadenfeld congregation, but also concerned
individuals from throughout the Molotschna. He was also involved in less formal meetings at the
homes of Molotschna Mennonites on Saturday afternoons, of Berdyansk Mennonites on Saturday
nights, where his contribution was devotional addresses and Bible exposition. His friends included
Jakob Buhler and Leonhard Sudermann of Berdyansk, August Lenzmann and Friedrich Lange of
Gnadenfeld and Abraham Matthies of Rudnerweide. Johann Claassen, Jakob Reimer and Jakob
Becker, later key figures in the establishment of the Mennonite Brethren Church, attended many
of his meetings. Becker reported that some people came to hear Wuest out of curiosity, but often
left the meetings asking the question “What must I do to be saved?”
Wuest was also invited to speak in surrounding Lutheran churches such as Grunau, and
even ministered in Catholic constituencies near Mariupol. In 1849 he made an extensive trip,
preaching in Kharkov, St. Petersburg and Reval. On at least one occasion he visited the Crimea.
But Wuest’s powerful and very specific preaching, as well as his popularity with the rank
and file of the congregations also aroused some opposition, perhaps fuelled to a considerable
degree by envy. In time Wuest was barred from preaching from the pulpits of the neighbouring
Lutheran and Mennonite churches as well as in private homes. This, however, did not stop him
38
from participating in the more unofficial devotional meetings, where he did not preach, but could
certainly answer questions.
A group within Wuest’s own congregation at Neuhoffnung exploited his emphasis on full
and free grace. Leader of this group was a former teacher from the Mariupol area named Kappes,
although there were also others, such as Joseph Hottmann. At a missions festival held in Rosenfeld
in 1 858 Kappes led his group out of the meeting, singing and shouting, in protest against Wuest’s
more moderate position. Kappes and his group withdrew from membership in the Neuhoffnung
chinch in 1858. This group influenced some of the Mennonites who later became founders of the
Mennonite Brethren Church, and particularly through Wilhelm Bartel seem to have contributed to
the early emotional excesses practiced by the Brethren.
Wuest was not a man with a profound and completely defined theology. Abraham Kroeker
felt that his message regarding repentance and salvation was well presented , but that other
scriptural truths were neglected. In his own congregation he definitely preached who was and who
was not in the kingdom of God, but for the communion table he did not distinguish between
believers and unbelievers. Like Luther, he could not bring himself to reject child baptism. Elder
August Lenzmann of the Gnadenfeld Mennonite Church summed up his impressions “Pfarrer
Wuest was undoubtedly a very talented, exceptional and blessed weapon in the hands of God... to
the glory of God I acknowledge the memories of our brotherly fellowship.” He did lament that
Wuest had gone overboard on “the free grace of God in Christ,” feeling that it may not have been
the best nourishment for the uninitiated masses. There is no doubt, however, that Wuest played a
significant role in the revival movement among the Mennonites in the mid nineteenth century,
specifically influencing those who would later found the Mennonite Brethren Church in 1860, and
those who led the Templar movement a few years later.
Wuest was aware of some of his own shortcomings, but was nonetheless disappointed in
the reactions of many of his colleagues. In the autumn of 1858 he became ill, and in the spring of
1 859 he took to his bed. His wife later reported that he had serious struggles, but eventually, in the
last few days, was able to have a sense of victory and joy. Eduard Wuest died on July 13, 1 859 at
the age of 41 years. His funeral was held the following Sunday, and was attended by a large
number of Swabians, Russians and Mennonites, many travelling great distances. He was buried
in the Neuhoffnung cemetery.
The opponents of Wuest attributed his premature death to the judgement of God, his friends
considered it to be deliverance from tribulation. Writer and publisher Abraham Kroeker
commented “His memorial is the blessing he has been, and his work will not vanish. We thank the
Lord, who brought him to Russia in such a wonderful way."
Sources:
Brandenburg, Hans, Eduard Wuest: Ein Bote Korntals in Suedrussland, Evangelischer
Missionsverlag GmbH, Stuttgart, Germany, 1955, pp 1-16
Doerksen, Victor G. Eduard Wuest and Jerusalem, Mennonite Quarterly Review, April 1982
pp 169-178
Friesen, P. M., pp 168-186
Kroeker, A. Pfarrer Eduard Wuest: der grosse Erweckungsprediger in den deutschen Kolonien
Suedrusslands, Selbstverlag, Spat near Simferopol, Russia, 1903, pp 1-116
Mennonite Encyclopedia
Toews, J. A., pp 29-32
Mennonites traditionally called Eduard Wuest “Pfarrer.” In Wuerttemberg he was an assistant
only; whether or not he was actually called a “Pfarrer” in Neuhoffiiung is not certain.
39
ELDER AUGUST LENZMANN
[1823 - 1877]
August Lenzmann was bom January 29, 1 823 , in Brenkenhofswalde, Prussia. His parents
were originally Lutheran, but they, together with some others, joined the local Mennonite church.
The local pastor was Wilhelm Lange. The Lenzmann family joined the migration when the group
settled in the Molotschna, founding the village of Gnadenfeld. August’s teacher, both in
Brenkenhofswalde and later in Gnadenfeld was Heinrich Franz.
August was baptized on May 27, 1837. He was elected minister in 185 1, chosen as elder
by a large majority in May of 1854, then ordained by Elder Bernhard Fast of the Ohrloff
congregation in September. Fast considered Lenzmann to have been a pious, humble brother, who
based his faith and hope on Jesus Christ. Lenzmann and Nikolai Schmidt, together with others such
as Johann Claassen, were sponsors of a Bruderschule [Brotherhood School] which was founded
in Gnadenfeld in 1857. This allowed education beyond the primary village school, and in 1859
acquired the right to train teachers.
Initially the church had met in the village school, but in 1854, the year Lenzmann was
ordained as elder, the congregation moved into a new sanctuary.
When the winds of revival and reform began to blow in Gnadenfeld, Lenzmann seemed at
first to be favourably disposed to renewal of life in the church. He was a friend of Eduard Wuest.
In a note penned in 1 863 he could say “Pfarrer Wuest was undoubtedly a very talented, exceptional
and blessed weapon in the hands of God., .to the glory of God I acknowledge the memories of our
brotherly fellowship...” He did lament that Wuest went overboard on “the free grace of God in
Christ,” feeling that it may not have been the best nourishment for the uninitiated masses.
Those in the Gnadenfeld congregation who were
agitating for reform, such as Johann Claassen and Jacob
Reimer, thought well enough of Lenzmann to ask him to
administer additional communion in their private homes. He
denied the request, later stating that he considered such a
request to be without historical precedent, that it would foster
a spirit of pride, and could cause disunity in the church. The
latter fear turned out to be well founded.
In late November, 1859, a group of believers met in
Elisabetthal in the home of Komelius Wiens. Without the
consent of Lenzmann communion was held, Abraham
Comelsen in charge. News of this event spread rapidly, and
the members of the Flemish Church which had been present
were immediately put under the ban. The six Gnadenfeld
members were asked to appear before the ministers of the
church, a meeting undoubtedly chaired by Lenzmann. They
were asked to, and consented to submit in “all things not
contrary to the Word of God and their conscience.” It appears
that the ministers and Lenzmann would have been satisfied
with this arrangement. There was, however, an extremely
critical and vocal element in the Gnadenfeld congregation which demanded more action.
There were two church membership meetings, on December 19 and 27, 1859, chaired by
Lenzmann, in which the matter of the unofficial communion was discussed. At the meeting of
'I
Elder August Lenzmann
[1823-1877]
40
December 27 stormy discussion came to a climax when someone shouted “Away with them, they
are no better than the others.” Jakob Reimer slowly went to the front of the church, and asked
Elder Lenzmann if he could leave. Lenzmann reluctantly gave his consent. Jakob Reimer, Johann
Claassen and about ten others left the meeting. This meeting, likely as painful to Lenzmann as to
those who left, led to the formation of the Mennonite Brethren Church. When the elders of the
Molotschna Mennonite churches condemned the secession of the Mennonite Brethren at their
meeting in Alexanderwohl of January 18,1 860, Lenzmann was among the majority of five to sign
the document.
Virtually at the same time Elder Lenzmann, as one of the leading elders in the Molotschna
Colony, was involved in trying to settle the Ohrloffer Gerstenstreit. This began as a simple dispute
over a piece of land which had been rented to one man, who had sowed barley [ Gerste ] on it. The
owner then rented the land to someone else. This resulted in accusations and counteraccusations
involving the village authorities and the various officials of the Ohrloff church. Eventually a series
of meetings was held, beginning in 1859, involving in particular Elders Benjamin Ratzlaff, Peter
Wedel and August Lenzmann. A number of lengthy letters and reports to and from the elders
travelled back and forth throughout 1860. In late 1860 the matter was turned over to the
Fuersorgekomitee in Odessa for resolution.
Lenzmann had further problems in his own congregation. Johann Lange, one of the
teachers at the Bruderschule, held to and spread the views of the “Friends of Jerusalem” or
“Temple” movement. Again there was a long drawn out struggle with religious and civil
authorities, resulting in Lange’s imprisonment in Halbstadt in 1863. Eventually 20 Mennonites
signed a document organizing the Evangelische Gemeinde of Gnadenfeld, which was the beginning
of the Templer church.
The two experiences of breakaways from his own church seem to have embittered
Lenzmann. This gradually drove him into the fold of the sharpest critics of his former intimate
friends, brothers with whom he initially seemed to agree. In an attempt at reconciliation the
Mennonite Brethren Church sent Elder Abraham Schellenberg to visit Lenzmann early in the
1870s. Lenzmann attacked Schellenberg on the basis of his youth, and reminded him of the
foolish, even sinful behaviour of some of the early Mennonite Brethren. He was moved to tears of
anger. Schellenberg was also moved to tears. He replied that he himself had been insulted, and that
the accusations about the church had been dealt with, and did not apply to the current membership.
Thereupon Lenzmann replied “Then please forgive me, if I unjustly insulted you.” This was
followed by a friendly invitation for coffee.
Little is known of Lenzmann’ s private life, but he did have a son Hermann who became
a leading educator among the Mennonites of the Molotschna. After an illness of a number of years
August Lenzmann died on July 30, 1877. Historian P. M. Friesen was impressed by Lenzmann ’s
personality, as being honourable and trustworthy. He considered him to have been one of the
leading elders of the Russian Mennonite period.
Sources:
Friesen, P. M., pp 171, 173-186, 218, 219, 743
Isaac, Franz, Die Molotschnaer Mennoniten, H. J. Braun, Halbstadt, Russia, 1908, pp 123-155
Mennonite Encyclopedia
Toews, J. A. pp 29, 32, 33, 39
41
JOHANN CLAASSEN
[1820- 1876]
Johann Claassen [Klaassen] was bom in Ohrlofferfelde, near Tiegenhof in West Prussia
on July 27, 1820. His parents were David and Aganetha [Penner] Klaassen. His father died in
Prussia in 1827. Very shortly thereafter the family, via covered wagon, migrated to South Russia.
The Klaassens, consisting of the mother, Johann, and at least two older brothers, settled on a
Kleinwirtschaft in the village of Liebenau, Molotschna. At the age of 14 Johann went to the
Halbstadt Zentralschule, graduating at the age of 18. Several summers he worked for Johann
Comies, going on buying and selling trips to Melitopol, Berdyansk and Simferopol. One summer
he managed the sheep of Johann Comies. A year after graduation he and Cornelius Reimer opened
a store in Liebenau, Cornelius was the clerk, Johann the wholesaler.
Johann was a member of the Gnadenfeld Mennonite Church, and shared the excitement
when new spiritual life became evident. He was particularly enthusiastic about the Lutheran
Pfarrer Eduard Wuest after he arrived in 1 845, who inspired Lutherans, but also Mennonites in the
area, especially in the Molotschna. Johann was one of those who participated in the founding of
the Bruderschule in Gnadenfeld in 1857. It was to be a school which would offer better Christian
training beyond the village school level, with special attention to gifted orphans. Claassen twice
travelled to St. Petersburg to obtain recognition for the school as a teacher training institution for
the Mennonites.
There continued to be agitation, inspired in part by
the preaching and teaching of Eduard Wuest, for renewal of
spiritual life in the Gnadenfeld Mennonite Church. In late
November of 1859 communion was held in the home of
Komelius Wiens of Elisabetthal, with Abraham Comelsen in
charge. When the elders heard of this meeting, the Flemish
participants were immediately put under the ban. The
Gnadenfeld members were reproved for their conduct, but
not expelled.
But this was not enough for the more critical element
of the Gnadenfeld congregation. At meetings held
December 1 9 and 27, 1 859, the whole new movement came
under attack. Although neither had been at the private
communion in question, Johann Claassen and Jakob Reimer
were singled out for special scorn. At the December 27
meeting some members shouted “Away with them, they are
no better than the others.” Jakob Reimer slowly walked up
to the front and asked Elder Lenzmann if he could leave.
Presumably Johann Claassen joined him in this painful trek.
When it seemed that only Reimer and Claassen would leave
the meeting, Heinrich Franz, who had opposed Claassen in matters regarding the Bruderschule ,
challenged Claassen “You are otherwise a courageous man; why don’t you call on your associates
to follow you?” Claassen turned and said “Well brethren, whoever is like minded, come along.”
About ten arose and left the church.
After consultinganumberofpeopleClaassen called on Abraham Comelsen, school teacher
in Elisabetthal, and the two agreed that Comelsen would write the letter of secession, and Claassen
Johann Claassen [1820-1876]
42
would call a brotherhood meeting for Epiphany, January 6, 1 860. At the meeting held in the home
of Isaak Koop of Elisabetthal the letter of secession was carefully studied, and after serious and
prolonged prayer was signed by 18 family heads, including Johann Claassen.
Johann Claassen, Abraham Comelsen and Jakob Koop were chosen as deputies for the new
brotherhood. The original letter from the dissenting group had gone to the elders of the Molotschna
Mennonite churches, but in a meeting of January 18, the matter was turned over to the colony
administrator, David Friesen. He immediately demanded an accounting from the three
representatives. Their explanation of the need to form their own church, because the present
teachers did not act according to the Word of God, fell on deaf ears. On January 27 the Gebietsamt
forbade religious meetings by the Brethren. The three deputies were called to the
Fuersorgekomitee by Inspector Andrea. There Claassen, Comelsen and Koop signed a prepared
statement on February 10, promising to refrain from further action until they received permission
from government authorities. Even on the way home Claassen realized that this permission would
never be granted, and he recognized that signing the document had been a mistake.
The three brothers who had signed the document for Inspector Andrea did not play an
active role in the specific organization of the church for some time, to be able to honestly fulfill
their promise, but others were not similarly restrained. Johann, having made the acquaintance of
government officials in the past, went to St. Petersburg in an attempt to obtain official sanction for
the new group. He was afraid that his departure would be hindered by the colony authorities, so
he left by horse, through his back garden, at 2 AM early on the morning of March 29.
Having achieved very little, Claassen returned home and advised the brethren to hold an
election, but to exclude himself and the other two representatives. The election, held in the home
of Jakob Reimer on May 30, resulted in Heinrich Huebert and Jakob Becker being chosen to lead.
At the end of November, 1 860, Johann returned to St. Petersburg in a further attempt to obtain
recognition for the brotherhood. Finally on May 15, 1862, he presented a petition to the Czar, and
received assurance that “ecclesiastical separation shall in no case incur a loss of civil rights or
persecution by police authorities.” He hurried home with the good news.
It had been felt for some time that it might be better for Mennonite Brethren to establish
their own colony. On June 30 Johann turned right around, and with five other brethren went back
to St. Petersburg to seek suitable land in the Caucasus region. He therefore became one of the
founders of the Kuban settlement. On a tract of 6,500 dessiatines the village of Wohldemfuerst was
established in 1863, although official permission to settle was not granted until March 4, 1864.
Another village, Alexanderfeld, was founded in 1866.
Some historians feel that it was unfortunate that Claassen did not play a more active role
in the early years of the Mennonite Brethren, first because of the promise he had signed , then
because of his prolonged trips to St. Petersburg. He returned to the Molotschna on a number of
occasions, both from St. Petersburg and from the Kuban to help settle the controversy of the
emotional excesses of the “joyful” faction. It may not have become a controversy if his steadying
hand had been more readily available.
On July 20, 1865, he returned to the Kuban, where both he and Heinrich Huebert had
moved. In 1869 he was elected Oberschulze of the colony. In this capacity he travelled to
Vladikavkas in 1 87 1 to a reception of Czar Alexander II. Later he received a silver medal in 1 872,
and a gold medal in 1874. He also received a gold watch from the government in recognition of
his services to the colonization of Russia.
Johann had married Katharina Reimer [daughter of David Reimer of Felsenthal, sister of
Jakob Reimer, later Johann’s co-worker in the Mennonite Brethren Church], the wedding being on
January 31, 1847. He was 26 at the time, she 21 years. The Claassen couple had a total of ten
43
children, of whom at least six died in infancy or early childhood. David, bom in 1855, lived to be
70, Maria, bom in 1860 reached the age of 16. Wife Katharina died July 25, 1869 in the Kuban
Colony. Johann married again, to Catharina Schmidt, on March 1, 1870. She was 1 8 years of age
[he was 49], and bom in the Chortitza Colony. The couple had five additional children, only one
dying in early childhood, the rest reaching ages of 21 to 39.
Johann Claassen died December 24, 1 876 in Wohldemfuerst, Kuban Colony, at the age of
56. His second wife Catharine outlived him by 38 years, dying in Com, Oklahoma, in 1915.
Historian P. M. Friesen rated Johann Claassen very' highly, considering him to have been one of
the great contributors to the cause of the Mennonites in Russia.
Sources:
Friesen, P. M„ pp 293, 297-303, 334-374
Klassen, Elizabeth Suderman, Trailblazer for the Brethren, Herald Press, Scottdale, USA, and
Kitchener, Canada, 1978, pp 13-306
Mennonite Encyclopedia
Mennonite Historical Atlas, pp 19, 119
Toews, J. A., pp 29, 33, 35, 40, 44-49, 52, 53, 55, 56, 59, 60, 62-64, 75, 76, 366
JAKOB DAVID REIMER
[1817-1891]
Jakob David Reimer was bom on January 29, 1817, in Kronsgarten, in the Ekaterinoslav
area. He was the son of David Peter and Maria [Neufeld] Reimer, and the eldest of six children.
Katharina, the next oldest, bom in 1825, was later wife of Johann Claassen, and Cornelius, bom
in 1827, was also an early Mennonite Brethren. In 1 820, when Jakob was three, the family moved
to Felsenthal, an estate which his father developed as a tree nursery, along the Molochnaya River.
He was a close friend of his teacher at Felsenthal, Heinrich Franz I, and followed him to
Gnadenfeld for one year, likely 1835.
In Gnadenfeld Jakob was admitted to the Mennonite Church by baptism. He would have
preferred the mode of immersion, rather than sprinkling or pouring, having been convinced of this
in 1837 by a biography he read about the life of the famous missionary, Ann Judson. Jakob was
an active participating member of the congregation. Together with Elder August Lenzmann,
Johann Claassen and others he was one of the sponsors of the Bruderschule which was established
in Gnadenfeld in 1857. He later also sponsored the Armenschule.
Jakob was inspired by the revival preaching of Eduard Wuest in the late 1840s, and
promoted it on an extensive trip he made throughout South Russia with Johann Claassen and
Wilhelm Bartel in 1853. He attended Missionfests in Gnadenfeld and Neuhoffnung, where Wuest
often spoke. He was a regular attender at Saturday afternoon meetings held in Molotschna homes,
and wrote that the purpose was “to strengthen one another in our common faith, and to exhort each
other to walk and work worthy of our position as members of the body of Christ.” These meetings
were often attended by Wuest, even after he was banned from preaching; he could not preach, but
did answer questions. The number of those wishing for revival grew, together with the desire for
more intimate fellowship . Reimer was among those who requested that Elder Lenzmann administer
communion to their group “as our fellowship based itself more and more upon the Word of God.”
The request was denied.
Some believers met in late November, 1859, in Elisabetthal, in the home of Komelius
Wiens, and participated in communion, Abraham Comelsen in charge. When news of the event
spread, the six Flemish church members who had participated were put under the ban, the
Gnadenfeld members were reproved. However at Gnadenfeld membership meetings of December
19 and 27, the whole new movement was attacked, and even though they had not been present at
the controversial communion, Jakob Reimer and Johann Claassen came in for particularly heavy
criticism. At the December 27 meeting some members shouted “Away with them, they are no
better than the others.” Jakob Reimer slowly walked up to the front and asked Elder Lenzmann if
he could leave. Lenzmann reluctantly gave his consent. Eventually Jakob, Johann Claassen and
about ten others left the meeting.
As a result of this episode Johann Claassen organized a meeting of the fellowship for
Epiphany, January 6, 1860, where a letter of secession was studied, and signed by those who
wished to. Claassen and 17 other family heads signed this document, but not Jakob Reimer. It is
quite evident, however, that he was part of the original group. He was one of the 33 who signed
an explanatory note directed to the church hierarchy dated March 19, 1860.
When, having signed a document that they would not proceed further without government
consent, the three representatives of the group, including Johann Claassen, felt that they could not
participate in church governance. But there needed to be some leadership, so an election was
45
called. It appears that Jakob Reimer, perhaps through his association with Felsenthal, was probably
quite wealthy, and had one of the larger houses in Gnadenfeld. The election of May 30, 1860 was
held in his house, and church services were held in his house and Scheune [machine shed]. Jakob
was among the 27 brethren who cast ballots on the leadership, each person having two votes. He
voted for Heinrich Huebert [who became elder, having 24 votes], and Andreas Voth [ who was not
chosen, coming third with 1 1 votes]. Some time later, in 1 863, it became evident that Jakob Becker
[who was second with 16 votes], could not continue, so Jakob Reimer was chosen to assist Heinrich
Huebert.
A question which was not initially controversial became more and more of an issue over
the next few years. Jakob Reimer had felt all along since his baptism into the Mennonite Church
that immersion was the preferred form. This was also the practice of some of the Baptist churches.
For further research Jakob Becker and Reimer discussed this mode with Minister Alf, senior of the
German Baptist preachers in Russia. Increasingly, immersion became the preferred method of
baptism among the Mennonite Brethren. On September 23, 1860, Jakob Becker and Heinrich
Bartel baptized each other. In the spring of 1 86 1 full immersion baptism was favoured, with
Heinrich Huebert being baptized, then Jakob Reimer on May 21. By 1 862 immersion baptism was
considered to be obligatoiy for church membership and participation in communion. Because they
did not agree with this new development, four of the original 1 8 who signed the letter of secession
withdrew from the Mennonite Brethren.
A more distressing and damaging struggle was the
question of “ Die Froehliche Richtung”[The Happy or Joyful
Faction]. There had been segments of Wuest’s church with
these leanings, and Wilhelm Bartel helped to introduce this
tendency among the Mennonite Brethren. In the absence of
Johann Claassen [who was in St. Petersburg for extended
periods of time], and with the weak leadership of Heinrich
Huebert, a group led by Benjamin Becker, Bernhard Penner and
Gerhard Wieler became virtual dictators. They introduced
joyful loud music, dancing and kissing [both the brother and the
sister kiss], and generally tended to be very emotional. Jakob all
along was very critical of this group, and let it be known. In a
letter to Johann Claassen he complained “I will no longer
tolerate the kind of noise [Laerm] which occurred in my
machine shed on Sunday, May 28. ..I stay away from the large
gatherings because I am uncomfortable there... and am convinced
it is not the Pharisee that warns me against such heathen
activities, but the Word of God.” The movement gathered
momentum autumn 1861 to spring 1862, then again in 1863 and 1864. The leaders of the
Froehliche Richtung used the ban [excommunication] as a threat, and “gave people over to the
Devil.” They burned Christian books that they did not agree with. Then they took discipline a step
further, according to Reimer “even the non-participation in the expressions of joy, which developed
into formal dancing, and wild music with kettle drums was cause for excommunication, because
silence also preaches.” It seems that even Johann Claassen at times thought Jakob was too critical
of the movement, although in her letters his own wife seemed to agree with Reimer. In December
of 1 864 Jakob, his wife and daughter were excommunicated without a hearing, even Elder Heinrich
Huebert was set aside.
Finally, enough was enough. Some of the Molotschna brethren called Johann Claasen from
Jakob Reimer [1817-1891]
46
the Kuban, and together, for two and a half months [May 4 to July 20, 1865], the situation was
discussed. The “June Reform” was the result. It condemned and rectified many of the excesses of
the “wild manifestations of joy,” and reinstated Heinrich Huebert, Jakob Reimer and others who
had been wrongfully excommunicated. It was felt by historian P. M. Friesen that after the work
of this reform neither Johann Claassen nor Jakob Reimer regained their former influence within
the Mennonite Brethren Church. He does credit Reimer with being the one who broke up the wave
of the “Hoppers” [Huepferei], despite the fact that the wave tried to, and almost succeeded in
destroying him.
In the meantime Reimer had participated in the exploration of the Kuban area in August
of 1 862 as a potential colony site for the Mennonite Brethren. On June 3, 1864 he and his family
left for the Kuban on three wagons, arriving there on June 20. Circumstances were very difficult.
They moved their belongings into a simlin [a sod hut], then started to work. In a letter written July
5 it is obvious that the Reimers were discouraged. Among the difficulties was the feeling that his
relationship with Johann Claassen was not the best “...for he was too domineering.” September 16
the Reimers packed up and headed for home, arriving back October 7, 1864.
Very soon thereafter the Reimers moved to Friedensfeld, near Andreasfeld, where they
rented land. Then they helped found Blumenau, which was also near Andreasfeld, where they first
rented, then owned land.
On July 4, 1865, after Reimer had already left the Molotschna, he and a number of other
brothers were invited back to a conference to be held in Ladekopp. There he met privately with
Johann Claassen, and they had a reconciliation, both privately and about church matters. There was
a general time of prayer and forgiving. This was soon after the “June Reform,” so the various
excommunicated members were likely restored to the church, including Reimer.
Reimer also participated in the first foreign mission festival held by the Mennonite
Brethren, in Neu-Halbstadt, in the spring of 1 867. At the festival a young man expressed a desire
to be baptized, and Jakob Reimer was asked to preside. The baptism was held in the Molochnaya
River at Halbstadt. The young man’s father complained to the Molotschna elders, and then to the
government authorities, but in time the furor died down. In a few years the father and his whole
family became members of the Mennonite Brethren Church.
Generally Reimer travelled less and less in his latter years, but in October of 1875 he and
Abraham Unger visited the Kuban. After having covered the 900 verst distance by train they spent
their time preaching and visiting homes.
In 1880 Reimer left Blumenau, likely because the village was disintegrating. He
established Wiesenfeld, together with his sons, his son-in-law and a number of brethren from
Chortitza. This village was also near Andreasfeld, in the Pavlograd area, Ekaterinoslav Province,
15 verst from the railroad station Saizevo on the Sevastopol line. Here he worked quietly, ever
striving to establish a gentle, milder brotherhood, “Where everything rotates around the centre,
Jesus Christ.” In 1885 Wiesenfeld was listed as an affiliate of the Einlage church, the congregation
worshipping in the school.
Jakob kept a diary during the formative years of the Mennonite Brethren Church, which
P. M. Friesen considered to be a very accurate and surprisingly dispassionate portrayal of events.
Reimer likely participated in the 25 year celebrations of the Mennonite Brethren Church held in
1885, writing a summary of the history for the occasion. At this time neither of these documents
has been found, although many passages of the diary are directly quoted by P. M. Friesen.
In 1886 P. M. Friesen visited Reimer in Wiesenfeld. They had a long intimate visit
wandering through the garden, where there were many interesting trees; Reimer described them as
his “children” which never disappointed him.
47
Jakob Reimer married Wilhelmine Augustine Strauss on February 16, 1 839 in Gnadenfeld.
She was daughter of Gottlieb Strauss, one of the early members of the Mennonite Brethren Church.
Roughly at the same time Jakob acquired a Vollwirtschaft [full farm] in Gnadenfeld. The couple
had 12 children, ten sons and two daughters. At least three sons died in early childhood [two of
them named David]. Their fourth child and eldest daughter, Maria, was bom on February 24, 1 844.
She married Johann Franz Martens, starting a family tree which now has numerous descendants in
Canada. The accounts of the founding of Wiesenfeld mention Jakob establishing it together with
his sons and son-in-law, so he must have had at least two sons who survived into adulthood and
who moved with him. The Reimers were quite hospitable - early Mennonite Brethren functions
are sometimes mentioned as being in their house or Scheune. In Wiesenfeld Wilhelmine also
invited women to their home to pray for, and make items to help the poor.
Twelve days before his death Jakob was visited by Elder Aron Lepp and four other leading
brethren from the Einlage church, brothers with whom he had worked in the Kingdom of God for
25 years. They had a meaningful discussion and celebrated communion with him and members of
his family. Jakob David Renner died on November 13, 1891 in Wiesenfeld, at the age of 74. His
wife had died two years earlier, November 11, 1889. P. M. Friesen commented that Reimer never
did find the ideal he was looking for through the secession of 1 860, but had, despite there being
some rough edges, learned to love many of the brothers with whom he had disagreed.
Sources:
Friesen, P. M., pp 86, 87, 169, 201, 225, 232-234, 236, 241, 242, 295, 296, 336, 345, 348, 362,
364, 367, 368, 377, 388-392, 403, 404, 420, 439, 449, 450
Hubbard, Ethel Daniels, Ann of Ava, Friendship Press, New York, USA, 1941
This is the story of the Ann Hasseltine Judson [1789-1826], missionary to Burma.
The German version of the story must have details about her life not included in this
English biography. In Ann of Ava there is absolutely no mention of baptism in
any form, either in her personal life or on the mission field.
Loewen, Harry, Echos of Drumbeats: The Movement of Exuberance Among the Mennonite
Brethren, Journal of Mennonite Studies, 1985, pp 1 18-127
Mennonite Encyclopedia
Pauls, Hugo [great-great-grandson of Jakob Reimer], Pauls Family Tree and Archives
Peters, Alan, Brotherhood and Family: Implications of Kinship in Mennonite Brethren History,
in P. M. Friesen & his History, edited by Abraham Friesen, Center for Mennonite
Brethren Studies, Fresno, USA, 1979, pp 41, 42
Reimer, J. C., Wiesenfelder Missionsstunden, Mennonitische Rundschau, 25 March 1953, pp 2, 3
Toews, J. A., pp 31-33, 52, 55, 59, 60, 62, 64, 366
Gottlieb Strauss, the father of Jakob Reimer’s wife, Wilhelmine, was one of the early members
of the Mennonite Brethren Church, signing the explanatory letter to the Molotschna elders on
March 19, 1860. He originally lived in Prussia and was a Lutheran.. It is mentioned that in his
earlier years he was in the Prussian army under the command of General Bluecher, fighting
against the French. Bluecher’s Prussian army played a significant role in the outcome of the
Battle of Waterloo. It is quite possible that Gottlieb Strauss fought in that battle!
48
10. INTER-MENNONITE FAITH CONFERENCE
IN RUECKENAU
SEPTEMBER 6, 1875
Various Mennonite groups were invited to attend a conference to be held in
Rueckenau, Molotschna on September 6, 1875. Elder Abraham Schellenberg of the
Rueckenau congregation of the Mennonite Brethren seems to have organized the
conference. It was meant to discuss a number of items concerning the faith on a Biblical
basis.
The Mennonite Brethren church building was filled to capacity with “brethren”
from various Molotschna churches and even some from the Chortitza Colony. Besides
Mennonite Brethren other church leaders mentioned attending were teacher and evangelist
Bernhard Harder of the Ohrloff-Halbstadt Mennonite Church, and Abraham Peters of
Friedensruh, who several years later travelled to central Asia with Klaas Epp. Ministers
Richert and Gaeddert of the Alexanderwohl Mennonite Church, while considered by the
reporter to be true believers, were not present.
The principle of discussing various tenets of faith in a calm and kind manner was
adhered to; the conversations were not in a contentious or confrontational tone. Under the
leadership of Elder Abraham Schellenberg a number of subjects were broached, and
conclusions reached. The topics were basically the burning issues of the day.
Prayer was discussed at some length. Should it be audible or silent? What form
should prayer take? May women pray at public meetings? The reporter mentions the
questions asked, but strangely does not inform the reader [and now more than a century
later, us] of the conclusions reached!
Baptism was also discussed. Having been a contentious issue since the time of the
Reformation, it still remained a point on which Mennonite groups disagreed. The brethren
tried, on the basis of God’s will as expressed in the Word, to come to the unbiased truth.
The conclusion seems to have been that it is essential to be baptized upon belief in the Lord
Jesus Christ, and to follow the practices of the apostles. One could not prove the opposite
from the Word of God.
After considerable further discussion Bernhard Harder got up , and presumably
addressing those from his own Mennonite Church said roughly as follows: “What do you
think, my brothers? Should the Lord actually wish us to be baptized in a river, would we
then not consent to do it? I for my part would be willing. What do you think?” To
observers it seemed that the participants were not taking Harder’s remarks to heart,
although a number did take his admonition seriously. Some of those present did become
convinced of the validity of baptism on confession of faith, for when in 1876 a total of 80
people were baptized and joined the Mennonite Brethren Church, among them were many
who had attended the conference. Bernhard Harder himself, however, remained a member
of the Mennonite Church. While not directly stated in the reports it appears obvious that
the principal arguments presented at the conference favoured baptism on confession of
faith, the mode being immersion in running water. This would be in direct opposition to
automatic baptism at a certain age [often just before marriage, since the church did not
49
marry non-members], with the mode of sprinkling, as practiced by the Mennonite Church.
At the end of the conference it was decided to organize another similar event for
November 29 that same year. One reporter, Abraham Unger, from the Einlage Mennonite
Brethren Church, could see no harm in these conferences for his church for, he mused,
“through the way of love truth must prevail, and the Word of God is truth.”
Sources:
Friesen, P. M., pp 409, 410
Toews, J. A., p 82
Background Information:
Elder Abraham Schellenberg [see Parting of Ways]
Bernhard Elarder
50
BERNHARD HARDER
[1832- 1884]
Participant in the Inter-Mennonite Faith
Conference in Rueckenau
Bernhard Harder was bom in Halbstadt on March 25, 1832, the eighth of nine children of
Abraham and Marie Harder. His father died when he was eleven years of age, so his mother made
a strong impression on him in his early years, but also throughout his life. The family was likely
landless, living on the edge of poverty. As a child Bernhard felt the call to teach and preach,
sometimes practicing his preaching techniques on unwilling playmates.
At the age of ten Bernhard entered the newly established Zentralschule in Halbstadt. Since
his family was poor, he was a “church pupil,” that is, he was educated at public expense. One of
his teachers, Johann Voth, encouraged his interest in poetry by sometimes allowing him to do his
written assignments in poetic form. Rather than fighting a bully. Teacher Voth suggested that
Bernhard write a poem about him. This was then read in class. Despite his often negative
experiences at the school, he graduated in six years, then was appointed apprentice secretary at the
Gebietsamt [county office]. He needed to do this to repay his free education by serving the
community.
Bernhard finally achieved his dreams when he was appointed as teacher, a profession he
followed for 26 years. His postings included Juschanlee, Halbstadt, Blumstein [twice], Friedensruh
and Alexanderwohl. Bernhard’s teaching skills may not have been exceptional, but his relationship
with students was excellent. He is described as having a progressive attitude and a lively, yet
spiritual orientation. He was trusting, sometimes naive, making discipline a problem in his classes.
In 1860, during the time Bernhard was teacher at
Halbstadt, he was elected as minister by the Halbstadt-Ohrloff
Mennonite Church. The final vote between ministerial candidates
was a tie, the successful Bernard being chosen by lot. He accepted
his position with enthusiasm. He was influenced in his theology
and preaching techniques by Elder Bernhard Fast, Ludwig
Hofacker [he memorized at least ten of his sermons], and Pfarrer
Eduard Wuest. Wuest had a particular influence on Bernhard,
playing a role in his original conversion around 1850, then later
being an example of preaching methods to be emulated. Bernhard
had no official religious training, but read extensively in theology
and church history; he read devotional material and literature
pertaining to preaching. He broke with the tradition of reading
prescribed sermons, often shifting into Low German as he ignored
the text and spoke with enthusiasm from the heart. He preached
with his entire being, and with a thundering voice. He travelled
widely throughout the Mennonite colonies, bringing his message
of salvation to many a soul. Historian P. M. Friesen described his preaching as “very convincing,
with soaring poetry , infused with burning love for the Saviour and the sinner.” Friesen considered
him to be the greatest evangelist and pulpit orator the Mennonites in Russia had produced.
Bernhard’s contribution to the spiritual life of the Mennonites, he thought, was comparable to that
of Johann Comies in the economic realm.
There were, however, some critics. The Mennonite Church [ Kirchliche ] did not appreciate
Bernhard Harder
[1832-1884]
51
his strong evangelistic thrust, and his frequent defence of the Mennonite Brethren positions, while
the Mennonite Brethren wondered why he did not join them! The faith conference held in
Rueckenau in 1875 illustrates this seeming paradox, where he basically seemed to agree with the
Mennonite Brethren on the discussion of baptism, but did not leave his own church because of this.
In 1872 Bernhard gave up teaching to be a full time travelling evangelist, supported by a
group of friends. Then he again taught school for three years in Alexanderwohl, after which he was
secretary of the Gebietsamt from 1 879 to 1 880. He taught Bible for one year in his old alma mater,
the Halbstadt Zentrals chide, before beginning another stint as travelling evangelist. During this
time four months of each year were spent contributing to his own congregation in Halbstadt. He
also visited Mennonites in far flung areas, the Volga region in 1868 and Prussia in 1873.
Bernhard periodically represented Mennonites in various capacities. In 1867 and again in
1882 he went to St. Petersburg, dealing with Mennonite emigration to Turkestan. In 1879, when
he was with the Gebietsamt, he twice went to Odessa to speak to Count Eduard von Totleben about
Mennonite alternative service.
Probably Bernhard’s most unique contribution, however, was his writing. He was prolific,
writing literally hundreds of poems for special occasions such as birthdays and family celebrations.
He also penned serious poetry reflecting his joys and sorrows, his spiritual journey and his hopes.
His literary output included many songs. He did not compose music, but would write the words
with a specific melody in mind. Much of his work, 539 poems and 584 songs, was collected and
edited by Heinrich Franz. It was published in 1888 under the title “ Geistliche Lieder und
GelegenheitsgedichteG His son Peter also collected and edited a collection of 2 1 3 songs, published
as uKleines Liederbuch. Geistliche Gelegenheitslieder in 1902. The “Gesangbuch der
Mennoniten Bruedergemeinde ,” published in 1955, still included eleven of Bernhard’s songs, all
for special occasions. Six were in the “Engagement” section, four were for weddings, and the best
known, “Z)/e Zeit ist kurz, o Mensch, sei weise! "[Time is short, o soul be wise] is for funerals.
Bernhard married Katharina Boschmann on March 16, 1854. The couple had eleven
children, four of whom predeceased him. Economics was not Bernhard’s strong point, so the
family most often lived with meagre resources. Being somewhat naive, he sometimes gave away
what the family actually needed for sustenance! Katharina died in 1878 at the age of 46, and the
following year Bernhard married Helena Ewert. This union was blessed with three additional
daughters. Helena proved to be a good household manager, so the finances of the family improved
somewhat. Bernhard’s children included Gerhard, who later wrote a biography of his father, and
Peter, an author on his own right, who published a book of Bernhard’s songs.
Bernhard continued working right to the end. He held an evangelistic campaign lasting a
week in the Sagradovka Colony, preaching three times a day, often at different places each day.
He returned home by steamship on September 27, 1884, ill with pneumonia. He died a few days
later, on October 1, at the age of 52. Friends erected a monument in Bernhard’s honour in the Neu-
Halbstadt cemetery. One side had a black cross on a massive base with the inscription “Faith,
Hope, Love.” This was a fitting encapsulation of Bernhard Harder’s life.
Sources:
Friesen, P. M., pp 87, 138, 139, 409, 410, 711, 743-754
Gesangbuch der Mennoniten Bruedergemeinde, 1955, Songs number 453, 482, 484, 485, 486,
487,488,494, 496,499, 501
Goerz, H., Die Molotschnaer Ansiedlung, Echo-Verlag, Steinbach, Canada, 1950\51, pp 166, 167
Harder, Leland, The Harder Family Review, Issue 4, October 1988, pp 1-14
Mennonite Encyclopedia
Toews, J. A., pp 20, 36, 44, 66, 82, 84, 95
52
11. PARTING OF WAYS
Farewell at the Mennonite Brethren Church
in Rueckenau on May 6, 1 879
After the defeats of the Crimean War, the Russian government decided to improve
the organization of the military. One of the changes was to implement universal
conscription. Mennonites quickly recognized the danger this posed to their long held
principle of non-resistance. Delegations were sent to St. Petersburg for clarification and
possible negotiation. It soon became apparent that some form of service to the government
was going to become mandatory.
At the same time the government was actively pursuing a program of Russification.
Official government business was to be conducted in Russian. The principal language of
instruction in all schools was to be Russian.
Some Mennonites felt that government service could be negotiated, and that a non¬
military option was acceptable under certain circumstances. Eventually a forestry service
[Forstei] was established and implemented in 1880. The Russification program was not
negotiable, so the Mennonites made special efforts to add instruction of German and
Religion to the school curriculum.
A significant number of Mennonites felt, however, that no form of service to the
government was acceptable. Russification was the thin edge of the wedge to eliminate
minorities and their rights. In 1873 a delegation of twelve men visited Manitoba and the
central states to assess North America as a possible new home. Despite attempts by the
government, through General Eduard Totleben, to disuade them, from a quarter to a third
of the Mennonites emigrated. From 1874 to 1884 about 10,000 went to the United States,
about 8,000 to Manitoba.
* * *
Mennonite Brethren were among those who participated in the emigration to North
America, eventually about one third of the membership migrating to the United States.
They had concerns that they might lose their scriptural and historical heritage, especially
that of non-resistance.
Abraham Schellenberg had been elected elder of the Molotschna congregation based
in Rueckenau in 1875. He was active, travelled widely, and influenced the Mennonite
Brethren Church throughout Russia. He decided that his task in Russia had been
completed, and that the Lord had a new assignment for him in America. He also expressed
some concern that in time religious freedom of “alien groups “ in Russia would be
curtailed. None-the-less the remaining members of his own church felt somewhat
abandoned when their elder as well as some of the other ministers such as Johann Regier
of Klippenfeld and Johann Poettker of Fuerstenau left the flock. The membership was also
aware of the fact that the leadership of other congregations, such as the Einlage Mennonite
Brethren Church, by and large remained in Russia.
53
Schellenberg did try to make appropriate arrangements for the continuance of the
leadership in the Molotschna Mennonite Brethren Church. On April 15,1 878 Franz Nickel
and David Schellenberg [younger brother of Abraham] were ordained as ministers. At a
church membership meeting held December 27, 1878, Johann J. Fast of Fuerstenau was
named “Elder Representative”[^eftas7erverAe/er ], and Jakob Dirksen of Muensterberg as
his assistant.
* * *
As the time for departure neared a farewell ceremony was organized in the
Rueckenau church for May 6, 1879. Four official sermons were on the agenda. Jakob
Dirksen, representing those remaining, spoke, using John 16:32-33 as text “But a time is
coming, and has come, when you will be scattered ...Yet I am not alone, for my Father is
with me ... .” Johann Poettker replied for the departing group using Revelation 2: 10 for his
sermon “Do not be afraid of what you are about to suffer ...Be faithful, even to the point of
death, and I will give you the crown of life.” Elder Abraham Schellenberg, also departing,
preached on John 14:19 “...Because I live, you also will live.” Klaas Enns, remaining,
among other thoughts, used the text Matthew 26:54 “But how then would the scriptures be
fulfilled that say it must happen in this way?” A number of departing people made
additional comments.
Likely with the two and one half tribes of Israel in mind who departed to their own
territory across the Jordan River, the departing group was then asked if they would make
a public pledge of their loyalty to the Lord. They confirmed their resolution by standing
up. Thereupon Abraham Schellenberg asked those remaining the same question. They also
stood up.
The last farewells were said on May 1 5, 1 879 at the Michailovka train station. At
this open air ceremony there were sermons and prayers by each of the groups. In all 42
families, or one third of the church membership, departed with Abraham Schellenberg,
leaving about 200 members behind.
* * *
According to David Schellenberg the remaining church members felt like a young
bird abandoned by its mother, like orphans without anyone to lead. But then, continued
Schellenberg, they pulled together, with everyone serving according to the gifts God had
given. Additional workers were ordained on June 1, 1880 - Wilhelm Loewen and Klaas
Enns. They, together with previously appointed ministers and deacons worked as a team
with Johann Fast to serve the church.
Unfortunately minister Jakob Dirksen and deacon Johann Kliewer moved away to
Herzenberg. New deacons were appointed, Johann Huebert of Blumstein, Johann Koop of
Pordenau, Heinrich Loewen of Alexanderkrone and Peter Boese of Tiegenhagen. During
this time Johann Wieler was appointed teacher at the Zentralschule in Halbstadt, and soon
helped with the proclamation of the Word. In 1881 the need was felt for an elder, and on
54
April 14 David Schellenberg was elected, receiving 1 12 of the possible 130 votes cast. He
was ordained on May 23, 1882.
Attendance at the Rueckenau church services was increasing, making it necessary
to expand. In the summer of 1883, under the supervision of Johann Koop of Fuerstenau,
a beautiful solid brick sanctuary was constructed. Membership grew. In 1884 and 1885
there were revivals in Waldheim, Margenau and Spat in the Crimea, all areas served by the
Rueckenau church. In 1884 there were 84 new members, in 1885 this increased to 171 !
Even Abraham Schellenberg, while on a visit back to Russia in 1886\87, was
surprised at the phenomenal growth of the church. He almost expressed a desire to move
back - and would have if “home, duty and interest” did not call him back to the United
States.
* * *
The Rueckenau church members departing likely travelled by train to Antwerp,
where they boarded the S. S. Switzerland, arriving in Philadelphia on June 24, 1879. The
Schellenberg family, Abraham, Katharina and five children are on the passenger list.
Johann Regier with young wife Maria [Abraham Schellenberg’s sister] and four children
are listed as well as Johann Poettker, wife Elisabeth and six children. The group did not
settle as a block in the United States. The Regier family became established in Boone
County, Nebraska. Twelve adults, among them Elder Abraham Schellenberg, arrived in
Kansas July 4, and began participating in the Harvey, Reno and McPherson County
Mennonite Brethren affairs. On August 1 0 Schellenberg was elected elder of the Ebenezer
congregation. The church was blessed, there was a revival and 26 new members were
baptized. On November 5 it was decided, despite the poverty of most members, to build
a new church the following year. The Molotschna church sent 200 Rubles to help in the
building program.
Sources:
Friesen, P. M., pp 412-415, North America pp 3-5
Gislason, Leona Wiebe, Rueckenau, Toronto, Canada, 1998, pp 71, 86
Hiebert, Clarence, Brothers in Deed to Brothers in Need, Faith and Life Press, Newton, USA,
1974, p 360
Huebert, H. T., Hierschau: An Example of Russian Mennonite Life, Springfield Publishers,
Winnipeg, Canada, 1986, pp 88-92, 98
Toews, J. A., pp 80, 81 , 83
Background Information:
Elder Abraham Schellenberg
Elder David Schellenberg [see Dedication Service at the Lugovsk Mennonite
Brethren Church]
55
ELDER ABRAHAM SCHELLENBERG
[1845-1920]
Elder of the Molotschna [Rueckenau]
Mennonite Brethren Church
Abraham Schellenberg was bom August 29, 1845, in Halbstadt, Molotschna Colony. His
parents were Abraham and Maria [Pauls] Schellenberg. He was the third bom of 13 children,
though the first to survive beyond childhood. David [later elder of the Rueckenau church] and
Maria [later wife of Johann Regier] were younger siblings. Early in Abraham’s life the family
moved to Tiegerweide, then to Tiege. He went to highschool [ Vereinsschule] in Ohrloff, where
Hermann Janzen was his teacher. At the age of 1 5 he began working in his father’s cloth dying
shop.
In 1864, at the age of 19, Abraham was converted and joined the Mennonite Brethren
Church. He very soon became active in the Molotschna congregation, and in the summer of 1 869
was appointed as “teacher-helper.” He, even at a young age, must have been a diplomat, for in the
early 1870s the Mennonite Brethren Church asked him to seek a reconciliation with August
Lenzmann of the Gnadenfeld Mennonite Church. Many of the original 1 8 Mennonite Brethren who
seceded from the Mennonite Church had been members of that congregation.
Heinrich Huebert was the leading elder of the Molotschna Mennonite Brethren, but when
he moved to the Kuban in the summer of 1873 Abraham Schellenberg was elected as “Elder
Representative.” He had, since his appointment in 1 869, gradually assumed more and more of the
teaching and leadership role in the church. In the autumn of 1 875 Abraham was elected elder, and
was officially ordained by Elder Huebert in the spring of 1 876. Showing his concern for the wider
Mennonite community, Schellenberg had already organized and chaired an Inter-Mennonite Faith
Conference [Algemeine Konferenz ] late in the fall of 1875. Various Mennonite groups discussed
common concerns, such as prayer and baptism. Abraham travelled extensively and preached
effectively. He participated in various ceremonies in which the presence of an elder was required,
for example the ordination of Jakob Jantz as elder of the newly organized Friedensfeld church in
1875.
When the Russian government seemed about to implement universal conscription and
introduced Russification, Abraham felt it was time to move on. He had concerns that religious
freedom of “alien groups” might in the future be compromised in Russia. It seems that his energy
and capacity for leadership may also have caused slight friction in the Rueckenau hierarchy. He
therefore felt that his task in Russia was completed, and that there were new horizons in America.
So Abraham with family, together with some of the other leaders of the church such as Johann
Poettker of Fuerstenau and Johann Regier of Klippenfeld and about one third of the Rueckenau
congregation, planned to emigrate to the United States.
Abraham prepared the way by ensuring that there would be leadership in place after his
departure. A number of ministers were elected in 1878, and Johann J. Fast was named “Elder
Representative”. After a farewell at the church on May 6, 1 879, at which Abraham was one of the
four main speakers, the group left from the Michailovka train station on May 15, 1879. The
Schellenbergs, and likely the whole group, travelled by train to Antwerp, boarded the S. S.
Switzerland , and sailed to Philadelphia, arriving on June 24. The passenger list mentions Abraham
[age 33], wife Katharina [31], and children Abraham [9], Katharina [8], Peter [7], Maria [3], and
Elisabeth [1], From Philadelphia the trip continued by train to the central states.
Twelve of the group from the Rueckenau church, including Abraham, arrived in Kansas
on July 4, 1879. Schellenberg himself settled on a farm south-west of Moundridge. The Ebenezer
56
Mennonite Brethren Church had been established in that region of Kansas in 1 878. No sooner had
Abraham arrived when he was elected elder of that congregation on August 10, 1879, a position
he held for 30 years. Under his leadership the Ebenezer church flourished, and was one of the
strongest congregations in the Mennonite Brethren Conference.
Abraham’s work again extended well beyond his own congregation. He was elected
conference moderator 18 times between 1880 and 1900. He served as itinerant minister and Bible
expositor, and participated in many functions where ministers and elders were commissioned.
Abraham was interested in foreign missions and was chairman of the Foreign Mission Board for
years. He urged the establishment of the official conference publication Zionsbote, and the
founding of a publishing house. He was chairman of the Publications Committee of the conference
for years. Abraham was concerned about the spiritual welfare of children, urging Sunday School
attendance, and encouraged the founding of Tabor College in Hillsboro, Kansas.
During this time Schellenberg was obviously still interested in his old home church. He
made at least one, possibly two, extended trips to Russia in the late 1 880s. It was said that he had
been present as a guest at the twenty-five year jubilee celebrations of the Mennonite Brethren
Church held in Rueckenau in January of 1 885. He participated in a conference in Rueckenau in
the fall of 1886, and was in Russia in 1887. Abraham visited many congregations throughout
southern Russia, and had extensive conversations with various church leaders, such as P. M.
Friesen.
Abraham married Katharina Lohrenz [Lorentz?] of Tiegerweide, Molotschna, in 1 868 . The
couple lived in Tiegerweide, and had eight children. The eldest child, Abraham L. Schellenberg,
became manager of the publishing house which his father had promoted, holding the position for
many years. The second child, daughter Katharina, became the first medical missionary of the
Mennonite Brethren Church, serving for many years in India. Wife Katharina died in 1884 in
Moundridge, Kansas. Abraham then married Susanna Flaming in 1885, and the couple had 14
children, of which two died within a few days of birth.
In 1907 the Schellenbergs moved to Escondido, California. There Abraham organized a
Mennonite Brethren church, and was its pastor until 1915. Returning to Kansas, they lived on their
farm for four years, then retired to Buhler. Abraham became ill for an extended period, giving him
time to reflect on his past life. A friend, D. D. Hiebert, visited him. Abraham told of a dear sister
who had come to comfort him. “You have” she said “often comforted me with your sermons. So
I have now come to comfort you ...but I don’t know how!” The child-like sincerity of the woman
had moved him to tears. Abraham, in assessing his career, was assailed by some doubts. “Behind
all the works I have done” he mused “is a great enemy who darkens everything. I will achieve
salvation only through grace!”
OnApril 11, 1920, at the age of74years, Abraham Schellenberg died. In his obituary wife
Susanna and family wrote “We miss father very much. He has been on many journeys, but he
always came home again. But this time he will not return. Our comfort is the hope of seeing him
in eternity.”
Sources:
Friesen, P. M., pp 202, 219, 234, 235, 353, 357, 373, 387, 407-409, 41 1, 413, 414, 424, 439, 460,
466, 499, 505, 506, North America, 3, 5, 8, 12-15, 17, 18,21,26,31,34, 37, 44, 48
Hiebert, Clarence, Brothers in Deed to Brothers in Need, Faith and Life Press, Newton, USA,
1974, p 360
Hiebert, D. D., Letter, Zionsbote, 28 April 1920, p 4
Gislason, Leona Wiebe, Rueckenau, Toronto, Canada, 1998, pp 69, 71, 87
57
Huebert, H. T., Hierschau: An Example of Russian Mennonite Life , Springfield Publishers,
Winnipeg, Canada, 1986, pp 97, 98, 103
Mennonite Encyclopedia
Obituary, Zionsbote, 30 June 1920, p 4
Schellenberg Family History, from Archival Genealogy Database
Toews, J. A„ pp 62,71,78, 80-82, 89, 106, 134, 135, 140, 141, 191, 196, 198, 200,203,218,
269, 284, 287
58
12. JOURNEY TO CENTRAL ASIA
[1880- 1882]
Jung- Stilling, a pietistic German author, in his novel Das Heimweh [Yearning for
Home], depicted Eugenius, a devout Christian, seeking a refuge in central Asia. This novel
inspired some Mennonites to seek a similar refuge by moving eastward, to be at the place
where Christ’s second coming was expected to take place. The imagination of a young
farmer, Claas Epp Jr. of Hahnsau, Am Trakt Colony, was caught up to the extent that he
wrote a book in 1 878, interpreting the prophesies of Daniel and Revelation along the same
lines. Christ was to come in 1889, and his followers needed to meet him in central Asia.
Coupled with these chiliastic ideas was the desire to escape the new draft laws of the
Russian government, at that time not enforced in the more remote territories.
Eventually plans were completed to migrate to Turkestan. The first contingent of
ten families, consisting of 20 adults, 29 children, with 17 specially equipped wagons and
40 horses left Hahnsau on July 3,1880, accompanied by Epp for the first few days. The
second wagon train of 13 families also left from Am Trakt, on August 13, 1880. A third
group, consisting of 80 families, departed from Waldheim of the Molotschna under the
leadership of Elder Abraham Peters; it also included
people from the Kuban. The fourth and fifth trains,
again from Am Trakt, concluded the migration of the
600 people. The last train, which included the leader
Claas Epp, began its trek September 1, 1881 .
Across mountain passes with snow, and
deserts with searing heat, braving broken axles and
wheels, suffering disease and death, the pilgrims
travelled on. The first group, for example, lost 14
children on the first 1,780 mile leg of the trip; the
third train had an epidemic of typhoid fever in early
1881 which claimed at least 27 lives. Eventually the
first groups reached the Tashkent area in Turkestan,
where they halted for the winter, taking time to
organize. Partly because of increasing difficulty with
accepting Epp’s increasingly radical views, about 1 00
families under the leadership of Abraham Peters [and
when he died in January of 1882 Jacob Janzen
became the leader] decided to accept government
terms and settle in Turkestan. They were granted
land near Aulie Ata, along the Talus River, moving
there in April, 1882. They established four villages,
Gnadenfeld, Gnadental, Nikolaipol and Koeppental; later Ohrloff and Hohendorf were
added. Prior to World War I there were about 1,000 inhabitants in this colony, of which
approximately half were Mennonite Brethren.
59
The last of the wagon trains, including Claas Epp himself, arrived in Turkestan after
a difficult four month trip. Epp took charge of the remaining 60 families of the migration,
and in August, 1 882, continued on the quest for Christ’s arrival site. Not wishing to accept
any type of alternative service demanded if they remained in Russian territory, yet being
refused entry by the Emir of Bukhara, the caravan of 50 wagons was driven back and forth
by circumstances, braving wide bleak deserts and considerable danger from roving nomads.
Eventually the Khan of Khiva invited the struggling group to settle near the Amudar’ya
River. Unfortunately the region was a disease-infested swamp, with surrounding natives
who freely raided the settlement. In time the Khan offered a safer refuge in Ak Metchet,
a garden near the city of Khiva. This was certainly much safer, and a pleasant place to live.
Epp now preached
that Ak Metchet was
the real refuge to
which Christ would
return, he even
supervised the
construction of more
apartments which
would be needed for
the refugees that were
expected to arrive for
the event.
The group still
under the leadership
of the ever more
radical and demanding
Epp slowly dwindled in number. Some dissenters moved to Aulie Ata, others emigrated
to the United States. As 1889 approached Claas Epp was also able to announce the exact
date of Christ’s appearance - March 8. On the expected date Epp explained that he would
be the first to be caught up to meet Christ, so he sat on a church altar which had been
carried outside to be his “throne.” The others stood all day, in white robes, in an attitude
of prayer and fasting. But the Lord tarried. Epp made the astonishing discovery that the
clock which he had used to calculate the date of Christ’s arrival had been tilted, that the
actual date was really 1891! When in two years the delayed second coming failed to
transpire, confidence in his leadership suffered a setback, ever more people leaving the
flock.
With more disappointments, and more plans going awry, Epp’s theology and
behaviour became increasingly bizarre. Eventually he concluded that he himself was
Christ’s son, so that there were four members of the Godhead - Father, sons, and Holy
Ghost. One of his faithful followers, Wilhelm Penner, finally could tolerate no more, and
eventually was excommunicated by Epp. After the turn of the century Epp began preaching
about a “New Ak Metchet” which would come down from heaven, much like the “New
Jerusalem” mentioned in the Revelation of John.
60
Claas Epp died in Ak Metchet, a lonely man. He passed away on January 19, 1913,
just five days after the death of his wife Elisabeth. Not all of the millennial beliefs of his
remaining followers died with Epp. In time some of them came to believe that Claas Epp
would return to earth again, this time with Christ.
Sources:
Belk, Fred Richard, The Great Trek of the Russian Mennonites to Central Asia 1880-1884,
Herald Press, Scottdale, USA, and Kitchener, Canada, 1976, pp 43-227
Dueck, A. J., Claas Epp and the Great Trek Reconsidered, Journal of Mennonite Studies,
1985, pp 138-147
Mennonite Encyclopedia
Mennonite Historical Atlas, pp 60, 61, 137
Smith, C. Henry, Smith 's Story of the Mennonites, Faith and Life Press, Newton, USA, 1981
pp 294-299
Toews, J. A. pp 81, 82
Background Information:
Map: Claas Epp Journey to Central Asia [Map 1]
Map: Claas Epp Journey to Central Asia [Map 2]
61
Mennonite Colony
Trail of Claas Epp and
his Followers
62
Claas Epp Journey to Central Asia [Map 1]
Aulie Ata
rDzhambull
63
Claas Epp Journey to Central Asia [Map 2]
13. EPIDEMIC IN SOUTH RUSSIA
WINTER 1888 - 1889
Infectious diseases were part of the cycle of life and death in earlier times. World
wide causes of death among children were diphtheria and scarlet fever, although children
also shared typhus , small pox and tuberculosis with the adults. This in part accounted for
the low life expectancy, significant child mortality bringing down the statistical average.
Mennonites were not immune to these diseases. Winter appears to have been high
season for infections to occur. In the winter of 1879-1880 three of the oldest school children
in Rueckenau died of diphtheria in a short time, also two daughters of G. Martens. In
February of 1 880 Gnadenthal reported that diphtheria causing swelling of the face and throat
reigned supreme, although there had been no fatalities. Gnadenfeld was not so lucky. Five
children of Dr. Heinemann died in one night.
In the late autumn of 1881 disease struck again. A correspondent from Ladekopp
reported that minister Peter Fast lost three children to diphtheria, two daughters and one son.
Their relatives, Johann Mieraus had five children die, almost at the same time, three
daughters and two sons. Jakob Neufelds lost two daughters, David Boese one son, then two
weeks later his wife also died.
Probably the most widespread and virulent epidemic affected the South Russian
colonies in late 1888 and early 1889. In the Molotschna Colony the village of Hamberg
reported that “diphtheria reigns; in one week thirteen children died, also one adult.” A
correspondent from Schoensee reported diphtheria to be in many villages, with quite a few
children dying. In Ohrloff the school was closed because of the epidemic.
At the same time scarlet fever also raged. Three children of Johann Mierau died in
Tiege, as well as one child of Jacob Willms. In the correspondent’s home three children had
just recovered from the disease, and one had come down with it the day before the letter was
mailed.
The 1 888-1889 epidemic was not confined to the Molotschna Colony. Isaak Ens of
Alexanderthal, Fuerstenland Colony reported “Our state of health is satisfactory, only the
children have been quite ill, with many a small pilgrim having been called to the great
beyond.” In Tiegenhof, an estate north of the Molotschna, Jakob Enns reported that the Peter
Giesbrechts lost three children. The school was closed because of the epidemic. Jakob
philosophized “Jesus now and then knocks at our heart’s door.” But not all the news was
bad. Bernhard Dueck of Friedensfeld, Borozenko Colony, reported that “in our region we
have had no epidemic this winter.” The fact that Dueck considered the absence of an
epidemic to be newsworthy tells us how common the diseases were.
By and large it seems to have been accepted that most winters would bring the cycle
of infectious diseases, causing many deaths among the children. This was expected to the
extent that most correspondents did not even mention children in their lists of deaths in the
community. Those who did include them never mentioned them by Christian name.
The winter of 1 888-1 889 seems to have been one of the worst for the young citizens
of the South Russian Mennonite colonies.
64
Sources:
Correspondent, Letter, Mennonitische Rundschau, 15 January 1882, p 1
Correspondent, Letter, Mennonitische Rundschau, 19 December 1888, p 1
Dueck, Bernhard, Letter, Mennonitische Rundschau, 3 April 1 889, p 1
Enns, Jakob, Letter, Mennonitische Rundschau, 20 March 1889, p 1
Ens, Isaak, Letter, Mennonitische Rundschau, 20 March 1 889, p 1
Neufeld, Jakob, Letter, Mennonitische Rundschau, 27 February 1 889, p 9
News Reports, Nebraska Ansiedler, May 1880, p 3
Sudermann, Johann, Letter, Mennonitische Rundschau, 13 Mar 1889, p 1
Background Information:
Worldwide Epidemics
Diphtheria
Scarlet Fever
WORLDWIDE EPIDEMICS
There was also considerable disease in other areas of Russia, not only in the Mennonite
colonies. Odessa was a large port on the Black Sea, south and west of the major colonies. The
Odesser Zeitung regularly announced cases of infectious diseases diagnosed by the department of
health in the city. In a three week period of late October early November 1888 there were 24 cases
of diphtheria and 18 of scarlet fever, many resulting in death.
Diphtheria was also a worldwide epidemic disease, as shown by news items from other
regions of the world. The July 1, 1881 Mennonitische Rundschau carried a news item from
Minnesota surrounded by a black border. It announced the deaths of 12 children from diphtheria,
varying in age from three to twenty years. Nine were girls, three boys. The Isaak Dueck family lost
five children within five days.
Sources:
News Item, Mennonitische Rundschau, 1 July 1881, p 3
News Items, Odesser Zeitung, 28 October [November 9] 1888, p 3; 10[22] November 1888, p 3
17[29] November 1888, p 3
65
DIPHTHERIA
Diphtheria is an acute communicable disease caused by a bacterium - Corynebacterium
diphtheriae. This organism chiefly infects the respiratory tract where it causes inflammation in the
region of the tonsils, pharynx and larynx [throat, including the voice-box]. An exudate [fluid] is
formed by these inflamed tissues, which hardens to form
an adherent greyish membrane, in time gradually closing
off the respiratory passages, making it harder and harder to
breathe. There are also skin changes, with deep punched
out ulcers. The infecting bacteria often produce a toxin
[poisonous substance] which can cause myocarditis
[inflammation of the heart muscle] resulting in heart
failure, also neuritis which can involve the cranial nerves
[nerves around the face and neck] and peripheral nerves
[nerves going to the limbs].
Humans are the only natural reservoir for the
diphtheria organism. Spread is by close contact via
droplets from breathing, or direct contact with throat
secretions or skin ulcers. Unfortunately the organism can
live up to six months outside the body, so dust and other particles can carry it. People actually
immune to the disease may still carry the bacteria and spread it to those who are not immune.
Epidemics are commonly in winter possibly due to more crowded conditions in that season.
Incubation period [time from contact with the organism until disease develops] is one to seven days.
Two to five year old children are the most commonly affected. Should the disease be severe enough
to be fatal, death most often occurs by suffocation, sometimes as a result of heart failure.
Once the disease has started current treatment is directed toward neutralizing the toxin
[using horse produced antitoxin], eliminating the organism [using antibiotics, penicillin and
erythromycin], supportive care [ensuring an airway and monitoring the heart and nerve functions],
and preventing further transmission [isolation until follow up cultures grow no organisms].
The most effective treatment, prevention of diphtheria, is possible because of a series of
discoveries made in the late nineteenth century. Klebs first described the bacteria in 1883. In 1884
Loeffler proved that Corynebacterium diphtheriae caused the disease diphtheria, growing the
organism from the throats of sick people. The effect of the toxin which travelled to the rest of the
body was proven in 1 888 by Roux and Yersin. These investigations led to the development of active
immunization by a neutralized toxin [1913] and then a toxoid [formalin treated toxin], which were
the basis for the near eradication of the widespread disease. Vaccination with the diphtheria toxoid
was first introduced in the 1 920s and 1 930s; in most western countries diphtheria has been virtually
eliminated. In the United States there were 147,991 cases in 1920, 15,536 in 1940, and only 40 cases
between 1980 and 1993. In time vaccine produced immunity wanes, so that revaccination of adults
may be necessary.
Obviously the nature of the disease was not understood when the epidemics spread through
the Mennonite colonies in the 1 880s. There was no active treatment given. The only measure which
may have helped control epidemics was the closure of schools, which was mentioned on a number
of occasions. Whether the schools closed to prevent the spread of disease, or simply because there
were not enough students to keep them running efficiently is not clear.
Corynebacterium diphtheriae
[the small dark objects]
66
Sources:
Hardy, Iain R. B., Diphtheria in Cecil Textbook of Medicine, W. B. Saunders Company,
20 th Edition, 1996, pp 1629-30
Hoeprich, Paul D., Diphtheria in Infectious Diseases, J. B. Lippincott Company, Philadelphia,
5th Edition, 1994, pp 373-380
McClatchey, Kenneth D., Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Williams and Wilkins, 1994, p 1 125
SCARLET FEVER
Scarlet fever is an acute streptococcal infection that may be localized to the respiratory
tract, skin and soft tissues. During the last 30 to 40 years outbreaks in the western world have been
fairly mild, but in the latter half of the nineteenth century mortality rates of 25-35% were common.
There is usually an initial sore throat, soon becoming extremely hyperemic [red due to
inflammation and increased blood flow] and swollen. The whole area, including throat, tonsils and
neck lymph nodes become inflamed. There is
marked fever, headache, delirium and there may
be convulsions. Within 24-48 hours there is a
reddish rash, beginning on the trunk, spreading
to the limbs, but typically not involving the area
around the mouth. There may be septic scarlet
fever where there is local invasion of tissues
mainly about the neck, with airway obstruction,
ear infection, inflammation of the lining of the
brain, mastoid infection and possibly
pneumonia. Patients often succumb after two or
three weeks. Toxic scarlet fever moves more
rapidly, with severe fever and uncontrolled
convulsions commonly causing death within 24
hours.
Current therapy consists of early and
massive antibiotic treatment, the streptococci being effectively killed by penicillin. Supportive
treatment such as monitoring breathing is also carried out. In the 1 880s antibiotics were, of course,
not available. Penicillin was first discovered in 1 929, and did not come into use for approximately
another decade after that.
\
< ^
t, ,
ft
Streptococci
Organisms are the dark chains
Large spheres are red blood cells
Sources:
McClatchey, Kenneth D., Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Williams and Wilkins, 1994, p 1 1 18
Scarlet Fever in Infectious Diseases, J. B. Lippincott Company, Philadelphia, 5th Edition, 1994,
pp 354-355
Streptococcal Infections in Cecil Textbook of Medicine, W. B. Saunders Company, 20th Edition,
1996, p 1587
67
14. SAENGERFEST IN RUECKENAU
MAY 29, 1894
Congregational singing in the Mennonite colonies of Russia in the late 1 800s was
loaded with tradition. For those from outside the colonies, however, or those with exposure
to other influences, it likely left much to be desired. If current Old Colony “singing” gives
us any clue as to how it sounded, it was probably in unison, directed by a Vorsaenger,
unaccompanied, with a penetrating nasal quality, incredibly slow and impossible to
understand. But there were signs of improvement. The establishment of the Mennonite
Brethren Church in 1 860 brought with it a whole new set of lively hymns, new songbooks
and a changed attitude to music. Some of the Kirchliche churches, though at first
grudgingly [one choir was for a time banned to the back benches near the door], eventually
had choirs. By 1 890 many of the Molotschna churches had choirs which sang at the Sunday
morning service.
Somewhat preceding the developments in Russia, there was an upsurge of singing
in Germany, particularly in the churches. There were numerous song festivals and
workshops, for singers and choir directors. The Christlicher Saengerbund [Society of
Christian Singers] was organized in 1879. In ten years it grew to include 500 choirs, and
a total of 12,000 singers, in Germany, Switzerland, the Netherlands, Russia, England,
Sweden, France, North America and Australia. The official publication of this organization
was Saengergruss, which by 1885 was an eight page monthly.
On May 30, 1 889 the choirs ofthe Christliche Saengerbund within Russia organized
into a separate Russische Saengervereinigung. Initially there were 26 choirs, 540 singers.
In 1 876 Friedrich Schweiger became conductor of a very dedicated and well rehearsed choir
at Zyrardow in Russian Poland, and in time he also became the chairman of the Russische
Saengervereinigung. Likely through this organization and Saengergruss, Schweiger
became known to a number of Mennonite musicians.
A Saengerfest had been held in Rueckenau on May 30,1 893, in which seven choirs
had participated, with 120 singers and about 2,000 guests. Now, upon the invitation of
Elder David Schellenberg of Rueckenau, Isaak Bom [later to publish an edition of
Liederperlen ] and Bernhard Dueck [choir conductor at Friedensfeld], Schweiger was asked
to conduct the second, presumably bigger and better, Saengerfest to be held in Rueckenau
on May 29, 1894. Preparations were made to obtain maximal benefit from Schweiger’s
expertise.
Schweiger himself described the events in a lengthy report to Zionsbote. He, his
wife and two youngest children set off on May 3, travelling from Zyrardow in Poland to
southern Russia by train. The expected 48 hour trip from Warsaw for some reason stretched
to 72 long hours. After recuperating for one week Schweiger proceeded to visit as many
choirs as possible to do preparatory work. He commented that it was regrettable that the
Mennonite colonies were so widely scattered. A twelve hour train ride brought him to his
initial destination, Memrik. The first practice was the following afternoon, Saturday, at the
church in Kotlyarevka. A large number of singers from the colony attended the two hour
68
session, where special attention was paid to enunciation and correct pronunciation. Then
followed a four hour wagon trip, where one and all rode to Alexanderpol, a village of the
Memrik Colony a considerable distance to the east. Schweiger bravely attended the regular
Sunday service, which also included ordination of two deacons and a prayer meeting. In
the afternoon testimonies of five baptismal candidates were heard, followed by acceptance
into the church. After that Schweiger held a choir practice, the singers being joined by a
group from Kronstadt.
Monday morning it was off by train to Alexanderheim, where he held two practices,
then he travelled on to Andreasfeld. Here Schweiger met Aron Sawatzky, a very good
musician and skilled conductor. In Andreasfeld there were three practice sessions, two of
which were also attended by a choir from Ebenfeld. Schweiger was delighted by the
enthusism and talent of the participants. Accompanied by Elder Epp, he next took a
steamboat to Friedensfeld, where he attended the annual church meetings. The choir at
Friedensfeld, led by Bernhard Dueck, was making good progress, but in the opinion of
Schweiger still had much to learn. He remarked that choir members were quite young - he
himself preferred a mix with older people, provided that they were still willing to accept
advice! The Sunday service, which included five sermons, was a time of blessing, and, he
hastens to add, was not too long for anyone [was aber niemanden zu viel war\. This was
proven by the well attended evening service later that day. Schweiger held two practices
in Friedensfeld.
Then it was off to Rueckenau. The sanctuary, seating capacity of 1,200, was
enlarged to 2,000 with wooden additions. Schweiger was astonished by the beautiful
villages in the region, and was very thankful that he was taken to visit the School for the
Deaf and Dumb in Tiege. He held a practice on Thursday, May 26, in the afternoon, even
though it was Ascension Day. On Saturday, May 28, there were full scale rehearsals in the
morning and afternoon. In the evening Schweiger met with the conductors to give them
special instruction; he also advised them to form a South Russian association of singers.
This association could promote choral music in various ways - by arranging songfests,
holding conductors’ workshops and having annual meetings.
Sunday, May 29, found the sanctuary jammed with enthusiastic singers and an
attentive audience, from early in the morning until late in the evening. Total attendance
was about 2,500, of which 300 were singers. In all there were eleven choirs present:
Andreasfeld, Reinfeld, Ebenfeld, Memrik, Friedensfeld, Waldheim, Alexanderthal,
Rosenort, Sparrau, Rueckenau [all Mennonite Brethren], and Gnadenfeld [Mennonite or
Kirchliche ]. On the yard was room for 200 buggies. Some participants had travelled 200
verst to be there; there were even some singers from the Kuban.
At six o’clock in the morning, bright and early, breakfast was served, then a
planning session to outline the specifics of the program. Thereafter a prayer meeting was
led by J. Reimer, followed by a greeting from the local elder, David Schellenberg. Then
followed the program, with alternating choral presentations and sermons. Usually the
singing included six to eight individual choirs, then the mass choir. The first sermon was
by Friedrich Brauer of Zyrardow, focusing on God’s call for mankind to come to him. The
second sermon was delivered by Wilhelm Neufeld of Gnadenfeld, emphasizing that the
69
text, the message of the song was of primary importance, the melody was secondary.
Lunch took two and a half hours, about 2,000 people were served coffee and buns.
The two hour afternoon program had a schedule similar to the morning, with alternating
singing and preaching. The two sermons were by K. Unruh of Tiege, who, using Psalm 98,
emphasized the importance of Christian choral music, and K. Neufeld of Kronstadt, who
spoke about the year of the jubilee. Following the late afternoon snack [ Vesper ] many
turned towards home, but most returned to the sanctuary, rain having made the roads
treacherous. They continued to sing well into the evening. Altogether about 50 numbers
were sung that day!
In assessing the situation Schweiger seemed well satisfied. Singing was enthusistic,
and there were many people with good voices. The Zahlsystem [ Ziffern , musical notation
by numbers, which his own choir in Zyrardow also used] stood them in good stead, the
singers having “ viel Treffsicherheit ” [could read notes well]. The Gnadenfeld and
Friedensfeld choirs had excellent directors, some of the others could stand more
improvement. Many would benefit greatly by reading the publication Saengergruss.
When Schweiger and his family arrived home safe and sound, he expressed
gratefulness for the experience and the blessings he had received.
It is intriguing that a musician who spent much time in travel, then many hours
rehearsing, followed by tremendous effort on one big day of conducting, would, in his
report, mention the texts and contents of the sermons preached, but not even once hint at
any of the choral works that were sung. He was a very dedicated Christian, and felt that the
importance of music was to lead people to faith, but one still cannot help but wish that he
would have given us more specific information as to the songs which were used for this
very vital function.
Sources:
Berg, Wesley, From Russia with Music , Hyperion Press Limited, Winnipeg, Canada, 1985,
pp 16-23
Letkemann, Peter, The Christlicher Saengerbund and Mennonite Choral Singing in Russia,
Mennonite Life, December 1986, pp 4-10
News Report, Saengergruss, September 1893, p 69
Schweiger, Friedrich, Ein Besuch unter den Saengern in Russland, Zionsbote, 26 September 1894,
PP 3,4
Background Information:
Friedrich Schweiger
Aron Sawatzky
70
FRIEDRICH SCHWEIGER
[1856-1925]
Conductor of the Saengerfest in Rueckenau
May 29, 1894
Friedrich Schweiger played an important part in determining the shape and direction of
Mennonite choral development in Russia. This occurred to a considerable degree through his
contacts with Mennonite musicians such as Bernhard Dueck, Isaak Bom, Aron Sawatzky, Wilhelm
Dyck and Johann Froese, mainly between 1886 and 1914.
Little is known of Schweiger’ s early life, but he was among the students of Karl Truderung.
Truderung founded the Zionschor of the German Baptist church in Zyrardow, Russian Poland, in
1871. He was a local teacher who began giving instructions to a group of young students, likely
utilizing quite substantially the writings of and direct contact with Ernst Gebhardt. In this
instruction Truderung began teaching the use of Ziffern to his choir in 1873. In 1 876 Schweiger,
then only 20 years of age, took over the choir, and in 1 88 1 the Zionschor became a member of the
Christlicher Saengerbund. In 1887 the pastor of the church, Karl Ondra, died. He had been
director of the Russian Choral Association [Russische Saengervereinigung ], a task which now
passed on to Schweiger. He continued to give strong leadership in this capacity until his death in
1925.
Schweiger was connected to the Mennonites through the Russian Choral Association, but
also through his wife, a Mennonite, whose maiden name was Wedel. She had a brother who lived
in the Molotschna; apparently he was the initial link between
Schweiger and Bernhard Dueck, conductor of the church choir
of Friedensfeld. The Schweigers had at least three children,
since they took “the two youngest” on their trip to the
Molotschna.
A tradition of song festivals and conductors’ workshops
had been established in Germany, then in Russian Poland. The
first Saengerfest of the Russian Choral Association was held in
Zyrardow in 1886, likely with annual repeats in that region of
Poland. The typical format of having alternating sermons and
choral presentations seems to have been accepted for the song
festivals, and was duly reported in Saengergruss . There were
also annual conductors’ workshops, again establishing a certain
routine of operation. The first Mennonite to attend Schweiger’s
seminar was Bernhard Dueck, early in 1 894. Aron Sawatzky of
Andreasfeld attended in 1895, then Dueck again and Wilhelm
Dyck, also of Andreasfeld, were there in 1901. Both the song festival and the workshop formats
were copied with very little variation when they were implemented in South Russia.
Friedrich Schweiger likely killed two birds with one stone when he accepted the invitation
to conduct a Saengerfest in Rueckenau in May of 1 894. He first visited his Wedel relatives in the
Molotschna, then went to work to rehearse choirs in various Mennonite colonies, then conduct the
final performance on May 29.
Probably due to anti-German feelings in Russia at the time most Mennonite choirs
withdrew from the Russische Saengervereinigung in 1908. Despite this setback Schweiger
continued with his faithful work, even reporting the association news through the Mennonite
Friedrich Schweiger
71
publication Friedensstimme as late as 1912 and 1913.
Friedrich Schweiger was known for his devotion to God, for his love of fellow Christians,
and his dedication to excellence in choral music. There is no doubt that he had a profound and
lasting influence on Russian Mennonite choral music, much of this influence later being transported
to North America, particularly Canada.
Sources:
Berg, Wesley, From Russia With Music , Hyperion Press, Winnipeg, Canada,1985, pp 22, 23, 48
Challier, A., Letter, Dirigentenkurs, Saengergruss, March 1894, p 22
Dueck, Bernhard, Letter, Die erste Reise eines Dirigenten aus Suedrussland nach Polen ,
Saengergruss, May 1894, pp 37, 38
Letkemann, Peter, The Christlicher Saengerbund and Mennonite Choral singing in Russia ,
Mennonite Life, December 1986, pp 5-10
Sawatzky, Aron, Von meiner Reise nach Polen, Zionsbote, 24 April 1895, pp 2, 3
Schweiger, Friedrich. Ein Besuch unter den Saegern in Russland, Zionsbote, 26 September 1894,
PP 3, 4
72
ARON GERHARD SAWATZKY
[1871-1935]
Conductor of the Andreasfeld choir, which
participated in the Saengerfest in Rueckenau, May 29, 1894
Aron Gerhard Sawatzky was bom on May 24, 1 871 in Andreasfeld, a village just east and
slightly to the north of the Chortitza Colony. His father was Gerhard J. Sawatzky; Aron was the
first son of his second wife, who was the daughter of Elder Aron Lepp. Altogether Aron had 14
siblings, of whom four died in infancy.
First faith came to Aron at the age of five, then conversion at the age of eight. He was
baptized and joined the Andreasfeld Mennonite Brethren Church at the age of twelve on May 26,
1883.
On September 19, 1891, at the age of 20, Aron married Elisabeth Niessen, daughter of
Wilhelm Niessen of Kronstadt. Grandfather Aron Lepp performed the wedding ceremony. The
couple had twelve children, five sons and seven daughters.
Music came easily to Aron; he played band music from the age of fourteen. At the age of
22 he was elected choir director of his church, a special challenge since none of the choir members
were saved at the time. Aron must have dealt with this
problem successfully, since he later could say “But the Lord
of the Harvest was faithful and the whole choir accepted
Christ.” He was also able to instill dedication and musical
excellence into the choir. When Friedrich Schweiger came
to Andreasfeld for preliminary choir practices prior to the
Saengerfest in Rueckenau in May of 1894, he found Aron
to be a musically talented conductor [ musikalisch
angelegten Dirigenten\. The Andreasfeld choir then
participated in the subsequent Saengerfest.
The church thought well enough of Aron to send
him to attend a choral conductors’ seminar in Zyrardow,
Russian Poland, in early 1 895. He was somewhat reluctant
to go because he would miss a Bible conference at his home
church, but came to the conclusion that both he and the
church would benefit from the trip. The purpose of the
workshop, Sawatzky said, was to gain knowledge about
singing so as to be able to educate singers. Schweiger and
Stiller were instructors, but Gebhard’s Gesangschule
seemed to be the basis of most of the teaching. Much effort
was expended during those days to learn proper conducting, to learn to understand the underlying
meaning of songs, and techniques to teach the choir proper diction and phrasing. Upon conclusion
of the seminar Aron spent a few days in Lodz, where he had additional training, then he took the
long journey home.
After this learning experience Aron continued to lead the choir in his own church, but also
participated in song festivals and workshops throughout southern Russia, and wrote articles about
singing in the Mennonite periodicals.
In 1903 the Sawatzkys with six children emigrated to Canada. They crossed Europe by
train, then departed from Bremen on the ship Kaiser Wilhelm der Grosse. Landing in New York,
AronG. Sawatzky [1871-1935]
73
they travelled via Chicago and St. Paul to Rosthem. The Sawatzkys eventually homesteaded in
Aberdeen, Saskatchewan. Initially times were rough, “Our visitors were mosquitos at night and
deer and field mice in the day time. These were very busy days and much of the work was new to
us...” Despite hard work on the homestead Aron continued to pursue his musical interests. Two
years after arrival he was asked to begin a study of church music. He started with a song festival,
and later a choir conductors’ seminar. Soon further invitations followed; he went to Herbert and
Hepburn in Saskatchewan, to Manitoba, Nebraska, Minnesota, North Dakota, Kansas and
Oklahoma.
Aron was also active in publishing helps for conductors and choirs. Beginning in 1 9 1 1 and
until at least 1922 he was editor of Saenger-Bote , the official publication of the Christlicher
Saengerbund der Mennoniten-Bruedergemeinde von Nord America. It appeared monthly, and on
a number of occasions printed articles by Sawatzky, usually about some fine points of choral music,
such as proper pronunciation of the text.
Aron Sawatzky is probably best known for the many hymns he composed. The Saenger-
Bote often included scores of hymns he had composed, as did Lieder-Quelle, which appeared
quarterly in 1929 and 1930. In 1915 a separate collection of hymns was published, also called
Saenger-Bote , of which nearly half of the 1 63 numbers were composed by Aron. He had written
the text as well in at least 28 of his compositions. Sawatzky composed gospel style hymns,
generally simple, and very singable. Three of his hymns were included in Gesangbuch [published
by the General Conference of Mennonite Brethren Churches in 1952], For Glaube einfach jeden
Tag he composed the music only, but for Wenn wir von dieser Erde and O Fest, alter heiligen
Feste he also wrote the text. The subsequent Worship Hymnal [1971] retained only Hail, Heavenly
Night, the English translation of O Fest, aller heiligen Feste.
Aron also did a considerable amount of writing. He described his trip to Zyrardow in great
detail, but also wrote more general articles about singing which were published in Zionsbote. Later
when his interests diversified, he wrote on a wide range of subjects; from 1920 to 1935 Zionsbote
published 47 of his articles and reports.
While in Aberdeen the Sawatzkys experienced some tragedy in the loss of four children,
three boys and one girl. As he did in his writing, Aron also changed the focus of some of his
activities while they lived in Aberdeen. He was first asked to preach in 1912, and continued this
ministry for the rest of his life.
In 1 920 the Sawatzkys moved to California, first settling in Lodi, then Livingston, Shatter,
then again Lodi, followed by Winton. When the leader of the church moved away from Winton,
Aron was elected to that post in 1 928. He was ordained to the ministry in 1 930, R. P. Rempel and
H. W. Lohrenz officiating. In 1933 there seemed to be trouble in the Winton church, so Aron
withdrew from the leadership. The Sawatzkys moved to Shatter, where Aron continued to preach
and compose.
In the middle of the night of July 11, 1935, Aron suddenly awoke and said “Oh, how
wonderful! Oh, how wonderful!” This awakened his wife, Elisabeth. When she asked what was
so wonderful he requested a pen and paper, and that he not be disturbed. With bright shining eyes
he wrote down words and notes. Elisabeth continued “ At Heaven’s gate he saw the Lord, whom
he loved, and behind him a chorus of radiant singers, who were singing the song in heavenly
harmony.” This song, Mein Heim [My Home], was published for his funeral a few months later.
On Sunday, November 10, Aron preached in the Shatter church, his last sermon. On
Tuesday, November 12, a banquet was held to honour the choir conductor and any new choir
members. Aron had written some music for the occasion which was sung by a quartet.
Aron had some heart problems since about 1 932, and was advised not to exert himself. But
his attitude was “ It would be so nice if the Lord called me while I am working.” He was unloading
74
furniture when he suddenly cried out. He fell gently, and died on November 18, 1935. He was 64
years, five months and 24 days old.
Aron’s funeral was at the Shatter church on November 24, 1935. Rev. K. G. Neufeld used
Revelation 5:9 “And they sang a new song” as his text. The choir sang Aron’s last song Mein
Heim. Rev. N. N. Hiebert preached on Revelation 15:1-3 “...and sang the song of Moses the
servant of God and the song of the Lamb...” William Bestvater read the obituary in English and
German, and conducted the grave side service.
Aron Sawatzky made a considerable impact on the musical development among the
Mennonite Brethren in Russia, and the later in both Canada and the United States. This is
particularly remarkable in that as far as can be ascertained he had only about one week of formal
workshop training. He was certainly talented in music and tremendously dedicated. His hymns
have, for a considerable period of time, been sung by and have blessed many people.
Sources:
Berg, Wesley, From Russia with Music, Hyperion Press Limited, Winnipeg, Canada, 1985
pp 23, 26, 27, 48, 49,51-54,58, 65,66, 95, 108, 111-116, 124
Funeral Pamphlet, Mein Letztes Lied, 1935
Gesangbuch, Bundeskonferenz der Mennoniten Bruedergemeinde von Nord-Amerika, Winnipeg,
Manitoba, and Hillsboro, Kansas, 1952, hymns number 78, 205,448
Janzen, H. F., Letter, Zionsbote, 4 December 1935, p 6
Mennonite Historical Atlas, p 121
Sawatzky, Aron G., Von meiner Reise nach Polen, Zionsbote, 24 April 1895, pp 2, 5
Sawatzky, Aron G., Gesang, Zionsbote, 19 March 1902, p 5
Sawatzky, Aron G., Begruessung, Saenger-Bote, 1 June 1912, p 1
Sawatzky, Aron G., Der Gesang in der Christlichen Gemeinde, Saenger- Bote, pp 5-7
Sawatzky, Aron G., Autobiography, written July, 1934
Sawatzky, Elisabeth, Obituary of Aron Sawatzky, Zionsbote, 4 December 1935, p 1 1
Schweiger, Friedrich, Ein Besuch unter den Saengern in Russland, Zionsbote,
26 September 1894, pp 3, 4
Toews, J. A., pp 242, 249, 251
Worship Hymnal, General Conference of Mennonite Brethren Churches, Fresno, California,
Hymn number 126
Zionsbote Index, Volume 2, 1920-1940, Board of Christian Literature, General Conference of
Mennonite Brethren Churches, 1983, p 144
75
MEIN HEIM
Words and Music by
A. G. SAWATZKY.
July 11, 1936.
Dort werd - « ich aoth einat ein - geh’n, wanni raw - nom Heim ge - faellt
Das Er be - reit • et selbat fuer mich; dort Bchwin-det je - de Nacht.
Und von uni f!ie - het Schmen und Not und je . de Trau - rig - Weit
Hi - nie - den ist das Truen - en - tai, doch drob • er lit der Freud - en - sail Scbcn
Dort werd ich Je - su Ant - titz seh'n und mein * e Lieh - en wie • der - aehn. 0,
Dm ist der Qrt, wo Je - sus wohnt; das Heim, da - rait Er drob - an Johnt Diw
win - ken Him - mels Lied - cr hier, von dies • er Heim - at mir.
welch ein Troat in dies • er Zeit, ea naht die E ■ wig - k«t
steig • ert mein • e Sehn - sucht hier. Bald, bald, bin Ich bei dir.
The last hymn composed by Aron Sawatzky
15. CHORAL CONDUCTORS’ WORKSHOP
IN FRIEDENSFELD
DECEMBER 28 - 31, 1894
The first Choral Conductors’ Workshop held by Mennonites
in South Russia
Bernhard B. Dueck, conductor of the choir of the Mennonite Brethren Church of
Friedensfeld, South Russia, obviously loved good music, especially choral music.
Some years earlier, in 1879, the Christlicher Saengerbund [Society of Christian
Singers] had been organized in Germany, in time having membership in many countries,
including Russia. In 1 889 a separate national association was formed, Russische Saenger-
vereinigung [Russian Association of Singers]. In time Friedrich Schweiger, conductor of
an excellent choir in Zyrardow, Russian Poland, became its chairman. He was devoted to
God, loved fellow Christians and was dedicated to the cause of Christian choral music.
Through the Russische Saengervereinigung, and the official publication of the Saengerbund
called Saengergruss, Bernhard Dueck as well as other Mennonite musicians such as Isaak
Bom, Aron Sawatzky, Wilhelm Dyck and Johann Froese became familiar with Schweiger
and his work.
Early in 1 894 Dueck travelled the 200 miles to Zyrardow to participate in a two day
workshop put on by Schweiger for choral conductors. He must have been impressed,
because later that year he himself organized a workshop, following much the same format.
A brief report of this first Dirigenten Versammlung [Conductors’ Workshop or
Seminar] of South Russia written by Dueck himself was published in Saengergruss. A
more extensive description written in two installments by Johann Loewen, then of Anadol,
was printed in Zionsbote.
At the invitation of Bernhard Dueck a total of 1 8 conductors arrived in Friedensfeld
to begin their seminar on December 28, 1894. Loewen lamented the fact that there were
only 1 8 present, but felt that some may have been reluctant to participate because they had
misconstrued Dueck’s motives. Loewen was somewhat embarrassed, since this had been
his own fear as well. Everyone present, however, rapidly came to the conclusion that
Dueck’s motives were beyond reproach, that the only object of the exercise was to elevate
or improve choral singing, both of choirs and congregations of Mennonite churches.
Proceedings were opened with greetings by Abram Wall, a minister of the
Friedensfeld church. Then Bernhard Dueck was unanimously elected to lead the
workshop. Dueck read the minutes of the seminar he had attended at Zyrardow, and shared
much that he had learned, both at the workshop and in Friedensfeld. The rest of the
participants were soon convinced that there was still much to learn - so they went to work!
Since all registrants were conductors their first topic of discussion was of course
conducting. Apparently the difference between dirigieren [conducting] and taktieren
[beating time] was not a new, but certainly a controversial subject. Ernst Gebhard’s
Gesangschule and an article from Saengergruss were the resource materials for this
discussion. Even more contentious was the conductor’s baton; it was said that “ In our
77
churches there are many members who have declared war on the conductor’s baton...”
The group came to the conclusion that the choir could much more easily interpret the
conductor as he signalled the expression and volume of the music with his baton than any
other way. Using the tuning fork, as some people suggested, just would not do. They were
quite united in their opinion that the baton was superior, and encouraged all conductors to
follow their example; the delicious fruit would demonstrate the efficacy of this method.
Possibly even a more contentious problem was that of enunciation. This was
summarized quite succinctly by Loewen: “...a song will not be of benefit if the listener
cannot understand the words or gather the contents. How often has a choir sung a Psalm
or a hymn where the listener has understood hardly a word. It is self evident that this
cannot be a blessing.”
Again an article from Saengergruss was used as resource. Vowels and consonants
were equally suspect. It is "Gott”, not “Gatt"\ it is “Himmel", not “Hommel. ” Numerous
other habits such as addition of extraneous “h”s and “n”s were discussed. Running words
together was also a problem, for
example: “Hoeret hoeret, was Er
spricht ” becomes “Hoeretoeret
Wasser spricht”. The latter is of
course unintelligible nonsense.
Also important in
conveying the correct message of
the text was correct breathing.
Loewen noted that “many of our
singers sing as loud as they can
until they run out of air, then haul
in a deep breath, often in such
places where the meaning of the
song is destroyed or altered. An
example is song No. 49 from
Liederperlen. In the first stanza it
is often sung ‘A land of milk and
honey at Sinai’, and that is where
the breath runs out.” But, explains
Loewen, it really says ‘A land of milk and honey, at Sinai do not stay.’ Choir members
should study the text well enough to be able to pronounce and phrase it properly. The group
felt that their concerted effort should be expended to eliminate these mistakes from
Christian singing as soon as possible.
But technical expertise is not the entire answer. After considerable discussion it was
concluded that to be really satisfactory, singing must come from the heart. What was the
purpose of the choir - entertainment, or to build up the saints? For the latter to occur the
singers had to mean what they sang. The saying goes, said Loewen, that “What comes from
the heart, goes to the heart!” In this regard behaviour of the choir members is crucial. They
must arrive on time, and know which music will be sung. They should not noisily page
— 59 —
As dun- * i, 49. lUMufiftc Sri.
nit )}<»«. '
»■ 4>, * * » 4,| 1. 3 -Lljj 3- «. 4.4. » ;
RH-®: — — -S — ft -j— tr. — 5 — ft— 5-j-5. — T— f — . ,T — 1. — T 1 .. ,7..j 7 g g _
■* | —6--!-*.— ft -b — f- r-7-**-j-4L--£ — $ — i i x I
n 6-th 1 -T-1 35-ji- r _ t — t — j 3 i ,...4 J
1 31*1 MM f}in * «* jun fcn-ja'*' (pin. bn* 8a»b i*oti Wild) u *t> i)o ■ am . na . i milt lan.gn nkfit, mo
2. «(» mt tost nl$t (fin 3«! bn ffitii . te Uanb, aud, [aQ • l«l iti> au 3oi>bairi nid)l
3. Bit trod- in* ftfgrt find kn fdn Buff but#’* re - it 38m, jo babul rr burtfi wn apr-ton tudj bm
4. hut mil ffllou.6fflf.fmt- Hu* frit $in4un$, gonj Sett flclotify, netjim dn b«»8anb, bn* nor rutf» ift. mil
5. Jftin tfa • no * ul . In b«l mflp fllaj, loan 3ecjvl ««> Jpn-Jfnl bai unb rrid)-ft t?c* blu^l
b«4 Ite.no * an, bfm.&njmeVim oot! fcMiig.
, , »--T . j:.|| a,. ,._0 - „ J. a s
Jr».--S-»- >> ,,*.-18*37 OlaT|7, 0 3 ' 7 |
I,*. B -t. t-TT»l : I. T T. I Ti) «. .jt *'•** , , j
U. 1 -it*— oH-H~l“T+<-0- 484-1.4+1!— o-l-ljS-S. 1(1 i> —
1. nut bn |
2. Mei.bm wit wr • jog. itm TOut.
3. li Inti on-irife'-uft SfMj. 1-5. Cram frif4 ^inon na<$ ita-tu-an, Nm Nntnthcim
4. ra-nm j
5. un* in ki • item fifilanb* 6d)0&. )
1-3. frint J 0db nur Rhirojl, la&tcu* nl$l grau'u, nvr molMc niffy out &cti wi.iwu’nl
- T- \ I - (> 4 s • ' • « , T, „ n
I-1’ - U-Jf-tJ. R-t-'-J- - X> V-X— - ff-ff R J---3 - 3 -
L«.l-i.r-X* y. q-j.r.Xlij. o- _T..X_y - L — j — .1 — a ., .1? 0_jj
^ u T- T.-T-T—tf — 0 — FU-T- -T- T T-R- - 0 - t-H-T T—T — T— 0- - 4 1 S 5- R R- ft 6 j 1 j « 4
mf p «/ 14-1
1-5. pcfl Grib nut la |l nidit grau'n, iwt mrQHc nittit auf ffloii m - Iruii'nl
Song No. 49 from Liederperlen
78
through the books when they are to start singing. They should pay attention to the
conductor, not all turn to see what late-comers are coming through the church door.
Loewen felt that “Christians and especially singers should, by their example, illustrate what
they sing and say.”
The conductors present also made a number of organizational decisions. It was felt
that an association of choral conductors would be helpful; the plan was to present a proposal
to the next General Convention of the Mennonite Brethren Church [Bundes konfer enz\,
which was to be held in Rueckenau in May of 1 895. They would start small, with units of
three or four choirs. These would get together twice a year for mutual challenge and
support. Conductors would get together three times a year to discuss items of common
concern. All conductors could meet at the annual conventions of the Mennonite Brethren
Church [most or all of the conductors at this seminar must have been Mennonite Brethren] .
They would get together the day before, then also during the evenings of the convention.
Bernhard Dueck and a Neufeld from Rueckenau were to write, then to present a
constitution to the convention.
Since the purpose of the three day seminar had been to “elevate hymn singing,” an
additional scheme was plotted. It was felt that improving choirs alone would not suffice;
to complicate matters many churches did not have accompanying instruments. The plan
was to establish an association of singers who would practise the most common hymns so
that they could sing them correctly. These trained singers would then infiltrate the
congregation, and try as hard as possible to counter the mistakes made and increase the
tempo of the singing.
New Year’s Eve the participants attended the service at the Friedensfeld church. It
was a joy to hear the wonderful hymns sung by the choir, with interspersed readings, and
of course the mandatory sermon. They parted with new plans and fresh resolve, only sorry
for those conductors who had not attended the workshop.
The plans to present the resolutions and the constitution of the proposed association
to the convention of the Mennonite Brethren Church of Russia in May of 1 895 were
probably not carried out. The convention was disrupted by government officials; names of
the delegates present were noted, and minutes of the proceedings were confiscated. The
organization was, however, established in 1 898, when Wilhelm Dyck of Andreasfeld was
elected president.
Bernhard Dueck, the workshop leader, and Johann Loewen, a participant, both fairly
young at the time [25 and 23 years old respectively], seem to have become good friends.
They collaborated, years later, in writing Mennolied for the celebration of the Anabaptist
four hundredth anniversary held in Switzerland in 1925. Loewen, a poet, wrote the lyrics,
Dueck composed the music. Unfortunately neither was allowed to leave the country at the
time to actually participate in the anniversary celebrations.
Sources:
Berg, Wesley, From Russia With Music, Hyperion Press Limited, Winnipeg, Canada,1985,
pp 16-27
Challier, A., News Item from Zyrardow, Saengergruss, March 1 894, p 22
Dueck, Bernhard, News Item from Friedensfeld, South Russia, Saengergruss, May 1894, pp 37,38
79
Dueck, Bernhard, News Item from Friedensfeld, South Russia, Saengergruss, March 1895, p 22
Letkemann, Peter, The Christlicher Saengerbund and Mennonite Choral Singing in Russia,
Mennonite Life, December 1986, pp 4-10
Liederperlen, No. 49, Das liebliche Los
Loewen, Johann, Line Dirigenten-Versammlug in Friedensfeld, Zionsbote, 27 February 1895,
p 3, and 6 March 1895, p 3
News Report, Zionsbote, 3 1 July 1895, p 4
Background Information:
Bernhard B. Dueck
Johann J. Loewen
The Friedensfeld Mennonite Brethren Church
80
BERNHARD B. DUECK
[1869-1936]
Organizer of the first Choral Conductors’
Workshop in South Russia
Bernhard Bernhard Dueck was bom on November 28, 1869, the third son of Bernhard and
Agatha [Thielmann] Dueck. He was bom and raised in Friedensfeld, a village of the Borozenko
Colony of South Russia. The Dueck family loved music. The senior Bernhard was musical, and
the younger Bernhard together with his brother successfully completed a music course in Riga,
Latvia. P.M. Friesen felt that the Friedensfeld Mennonite Brethren Church was exemplary in its
Sunday school, youth programs, music and choral groups. The Dueck family was singled out as
being particularly outstanding in music. Bernhard sang and played the guitar, his younger brother
Abram had mastered an eleven stringed guitar.
In 1 892 Bernhard married Margaretha Wiebe from the Kuban Settlement: they began their
married life as farmers in
Friedensfeld. Between 1893
and 1912 the couple had eight
children, Bernhard [1893],
Katharina [1894], Jacob
[1899], Johann [1901], Greta
[1903], Abram [1906], Lena
[1909] and Gerhard [1912],
While Bernhard’s
occupation was farming, his
true love was always music. In
1 892 he was elected as director
of the church choir in
Friedensfeld. He obviously
motivated the singers to such a
degree that they could
subsequently be used as
examples of what could be
achieved in both technique and dedication. In early 1 894 Bernhard attended a choral conductors’
workshop in Zyrardow, Poland; at this workshop he was not only a student, but sang and played
the guitar for the group. He was inspired to organize a similar workshop in Friedensfeld December
28 to 3 1 later that same year. The 1 8 participants felt that it was a great success.
Over the years Bernhard continued his enthusiasm for music. When he moved he soon
became the choir conductor of the local church. He continued to organize choral conductor work¬
shops in various parts of Russia, for example in Margenau, near Omsk, in 1 92 5 . Participants were
required to bring along their batons in order to practice conducting technique, an emphasis
Bernhard seems to have pursued with vigour throughout his musical career. Members of the group
formed a choir themselves, but also rehearsed songs with the Margenau church choir. All
musicians then participated in the church service the following Sunday.
Bernhard was also a composer. He had obviously become a friend of Johann Loewen who,
though interested in music, was at heart a poet. The two collaborated in writing a hymn
Mennolied, where Loewen wrote the lyrics and Dueck composed the music. It commemorated the
Bernhard Dueck, wife Margaretha and children
81
four hundredth anniversary of Anabaptism, and was to be used at the celebrations in Switzerland
in 1 925. Unfortunately neither Dueck nor Loewen were allowed to leave the country, so they could
not attend the ceremonies. Dueck also collaborated with Loewen in the writing of a Low German
song, Sing am levlich, sing am scheen, written especially for an elderly grandmother who had
trouble understanding High German.
The home of Bernhard and Margaretha Dueck was also filled with music. Daughter
Katharina recalled “He lived for music and singing. We had a pump organ.. .and father’s younger
brother... had an eleven stringed guitar. Very often we spent Sunday nights singing and playing.
It was a pleasant unforgettable childhood.”
On February 27, 1902, Friedensfeld had an evening celebrating the ten years that Bernhard
had been conductor of the choir. The whole village was invited, and the sanctuary was filled to
capacity. Elder Jantz began the
“jubilee” with prayer, reading a
relevant passage of scripture
and making a number of
pertinent remarks. Then the
singers took over; there were
songs by a mixed choir, by a
men’s choir, even a solo by
Bernhard himself accompanied
on the guitar by his brother
Abram. The music was
interspersed by recitation of
appropriate poems. Then
followed a meal, during which
time a representative of the
choir presented Bernhard with a
gift. Then the congregation
reassembled, and “many more
lovely songs were sung to the honour and praise of God.” Obviously the Friedensfeld congregation
appreciated its choir conductor.
Due to poor health Bernhard gave up farming after ten years. In 1903 the family moved
to the village of Bahndorf [Orlov] in the Memrik Colony, where he again directed the church choir.
Bernhard, together with a number of partners built a small mill in Bahndorf, which they operated
for four years. The Duecks then moved to Poltava, near the city of Chorol [Khorol], where a four
story steel mill was purchased. There were financial difficulties, so to improve business
opportunities the mill was moved near a railroad station in 1 909. During the overthrow of the
Czarist government and then the establishment of communist rule the mill continued to operate.
In 1922 it was confiscated by the government, Dueck continuing as manager. In 1926 Dueck was
released from this position.
Since he knew many people there, and had relatives in the region, it was quite easy for
Bernhard to settle on a farm at Putschkovo, near Omsk in Siberia. Eventually more and more farms
were collectivized, even in Siberia; as a land owner Bernhard was arrested and imprisoned in Omsk
early in 1 93 1 . In prison he was not well; his daughter Greta often brought him extra food to help
him maintain his health.
When Bernhard was released from prison in August of 1 932, he had lost all interest in life,
and more particularly he had also lost his zest for music. He joined his family in southern Russia,
then together with his wife, Margaretha, joined their youngest son in Alma Ata. Bernhard died
82
there on January 12, 1935. His funeral was not accompanied by the instrumental and choral music
with which he had enriched so many occasions. After Bernhard’s death Margaretha moved back
to Nikopol in southern Russia, where she lived with her children until she also died, on February
8, 1937.
Sources:
Berg, Wesley, From Russia with Music, Hyperion Press Limited, Winnipeg, Canada, 1985, pp
21,23,24, 27, 28
Braun, D. D., Ein Jubilaeums=Saengerfest, Zionsbote, 16 April 1902, pp 1, 2
Challier, A., Letter, Dirigentenkurs, Saengergruss, March 1894, p 22
Dueck, Bernhard, Letter, Die erste Reise einesDirigenten aus Suedrussland nach Rolen,
Saengergruss, May 1894, pp 37,38
Friesen, P. M., p 461
Loewen, Johann, Eine Dirigenten=Versammlung in Friedensfeld, Zionsbote, 27 February 1895,
p 3, and 6 March 1895, p 3
Mennonite Historical Atlas, pp 1 8, 1 1 8
Rahn, Peter, Zu der Anfrage ueber das ‘Mennolied’, Der Bote, 1 July 1975, pp 4, 6
Redekopp, Alfred H., Jacob Thielmann and Helena Kroeker, published by A. H. Redekopp,
Winnipeg, Canada, 1987, pp 19-24
83
JOHANN J. LOEWEN
[1871-1937?]
Participant in the first Choral Conductors’
Workshop in South Russia
Johann Loewen was bom in 1 87 1 in the Yazykovo Colony in southern Russia. At the age
of 1 5 he moved to Friedensfeld with his parents. He was converted at an evangelistic campaign of
Christian Schmidt of the Kuban, was baptized and joined the Mennonite Brethren Church. At the
age of 21 he entered the forestry service [Forstei], where he served at the Anadol camp for four
years.
During this time Johann was already writing poetry, some of his early poems being about
camp life. He was also interested in music, and must have had some expertise and training, since
he participated in the choral conductors’ workshop held by Bernhard Dueck in late 1894. Johann
wrote an extensive report about
this experience which was
published in Zionsbote. He
encouraged others to participate in
similar events.
In 1897 Johann married
Helene Friesen, the neighbour’s
daughter, and a relative of P. M.
Friesen. The young couple settled
in Blumenfeld [1] of the
Nepluyevka Colony. They had a
total of six children; these were
Anna, Johann, Heinrich and
Nikolai, two others dying in early
childhood.
The Nepluyevka
congregation was founded in 1 880,
was an affiliate of Friedensfeld,
and met alternately in the schools of Blumenfeld and Steinau until a building was constructed in
Steinau in 1905. Upon moving into this area Johann founded a choir in their church, remaining the
conductor for 20 years.
Johann published a 300 page book of poetry in 1899 called Herzenstoene fuer schlichte
Christen-herzen [Thoughts for gentle hearted Christians]. This publication was available at a
bookstore in Tiege, Molotschna. Loewen sometimes combined his poetic and musical interests.
He supplied the lyrics, Bernhard Dueck composed the music for Mennolied , written to celebrate
the four hundredth anniversary of Anabaptism in 1925. The words were dedicated to all
Mennonites, and emphasized Mennonites as wanderers, even in difficult times. He wrote:
Wenn man in unsern Tagen die Freiheit ketten will,
dann schaun wir fest entschlossen aufs neue Wanderziel.
[If in our day they want to chain our freedom,
Then we resolutely look ahead to a new goal.]
He again collaborated with Dueck to write a Low German song, Sing am levlich, sing am scheen.
During the unsettled times following World War I the Loewen farm was taken over by
neighbouring Russians, so the Loewens moved to Friedensfeld. Johann continued to be active in
84
the church, teaching Sunday school and directing the choir. He was elected area conductor, and
held Saengerfeste [song festivals] and workshops for conductors, even as late as 1930.
By the time their turn came to emigrate to Canada in the 1920s, it was too late. The
Loewens could not even get travel passes to go to Moscow in 1929 for the largely unsuccessful
attempt of Mennonites to get exit visas [only about 6,000 of the 13,000-15,000 gathered inMoscow
actually got visas and were able to escape].
Collective farms were established in the region, and Johann was appointed gardener. His
boss tried to get rid of him, and had him sent to jail in Nikopol on three occasions. The court
released him, however, because he was so valuable to the state, having planted a very productive
vineyard. In time his enemy did triumph. The NKVD again came for him, at night, in June of
1937. Johann was again imprisoned in Nikopol, this time permanently. He was visited a number
of times by his son Nikolai - but soon this stopped, because the son himself was imprisoned three
months later. Johann was tortured, and eventually “confessed” to destroying vineyards and
orchards on the collective farm.
After being imprisoned in Nikopol for some time both father and son, together with a
nephew, were transferred elsewhere and were never seen again. It has since then been discovered
that many of the prisoners who were said to have been “transferred” were actually shot. This may
well have happened to Johann Loewen.
Sources:
Friesen, P. M., pp 461, 671
Loewen, Johann, Eine Dirigenten-Versammlung in Friedensfeld, Suedrussland, Zionsbote
27 February 1895, p 3, and 6 March 1895, p 3
Loewen, Harry, Johann J. Loewen: Ein mennonitischer Dichter und Saenger, Mennonite Mirror,
November 1986, pp 28, 29
Loewen, Harry, Can the Son Answer for the Father? Reflections on the Stalinist Terror,
Journal of Mennonite Studies, 1998, pp 76-78
Mennonite Historical Atlas, pp 18, 118
P. P., Letter, Mennonitische Rundschau, 15 November 1900
Toews, A. A., Mennonitische Maertyrer, Volume 2, 1954, Article written by Helene Loewen,
Johann Loewen, pp 121-123
85
. . s |S . |S I
t lt4ct -e 1 f
Sdjlitftdjor nad) Strophe 7 ju fingen.
^[ieftcnb
S N S f' \ -h
-=#
- V- i x i v — _
P
Sim lag bie SBol fen • fan
Sim Sag bie bunt » le SBol
2 2c 2 j?-2 2 ,
rjrcc-r^cf-
- cc-tc
•I
fen
&& s
le, bei
■fau-(e, bei
, 2
- 0 -
- ' - r f i c <-c
‘JJndjt be<s fjel
'Jfadjt be3 gen
ten [5eu>erb@d)fin. ©o
er3 @tf)cin . ...
-rc-
mirb (Sr treu un§
1
(dtrirt .
JU
4-
-_C-
=±
- — —
-i
c/
r
fF-
=$=
1
i |
_n-
i ! 1
1/
fiif)
- reit
in3 i'anb
ber
3iu
f)t
ein,
in3 Caub
ber
-M-
J'
J_
J"
-7-
,,
pPF
M-
1
— 4 —
*" 1
t
-w
-bB
j- Fc
1
—C*' rit. K s. k
=C^Ehck
l - « - J - - 0—
/7\
-+-
9{u - fje ein,
iC 2"
t'CCC
ind Sanb
ber
r
Sffti - Ije eitt.
3ol)an» Potmen.
The seventh stanza of Mennolied, words written
by Johann J. Loewen, and music composed by
Bernhard B. Dueck
86
THE FRIEDENSFELD MENNONITE
BRETHREN CHURCH
The village of Friedensfeld [Miropol] was considered to be an outlying part of the
Borozenko Colony, although it technically was in the Russian volost Leschkarevo. From 1865 to
1867 about 120 Kleine Gemeinde families from the Molotschna purchased 6,137 dessiatines of
land near Nikopol in Ekaterinoslav for 184,100 rubles. Steinbach, Blumenhof, Heuboden,
Rosenfeld and Annafeld were established. Gruenfeld and Friedensfeld were founded roughly the
same time, somewhat north and east of the main centre of settlement. At the same time a number
of people from Chortitza established the villages of Nikolaithal, Felsenbach and Schoendorf. The
Borozenko Colony had its own volost, administrative offices being at Nikolaithal.
Friedensfeld was founded in late 1866, largely by members of the Kleine Gemeinde from
the Molotschna. Among the first settlers were also three Mennonite Brethren families, Jakob Jantz
from Fuerstenau, Bernhard Dueck from Schoenau, and Peter Fast. A Mennonite Brethren
fellowship was organized which first met in the Jantz’s semlin [an earth hut, half dug in, half above
ground], where they held Sunday services and Wednesday evening prayer meetings. Needing more
space they moved to the home of Bernhard Dueck in late 1868. In 1869 five people were baptized,
and two additional Mennonite Brethren families moved into the village - bringing the total to 1 7
members. Jakob Jantz was leader of the group, Peter Fast, teacher in the village, assisted as
minister, Bernhard Dueck was deacon. When most of the Kleine Gemeinde congregations of
southern Russia emigrated to North America in the mid 1870s, many members also left
Friedensfeld. Most of the remaining inhabitants of the village then joined the Mennonite Brethren,
to a considerable degree due to the work of Jakob Jantz.
There was at this time a period of bitter strife within the church membership. There was
quarrelling and enmity about peripheral issues and matters of “honour.” P. M. Friesen comments
that for a time the name “Friedensfeld” [field of peace] was actually a misnomer, it should really
be “Battlefield!” But, continued Friesen, “...file Lord could help, though not without some
punishment; powerful and rich members left [were expelled from?] the membership.. .God had to
make poor and small what had been large and wealthy, to
discipline and then to rescue.” Later the church was greatly
strengthened and encouraged when minister Christian Schmidt
and Johann Wieler moved to Friedensfeld.
At first the congregation was an affiliate of the
Molotschna Mennonite Brethren Church, but on June 1 5, 1 875
it was organized as a separate group. Jakob Jantz was elected
elder, Christian Schmidt as “associate elder.” Elder Abraham
Unger of Einlage and Elder Abraham Schellenberg of
Rueckenau presided at the installation service.
Initial membership was 45, with a total of 125
adherents. In the autumn of 1875 Peter Fast moved to
Sergeyevka, then in 1878 Christian Schmidt departed for the
Kuban. Since there was then a dearth of ministers, the
congregation elected two “teachers” in 1878, Benjamin Jantz
and Johann Neufeld. Four years later they were confirmed as
ministers and Bernhard Dueck as deacon at an installation
service presided over by Elder Aron Lepp. In February of 1883 Christian Schmidt visited his
former church home. As a result of his powerful preaching a great revival gripped many at
87
Friedensfeld, leading to 40 baptisms in April of that year.
At the twenty five year anniversary celebration of the Mennonite Brethren Church on
January6, 1885, the Freidensfeld church had about 1 00 members, with another 125 adherents. The
church also related to and served a Baptist church in the nearby village of Michailovka.
After 1885 the life of the Friedensfeld church is described as “...quiet and orderly
progress.” It acted as a bridge between the Molotschna and Chortitza, since it had active members
from both areas. The congregation lost some valued members through death, Martin Thielmann
[dedicated and energetic], Dietrich Klassen [itinerant minister], Bernhard Dueck [one of the
founders and deacon], Franz Peters [minister, particularly interested in missions], also Margareta
[Toews], the wife of Elder Jakob Jantz.
Elder Jantz continued to work effectively; he and the church took a fairly conciliatory
stand on the question of “open communion,” which was a serious problem in some of the other
Mennonite Brethren congregations. He had very little formal education himself, but was school
teacher in the village for four years in the late 1880s. Abram Wall, formerly of the Crimea, was
for a time based in Friedensfeld [while carrying out itinerant ministry], but by 1910 had settled in
Miloradovka. Peter Funk was elected deacon after the death of Bernhard Dueck [senior].
The church was known for its dedication to education, a fair number of the young men
having completed high school in Ohrloff, some also the Teachers’ College in Halbstadt. Sunday
school and youth programs were also emphasized. In 1889 the Sunday school had five teachers
with 65 students. There were two youth groups, the young men numbered 18, while the young
ladies totalled 22. There was particular love for, excitement about and understanding of
instrumental and choral music. The choir in 1889 had 25 members.
Bernhard Dueck, one of the founders of Friedensfeld, was very interested in many aspects
of church work, but especially music. The extended Dueck family, which would include his wife’s
family [she was a Thielmann], often constituted a major part of musical groups. Two sons of the
family, Bernhard and Abram, studied music in Riga. Bernhard [junior] became the conductor of
the church choir in 1892. As well as singing at the Sunday morning services, the choir sang at
funerals, weddings, baptisms, at sick beds, had gone carolling at Christmas, and participated in
choral festivals. In one period they made 36 trips to 23 different places. Dueck obviously trained
the singers to a high degree of dedication and competence, having ten additional services featuring
music, and learning a repertoire of 250 songs. Dueck was training his choir so that he could use
it as an example of excellence at the Choral Conductors’ Workshop which was held in Friedensfeld
in December of 1894. The choir was also an inspiration to neighbouring congregations,
participating in a song fest of the Judenplan villages in 1902. Bernhard continued in this position
until he moved to the Memrik Colony in 1 903 . However the excellence of the choir must have been
carried on, since in subsequent reports of activities of the church there is repeated praise for its
contributions.
Around the year 1900 Friedensfeld underwent a difficult time, in part because a number
of people moved away, but also fuelled by an economic downturn likely due to poor crops. The
church was near dissolution. Then there seemed to be an about face, and the church again
flourished. The church building, which had been constructed in 1885, had ample room for the
congregation and the village school.
The Friedensfeld congregation always had a strong outreach program, the ministers often
participating in itinerant evangelism and nurture in far away places. Jakob Jantz himself travelled
to Germany, Turkestan, Siberia and to the Terek. He also spent considerable time in Sagradovka,
but his particular interest seems to have been Poland, the region where he was bom. He visited
Poland 23 times, being active in the establishment of a Mennonite Brethren church at Deutsch-
Wymyschle. Jantz was ecumenical in his interests, cultivating fellowship with ministers of the
88
nearby Russian evangelical church at Koudashovka. The Baptist leader JohannjTvan] G. Kargel,
from St. Petersburg, held a month long missions school in Friedensfeld in January of 1 889; 1 6 men
participated.
As a result of the outreach a number of “outposts” were established which in time became
independent Mennonite Brethren congregations. Jakob Jantz was the presiding elder when the
Deutsch-Wymyschle congregation was incorporated and the officials ordained in 1895.
Sagradovka-Tiege also flourished, in 1885 having about 100 members; in 1889 alone 50 new
members joined through baptism. In June of 1902 Elder Jantz ordained Johann Nickel as elder
for this what P. M. Friesen called “a more or less independent” congregation.
In 1905 the Friedensfeld congregation had one elder, eight ordained ministers, 35 baptisms
for the year, and a total membership of 3 44, of which only 83 were in the home church. By the end
of 1906 total membership had climbed slightly to 360. Altogether there were 1,065 adherents, and
not surprisingly for a church so interested in music, 110 choir members.
Friedensfeld continued to have a number of official affiliate congregations. At the
beginning of 1906 these affiliates were:
1. Nepluyevka, established in 1880, leader Heinrich Friesen, membership 97,
owned building since 1905
2. Novopodolsk, established 1888, Judenplan villages, which consisted of
Mennonite model farmers living in basically Jewish villages, leader
Franz Wieler, membership 61, met in homes and schools
3. Steinfeld, of the Schlachtin Colony, established in 1888, leader Franz
Krause, membership 60, had own building
4. Miloradovka and Schilovo, established 1895, leader Abram Wall,
membership 43, had own building
On February 27, 1 902, Friedensfeld had an evening celebrating the ten years that Bernhard
Dueck had been conductor of the choir. The whole village was invited, and the sanctuary was filled
to capacity. Elder Jantz began the “jubilee” with prayer, reading a relevant passage of scripture and
making a number of pertinent remarks. Then the singers took over; there were songs by a mixed
choir, by a men’s chorus, even a solo by Bernhard himself accompanied on the guitar by his brother
Abram. The music was interspersed by the recitation of appropriate poems. This was followed by
a meal, during which time a representative of the choir presented Bernhard with a gift. Then the
congregation reassembled, and “many more lovely songs were sung to the honour and praise of
God.” Obviously the Friedensfeld congregation appreciated its choir conductor.
Friedensfeld celebrated a most wonderful Pentecost season in 1910. “As is well known,”
wrote a correspondent, “we had a great revival here this winter, mainly among the youth. In almost
every household there were people whose sins had been forgiven, in a number of homes there were
even three individuals who turned to Christ.” Testimonies were given, and on the third day of
Pentecost 27 of the newly converted were baptized, including a 60 year old man. A minister from
Ufa assured the participants that despite difficulties they had someone to turn to, Jesus Christ.
Minister Abram Wall performed the actual baptism. Ten of the candidates sang “ Jesugeh voran.
[Jesus lead the way...].
Leadership of the church must have been quite adaptable and willing to travel to serve its
far flung membership. Jakob Jantz remained elder, and did itinerant ministry even at an advanced
age. He usually had communion once a month at his home base in Friedensfeld, once every three
months with the affiliate congregations. A correspondent remarked in 1913 that at the age of 79
he was still on duty, although others had to read the biblical text for him as well the words for
songs, because a severe tremor of his hands made holding books difficult. Abram Wall was active
in the home congregation even though he lived in Miloradovka. He greeted the participants in the
89
name of the church at the Choral Conductors' Workshop in 1894, he spoke at the funeral of Jakob
Jantz’s wife in 1903, and likely participated in many other functions. Heinrich Friesen headed the
Nepluyevka affiliate, but also spoke at various church functions. He was a faithful correspondent
for the whole church, writing a fair number of reports which were published in Zionsbote. His
letters stopped abruptly after April, 1914, so it is quite possible that he moved away or was
incapacitated after that time.
The Friedensfeld congregation actively participated in the work of the wider Mennonite
Brethren constituency. From two to nine representatives were recorded as delegates to annual
conventions held in 1882, 1903, 1904, 1910, 1913 and 1918. Jakob Jantz was invariably one of the
group while he was still able to travel, and played an active role at the conventions. He, for
example, delivered one of the eight sermons which inspired the delegates at the convention held
on May 18, 1903, in Waldheim. In 1904 the Friedensfeld delegates invited the conference to their
locale for 1 905, so the convention was likely held there, although no extant minutes document this.
As mentioned previously, Friedensfeld ministers travelled widely; some of these trips were itinerant
ministry under the jurisdiction of the Mennonite Brethren Conference. Reports confirm that
Friedensfeld also contributed financially to the various conference projects.
Jakob Jantz likely functioned as elder until he died in 1917. The church sent delegates,
Abraham Neustaedter and Abram Wall, to the Menonnite Brethren convention held in Vassilievka
in September of 1918. In the unsettled times after World War I the Johann J. Loewens lost their
farm in Blumenfeld, Nepluyevka Colony, so they moved to Friedensfeld. Johann was active in the
church, teaching Sunday school, and not surprisingly, conducting the church mixed choir as well
as a male choir.
The unsettled times also had a direct effect on the church. On Christmas Day, 1920
Makhno bandits came riding into Friedensfeld. Likely finding nobody at home, they headed for
the church. Minister Aron P. Toews, also school teacher, was in charge of the service when the
bandits stormed into the church sanctuary screaming, demanding that the singing stop [how
appropriate that they would find the church singing!]. Toews asked the congregation to remain
calm, since they were “in the house of God, and under his protection.” A shot was fired, the bandits
collected a sum of money, and left the worshippers in peace.
A series of letters written by members of the Jantz family gives insight into some of the
church life in the mid 1920s. The communists had obviously taken over administration of the
village. They were using the front classroom of the school/church for Spektakel [loud programs,
music?] on Sunday mornings. The congregation put up an additional brick wall between the rooms
to muffle the sound. The services were allowed to continue, but children under 1 8 were not to
attend. Sunday school was forbidden. The congregation had to pay rent to use its own facility.
The musical emphasis, spear-headed by Johann Loewen, continued to be strong. The
mixed choir, consisting of 19 members in 1923, participated in regional songfests. Loewen also
organized a male choir, and on occasion practiced with a youth choir as well. The tradition of
songfests in the Friedensfeld sanctuary continued, although the congregation sometimes found it
hard to make all the arrangements.
On October 23,1923 there were 80 singers from five choirs at Friedensfeld. A total of 1 05
numbers were presented, including songs, sermons and poems. The weather was beautiful, and
every seat in the church was filled.
Continuing with a tradition begun in 1894, Bernhard Dueck, then of Poltava, held another
choir conductors’ seminar in Friedensfeld on January 7-11, 1925. There were 18 registrants. The
church choir had to attend every evening to allow the conductors to practice their art. The closing
program produced music which was well appreciated, “one was in the spirit transported to heavenly
regions!”
90
Accepting more than its share, the regional songfest was again in Friedensfeld in May,
1926, when preparations were made for 180 singers. They butchered two cows, two sheep,
prepared four large crocks of borscht, four large pots of fruit soup [Fruchtmuss] , and much baking,
including, of course, Zwieback. Seven choirs appeared for the two day festival, including a large
Russian group from Kadushovka. Johann Loewen had made the arrangements; an addition had
been added to the church building to hold the large number of guests, and food was served in the
machine shed [Scheune] of Peter Isaak. All guests left happy, having had a blessed time.
There were some technical difficulties with the celebration of Christmas, New Years and
Easter. By this time there was a significant Russian population in Friedensfeld. The Mennonites
had accepted the new, Gregorian calendar, the Russians stuck to the old, Julian calendar. The
businesses in the village, notably the mill and the store, had been taken over by Russians, so their
holidays followed the Julian dates. To comply with its neighbours the Friedensfeld church, at least
for a number of years, certainly in 1925, celebrated according to the “Old” calendar. Mennonite
visitors to the celebrations in Friedensfeld therefore could participate twice, once at home, then
later in Friedensfeld.
Towards the end of the 1920s , however, gradually more restrictions came into effect.
After a time collective farms were established in the area, and some of the farmers will have been
sent off their land. The church was likely forced to close its doors about 1930, although some of
the Mennonites, such as the Johann Loewens, still lived in the area. Many of the men were
subsequently imprisoned during the Purge of 1936-1938.
Sources:
Berg, Wesley, From Russia with Music, Hyperion Press Limited, Winnipeg, Canada, 1985,
pp 23, 24, 27
Braun, D. D., Ein Jubilaeums=Saengerfest, Zionsbote, 16 April 1902, pp 1, 2
Braun, Heinrich, Bundes-Statistic, der Vereinigten, Taufgesinnten, Mermonitischen Brueder-
Gemeinde in Russ land. 1905, Nikopol, 1906
Dueck, Abe J., Moving Beyond Secession, Kindred Productions, Winnipeg, Canada, and
Hillsboro, USA, 1997, pp 24, 25, 27, 30, 42, 44, 55, 60, 66, 87, 93, 98
Friesen, Heinrich, Letters, Zionsbote, 8 November 1911, pp 2, 3; 24 January 1912, p 5;
30 April 1913, pp 3, 4; 13 August 1913, pp 4, 5; 15 April 1914, p 4
Friesen, P. M., pp 406, 423-427, 459-464, 722
Jantz Family Letters, edited and typed by Harold Jantz, Winnipeg
Jantz, Harold, great-grandson of Jakob Jantz, personal information
Jantz, Jakob, Jahres Bericht von der Gemeinde Friedensfeld 1889, Zionsbote, 5 March 1890, pi
Jantz, Jakob, Obituary of Margareta Jantz, Zionsbote, 8 July 1903, p 5
Mennonite Encyclopedia
Mennonite Historical Atlas, ppl 8, 118
Kargel, J. G., Zwischen den Enden der Erde, Licht im Osten, Wemigerode am Harz, 1928,
Introduction by Jakob Kroeker, pp viii, ix
Klippenstein, Lawrence, Russian Evangelicalism Revisited: Ivan Kargel and the Founding of
the Russian Baptist Union, Baptist History and Heritage, April 1992, pp 42, 43
News Report, Friedensstimme, 19 June 1910, p 8
Ratzlaff, Erich L., Im Weichselbogen, Winnipeg, Canada, 1971, pp 55-57, 59, 60, 62, 203
Redekopp, Alfred H., Jakob Thielmann and Helena Kroeker, published by A. H. Redekopp,
Winnipeg, Canada, 1987, pp 11-13, 29, 30
Rempel, Olga, Einer von Vielen: Die Lebensgeschichte von Prediger Aron P. Toews, Winnipeg,
Canada, p 37
Toews, J. A., pp 62, 63, 70, 78, 84, 93
91
16. DEDICATION SERVICE AT THE LUGOVSK
MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
OCTOBER 7, 1901
When the Neu Samara Colony was first established in 1891 there were few
Mennonite Brethren settlers. Through the itinerant evangelistic efforts of David Duerksen
of the Crimea, Jakob Reimer of Rueckenau, David Nachtigal and Peter Koehn of
Waldheim, many people were converted and joined the Mennonite Brethren Church. Up
to 35 were baptized at one time, in the Kaltanka River near the west end of Lugovsk; the
stream had been dammed up to retain the snow run-off. The congregation walked to the
river, filling the air with song; at the water’s edge they listened to a sermon, then the
baptismal candidates prayed. The minister and the candidates stepped into the stream for
the baptism, then the candidates were accepted into membership.
Abram Martens led the church from 1893 until 1926. A confession of faith was
accepted by the congregation on December 16, 1900. A special seal was affixed to the
document, as well as signatures by leader Abram Martens, minister Daniel Friesen, and
deacons Isaak Wiens and Jakob Fast. Abram Martens was ordained elder in 1910, Elder
David Duerksen presiding.
The first church was on the front yard of Franz Braun of Lugovsk; a second building
was soon too small. Then a much larger sanctuary was built on the western end of Lugovsk,
north side of the street.
The
new building
had a high
foundation, on
which were
placed stones
from a quarry
30 verst east
of Ivanovka.
Earth for the
structure was
obtained from
a hill west of
the village.
Human bones and a variety of coins were discovered in this hillock, likely from the tomb
of some long forgotten nomad chieftain. A brick-yard just north of the building supplied
material for a master bricklayer and his assistants, who had come from the Molotschna for
this job.
The main sanctuary was oriented parallel to the street, running east- west. The pulpit
was on the east end, elevated on a 4‘/z foot platform, which spanned the entire width of the
sanctuary. The pulpit itself was created by a mastercraftsman from the south, its form
representing an opening lily. On each side of the pulpit were seats for singers, with room
The church at Lugovsk under construction [from Friesen]
92
for two choirs. The main sanctuary comfortably seated 800 people. A balcony on the west
end seated another 200, but was only used on special occasions. On the north side of the
building, west end, there was a room for the women, a cloak- room and a nursery. On
the east end was a room for men, a cloak-room and a room for ministers. Later these rooms
were combined, allowing use as a dining hall. On the west end of the church lot, horse
stables were provided, and there was also a well, allowing horses to be watered over the
noon hour.
It was felt that the Lugovsk church building was the largest and most beautiful of
any in the colony, and the best in the whole Russian Mennonite Brethren constituency.
The completed sanctuary at Lugovsk [from Bracks]
The dedication of the new building was celebrated on October 7, 1901. The
proceedings were undoubtedly chaired by Abram Martens and likely began fairly early in
the morning. Guests from various colonies participated; the church was packed to the
rafters, there being 3,000 people filling the sanctuary and spilling into the aisles. Elder
David Duerksen from the Crimea, known as a prince among Mennonite preachers, and to
some degree responsible for the growth of the Lugovsk church, was an invited guest
speaker. Elder David Schellenberg, representing the mother church at Rueckenau, was
another invited speaker. The newly appointed Elder Komelius Fehr from Kamenka in
Orenburg also participated. Komelius G. Neufeld from Devlakanovo of the Ufa Colony
was there; his choir enriched the proceedings with a number of songs and concluded the
program with a rousing rendition of the glorious Hallelujah Chorus from Handel’s Messiah.
After the celebration all 3,000 guests were served a lunch.
It was felt that this day the verse of scripture, possibly the motto for the occasion,
indeed was fulfilled: “Glorious things are preached within your walls, you city of God .”
Psalm 87:3.[ German versions read “Herrliche Dinge werden in dir gepredigt, du Stadt
Gottes.” The English versions are different. They read “Glorious things are said of you, O
city of God.”]
The congregation seemed to thrive in its new facility. The annual Christmas season
93
Bible studies were held in December, 1901, with Abram Martens, Daniel Friesen, Nicholas
Toews, J. Klassen and others proclaiming the message of the new birth to a congregation
of about 500 people.
In all, three churches were constructed in Neu Samara. There was the Mennonite
Brethren building at Lugovsk, a Kirchengemeinde building in Pleshanovo and an Alliance
house of worship in Donskoye. With eventual collectivization and a more consistant anti-
religious policy by the communist government church life and function became more and
more difficult. The church in Donskoye was closed on January 6, 1931. It was initially
converted into a club and cinema, and in the late 1 940s was revamped to become a school.
The church in Pleschanovo was closed at roughly the same time, early in 1931, and was
remodelled to house a school. In the late 1960s, when a new school was built, it was
coverted to a club.
The Lugovsk church continued to function another two years, into 1933, when it
was transformed into a high school. The roof was raised to allow construction of a second
story; the ten classroom school served the whole colony. In 1973 a new school was built
between Lugovsk and the neighbouring Podolysk, so the church building was used as a
granary by the collective farm. In 1 995 it was sold to the cheese factory across the street,
with the understanding that the building would be restored to its original appearance. To
comply with this condition the second story was removed, and the building completely
renovated. The cheese factory now uses it for office and laboratory space.
Sources:
Bracks, J. H., and Hooge, H., Neu-Samara am lock, Clearbrook, B. C., 1964, pp 56, 85-87
Dueck, Abe J., Moving beyond Secession, Kindred Productions, Winnipeg, Canada, and
Hillsboro, U.S.A., 1998, pp 26, 33
Friesen, P. M. pp 444, 480
Janzen, Daniel, Die Mennoniten in Russ land, unpublished article, 1998
The Mennonite Encyclopedia
News Item, Zionsbote, 16 October 1901, p 4
News Item, Zionsbote, 12 March 1902, pp 4, 5
Background Information:
An Architect’s Appraisal and Plan of the Lugovsk Sanctuary
Neu Samara Colony
Map: Neu Samara Colony
Elder David Gerhard Duerksen
Elder David Schellenberg
Elder Komelius A. Fehr
Komelius Gerhard Neufeld
Liederperlen and the Hallelujah Chorus
94
AN ARCHITECT’S APPRAISAL
RUDY P. FRIESEN, FRAIC, Hon. FAIA
ARCHITECT, WINNIPEG, MANITOBA
The Mennonite Brethren meetinghouse in Lugovsk was located on the west end of the
village, on the north side of the street, and parallel to the street in the traditional manner [almost
all Mennonite church buildings in Russia were placed parallel to the street]. It had a spacious
sanctuary with a ceiling that may have been well over 20 feet high [the exterior windows could
have been 10-12 feet high], and could comfortably seat 800 people. The pulpit\platform was located
at the east end of the rectangular building at a height of approximately four and a half feet above
the floor. The platform stretched across the full width of the sanctuary, with space for two choirs,
one on each side of the pulpit. A balcony with seating for another 200 people extended across the
west end. It was used only for overflow seating on special occasions.
At each end of the building, on the north side, there was a Halle or entrance hall. Actually
this suggests more than just an entrance; the west [women’s] hall had a coat room and a baby room,
and the east
[men’s] hall had a
coat room and a
ministers’ room.
These two
entrance halls
were later
connected to
create a long
room used as a
dining hall. The
photo in Quiring
[the one on this
page] was likely
taken before this
was built; one can
make out only
two arched windows on the north facade [the side away from the picture], suggesting that these
halls extended north from the building. The photo in Friesen was likely taken before any of these
halls were built. These halls were the main entrances for the men and women respectively. The
fact that these entrances faced the church yard was in accordance with the general Mennonite
church building tradition; the building was located near the village street, the church yard was
behind the building, and the entrances usually faced the church yard.
An extension to the west end of the building likely contained a stair to the balcony [similar
to the Schoensee church building] and an exit door. The photo in Friesen does not show this
addition, yet it clearly indicates that the west wall of the sanctuary was built to accept the
extension, with a door opening at ground floor level and another door opening at the balcony level.
The west and north extensions were probably constructed soon after the main structure was erected.
Based on the chimneys evident on the photos there would have been two stoves in the
sanctuary, for heating the building in winter.
The exterior walls of the church were made of burned clay bricks, manufactured on site,
resting on a foundation made of quarried stone. The hip roof was covered with metal sheeting. The
building’s exterior was designed in a neo-classical style, with baroque like windows that recall
Partially completed church building at Lugovsk
[from Quiring]
95
those of the Gnadenfeld church building [constructed in 1854] in their proportions. A number of
the Kirchkiche church buildings constructed around this time had gothic shaped windows.
The centre portion of the front facade, facing the street, had a higher parapet. This created
a visual axis perpendicular to the street and suggests at first glance that the pulpit\platform would
be behind this facade. The entrance halls extending from the north facade reinforced this axis. Yet
the interior layout of the sanctuary created an axis parallel to the street. This created an interesting
contradiction between what the exterior of the building expressed and the actual interior form. This
contradiction was likely quite unusual in Mennonite churches, although Millerovo and Alexandertal
may have been similar.
Not directly related to architecture, but of interest is the labelling of worship facilities. The
Kirchliche gradually adopted the term Kirche or church, the Mennonite Brethren tended to use the
terms Versammlungshaus [meeting house] or Bethaiis [house of prayer].
Sources:
Quiring, Walter, and Bartel, Helen, A Is Ihre Zeit erfuellt war, published by the authors, 1963, p 139
COAT ROOM COAT ROOM
Plan of the Lugovsk sanctuary
96
NEU SAMARA COLONY
Neu Samara [also known as Pleshanovo] was established in 1891 by settlers from the
Molotschna. The colony bought 20,388 dessiatines of land for 664,416 rubles in the Luxemburg
District, Region Busuluk, 400 kilometres east of the city of Samara. The parcel of land, largely
south of the Tok River, was purchased from a number of land owners, among them Krassikov,
Pleshanov and Bogomasov.
Intended for Molotschna landless families, pioneers to this colony received farmsteads,
but had very few other resources, so initial development was slow. Farmers had to adjust to
different soil and much longer and more severe winters. Droughts devastated crops about every
five years.
Originally 12 villages were laid out, but by 1917 there had been expansion to 14 villages
and at least nine separate estates, 3,670 people occupying almost 32,000 dessiatines. Each village
started with an elementary school, although buildings were of clay bricks with thatched roofs, and
instruction was quite rudimentary. A secondary school [Zentralschule] was established in Lugovsk
in 1908, moving into a brand new building in 1910. Medical services were at first primitive, but
in time there was a doctor. In 1 907 a hospital founded by G. G. Voth was dedicated in Pleshanovo;
it was enlarged when the district took over its management in 1912.
In time there were small shops in each village, with two larger stores in the colony. By
1917 there were two farm implement dealers, a cheese factory, a number of metal machine shops,
furniture factories and one painting business. There were three steam driven flour mills and one
water-powered mill on the Tok River.
The Pleshanovo Mennonite Church was established in 1 89 1 , the first services taking place
at a temporary camp near the mill on the Tok River. A sanctuary meant to serve the whole colony
was built in the village of Pleshanovo, and dedicated in 1900. In 1905 the elder was Daniel
Boschmann, and the baptized membership stood at 1,034.
Only few initial settlers were Mennonite Brethren, but their numbers swelled through the
work of itinerant ministers such as David Duerksen of the Crimea. Abram Martens was leader of
the congregation from 1893 to 1926. A large church building was erected in Lugovsk, the
dedication service being held on October 7, 1901 . Three thousand guests packed the sanctuary for
the celebration. In 1 909 an Allianz church was established in Donskoye, erecting a building in that
village. In time the members drifted to the Mennonite Brethren, Donskoye becoming an affiliate
of the Lugovsk congregation.
Neu Samara suffered little during the revolution, but the front passed through the area on
several occasions during the civil war. In 1919-20 the Neu Samara settlement became part of the
Bashkir Republic, beginning a period of frequent requisitioning and oppression. Following the
request of a delegation sent to Moscow, Neu Samara and Orenburg were transferred to the
administration of the Russian regional government in 1921. In the 1920s a number of people left
the area, at least 104 migrating to Canada in 1926.
During the collectivization of 1929-30 many, especially wealthier farmers and religious
leaders, were exiled to Siberia or the far north. The settlement itself, however, was not totally
destroyed, leaving a considerable number of Mennonites in the area. Church congregations were
disbanded, especially after the imprisonment of most of the leadership, the buildings being used
as clubs or for schools. Initially all 14 villages formed one collective farm, but later they were
divided into three administrative regions.
Religious life seems to have persisted, and showed renewal even during Stalin’s later years.
There were many obstacles to overcome, imprisonment was still a constant threat, but by 1976 a
Mennonite Brethren church was registered in Donskoye, and on April 15, 1978 construction of a
97
new church building was begun. By the 1980s there was a flourishing Mennonite Brethren
congregation in Donskoye, with Pastor Daniel Janzen. The land in the region was part of the Karl
Marx Collective Farm, centred in Podolysk.
In recent years, particularly after the breakdown of the Iron Curtain, many Mennonites have
left the area, migrating to Germany as Aussiedler.
Sources:
Brucks, J. H., and Hooge, H., Neu-Samara am Tock, Clearbrook, B. C., 1964
Janzen, Daniel, Die Mennoniten in Russland, unpublished article, 1 998
Mennonite Historical Atlas, pp 54, 134-135
Neu Samara Colony
98
ELDER DAVID GERHARD
DUERKSEN
[1850-1910]
Special invited guest speaker at the
Lugovsk dedication service
David Duerksen was bom in the Molotschna, likely in Margenau. Not having opportunity
for further education, he was largely a self taught man. Even early on his talents were recognized,
leading to his appointment as village teacher. In a few years the previously neglected Margenau
school was considered to be one of the best in the Gnadenfeld Volost.
Duerksen’ s teaching skills and spiritual gifts were so well thought of that he was elected
as minister of the Margenau Mennonite Church. Here he soon demonstrated an independent, yet
devout spirit, in that he preached without using the old prescribed
sermons, and prayed spontaneously. This delighted some, but aroused
the opposition of others in the congregation. In 1884 and 1885 a
considerable number of people in the area, including ministers, joined
the Mennonite Brethren Church, Duerksen among them. He began
worshipping with the Rueckenau Mennonite Brethren congregation.
Recognizing his evangelistic fervour and his skill at preaching, he was
chosen as an itinerant minister for the entire Mennonite Brethren
Conference. In this capacity Duerksen visited most Mennonite
settlements in European and Asiatic Russia, as well as the United States
and Germany. In his travels he also preached in the recently
established Neu Samara, greatly increasing the Mennonite Brethren
presence in that colony.
In 1897 the Spat-Schoental congregation extended a call to
Duerksen to assume responsibility for leadership of the growing
Mennonite Brethren constituency. Knowing that this might somewhat limit the sphere of his
activities to the local area, he nonetheless accepted, and moved to Schoental. In 1 899 Duerksen was
ordained as elder, with Elder Aron Lepp of Chortitza and Elder David Schellenberg of Rueckenau
presiding. The Spat-Schoental congregation became organizationally independent, with sanctuaries
in Spat [1887] and Schoental [1905]. In 1902 membership stood at 330, with 500 additional
adherents.
David Duerksen was called “a prince among Mennonite preachers”. Even when he had
specific obligations in the Crimea, his heart was in evangelism; he was also called upon to speak
at many special occasions. His sermons were always “very well worked out, and prepared on his
knees”. He preached with deep conviction and great enthusiasm.
Duerksen was a well respected teacher, having been in that profession for 1 8 years, and in
the Crimea was a member of the board which supervised the teaching of religion and German in the
schools. He organized monthly youth meetings [Jugendvereine] , not only planning them, but often
writing poems, plays and songs for the programs. He wrote extensively; one hundred of his
sermons are extant and testify to his widespread concerns.
The question of open communion which plagued the Ruekenau church also flared up in the
Crimea. Duerksen in time came to side with those who would restrict communion to baptized
members only. This controversy caused him some difficulties towards the end of his career.
David Duerksen was married to Anna Martens of Hamberg, Molotschna on November 23,
99
1871. She was a loving support for his work. The couple had nine children, of which five survived
to adulthood, Gerhard [later a medical doctor], Katharina [married Jacob C. Reimer], David,
Johann, and another girl. Anna died September 20, 1906.
It seems that after Anna’s death Duerksen remarried, the bride being suggested by a friend
of his. Apparently the marriage was not a happy one.
After nine months of painful suffering David Duerksen died on July29, 1910; the funeral
was on August 4. He, despite having been involved in some controversies, seems to have been able
to bridge the gaps to continue ministry. For more than two decades he was one of the strongest
influences for the awakening, nurturing and furthering the spiritual life in the Russian Mennonite
churches.
Sources:
Brucks, J. H., and Hooge, H., Neu-Samara am Tock, Clearbrook, B. C., 1964, pp 85, 86
Duerksen, David, family tree
Durksen, Martin, Die Krim war unsere Heimat, Winnipeg, Canada, 1977, pp 150-51
Durksen, Martin, family tree
Friesen, P. M. pp. 193, 202, 216, 324, 373, 407, 410, 414, 415, 439-42, 445, 458,
466-468, 470, 479, 529, 530, 561, 563, 720, 723
Mennonitisches Lexikon
News Item, Zionsbote, 7 September 1910, p 5
News Item, Zionsbote, A brief obituary of David Duerksen, 21 September 1910, p 9
Obituary of Anna Duerksen [Martens], written by David G. Duerksen, Mennonitische
Rundschau, 28 November 1906, p 10
Toews, J. A., pp 83, 89, 90, 369
100
ELDER DAVID SCHELLENBERG
[1852-1919]
Special invited guest speaker at the
Lugovsk dedication service
David Schellenberg was bom in Neukirch, Molotschna, on September 13, 1852, to
Abraham and Maria Schellenberg. His elementary school education was supplemented by
extensive reading. Initially a very enthusiastic and well thought of Sunday school teacher, he was
ordained to the ministry on October 2, 1 876, at the age of 24. He commented “It came as a surprise
to me; I did not think I had the gift, but really one could not refuse.” Elder Abraham Schellenberg,
his older brother, emigrated to the United States in 1 879, taking part of the Rueckenau congregation
with him. David Schellenberg was elected elder of the remaining membership on April 14, 1881,
and was ordained on May 23, 1882.
Particularly in his earlier ministry Elder David Schellenberg was modest and wise, and
gladly recognized the talents of others. On July 6, 1886, he presided at the ordination of a number
of ministers, Jakob Reimer, David Duerksen, Peter Bergmann as well as Isaak Koop and Isaak
Friesen. The celebration was described as a well attended time of blessing. The Rueckenau church
was recognized as being rich in those capable of the teaching ministry, and so was willing to send
out itinerant ambassadors. In this capacity “David Schellenberg was able in 1890 to accept it as
God’s will that he embark on a trip to the Mennonite Brethren churches of America. He, through
proclamation of the Word and various other activities, was a blessing to many, as he himself was
also blessed.” Schellenberg sent a number of reports of this trip to the Mennonite publications.
He and a number of others travelled to America via Berlin, Bremen, New York and Chicago; he
was particularly impressed by the Berlin Zoo and the Brooklyn Bridge. From September to
December 1890, Schellenberg visited churches and various acquaintances in Kansas, Nebraska,
Minnesota, the Dakotas and even Manitoba. Together with others, including his older brother,
Elder Abraham Schellenberg, he preached in many of the churches and participated in conferences.
In 1 899 David Duerksen was ordained elder of the Spat-Schoental congregation by Aron
Lepp [Chortitza] and David Schellenberg. He, as elder of the Molotschna Mennonite Brethren
Church, represented the mother church at Rueckenau in the dedication of the sanctuary of the
affiliate daughter church at Lugovsk. On May 3, 1904, Schellenberg ordained A. H. Unruh as a
minister of the Mennonite Brethren Church of Barvenkovo.
The travel bug seems to have bitten Elder Schellenberg; he made at least two more
extensive trips to America. April to September, 1 908 he travelled “from Saskatchewan to Oregon
and California.” He again visited the New World from December, 1913 to June, 1914.
Besides writing travel reports Schellenberg also penned a number of articles published in
the Zionsbote. He covered a variety of subjects, such as “Giving,” “What God does with Mankind”
and “One in the Spirit.”
Elder Schellenberg was caught up in the “open communion” controversy which erupted
in the Rueckenau church, taking the more restrictive approach. Eventually, together with some
questions about his personal life, which may have had something to do with finances, this dispute
led to his being deposed from the office of elder at Pentecost of 1909. The last ten years of his life
were spent quietly, in fellowship as a church member, but not as elder.
David Schellenberg married Lena Ens in 1879; the couple had four children. Lena died in
1 903, and David married Sara Koop [Klassen] in 1 904. He died in 1 9 1 9, his funeral being held on
March 3, just before the Red Army invaded the Molotschna.
101
Sources:
Brucks, J. H. and Hooge, H., Neu-Samara am Tock, Clearbrook, Canada, 1964, p 86
Ewert, Wilhelm F., Letter to the editor, Zionsbote, 16 October 1901, p 4
Friesen, P. M„ pp 407, 410, 414, 415, 439-442, 445, 458, 468, 530, 720, 723
Mennonite Encyclopedia
News Report, Mennonitische Rundschau, 20 July 1904, p 9
Schellenberg, David, Letters to the Editor, Zionsbote, 29 October 1890, p 4;
5 November 1890, p 2; 12 November 1890, pp 2, 3; 17 December 1890, p 4;
1 June 1910, pp 3, 4
Schellenberg, David, Geben, Zionsbote, 30 July 1902, pp L 2
Toews, J. A., pp 81, 89, 91, 101, 304, 305
102
ELDER KORNELIUS A. FEHR
[1846-1920]
Special invited guest speaker at the
Lugovsk dedication service
Komelius Fehr was bom in 1846, likely in the Chortitza Colony. He married Margaretha
Koslowsky in 1868, but it appears that the couple had no living children. About 1877 both were
converted, and in 1 885 Komelius was appointed deacon of the Einlage Mennonite Brethren Church.
In 1893 he was commissioned as minister.
In 1900 Fehr moved to the Orenburg Colony, likely settling in the village of Kamenka.
Despite there being only five Mennonite Brethren families in Kamenka, a sandstone house of
worship was built there, with the strong financial backing of Fehr. The building was completed and
dedicated in 1900. The following year the Kamenka congregation, initially an affiliate of Einlage,
became independent. Fehr was commissioned elder on July 17, 1901, the presiding minister at the
ceremony being Elder Aron Lepp of Einlage, Chortitza.
Shortly after his commissioning Elder Fehr represented the Orenburg Mennonite Brethren
Church at the Lugovsk church dedication. Fehr had a long history of being active in various
conferences and meetings. He was recorded as having been at a convention in Einlage May 20,
1882 and intermittently through the years to at least 1913, when he represented Kamenka at a
convention in Spat. He participated, occasionally playing a minor role, never being a major force
in conference activities. On at least one occasion he travelled to Siberia as minister, and also
participated in the distribution of flour to poor people.
Fehr’s own congregation in Orenburg grew, in 1902 having 176 members, in 1904 there
were 259, and in 1906 this had increased to 288. Eventually the membership split into three
congregations.
Towards the end of December of 1919 both Margaretha and Komelius became ill with
typhus. Margaretha succumbed December 30, while Komelius died a few days later, early on
January 1 , 1 920. Altogether they had 1 2 foster children in their home, of which only one survived
them. A combined funeral was held in the Kamenka sanctuary on January 3; the building was far
too small to hold the large number of mourners. Ministers at the funeral were Gerhard Neufeld,
David Franz, David Paetkau, and Elder H. Rempel of the Orenburg Mennonite Church. It was said
of Margaretha and Komelius Fehr “Their life has honoured the Lord.”
Sources:
Brucks, J. H., and Hooge, H., Neu-Samara am Tock, Clearbrook, B. C., 1964, p 86
Dueck, Abe J., Moving Beyond Secession: Defining Russian Mennonite Brethren Mission
and Identity 1872-1922, Kindred Productions, Winnipeg, Canada, 1997, pp 41, 55,
58, 66, 69, 75,76, 77,81,87
Fast, Karl, Orenburg: die letzte Mennonitische Ansiedlung in Osteuropa, Das Bunte Fenster,
Winnipeg, Canada, 1995, pp 37-40, 150
Friesen, P.M., p 476
News Item, Mennonitische Rundschau, 26 Mar 1924, p 13
103
KORNELIUS GERHARD NEUFELD
[1871-1946]
Conductor of the visiting Ufa choir
Komelius Gerhard Neufeld was bom on February 25, 1871 in Alexanderkrone,
Molotschna, where he spent his early childhood. He was baptized on confession of faith and joined
the Mennonite Brethren Church at the age of 18, remaining a member up to the time of his death.
He began his education in Ohrloff, graduating from the high school in 1 888. He taught for three
years at in intermediate school in Sagradovka, then from 1895 to 1897 continued more advanced
studies at a Theological Seminary and the University of Basel in Switzerland. He then moved to
Davlekanovo, Ufa Colony, where he was appointed principal of the elementary school.
Komelius was ordained as a minister of the Mennonite Brethren Church, but also had
special interests in teaching and music. He was described as very talented and progressive; he had
a striking appearance, and loved to wear a white vest on special occasions. During his time in Ufa
he continued to function as a Mennonite Brethren minister, and likely was the choir conductor for
the local congregation. It is in this capacity that Komelius Neufeld and his choir will have
performed at the dedication ceremonies at Lugovsk.
From 1902 to 1905 he taught in Neu Samara, likely in Lugovsk, then went on to study at
Spurgeon’s Pastors College in London, England. He must have been an observer or an auditing
student, for he is not on the official registry of the school. During his travels Komelius studied at
various places in Germany and Austria as well. Wherever he went he also took in musical
performances. He heard cathedral choirs in Moscow, St. Petersburg, Berlin and Rome. He had
listened to Bach’s St. Matthew ’s Passion
in Basel and Mendelsohn’s St. Paul in
Dresden. According to his own account
the most memorable experience, however,
was hearing Handel’s Messiah performed
by a 4,000 voice choir at the Crystal
Palace in London in May of 1906.
On his return to Russia Komelius
continued on as a minister, and is listed as
such by the Lugovsk congregation, but he
also played an important part in music
workshops which were held in various
Mennonite colonies. He was elected
chairman of a new choral association of
choirs and conductors of the Ufa, Neu
Samara, Alt Samara and Orenburg
colonies.
In 1908 Komelius was appointed principal of the newly established Zentralschule in
Davlekanovo, Ufa Colony, being one of two teachers that year. The school was unusual, in that
it was coeducational; enrollment went from 44 the first year to 87 in the second and 130 pupils in
the third year. Teacher Neufeld had the special skill to enthuse young people. He held weekly
lectures open to students and the public in which he covered a wide range of subjects. He edited
a periodical “. Aujwaerts ,” which at first emphasized choral music, but then broadened its scope to
interest all aspects of youth work. Despite support from the Mennonite Brethren Conference,
Neufeld found the financial burden of the publication to be too heavy, so he discontinued this
The Crystal Palace, London, built for the
Great Exposition of 1851
104
project after two years.
Komelius married Maria Friesen in 1895; the couple had four children, Maria, Lillian,
Komelius, and another which died in infancy. The family was emigrating to the United States
when his wife died in late 1913; she was buried in Germany. The remaining Neufeld family landed
in New York and first settled in Fairmead, then in Reedly, California. Komelius married Louise
Schapansky in 1916. In his later years he pastored churches in Rosedale and Shafter, California.
He died in Bakersfield on May 2, 1946, after an illness of about nine months.
Sources:
Berg, Wesley, From Russia with Music, Hyperion Press Limited, Winnipeg, Canada, 1985,
pp 28-33
Bracks, J. H., Neu-Samara am Took, Clearbrook, Canada, 1964, p 86
Ewert, William F., Letter to the Editor, Zionsbote, 16 October 1901, p 4
Friesen, P. M., pp 624, 672
Hein, Gerhard, Editor, Ufa: Die mennonitische Ansiedlung bei Ufa am Uralgebirge 1894-1938,
July, 1975, numerous references
Mennonite Historical Atlas, p 135
Obituary of Komelius G. Neufeld, Zionsbote, 10 July, 1946, p 12
Powles, J. C., Librarian, Spurgeon’s College, London, England, Letter, 15 May 1998
105
LIEDERPERLEN AND THE HALLELUJAH CHORUS
In the mid and late nineteenth
century new music was entering the
repertoire of some of the Mennonite
churches and choirs of Russia -
particularly among the Mennonite
Brethren. Initially new music had to be
ordered from Germany or North America,
but this then had to be transposed into
Ziffern, with which the Mennonite singers
were familiar. Ziffern is a system of
musical notation using numbers to
represent notes, popularized among the
Mennonites by Heinrich Franz [Sr.], a
long time teacher in the Mennonite
colonies of South Russia.
Publication of Liederperlen by
Isaak Bom began in 1889. A considerable
portion of the music came from American
German gospel collections such as Evangeliums-Lieder, the rest were taken from Swiss and
German sources. In time music written
by Mennonite composers such as Aron
Sawatzky also appeared, and the scope
widened even more to include world
recognized classical music scores. The
Hallelujah Chorus , part of Handel’s
Messiah, was transposed to Ziffern and
printed in the 1896 second edition of
Liederperlen, edited by Heinrich Braun
of Neu-Halbstadt, Taurien. It is quite
likely that Komelius Neufeld’s choir
from Ufa used this songbook for its
performance in Lugovsk in 1901 .
More editions of Liederperlen
were printed over the years. The third
[ 1 897] was collected by H. J. Braun, the
fourth [1900] by Isaak Bom, the fifth
[1903] also by Isaak Bom. It was
labelled as “A collection of lovely
songs for mixed choir.” The sixth
edition [1907] was by Heinrich Braun of Nikolaipol, the seventh [1910] and eighth [1912] were
gathered by Komelius Neufeld of Davlekanovo, Ufa Colony.
Sources:
Berg, Wesley, From Russia with Music, Hyperion Press Limited, Winnipeg, Canada, 1985.
pp 16-18, 26
Braun, Heinrich, Liederperlen, Part II, Neu-Halbstadt, Russia, 1896, pp 125-131
Hallelujah in Ziffern in the 1896 edition of
Liederperlen
Title page of 1896 edition of Liederperlen
Right lower comer smudged from much use!
106
17. FIRES m 1904
In the Molotschna Colony the summer of 1 904 was dry and hot. No rain had fallen
since May 22, and the temperature in early July was 30°R [37.5°C]. Hay crops were
suffering, although some of the other grains did manage a fair yield.
Heinrich Thiessen of Michailovka reported an unusual number of fires in the
Molotschna in August and September. A strong prevailing wind from the east only helped
the rapid spread of flames once a fire began. Peter Goossen of Lindenau felt that some fires
were started by arsonists, but others came about through carelessness.
A prairie fire began near Hierschau, likely in August, then spread to the Hamberg
steppe. While no buildings were reported burned, it destroyed much grain which had
already been cut, with losses said to be enormous.
Then the action really started! In late August or early September a huge fire caused
considerable destruction in Muensterberg. Five small farms were completely destroyed.
The fire also struck six large farmsteads, one was totally destroyed, the others were left with
houses only and one additional bam. In Tiegenhagen one large farmstead was completely
destroyed on September 1 1 , while in another six only the houses were saved.
A substantial part of Rueckenau was destroyed by a huge conflagration on
September 13. Possibly spreading from the surrounding steppes, the fire started on the first
farm at the east end of the village, lower [north] side of the street. Despite all efforts to
contain the blaze, it raced up the street, driven by the wind, eventually reaching the western
end of the village. Remarkably only one farmstead remained intact on that side of the street,
that of Cornelius Penner, where not even the straw stacks burned! Seven additional houses
were also spared, although the rest of the farmsteads had been destroyed. The wind was a
fickle foe, and periodically shifted directions, so the fire also jumped to the upper, south
side of the street. It swept down a row of houses, claiming at least five small farmsteads,
stopping only at the school and store, which were situated on the Mittelstrasse. Two young
men, a son of the storekeeper and a Russian farmhand, were working in the bam. They
heard cries of panic, upon which the hired hand leaped down to the ground, landing on a
huge pile of watermelons. They both ran out to help control the fire. Widow Peter Neufeld,
who lived near the Mittelstrasse, being obese and short of breath, luckily had enough breath
left to call for help, otherwise she may have succumbed to the fire. One woman was so
confused that she returned to her burning house to save what she could. She began to throw
crockery out through the window, of course smashing it in the process.
In all, at least 35 farmsteads were totally or partially destroyed in Rueckenau. At
first the refugees were housed in the church and school, but then they had to find
accommodations with relatives in neighbouring villages while their farmsteads were being
rebuilt. The day after the fire some of the people were digging among the ruins, hoping to
find at least some half burned grain to feed their cattle. It was said that a number of
farmers, owning what they thought to be fairly fireproof buildings, had very little insurance
coverage.
The same ill-fated September 13 two large farmsteads were destroyed by fire in
107
Blumstein, another two or three losing straw stacks and threshing facilities. Also during
this time two farmsteads burned in Altonau, one being completely destroyed, as well as one
in Margenau and another in Gnadenthal [September 25].
Despite the many fires in the Molotschna that summer, there was no loss of life,
although some people in Rueckenau literally escaped with only the clothing on their backs.
No report mentions fire fighting methods. The one reference to equipment is by
Jakob Wiens of Tiegerweide, the village immediately to the west of Rueckenau. When he
heard the news of the fire he commented “We reacted to the news with fear and trembling,
in that there was a strong eastwind [presumably there was some danger of the fire spreading
to the next village]. We prepared the Spritze [small fire wagon?], harnessed my horse, then
set off to observe the frightening spectacle at closer range. In a quarter of an hour we
reached the first farm on the west end of the village and helped the Sukkaus clear out their
belongings.” No mention is made of the use of the fire wagon. It was undoubtedly far too
little, too late.
The general tendency was for farmers to rebuild as soon as possible, especially since
it was already late in the year. It was mentioned by a number of correspondents that
unfortunately there was a shortage of building materials such as bricks and tiles. This made
it unlikely that all the victims of the fire would be in their new homes before winter set in.
By November 5 the weather was reported to be no longer suitable for construction. The
next summer it was noted that people in Rueckenau were very busy building, and that
rumour had it that some of the farmers were constructing very nice homes.
There was also a spiritual lesson to be learned from these catastrophes. Jakob Wiens
of Tiegerweide commented “May the Lord protect us from further mishap, so sighs many
a person during this time. We ever more learn that ‘Unless the Lord watches over the city,
the watchmen stand guard in vain’ [Psalm 127:16].”
Sources:
Gislason, Leona Wiebe, Rueckenau, Toronto, Canada, 1998, p 78
Goossen, Peter, Letter, Mennonitische Rundschau, 2 November 1904, pp 4, 5
Huebert, M., Letter, Mennonitische Rundschau, 31 August 1904, p 3
Huebert, M., Letter, Mennonitische Rundschau, 5 October 1904, p 9
Martens, John, Interview by Leona Wiebe Gislason, 1994
News item from Odesser Zeitung in Mennonitische Rundschau, 26 October 1904, p 9
News Item, Mennonitisch Rundschau, 5 July 1905, p 9
Thiessen, Heinrich J., Letter, Mennonitische Rundschau, 9 November 1904, pp 4, 5
Wiens, Jakob, Letter, Mennonitische Rundschau, 19 October 1904, p 4
Woelk, Jakob, Letter, Mennonitische Rundschau, 21 December 1904, p 5
Background Information:
Map: Western Molotschna Colony and Halbstadt
Weather in the Molotschna Colony
Fire Insurance
108
Western Molotschna Colony and Halbstadt, showing the villages which had fires in 1904
109
WEATHER IN THE MOLOTSCHNA COLONY
Climate in the Molotschna had a distinctly continental flavour, with extremes being
common. Summer temperatures were usually 16-20°R [Reaumur temperature scale was used],
which is 20-25 °C. Maximum temperatures recorded in Halbstadt and Ohrloff were 3 1 °R [about
39°C or 102°F] in July of 1850. The temperature of 30°R in the summer of 1904 was therefore
near record highs. Combined with dry winds, the heat sometimes resulted in severe droughts.
Overall yearly precipitation in the Molotschna was low, averaging 30-35 cm. [12-14
inches], most coming in May, June and July. In 1904 no rain was reported after May 22, so
conditions were indeed more dry than the average.
The unusually high temperatures, the absence of rain and the strong wind from the east
certainly combined to make the Molotschna a dry tinderbox. waiting to bum!
Sources:
Huebert, H. T., Hierschau: An Example of Russian Mennonite Life, Springfield Publishers,
Winnipeg, Canada, 1986, pp 20, 21
Molotschna Report, Unterhaltungs Blatt, August 1851, p 63 and January 1852
Rempel, David, The Mennonite Colonies in New Russia, PhD dissertation, Stanford University,
July, 1933
Thiessen, Heinrich, Letter, Mennonitische Rundschau, 17 July 1901, p 2
FIRE INSURANCE
The Molotschna Colony had a well established community fire insurance. Payment of
insurance premiums and methods of fire prevention were compulsory. With danger of fire in mind,
many farmers changed thatched roofs to tiles. Cornelius Penner of Rueckenau had his farmstead
burned out ten years prior to the 1904 fire, and had tiles on all his new roofs. This may have saved
his household even though all his neighbours burned.
From 1872 to 1882 payment for fire losses in the Molotschna averaged 45.200 rubles per
year. By 1909 it had risen to 55,831 rubles, although this included some of the other Mennonite
colonies. The payouts represented two-thirds of the assessed value of the buildings, and specified
amounts for machinery and animals. It seems that fanners did have some choice as to the exact
extent of insurance coverage. Payment of premiums depended on the needs of the comm unity, the
more fires for the year, the higher the premiums. With this in mind Peter Goossen, in 1904,
lamented that " in spite of fairly good crops it will be difficult for many to pay so much fire
insurance premium
Sources:
Goossen, Peter, Letter, Mennonitische Rundschau, 2 November 1904, pp 4, 5
Huebert, H. T., Hierschau: An Example of Russian Mennonite Life, Springfield Publishers,
Winnipeg, Canada, 1986, pp 145, 146
Klaus, A., Unsere Kolonien, Odesser Zeitung, Odessa, 1887, pp 229, 230
News Report, Mennonitische Rundschau, 15 February 1883, p 2
News Report, Friedensstimme, 16 January 1910, p 4
110
18. EXPOSITION IN HALBSTADT
AUGUST 14-16, 1909
The Molotschna section of the Royal Russian Fruit Growers Association [Kaiserlich
Russischen Obstbauverein ] planned an exposition [ Obstbauaustellung ] for August 14-16,
1909. It was to be held in Halbstadt in the building and on the grounds of the School of
Commerce [Kommerzschule]. There would also be some opportunity for related
agricultural products to be displayed. The organizing committee placed several
announcements in the newspaper Friedensstimme, asking that those who were interested
in mounting displays to contact the secretary of the Association, Fr. Wall of Muntau, by
August 1. They could then discuss space requirements as well as other arrangements.
On the morning of August 14 the president of the Association, P. Wiebe, officially
opened the exposition. In his welcoming remarks to the considerable number of visitors at
hand, he emphasized that the Association had begun and continued its efforts in the context
of its motto, Colossians 3:17. This reads: “And, whatever you do, whether in word or deed,
do it all in the name of the Lord Jesus, giving thanks to God the Father through him.”
Wiebe continued by explaining the three objectives the Association had set for the
exposition. First, to inform the public about the state of fruit growing and gardening.
Second, to introduce and promote new varieties of fruit. Third, to give opportunity to sell
products.
The person who reported on the exposition [no name was given, but initials were
H. Sch.] felt that it should not be judged by international standards, but rather as the
“accomplishments of a small group of pioneer farmers lost on the treeless steppes of South
Russia.” With this in mind, he thought, the results were worthy of praise!
The exposition included the display of, and then the judging of fruit in various
categories. The judges were experts from the Simferopol section of the Royal Association.
Some of the prize winners were: J. Friesen, Rueckenau, large gold medal for an assortment
of commercial fruit; K. Enns, Altonau, small gold medal for his tree nursery and a
collection of fruit; A. Lissner, Ackerman, small gold medal for an assortment of
commercial fruit. Large and small silver medals were handed out in various categories as
well as bronze medals.
The organization itself had prepared displays demonstrating the development of
insects detrimental to fruit, showing the stages from pupa to butterfly. It was felt that it
would be easier to defeat the enemy if you could recognize him, no matter what the phase.
The reporter then wandered through the various displays, mentioning, however, that
he would emphasize only the new and innovative. He further added that he would
overcome his usual shyness, and boldly ask the exhibitors many questions about their
products. The subsequent comments are an interesting barometer of life in the Mennonite
colonies at that time.
H. Ediger, of Kurman, Crimea, showed a system of canning, whereby fruit was said
to retain its taste, smell and appearance. The total apparatus, together with enough jars to
do for a typical farm establishment, would cost between 50 and 100 rubles. It came with
a printed set of instructions.
Ill
The publishing house, Raduga, had a display of books dealing with cooking,
canning and preserving of fruit, as well with fruit, grape and garden growing. There were
also books about various related topics discussing the household and the farm. With such
a wide variety, there was something for almost any interest.
The factory Franz & Schroeder of Halbstadt displayed a new grain cutting machine
[Getreidemaehmachine] with a recently invented self-binding Schellenberg attachment
[patent pending]. This machine had actually undergone field trials in the last three crop
years. Heinrich Schroeder, also of Halbstadt, showed a locally manufactured eight horse¬
power stationary naphtha motor called Advance. It appeared to run very smoothly. Its
principal advantage over foreign motors was the price, perhaps one third less. Because it
was made locally there was less transportation cost, and it was not subject to import duties.
There was considerable interest in the multibladed plows [called bugger], produced
by the factories Fuchs of Tokmak, and J. J. Neufeld & Ko. of Waldheim. It had hand
levers at the front end of the machine to raise or lower the plow blades.
Gaede of Lichtfelde had produced and run trials on an incubator for chickens. Even
though it was in common use in foreign countries, Mennonite farmers had tended to resist
this innovation. The reporter felt that the people who persisted in the “sitting behind the
stove” technique of raising chickens would certainly not take the world by storm!
Fr. Heine of Prischib displayed a new type of paint, Ripolin, which had considerable
advantage over the well known oil-based paints. It was particularly useful for painting roof
tiles, but also very good for covering wood, iron and stucco. H. Janz of Alexandrovsk
offered a practical, well designed iron cook, fry and bake stove, while Friesen and Dueck
of Halbstadt showed a large collection of American Keystone-Elgin clocks and watches.
The arts were not entirely neglected in this exposition, being represented mainly by
the paintings of Johann H. Janzen of Ohrloff. Having felt uncomfortable in judging fruit
growing, the writer of the report was even less confident of being an art critic. But then, he
mused, every bird has the right to sing regardless of the shape of its beak! Who was he to
judge whether in Janzen’s painting the water really splashed over the rocks, or if there was
real foam, or was it just an illusion? Was the sunshine in his landscapes really warm, was
the water clear, and was it perchance actually wet? The writer philosophized that if life
consisted only of factories, mills, places of business and grain bins, with no aesthetic
values produced by homes, churches and the arts, we would all simply be animals, homo
sapiens. One painting by a Miss M. Schroeder of Berdyansk actually sold for 60 rubles; it
depicted a very realistic looking pair of oxen.
The exposition appeared to be a financial success; more than four and a half
thousand entrance tickets were sold. Together with other sources of income the Association
likely netted more than 1 ,000 rubles. Considering the overall benefits of such an exposition
to the public, the reporter felt that the Association well deserved this profit.
There was one little complaint. Should there be another event of this nature, then
the specific age for children’s tickets should be defined. This would settle some of the
disputes which erupted between ticket vendors and visitors, where the definition of a child
varied all the way from seven to fifteen years. But, the reporter adds, this small criticism
should not sour the overall impression of this event.
112
Sources:
Announcement, Obstbauaustellung, Friedensstimme, 25 July 1909, p 13, and 1 August 1909,
P 13
News Report, Friedensstimme, 22 August 1909, pp 8, 9
News Report, Mennonitische Rundschau, 29 September 1909, pp 12, 13
Background Information:
Advertizing in Friedensstimme
Johann Heinrich Janzen, Artist
ADVERTISING IN FRIEDENSSTIMME
While most Mennonites were
basically deeply religious people,
cultivation of the land and other
related activities have also been close
to their hearts. God’s blessings have
often been associated with bountiful
harvest and thriving agricultural
business. It should therefore not
come as a surprise that Mennonites
would promote expositions,
particularly if they were related to
agriculture. This philosophy would
easily be reflected in Mennonite
publications. Friedensstimme, a
privately published newspaper, was to
a large extent owned and operated by
church people. While the principal
owners and editors were businessmen
and also writers, they were ministers
as well. The contents of the paper
may therefore be taken as an
indication of what some of the
church hierarchy thought.
In the first half of 1909
Friedensstimme published a 16 page
paper, of which on the average
eleven pages were text, five pages
advertising. Some of the companies
which are recorded as having
displays at the exposition also ran
fairly regular advertisements in the
paper. Examples are those of Franz
& Schroeder of Neu-Halbstadt, and
Friesen and Dueck of Halbstadt.
3)1 it Qkpftnodriiflciii btcljrrn ti*ir uitti t>cin gvrltrtcti T'uMihnu jpir
ttctiiilnitf jit brinjicn. baft u'ir in mtfmn
II I) r < n * 'J.'i a n n \ i h
ictit cine iHofir flueuoM trr mdibmibmicn anifrtltinijrtirn lafdjrnubrrii
KEYSTON E-ELGIN
m man it* jjell'plultnl «»• t«voK, Bh’lb rouble, iilbft, -Jlicffl apalrtn
I'flbm. Xieir flcljfiuiic lltjmi uiit «ri)\ai»b Wcljaufcn. tic in
.tiumM. fliritu, iftiubtu.u'if ii. retitid'lunb unt> itiibtri: fi* bilirlt
.Uii'orKuen. rein imp bin ten .tvi«li.iiiblcu nnimtaitmftrit Weluiufr I'inren
.tiirii in •Hindniib (ihcii jtcie ^iiichiiKiibrii Otbj.ib, tine nidi! ohm* tflfiii :
(# I’onbi’H *iil» l-uM urn fin Hdunijf, it'clihe* No itfrrf bor Pan Or;
Minmii 2t.nl *e* idupt; l claim lint imp (Watrtii. h«p 'Witt.
:mt fun* «'*el-a»ife*3 mil WciiMiiPrn orrfrbrM. u»*hbe hide hnri Icile »f‘i ir *
?i»M .uifamnuiiKilton.
IV tfoffcn Hie firfi nirlit tniifdtnt !! ourdi mmmuuititfe Jim:
nluimiiiKft bn fd'teM, m irPer ^r.iulniiM le um bueii
auurifnitifrtiru fti t) flour (< lf\t«i > 11 t>rr n
Aviut t^i n Ian » itd'U man nin nv r.f! fiiinbrrbr 'JJi'i.rfr, melrtn- man ,
mi l-inie m I\dil icPcr U(>r finbct. jlfil
tMiibivniifNi lurriluf.iaitP Jvrirjnui X iitf, ■Ontbftobi, launni.
NT
Mi$ii(ni$ |$frait£ &'
Jobril Innbiotrtfdjaftlldicr iDlafrijiitrn nnb Wtrdtc
— ■ 9i c u b a I b ft a b t.
llfnhritl ''m' vxrrtt 0. Sdulltnbcrn crfii iibnic WctrcibeBidlimufrfiiHc
mit iclbftnblcflcr ('Jlalrm iiui\rmrlbct, £rfHi(i$cm Hr. JH7B3
■mb Hr. SSlnfl) ivrrim.y in firfi ullr 'Ilonii.y <iucr i'arluiilbm.iiilum unb
finer JttrfiilfJiiiil)Difli(l)inc.
Son bcji Sfrmi itatifenurtoi, Nc mu Pen iirrlKinnfdpneu tm mTiiatwioncn
$n('rc acVbcitct Imbeii, He 13c it ttncrfomiiii.ldtfercijhni ber, Pie allc Sor$fu\c
biefer 3Kafd)iiifn bm*ort»c&fu. Tic ^Tol'cmrti.inucii babeii in biddcni unb
toHtMuftiicm, in febr unb iv'.u; wtfbcifm, m miicnt unb mil bullion
bobot Un front iu*rii»odii«i«i ttMrdbc iVMibciici , nub iilwniU bai nrti ber
2c Ibftoi'Vunot *3111 bctBtfor!.
n>ir iiir bir luldifie Soiioii mir tint *y\u\ Anf rc bieier
'Duiittuicit anfcrtigcti fbiuun, jo ill c*> laiMtji, ftUUeUun^i’u ant bide 'IKa
ftlMiioi balbuiP^liftn't liiiHiioiboi.
^0 iiiri)l iUU’bvrBOVfdiiftT in ba h« tib:* mon u*t» biv»fi on iuw
nub in triitrr prompun *iWMviutn»\ ivr»td»o t.
’V uft a hr cur :
ra/ibtiiiJTaATTj. Tasp.
ry<5. . ToprosoM^ AOMy
Opamo. m LLlpeAept.
Jclcflrnimnnhrcfir :
ro^bfiuiTaA'ni.
OpaHuy.
Wclbcitf 11 ft lOern c IRt-
b.iiUrn. 'Jt'ifle •.Hiuif-ii
11 '.mq^Sdyrc itoi .
fluijt-TPfm c:ii oil M* n iru
tmierr moblrvliimtu*!*
niclrnbcnioliniflliltiiitii
rrtirtjiuQldntfii, ‘^rtiu
iiitinoldjtHCH. tin uud
iiiftiridjnr t'ftuqc. i till*
p limit, Itillni in.uiiifrtr
11 cut 11 Htitliofr,
frfiup ’.‘fr. ■•iO-'H jpiirffd.
nmfdiinni Wnriciiyfliirir.
jl'Climloruriiliur.
Imbtfliiliidjc Cflptcntn,
Ifldlpfaiiiiriiurtiini ufw.
113
JOHANN HEINRICH JANZEN
[1868-1917]
Artist who displayed paintings at the
1 909 Halbstadt Exposition
Johann Heinrich Janzen was bom in Waldheim, Molotschna Colony, on January 6, 1868.
He was the eldest son of Heinrich Johann Janzen, who was an artist, a teacher, preacher as well as
a surveyor. Johann completed the Gnadenfeld Zentralschule, then took teacher training in
Halbstadt. After that he attended the teachers’ college in Feodosiya in the Crimea for three years.
While in the Crimea he became acquainted with, and was tutored by the marine artist, Aiwasowsky .
It is probably this influence which inspired Johann’s early paintings of seascapes.
In 1889 Johann was appointed as teacher at the
Ohrloff Zentralschule, in mathematics. He held this
position for 28 years, until his death in 1917. He used
imagination and innovation to liven up dry and boring
teaching methods. For a number of years, including 1910,
he was chairman of the Molotschna Teachers’ Society.
Johann had originally been racked by doubts and
was searching in his spiritual life. In 1906 he had a
conversion experience, and accepted a more pietistic
philosophy of life. He became active in the church, and was
ordained as a minister of the Gnadenfeld Mennonite Church
in 1909.
Living on the steppes in the Molotschna
increasingly inspired Johann to use his surroundings as
subject for his painting. His younger brother Jakob H.
Janzen put it this way: “But then he lived and worked as a
teacher on the steppes, among the people of the steppes, and
in the dust of the steppes -
and it became clear to him
that in the ordinary
monotony there was an
unexpected beauty.”
Johann painted in oils, did
pencil sketches and used
water colours. He tended
to favour Molotschna
landscapes, but also
painted on commission, at
which time his subjects
might vary. He did little in
the way of promoting his
art, displaying only at
modest exhibitions in Ohrloff and Halbstadt. Johann illustrated a book written by his brother
Jakob, Denn meine Augen haben deinen Heiland gesehen, which was published in 1910. He also
illustrated the months in Abraham Kroeker’s Christlicher Familienkalendar. It is likely that in
t
Typical Mennonite village in South Russia - picture drawn by
Johann Janzen
114
the Halbstadt Exposition of 1909 he
displayed various landscapes, but from the
description of water so dramatically
presented by the Friedensstimme reporter, he
must have shown some seascapes as well.
Johann did not restrict his
endeavours to teaching and art, he also wrote.
He wrote and illustrated children’s books
such as Das Maer chert vom Weihnachtsmann
[A Fairytale about Santa Claus] and Die
Geschichte von Miez, Mauz, Murr und Hinz
[The Story of Miez, Mauz, Murr and Hinz].
He wrote lyrical poetry and prose. The prose
included writings about pedagogy,
philosophy as well as fiction. In 1907 he
came out with Das goldene Zeitalter der
Zukunft [The Golden Age of the Future], a
book of imaginative fiction. Most of his
literary output was not published, although
short stories such as Der David and Das
Falkennest appeared in periodicals.
September
Pictures illustrating the months drawn by
Johann Janzen for Christlicher Familien-
Kalendar
Johann was married to Lene
[Goerz], and the couple had six children.
They were Maria, Hans, Helene, Nikolai,
Elisabeth and Greta. Three of them were
actually used to some extent as models for
the children in Das Maerchen vom
Weihnachtsmann. Son Hans was also an
artist and in later years provided new
illustrations for the book.
Illustration from Jakob Janzen’ s book drawn by Johann Heinrich Janzen was still at
Johann Janzen the height of his career when he became ill.
Towards autumn of 1917, when he was
already so weak that he could not walk, his brother Jakob took him for a ride across his beloved
steppes. He once again appreciated the grass in the meadows turning golden, the dry leaves rustling
as they fell from the trees, the last fruits of the land being harvested. Johann died soon after, of
leukemia, in September of 1917, at the age of forty nine.
Sources:
Friesen, P. M,, pp xv, xvi, 595, 636, 688, 708, 776
Goerz, H., Die Molotschnaer Ansiedlung, Echo-Verlag, Steinbach, Canada, 1950\1951,
pp 169-170; English translation, 1993, p 204
Janzen, Jakob, Etwas Rezension, Der Bote, 29 August 1931, p 1
Janzen, Johann, Illustrations in Denn meine Augen haben Deinen Heiland Gesehen written by
Jakob Janzen, originally published in 1910, then again in 1925 and 1927
Janzen, Johann, Feature Illustrations, The Months of the Year, Mennonite Life, October 1951, p 13
115
Janzen, Johann, Feature Illustration, Peace on the Molotschna, Mennonite Life, 1 January 1956
P 6
Janzen, Johann, Das Maerchen vom Weihnachtsmann, edited by Waldemar Janzen, post script
written by Waldemar Janzen, CMBC Publications, Winnipeg, Canada, 1975
Janzen, Waldemar, personal communications
Mennonite Encyclopedia
Mennonitisches Lexikon
News Report, Friedensstimme, 22 August 1909, p 9
116
19. BIBLE CONFERENCE IN HALBSTADT
AUGUST 20-23, 1909
Mennonites have traditionally been people of the Word. It is therefore not
surprising that periodically there were Bible conferences in the Mennonite colonies of South
Russia. One such conference was held in Halbstadt, Molotschna June 15-22, 1908,
featuring Mennonite missionaries as speakers. Participants arrived from as far away as the
Crimea and Sagradovka. A bigger and presumably better conference was then arranged for
the following year, to be held on August 20-23, 1909. Organizers were listed as H.
Braun, H. Unruh, and J. Kroeker of Halbstadt. No announcements or reports mention a
specific denomination, so one might assume that it was meant to include all Mennonites.
Heinrch Braun and Jakob Kroeker were Mennonite Brethren, and much of the subject
matter had heavy Mennonite Brethren overtones; the other organizer was likely Heinrich
Unruh, returned missionary from India, also Mennonite Brethren.
The conference was well advertized in the Mennonite newspaper Friedensstimme ,
not surprising since Jakob Kroeker was one of its editors and Heinrich Braun part owner
and managing director of the publishing house that printed it. Part of the rationale for
hosting the conference was included in the invitation, first published on July 18,1 909, “We
are aware that at times when we withdraw and quietly contemplate scripture, the Lord
allows us to better understand his Word, to have wonderful blessings, and to be
strengthened...”
The organizers expanded the scope of the invitation, which the previous year had
been only for teachers and ministers and their wives. In 1909 it included “...all children of
God and lovers of truth.” They asked all those planning to attend to register with J. Kroeker
as soon as possible, so that accommodations could be arranged. Teachers and ministers
would receive free accommodations [presumably others, if they did not find relatives to stay
with, would pay] ; all participants were asked to bring along their own pillows and blankets.
The organizers announced some of the speakers and published a proposed program. As the
conference approached there were repeated reminders in Friedensstimme.
The conference began on August 20 with a large number of guests from far and wide
[...eine Menge Gaeste von Nah und Vern erschienen...]. The sessions were held at the
Vereinshaus [presumably a fairly large auditorium, definitely not a church] in Neu-
Halbstadt. Speakers invited from abroad were P. Grubb from London, England, who
brought his wife, Evangelist Widmer from Switzerland, and Adam Podin of Latvia, who
brought his wife as well. Additional participants were Preacher Regentrop from
St. Petersburg, Missionary J. Huebert and others.
The schedule was similar to that of previous conferences. Mornings began with a
prayer meeting, followed by Bible exposition by the guest speakers. The area of study for
this conference was the book of Hebrews, chapters 5 and 6. In the afternoon there were
talks on faith, holiness and fellowship. Evenings were either lectures on various practical
subjects or evangelistic sermons.
Sunday morning two of the foreign speakers preached in Halbstadt, the rest served
in other churches in the region. Following a late afternoon snack [Vesper], the Bible
117
exposition continued at the church, with an evening worship service after that.
A participant, Jakob Enns of Tiegenhof, commented “The Lord blessed his Word
through whomever it was proclaimed, it was a rich blessing for us poor simiers, to the praise
of His holy name.” He was also sure that the Lord would bless all those who had helped
organize this wonderful event.
It is remarkable that an event which had so much advance publicity, and was
planned by editors and publishers, would have had no official report in the Mennonite
periodicals. The pages of Friedensstimme give no evidence of a similar conference being
held the following year.
Sources:
Braun, H„ Announcement, Friedensstimme, 18 July 1909, p 3; 25 July 1909 pp 3, 4;
8 August 1909, p 10; 15 August 1909, p 8
Enns, Jakob, Letter, Friedensstimme. 12 September 1909, p 7
Enns, Jakob, Letter, Mennonitische Rundschau, 13 October 1909, pp 14, 15
News Item, Friedensstimme, 28 June 1908, p 409
News Item, Friedensstimme, 22 August 1909, p 9
Reimer, Jakob, Announcement, Friedensstimme, 17 May 1908, p 312; 7 June 1908, p 357
Background Information:
Heinrich Jakob Braun
Heinrich Heinrich Unruh, Missionary
Jakob Johann Kroeker
Harry Percy Grubb
Adam K. Podin
Johann Huebert, Missionary
118
HEINRICH JAKOB BRAUN
[1873-1946]
One of the Organizers of the Bible Conference
held in Halbstadt August 20-23, 1909
Heinrich Jakob Braun was bom on April 30, 1 873 in Alexanderwohl, Molotschna Colony.
His parents were Jakob and Helena [Baergen] Braun. He was the seventh of ten children, having
five brothers and four sisters. Heinrich attended the Dorfschule in Alexanderwohl from 1879 to
1887. He did not attend Zentralschule , but had private instruction in various subjects such as
Russian and English. He began the position of “£7nteWe/wer”[apprentice teacher] in Kleefeld in
1887, then helped at home on the farm from 1888-1889.
Heinrich then began a series of teaching assignments as tutor on various chutors from 1889
to 1 994. In 1 894, at the annual convention of the Mennonite Brethren Church held in Friedensfeld,
he was selected to be sent to the Hamburg Baptist Theological Seminary to be trained as a minister.
He was in Hamburg from 1895 to 1899, his room mate being Heinrich Unruh, later missionary to
India. He graduated in 1899 and returned to South Russia.
Once back in the Molotschna, Heinrich must have been active in the church quite quickly,
since in 1900 he was involved in the formulation of a confession of faith of the Mennonite
Brethren, and was listed as approving the document. At the time he was recorded as a ministerial
candidate. He was ordained as a minister by the Rueckenau Mennonite Brethren Church on
September 2, 1901.
Braun married Maria Peters, eldest daughter of Isaak Peters of Nikolaipol, on October 7,
1899. Unfortunately she died during childbirth in early 1902. The child, a boy, died in early
infancy. Heinrich then married his wife’s younger sister, Helena, on February 27, 1903. There
were no children from this second marriage, but the Brauns
seem to have been hospitable with regard to youngsters, since
a number of missionaries left their children with them while
they went to the mission field.
Possibly using his wife’s money, Heinrich purchased
a chutor near Nikolaipol on February 6, 1901. He seems to
have been an astute businessman, and soon purchased a second
chutor. In 1903 he was one of the leading partners who
purchased a Halbstadt printing establishment from Peter
Neufeld. This company was reorganized in 1908 to form
Raduga, which printed, published and distributed a wide variety
of printed material. It published, for example, the newspaper
Friedensstimme, the massive historical tome by P. M. Friesen,
a devotional family almanac, as well as many other books.
Heinrich was the major shareholder in this enterprise as well as
the managing director.
Heinrich participated actively in many aspects of the
Mennonite Brethren Church, for a time being the secretary-
treasurer of the conference. In this capacity he published detailed statistics relating to church
membership and activities, Bundes-Statistik, certainly for 1 905 and 1 906. In 1 9 1 0, at the convention
held in Tiege, Sagradovka, Heinrich was unanimously acclaimed as treasurer of the Foreign
Mission Account of the Mennonite Brethren Conference, with Abraham Friesen the intermediary
Heinrich Braun [1873-1946]
119
between the conference and the field workers. In September of 1914 Heinrich reported some
difficulties, the bank drafts he had sent to India had not been cashed. Heinrich continued to play
a leading role in the Conference and its affairs, being vice-chairman of the sessions in 1918. He
sometimes represented the Mennonite Brethren Church in negotiations with government, for
example dealing with the permission to continue open air baptismal services.
Planning for the 1 908 Bible Conference in Halbstadt involved mostly Mennonite Brethren.
While the principal organizers for the 1909 conference, again including Heinrich, were also
Mennonite Brethren, the wide variety of speakers seems to indicate that the scope was likely meant
to serve a much wider sphere.
But Heinrich also played a prominent role in inter-Mennonite affairs. Raduga, the printing
and publishing firm certainly functioned to help developments in the broad stream of Mennonite
life. He was on the board of the Nerven-heilanstalt Bethania , of Kronsweide, as well as on the
board of the Diakonissenheim Morija of Neu-Halbstadt. He was a participant in the first official
All-Mennonite Conference of October, 1910, and was elected to be the Mennonite Brethren
representative on the three member Glaubenskommission [Faith Commission], In two years this
was renamed Kommission fuer Kirchenangelegenheiten [KfK] [Committee for Church Affairs],
Possibly also at that time Wilhelm Dyck took the place of Heinrich on the Committee. Heinrich,
together with Elder Heinrich Unruh of the Halbstadt Mennonite Church, conducted an open air
service for departing reservists on September 1, 1914. Braun preached on Acts 20:32 “Now I
commit you to God and to the word of His grace,” while Elder Unruh used Romans 12: 12 as text.
Upon conclusion of the service the reservists boarded trains bound for Ekaterinoslav.
During this time Heinrich also wrote, having the particular interest of including the
Mennonite Brethren within the sphere of the greater Mennonite community. Articles such as
“Mennonites or Baptists,” published in Friedenstimme and Botschafter in 1 9 1 0 would relate to this
subject.
In 1 9 1 8 the Mennonite Brethren Conference appointed Heinrich as the second teacher of
the newly established Bible school at Tchongrav, in the Crimea. He probably continued to live in
Neu-Halbstadt and commuted to the Crimea. On at least two occasions he had some difficulty
reaching the school because he was caught in the revolutionary front; other teachers then had to
temporarily replace him. Because the school and students had great difficulty getting teaching
materials, Heinrich donated books to the school from his own personal library.
In the autumn of 1921 Teacher Braun “...addressed the school and took his leave...,” soon
after fleeing from Russia. Heinrich must have felt that he was in considerable immediate danger
to leave so abruptly. He travelled to Batum, spent some time in Constantinople, then went to
Germany, staying at Oberursel, Taunus, where his younger brother Abraham lived. His wife left
Halbstadt in the summer of 1923 for Canada, and a short time later joined Heinrich in Germany.
In 1924 Heinrich travelled to South America at his own expense to investigate the
possibility of Mennonite settlement in Paraguay. He sent a comprehensive report of his findings
to the Mennonitisches Studienkommision. Upon his return to Germany he settled in Bochum,
occupying himself with a herbal and “natural” medical healing practice. He had actually begun
studying this subject in Odessa after he graduated from seminary. He later moved to a village near
Ibersheim, where his brother Abraham had become a pastor, then finally settled in NiersteinVRhein.
Heinrich also gave lectures on Christian Education for the Evangelische Schulgemeinschaft
[Evangelical School Society], and for many years was actively involved in sending relief packages
to Mennonites in the Soviet Union.
Heinrich’s second wife, Helena, died in Germany in 1941, after which he married Martha
Siever, daughter of a German Baptist family. He survived World War II in Germany, and died June
24, 1946, at the age of 73 years.
120
Sources:
Braun, Heinrich J., Bundes-Statistik der Vereinigten, Taufgesinnten, Mennonitischen Brueder-
Gemeinde in Russland, Nikolaipol, 1905, 1906
Braun, Heinrich J., Mennonites or Baptists , originally in Friedensstimme, 5 May 1910, pp3-5,
also in Botschafter, 25 May 1910, p 4, and 28 May 1910, p 3; translated into English
by Abe J. Dueck, in Moving Beyond Secession pp 177-122
Dueck, Abe J., Moving Beyond Secession, Kindred Productions, Winnipeg, Canada, and
Hillsboro, USA, 1998, pp 7, 12, 14, 16, 57-59, 64, 67, 68, 70, 72-75, 78, 81, 83, 84, 86,
87, 92-96, 100, 101, 111, 117-122, 132, 137, 141, 143, 145, 146, 148-150, 152, 158,
166
Friesen, Abraham, Santa Barbara, USA, personal family history
Friesen, P. M„ pp 450, 530, 534, 536, 542-545, 568, 598, 659, 661, 670, 672, 673, 722
Mennonite Encyclopedia
Mennonite Historical Atlas, p 122
News Report, Friedensstimme, 3 September 1914, p 5
Peters, G. W., Foundations of Mennonite Brethren Missions, Kindred Press, Hillsboro, USA,
and Winnipeg, Canada, 1984, p 39
Reimer, Margaret, The Story of the Crimea Bible School, Translated by Edwin Reimer, 1974[?],
PP 6,11,21
Toews, J. A., pp 103, 113, 381
121
HEINRICH HEINRICH UNRUH
[1868-1912]
One of the Organizers of the Bible Conference
held in Halbstadt August 20-23, 1909
Heinrich Heinrich Unruh was bom October 4, 1868 in Temir-Bulat [Philippstal], Crimea.
He was the eldest of the ten children of Heinrich B. and Elisabeth [Wall] Unruh. Three younger
brothers were Komelius [missionary to India], Abraham [Bible teacher and minister] and Benjamin
[teacher and writer].
Heinrich attended the Hamburg Baptist Theological Seminary, likely beginning in 1895,
graduating in 1 899. During this time his room mate was Heinrich Braun of Alexanderwohl. Soon
after graduation he married Anna Peters, daughter of Franz Peters of Friedensfeld. Anna Peters is
also listed as a student at the seminary, so it is quite likely that they became acquainted during the
time they spent in Hamburg.
On August 27, 1899, Heinrich and Anna were ordained as missionaries by the Spat
Mennonite Brethren Church. They were accepted by both Mennonite Brethren of Russia, and the
American Baptist Missionary Union to be missionaries in the
Nalgonda district, north-east of Hyderabad, India. Heinrich’s
principal work was to establish a station at Jangaon, which
was on a railway line. Permission for building any structure
was hard to obtain, and the surrounding people were not
particularly receptive, nonetheless Heinrich persisted. A
mission station was built at Jangaon, and in time there was a
church of 200 members, with 8-10 affiliate stations.
In 1909 the Unruhs returned to South Russia for a
rest [zur Erhohlung\. But Heinrich did not spend much time
resting. He was one of the three planners of the Bible
conference held in Halbstadt in August of 1 909. He was listed
as attending the annual convention of the Mennonite Brethren
Church, held in Tiege, Sagradovka, in May of 1 9 1 0. Heinrich
read a letter to the delegates from the missionaries in India,
who wished the conference God ’ s richest blessings. The letter
described the work and struggles of the past year, also the
results of the Gospel being spread to all areas. After a hymn
was sung he closed the session with prayer.
Heinrich did not restrict his missionary fervour to
India. He visited many of the churches of South Russia, many a person accepting salvation through
his ministry. A great revival swept through a forestry camp where he had preached. Together with
G. P. Froese, Heinrich was invited to speak at a large Russian Baptist convention which was held
in Rostov, in the Don region. During the day they had business sessions, but evenings there were
evangelistic services where Heinrich preached in German, while P. M. Friesen translated his words
into Russian.
Heinrich and Anna had a total of seven children. Heinrich [1900], Maria [1901], Martha
[1903], Arthur [1905], and Cornelius [1909] were bom in India. During the time in Russia, while
they were planning to return to their beloved mission work in India, it was of considerable concern
to find a place for the four oldest children to stay. The Unruhs did find homes for them,
■s
Heinrich and Anna Unruh
likely in 1900
122
at least one daughter staying for a time with the Heinrich Brauns. Heinrich and Anna departed for
India in 19 1 1. In April of 19 12 Heinrich sent a report back to Russia in anticipation of the annual
convention of the Mennonite Brethren Church. He mentioned that the separation from their four
oldest children, and the death of their little Anna had caused them more sadness than they had
thought possible. Little Anna must have been bom during the furlough in Russia or shortly after
their return to India, then died as an infant or young child.
The mission work in India was progressing. The number of converts had increased, this
despite the fact that persecution by the Muslims never ceased. Heinrich was busy and attended a
district missionary conference in mid September, 1912.
Soon after he returned to Jongaon from the conference he became seriously ill. When his
condition did not improve medical help was sent for, but that did not stop the relentless progress
of typhus. Heinrich died on October 23, 1912.
In his last days Heinrich had some time to reflect on his work and the church. He urged
the young people to come out as missionaries; others should give up their accumulated rubles and
donate them to the work. He also noted, from his recent experience in Russia, that the Mennonite
Brethren spent too much time focussing on dogma, rather than putting all effort into mission work
that needed to be done.
Heinrich was buried almost immediately. Missionaries Franz Wiens and Abram J. Huebert
dug the grave overnight and lined it with concrete to protect the body from jackals and white ants.
The funeral service was held the next day, on October 24, with a sermon by Tirmalajah, one of
Unruh’s preachers. Abram Huebert gave the tribute in German, Franz Wiens in Telugu.
Anna was pregnant at the time, and on December 1, 1912, the last Unruh child, Elisabeth,
was bom. In the meantime Anna carried on managing the entire station at Jangaon. She left for
Russia on January 29, 1913, and stayed with a Reimer family in the Molotschna. Provisions were
made for her support and that of the six children, presumably by the Mennonite Brethren
Conference. Anna died in Ohrloff, Molotschna, on October 13, 1921. All six of her surviving
children eventually emigrated to Canada, where they settled in British Columbia.
Heinrich Heinrich Unruh left an impressive legacy. His good friend Heinrich Braun wrote
about his work as a missionary “...he put his whole soul into the work. His body and spirit
belonged to the great work of the heavenly master, and he pointed out the way to Christ for many
a Telugu. God be praised!” About the time spent in South Russia Braun remarked “...when he
visited our churches one or two years ago, many a person could, besides thanking Jesus, also thank
Unruh for salvation... he was a real minister to people and an effective soul winner.”
Sources:
Braun, Heinrich, News Report, Unruh tot, Familie bleibt, Friedensstimme, 20 November 1912
P 3
Dueck, Abe J., The Changing Role ofBiblical\Theological Education in the Mennonite Brethren
Church, a chapter in The Bible and the Church, Kindred Press, Winnipeg, Canada, and
Hillsboro, USA, 1988, p 143
Dueck, Abe J., Moving Beyond Secession, Kindred Productions, Winnipeg, Canada, and Hillsboro,
USA, 1998, pp 67, 70
Friesen, P. M., pp 468, 469, 564, 567, 568
Penner, Peter, Russians, North Americans, and Telugus, Kindred Productions, Winnipeg, Canada,
and Hillsboro, USA, 1997, pp 10, 25, 35, 41, 55-57, 89
Peters, G. W., Foundations of Mennonite Brethren Missions, Kindred Press, Hillsboro, USA,
and Winnipeg, Canada, 1984, p 39
123
Unruh, A. H., Die Geschichte der Mennoniten-Bruedergemeinde, General Conference of the
Mennonite Brethren Church of North America, Hillsboro, USA, 1955, pp 193, 194,
262, 263
Unruh Family History, Peggy Regehr [grand daughter of A. H. Unruh] of Winnipeg, Canada
It should be noted that in some of the indexes all references to “ Heinrich Unruh” are lumped
together, or attributed to the wrong person. There were at least three church leaders by that
name active at roughly the same time, Elder Heinrich Peter Unruh of the Halbstadt Mennonite
Church, Heinrch Unruh of the Kuban, and Missionary Heinrich Heinrich Unruh.
124
JAKOB JOHANN KROEKER
[1872-1948]
One of the Organizers of the Bible Conference
held in Halbstadt August 20-23, 1909
Jakob Johann Kroeker was bom on October 31, 1872, in Gnadental, Molotschna. From
there his parents with their family moved to Spat, in the Crimea. One of his teachers, likely in
primary school, was the well known Peter P. Siemens. After passing his state examinations he
spent two years teaching at a Mennonite school in Minlertschick, near Spat.
Jakob married Anna Langemann, daughter of Johann Langemann of Margenau, in 1893.
He attended the Hamburg Baptist Theological Seminary, graduating in four years, then returned
to Spat in the summer of 1897. The Mennonite Brethren Church quickly recognized his gifts, so
he was ordained to the ministry by Elder David Schellenberg on May 25, 1 898. Jakob Kroeker and
David Duerksen served a number of years as travelling evangelists for the Mennonite Brethren
Conference. Together they also were members of a commission which supervised the teaching of
religion and German in the Mennonite schools of the Crimea. In 1 902 they collaborated in sending
a report about the activities of the Mennonite Brethren Church in the Crimea [used by P. M.
Friesen, pages 465-470].
In 1897 Jakob’s cousin, Abraham Jakob Kroeker, also
moved to Spat in the Crimea. They began an association which
produced an important series of publications. Starting in 1 897
they published the Christlicher Familienkalender, a Christian
family almanac, which by 1911 sold 12,000 copies. From 1899
to 1917 the Christlicher Abreiss-Kalender appeared, a daily
devotional booklet; in 1911 a total of 25,000 were printed. A
less successful venture was the Christliches Jahrbuch, which
they published from 1902 to 1905. All of these had a wide
circulation among Mennonites in Russia and North America, as
well as in non-Mennonite circles.
Initially from their homes in Spat the two Kroekers
published Friedensstimme, a general Mennonite newspaper,
which also in part served as the unofficial voice of the
Mennonite Brethren. It was started in 1903, originally being
printed in Berlin, Germany, because the Kroekers feared that
permission to print in Russia would never be granted. In
January of 1906, however, permission was granted, so
publication began in Halbstadt, although the paper was carefully
censored. The Kroekers in the meantime [in 1905] had moved
to Halbstadt to continue their work. At first Friedensstimme
appeared twice a month, then from 1 906 to 1 908 weekly, and after that twice a week. By 1 9 1 3 there
were 5,800 subscribers. The paper contained inspirational articles, home and foreign mission news,
reports from schools, hospitals, and other institutions, news of events in the Mennonite colonies,
book reports and a wide variety of advertizing. With the outbreak of World War I publication was
discontinued, although it appeared for brief times under various other names, including
Molotschnaer Flugblatt and Volksfreund, the last issues appearing as late as September, 1920.
Jakob was one of the founders of Raduga, the printing and publishing house based in
125
Halbstadt. He was on the board of Morija, the nursing school also based in the Halbstadt area, and
for a time was secretary of the organization. Jakob was one of the speakers at the official
dedication of the facility on May 23, 1910.
Jakob became interested in the revivalist Dr. Friedrich Baedeker, and through this contact
became acquainted with the evangelical movement in St. Petersburg, which included some of the
nobility. He also became familiar with the Alliance movement of Germany and the Baltic
countries. He was a member of the organizing committee of the Alliance Conference in
Blankenberg, and attended the conferences almost every year. Jakob extended his interests to
organizing Bible conferences in South Russia as well. As one of the organizers of the 1909
conference in Halbstadt, he undoubtedly used some of his contacts in St. Petersburg to obtain a
number of the speakers, such as Preacher Regentrop, P. Grubb and Adam Podin.
Jakob also had a heart for his immediate neighbours. He and Walter L. Jack, a Reformed
Pfarrer from Germany who had begun a seminary in Astrakhan, were involved in a tent ministry
among the Russian population. It is possible that through this contact Jack was asked to be the
keynote speaker at the dedication of the Morija Deaconess Home.
In 1 9 1 0 Jakob felt the distinct call to move, in part because of his health and partly because
he needed to rest. In the spring of the year he had travelled to Switzerland and Germany to find a
suitable place. He found a very neat house with a small garden in the picturesque town of
Wemigerode am Harz, in Germany. He preached a number of farewell messages, one in Halbstadt,
the other in Tiegenhagen, visited relatives in the Crimea, then departed, likely in mid June.
Jakob did keep up some contacts with southern Russia, for example, he published a
devotional article in Friedensstimme in January of 191 1 , but his absence may account for the fact
that the “annual” Bible conferences held in Halbstadt did not continue. Many of Jakob’s
connections with Russia were of course interrupted with the outbreak of war in 1914.
Jakob, however, continued his theological studies, and he continued to write. He had
written and published books both in Spat and Halbstadt, and pursued this aspect of his ministry in
Germany as well. A series of books, eight volumes, Das
lebendige Wort, was published in 1934. Other books
included Allein mit dem Meister, Der verborgene Umgang
mit Gott, Licht von seinem Lichte, and Weltstaat und
Gottesreich. Roemerbrief-Kommentar Kapitel 1-8 was
published after his death in 1949; Im Heiligtum des
Vaterunsers was actually written in 1898 when Jakob still
lived in Spat, but was first published in 1951. Someofhis
books went through numerous editions.
During World War I Jacob was active in ministry
to Russian prisoners of war, distributing Bibles and
preaching in the camps. After conclusion of the war,
together with Walter Jack, he founded Licht im Osten, a
missionary society which helped educate Russian
preachers at a seminary in Wemigerode, supplied relief to
the needy in Russia, and conducted an annual faith
conference. Kroeker was president, Jack the Missions
Inspector, with special interest in Russia. This agency also
printed Dein Reich Komme, a monthly missionary paper:
begun in 1920, it still is being published [1999]. It
provided an excellent vehicle for Kroeker and Jack to
write articles, often relating to the state of the church in
Jakob Kroeker in his later years as
Director of Licht im Osten
126
Russia. Jakob became known among the Protestant churches in central and eastern Europe, and
participated in many conferences. Rroeker and Jack, in 1937, were asked to become president and
vice-president of the Band der Evangeliumschristen [Society of Evangelical Christians], but
declined the offer.
While working in a non-denominational mission, Kroeker still maintained his ties with
the Mennonite brotherhood. In 1 925 he delivered the keynote address at the first Mennonite World
Conference, held in Basel, Switzerland. Through his lecture tours he influenced Mennonites in
Germany, Switzerland and North America.
In 1945, after the collapse of Germany at the end of World War II, the Kroekers left
Wemigerode because the area fell into the Russian zone of occupation. They settled near Stuttgart,
where Jakob’s health began to deteriorate in 1946. C. F. Klassen visited the very ill Jakob on
December 8, 1 948, taking along greetings for his many friends in North America. Jakob died four
days later, on December 12, 1948. The funeral was held on December 16. Some of the speakers
were Pfarrer Walter Fellmann, Preacher Rupp, Pastor Hans Brandenburg, chairman of the board
of Licht im Osten, Professor Benjamin Unruh of Karlsruhe, representing the Russian Mennonites,
and C. F. Klassen, representing the Mennonite Central Committee. A small choir from the
Muehlhausen church sang. The funeral, at the request of Jakob’s wife Anna, was concluded by the
singing of the well known hymn “ Grosser Gott, wir loben Dich,” [Holy God, We Praise Thy
Name]. Jakob Kroeker was buried in the Stuttgart-Muelhausen cemetery.
Anna and some of their nine children stayed in Germany, while a number of them
emigrated to Canada.
Sources:
Dueck, Abe, The Changing Role of BiblicalXTheological Education in the Mennonite Brethren
Church, a chapter in The Bible and the Church, Kindred Press, Winnipeg, Canada
and Hillsboro, USA, 1988, p 143
Dueck, Abe, Moving Beyond Secession, Kindred Productions, Winnipeg, Canada, and Hillsboro,
USA, 1998, pp 13,65,57, 111
Friesen, P. M., pp 465, 467-469, 659, 671, 672, 720, 724. Pages 465-470 are a report co-authored
by Jakob Kroeker and David Duerksen.
Goerz, Heinrich, Die Molotschnaer Ansiedlung, Echo-Verlag, Steinbach, Canada, 1950\1951
p 166, English Edition, 1993, pp 199, 200
Klassen, C. F., Ein Kranker gruesst, Der Bote, 5 January 1949, p 3
Krahn, Cornelius, Obituary, Der Bote, 5 January 1949, p 5
Kroeker, Jakob, Einladung, Friedensstimme, 15 May 1910, p 3
Kroeker, Jakob, Die Wohnung Gottes, Friedensstimme, 8 January 191 1, pp 1-3
Mennonite Encyclopedia
Mueller, Joachim, Dem Gedaechtnis Jakob Kroekers, Dein Reich Komme, January 1949, pp 1-3
News Report, Abschiedspredicht , Friedensstimme, 2 June 1910, p 8
News Report, Einweihung des Diakonissenheims Morija, Friedensstimme, 5 June 1910, pp 3, 4
Springer, Nelson P., and Klassen, A. J., Mennonite Bibliography 1631-1961, Herald Press,
Scottdale, USA, and Kitchener, Canada, 1977, Kroeker has 237 references
Toews, J. A., pp 89, 90, 96, 97, 104
Unruh, A. H., Die Geschichte der Mennoniten-Bruedergemeinde, General Conference of the
Mennonite Brethren Church of North America, Hillsboro, USA, 1955, pp 193, 194, 229,
251,252, 254, 821,822
127
HARRY PERCY GRUBB
One of the Guest Speakers at the Bible Conference
held in Halbstadt August 20-23, 1909
Speaker P. Grubb was most likely Harry Percy [he was usually called Percy] Grubb [1848-
1925], seventh child and fourth son of Richard and Maria Grubb. While “Grubb” is not a typical
Irish name, but is found among the Pennsylvania-Germans, this Grubb family was known as “The
Grubbs of Tipperary”. They must have lived in Ireland for some time to achieve that distinction.
Percy’s parents were originally Quakers, although they were “disowned” by this group in
1840, eight years before Percy was bom. He was baptized as an infant in Cahir Church in Ireland
on October 31, 1850. Percy was the first of the Grubbs to become a clergyman, graduating from
Trinity College, Dublin, with his M.A. The Reverend Harry P. Gmbb held a number of posts in
Ireland, then beginning in 1879 in London and other areas of England. While rector of a parish in
Nottinghamshire he was called “an Irishman with evangelical leanings”. Percy was assistant
General Secretary of the Church Mission Society from 1 885 to 1 897, therefore obviously interested
in missions and evangelism. His education and all his positions and activities both in Ireland and
later in England related to the Anglican Church.
Percy married Margaret Crighton-Stuart in 1892. Her father, James Crighton- Stuart, Esq.,
was in the Foreign Office. One side of his family was of Huguenot background. Through his wife
Percy had connections with G. W. A. Waldgrave [Lord Radstock], an itinerant evangelist from
Great Britain who had begun to bring about spiritual awakening in a number of aristocraticfamilies
in Russia connected with the imperial court. Margaret’s mother was wealthy, and a real Victorian
aristocrat. She became associated with the evangelistic activities of the “upper classes” centering
around Lord Radstock’ s large London home on Portman Square.
It is probably through the Lord Radstock connection that the organizers of the Halbstadt
Bible Conference learned to know of Percy Grubb. Both Lord Radstock and Jakob Kroeker spent
time in St. Petersburg, so they quite possibly knew each other, and could quite easily have made
arrangements for the invitation to Halbstadt.
Did Percy speak German or Russian at the conference? Being bom, raised and educated
in Ireland makes it unlikely that he was fluent enough in either language to preach in it. English
was certainly not well enough known by the Mennonites in the Molotschna to understand sermons.
Were translators used? No report gives any information on the subject.
George Carleton Gmbb [1856-1940], younger brother of Percy, was also interested in
missions and evangelism. He was also educated in Trinity College, Dublin, and became a curate,
with posts in Ireland. He became a travelling evangelist and missionary for the Keswick
Convention, and did travel to Russia. It is unlikely, however, that George was the Gmbb involved
with the Halbstadt conference. He does not seem to have been based in London, and his initial was
certainly not “P”.
Sources:
Grubb, Geoffry W., The Grubbs of Tipperary, The Mercier Press, Cork, Ireland, 1972,
pp 157, 162, 164
Klippenstein, Laurence, Russian Evangelicalism Revisited: Ivan Kargel and the Founding of the
Russian Baptist Union , Baptist History and Heritage, April 1992, p 42
Mennonite Encyclopedia
Pawles, J. C., Librarian, Spurgeon’s College, London, England, Letters, 8 June 1998;
1 1 November 1998
128
ADAMK. PODIN
One of the Guest Speakers at the Bible Conference
held in Halbstadt August 20-23, 1909
Baptists in Russia, just like the Mennonites, had strict instructions that they could preach
to, but not convert their Russian neighbours. Adam Podin was one person who preached with the
aim of converting with the full blessing and encouragement of the government.
Adam was bom in Lithuania in 1862, received a good education, then became a teacher in
a government school. Upon his conversion in 1889 he was dismissed from his position. He
travelled to England to visit friends, then on his return home was baptized by Baron Stackelberg,
pastor of the Baptist church in Kegel. Adam, under the supervision of Stackelberg, preached and
evangelized in the villages around Kegel, and in time even made preaching tours into Estonia.
Adam returned to England, spending time at the Missionary Training Home at Drayton
Park, N. Having completed his studies he returned to Kegel where he succeeded Stackelberg as
pastor in 1900. He was called “the God-equipped man for the work”. He was a good linguist,
familiar with seven languages, tall, broad-shouldered, yet obviously kind and gentle.
About 1904 Adam was approached by a highly placed government official in St. Peters¬
burg, who was also a Baptist. It was requested that Adam visit the prisons throughout the northern
part of the Russian empire, as well as the exile camps in Siberia. Documents were prepared which
allowed him to hold gospel services in prisons and exile settlements, and in addition he was given
several thousand copies of the New Testament for distribution among the prisoners. In this capacity
Adam travelled long and arduous journeys by train,
steamer and droshky, through storms and floods.
On one trip, in the spring of 1 9 1 1 , he distributed
3,400 New Testaments in seven different languages. On
another occasion he preached at a series of meetings at
Perm, the great exile forwarding station. Altogether
there were 6,000 prisoners, many of whom were not
likely to see their homes again. He spoke to them in
groups, for instance the second day he preached to 800
manacled men, sentenced to twenty years in exile, to be
served near the Amur River. First they would have to
walk thousands of versts through forests and across
deserts, then at their destination the work would be
extremely hard. Very few would survive five years of
their sentences. In a number of days Podin had spoken
to all of the prisoners, most gladly accepting the gift of
a New Testament.
So the work continued. Sometimes Adam would
speak at up to forty gatherings in one day. He was
fatigued, the strain was severe, but “having heard the
Master’s call” he could not turn back.
It is quite probable that Jakob Kroeker came into contact with Podin, since both frequented
St. Petersburg, the Russian capital. This was likely the personal connection with the newspaper
Friedensstimme, where Podin published a series of articles about his prison ministry. Both Jakob
Kroeker and the Mennonite community would therefore have been familiar with his work. It is thus
not surprising that he was invited to be a speaker at the August 20-23 Bible Conference in
Adam K. Podin
129
Halbstadt. The Mennonites obviously liked him, since he was asked to be a guest speaker again,
at the dedication of the Morija nursing school on March 23, 1910. He used Romans Chapter 1 as
his text, emphasizing the inexpressible riches we have in Jesus Christ.
Through a series of letters Adam wrote to a journal, Evangelical Christendom, it is known
that he was active in the prison ministry until at least 1917. It is highly unlikely that he continued
his ministry in the prisons during the Russian Revolution and even less likely that he would have
continued once the Bolsheviks took power.
Sources:
Byford, Rev. Charles T., Peasants and Prophets, Second Edition, James Clarke and Co., London,
1914, pp 127-134
News Report, Friedensstimme, 5 June 1910, p 3, 4
Podin, A., Gefangenenmission, Friedensstimme, 14 February 1909, p 5
Podin, A., Aus der Arbeit in den Gefaengnissen, Friedensstimme, 28 February 1909, pp 4, 5
Podin, A., Arbeit unter den Gefangenen, Friedensstimme, 18 July 1909, pp 6, 7
Podin, A., Gefaengnismission, Friedensstimme, 3 April 1910, pp 3, 4
Wardin, Albert W., Evangelical Sectarianism in the Russian Empire and the USSR, The American
Theological Library Association and Scarecrow Press, Inc., Lanham, USA, and London,
UK, pp 56, 57
130
JOHANN HUEBERT
One of the Guest Speakers at the Bible Conference
held in Halbstadt August 20-23, 1909
Johann Huebert came from the Lichtenau area of the Molotschna.. He was married; his
wife’s name is not known, but her initial was “M”. In 1893 Johann, likely aged no more than 30,
went to Java as a missionary under the Niederlaendisch-Indischen Taufgesinnten-Mission
[Mennonite Association for the Spread of the Gospel in Dutch Colonies]. He worked in Kedung,
Pendjalin. When he arrived there were few Christians in the largely Muslim area. In 1899 Johann
could report that 1 5 persons had been baptized that year, bringing the total church membership to
30. They had just finished building a school large enough to house 150 children. Medical work
was also proceeding, with medical supplies having been distributed to 160 villages. After 16 years
of work there was a flourishing church of 507 members. In order to allow people to become
Christians the mission had to help them move out of their immediate surroundings, so it provided
settlements on rented land.
Johann and his wife returned on furlough to South Russia, probably in late 1908. On
January 6, 1909 Johann preached in the morning at the Alexanderkrone Mennonite Church, then
at a funeral in the afternoon. On Pentecost, 1909, he preached at the annual Missionfest held in
Gnadenfeld.
In June of 1909 the Hueberts planned to travel from Steintal in Russia to Germany. His
wife was to stay in Germany, Johann would return to southern Russia in the autumn. August 20-23,
1909, he participated in the Bible Conference in Halbstadt, likely reporting about his mission work
in Java.
Back in Germany, Johann visited churches in southern Germany, in Baden Baden,
Wuerttemberg and the Pfalz. He also visited Swiss churches at Emmental and Langnau, reporting
about his mission work and collecting funds. Then the Hueberts headed to Lucerne, through the
St. Gotthard Tunnel, and south to Genoa. March 3,1910 they boarded the steamer “Oranje”, bound
for Java. Johann sent a lengthy report about the trip to Friedensstimme, but beyond that no further
information about the Hueberts has been found, except that Johann died in 1944.
Sources:
Friesen, P. M., pp 551, 559
Huebert, J., Auszug aus dem Jahres Bericht, Christlicher Familienkalender, 1901, pp 64, 65
Huebert, J. and M., Letter, Friedensstimme, 19 December 1909, p 5
Huebert, J., Letter, Friedensstimme, 6 June 1909, p 9
Huebert, J. and M., An Bord des Dampfers "Oranje ”, Friedensstimme, 3 April 1910, pp 2, 3
Mennonite Encyclopedia
Mulder A., A Century of Mennonite Missions, Mennonite Life, January, 1 948, pp 12-15
News Report, Friedensstimme, 10 January 1909, p 1 1
News Report, Missionsfest, Friedensstimme, 30 May 1909, p 10
News Report, Friedensstimme, 14 November 1909, p 3
131
20. DEDICATION OF THE
DEACONESS HOME MORIJA
MAY 23, 1910
A hospital was established in Muntau, Molotschna Colony, in 1889. Minister and
land owner Franz Wall of the Crimea was inspired by the example of Georg Mueller of
Bristol, England, to act in faith. The Muntau project grew, and when the founder died in
1906, his son, Franz Wall Jr. took over the operation. Shortly before World War I the
facility was expanded to a capacity of 60 beds. For many years the Chief of Medical Staff
was Dr. Erich Tavonius.
The Muntau Hospital also had an associated school of nursing with a residence,
established in 1896, but it remained small. In 1907 there were four qualified nurses and
four trainees involved.
The need was felt to establish a much larger and more comprehensive deaconess
home in the Molotschna. Likely the models used were a number of deaconess homes that
were in the Baltic States, in Mitau [Jelgava], Riga and Reval [Tallin], A number of
Mennonite women had actually graduated from these institutions . There was to be religious
and general knowledge instruction as well as theoretical and practical nursing. Once the
course was completed Morija could remain the home for nurses working in various
surrounding health care institutions. It was planned that it would also serve as a retirement
home for sick or aging nurses. Three men had the vision to establish the Morija Deaconess
Home - Franz Wall Jr., Peter Schmidt [a rich land owner], and Dr. Erich Tavonius.
A three year curriculum was developed to implement the plans. The first year
involved theoretical instruction in subjects including Bible, German, mathematics,
geography, history, anatomy and other sciences. The last two years were dedicated to
practical work in the Muntau Hospital. Instructors would be the Home Administrator,
medical staff such as Dr. Tavonius, and various other teachers. Nursing was to be the
vocational vehicle, but service to God by helping the sick and disabled was the primary
focus. The overall vision statement was modelled somewhat after that of a similar home
in Beme, Switzerland.
Construction of the building, meant to house 20-25 nurses, was begun in May, 1 909.
Apparently initial plans had been to complete the project by September, but inclement
weather caused some delays. In June they were working on the foundation, and finally in
December the facilities were ready to be occupied. On the evening of December 3 all the
nurses, Dr. Tavonius and a number of other guests were invited for tea to celebrate the
event. This was followed by a prayer meeting in which the whole project was offered to the
Lord and Master. The official dedication, however, was delayed until the spring of 1910,
because it was felt that the roads were undependable in wintertime, making it difficult for
the out of town visitors.
Throughout 1909 and into 1910, Heinrich Braun, the treasurer for the Morija
project, published requests for funds for the building project in Friedensstimme. Lists of
donors and donations were also published, for example gifts totalling 3,655 rubles, 76
132
kopeks were listed on June 13, 1909. P. Schmidt, likely one of the founders, gave 2,000
rubles, and Dr. Tavonius contributed 912 rubles, 76 kopeks.
hi early 1910 a number of invitations to the official dedication to be held in
Halbstadt on May 23 appeared in Friedensstimme. The secretary of the committee
responsible for making the announcements was Jakob Kroeker.
*
*
*
On Sunday, May 23, at 8:30 AM, the dedication ceremonies for the Morija
Deaconess Home began in the Mennonite church in Halbstadt. Proceedings started with
brief introductory remarks by Elder Heinrich Unruh of Muntau. On the basis of Paul’s
letter to the Ephesians 2:10 “For we are God’s workmanship, created in Christ Jesus to do
good works...” he felt that the
attitude of the children of God must
be one of service.
Then Pastor Walter Jack, at
the time residing in Astrakhan,
delivered the celebration address,
tying together the description of the
Last Supper of John 6:53-58 with
“being in Christ Jesus” of Paul’s
description in I Corinthians 1:30.
He drew the parallel that the life is
in the blood; if a body loses blood,
there is less and less life remaining.
So, said Jack, the drinking of the
blood of Christ means the
acceptance of a new, godly,
everlasting life. Partaking of his
flesh means the acceptance of Christ’s life in the flesh, as he lived it from the cradle to the
grave. Through the acceptance of these elements our knowledge and our justification will
be completed in the eyes of God.
The last sermon of the morning was delivered by Adam Podin of Kegel. He spoke
of the inestimable riches we have in Jesus Christ, based on Ephesians chapter 1. We were
chosen before the creation of the world [v.4], he then predestined us to be his adopted sons
[v.5], we have redemption through Christ’s blood [v.7], and we have received the riches of
God’s grace [v.7, 8], Only a fool would prefer the wealth the world has to offer according
to Luke 12:20.
The afternoon celebration continued in the Halbstadt community hall. The first
speaker, Heinrich Guenther of Ohrloff, mentioned the testing of Abraham on Mount
Moriah [German \Morija ] as described in Genesis chapter 22. The Old Testament story
Morija Deaconess Home, completed in
December, 1909
133
showed Abraham’s absolute faith, by being willing to give everything over to God. He
wished the deaconesses a similar experience in the newly founded Morija, that they could
give themselves totally to the service of God, and that God would accept the offering.
Jakob Kroeker based his remarks on Luke 10:38-42, where Jesus entered the home
of Mary and Martha. Mary had learned to sit at the feet of Jesus and listened to what he
said. That is necessary to effectively serve the Lord. Later [John 12:1-11], Mary put
perfume on Jesus feet and wiped them with her hair. Only when one has sat at Jesus feet
and listened, can one truly serve him in a practical way. That is true even now. Many a
person may have thought that the nurses at Morija should start the clinical bedside nursing
immediately, but following the example of Mary, they first need to sit at Jesus feet before
they start to serve.
Dr. Erich Tavonius made a distinction between a nurse and a deaconess. A nurse
may chose her profession simply to make a living. With a deaconess, on the other hand,
the material considerations are totally subservient to the desire to serve in the name of
Christ. It is quite possible to take the required courses at the Deaconess Home, yet chose
to be a nurse only upon completion, if the person does not feel called to be a deaconess.
Tavonius encouraged many more young ladies to apply, since both options were available,
and the nursing profession itself was quite well paid.
Heinrich Braun remarked that they were there to make an offering - but not to offer
up others, rather themselves. This would include material goods the Lord had entrusted
them with. In the words of a pastor he encouraged the guests to keep the copper for
themselves, but to give the silver and the gold. As treasurer, Braun continued that the three
necessary ingredients for a successful home had been provided, namely Light, Air and
Water. There were still a number of debts, but the institution was young, and the hope was
that God would continue to provide for this work of Christian charity. Thereupon Braun
read the financial statement, which it was hoped would soon be published in the newspaper
Friedensstimme.
*
*
The first class had nine
students, which as mentioned, had
moved into the new structure in
December of 1 909. Some reports
quote there being 40 students per
year, which likely refers to the later
expansion. Physicians involved
with instruction were Dr. Erich
Tavonius and Dr. Hausknecht.
Administrator [ Hausvater ] was
Minister Jakob Friesen. The head
Morija staff 1915-1916. Sitting, 1. to r. Maria Wall,
Minister Jakob Friesen, Vera Michelson and
Dr. Hausknecht
134
nurse was Vera Michelson from
Estland, in the Baltics, likely
from the deaconess home in
Reval. Nursing instructors were
Katya Klassen, Maria Braun, and
by 1915 Maria Wall. Committee
members were president, initially
Elder H. Unruh, then later David
Klassen, secretary Jakob Kroeker
and treasurer Heinrich Braun.
Other members were Jakob J.
Sudermann, Franz F. Wall and
David J. Dick of Apanlee.
The first structure, dedicated in 1910, was a one story building. It is mentioned that
just before the outbreak of World
War I the home was greatly
enlarged, and moved to a new two
story building. Obviously the
concept of this, the only deaconess
home among the Mennonites, had
taken hold and was flourishing.
The Deaconess Home
continued to function through the
revolutionary period, but when the
communist government was
entrenched the religious aspects of
the instruction were dropped. As
late as January 22, 1927, Dr.
Tavonius wrote a letter to Unser Blatt, which was also published in the Mennonitische
Rundschau , asking young ladies to consider nursing as a career by training at the
“professional medical school.” There was no specific mention of the previous “deaconess”
function. After the death of Vera Michelson in 1929 the home was turned into a medical
institute under the supervision of a communist administrator.
The new expanded Morija Deaconess Home
Schwesternfest [Nurse Celebration] at Morija
Sources:
Friedensstimme - news items and announcements:
6 June 1909, p 9
13 June 1909, p 10
5 September 1 909, pp 2,3
30 January 1910, p 3
15 May 1910, p 3
5 June 1910, pp 3,4 - principal source of information about the dedication ceremonies
3 July 1910, p 9
18 July 1910, pp 3,4
135
Friesen, P. M., pp 659, 650
Goerz, H., Die Molotschnaer Ansiedlug, Echo-Verlag, Steinbach, Canada, 1950/51, p 150
Lohrenz, Gerhard, Heritage Remembered, CMBC Publications, Winnipeg, Canada, 1974, pp 78, 81, 83, 84
Mennonite Encyclopedia
Quiring, Walter, and Bartel, Helen, A Is Ihre Zeit Erfuellt War, Saskatoon, Canada, 1963, pp 70, 73, 79
Tavonius, Erich, and Thiessen, Isaak, Letter, Mennonitische Rundschau, 8 June 1927, pp 5, 8, a reprint of
a letter first published in Unser Blatt
Webster’s New World Dictionary defines “deaconess” as follows:
“A woman appointed as an assistant in a church, as for helping with the care of the sick and poor of the
parish.” This definition precisely fits the term as used in the establishment of the Morija Deaconess
Home.
Background Information:
Dr. Erich Tavonius
Pastor Walter L. Jack
136
DR. ERICH A. TAVONIUS
[1872- 1927]
A Founder of Morija, Speaker at the Dedication
and Medical Instructor
Erich Tavonius was the third of five children of Alexander and Alexandra [Schulinus]
Tavonius. He was bom on October 3, 1872 in a small fortification Psebaj in the Kuban region of
Russia. His father was Swedish, a doctor, serving in a Russian military outpost. By the time Erich
reached school age his father had been posted to Gluchow, Province Tchemigov, where he attended
the first two years of gymnasium. He received a certificate of excellence, both for his studies and
his behaviour.
When Erich was ten his father died, at the age of 44, leaving mother Alexandra with five
children, four boys and one girl. The family moved to Alexandra’s former home, Dorpat [now
Tartu, in Estonia], near Koenigsberg, in East Prussia. Here Erich attended the Dorpat Gymnasium,
and again distinguished himself for diligence and talent. A scholarship of 100 rubles per year for
four years enabled him to go to the University of Dorpat, where he entered the medical faculty.
Erich was recognized as a serious, ambitious student. He never missed classes, and thanks to his
talent and excellent memory, he knew the subject matter as soon as the professor had completed
the last lecture. In the summer holidays, to help their mother, Erich and his older brother Alexander
worked as tutors in various aristocratic homes in the Baltic provinces.
Erich graduated from the university in 1895 with highest honours. He obtained an
appointment at a hospital in Kremenchug, province of Poltava, where he worked under the
Dr. Erich A. Tavonius [1872 - 1927]
supervision of a skillful surgeon, Dr.
Bogajewsky. After that he served a brief time
on the estate of Prince Dimitri Konstantinovitch,
near Mirgorod, a posting he soon traded for a
job at Novo-Wassiljewka, Berdyansk area,
where he stayed until 1900. When the position
of Chief of Staff at the Muntau Hospital and
Regional Medical Officer became available he,
upon the recommendations of his friends Jakob
Sudermann and David Dueck, applied for and
was given the post.
Only a brief summary of his 27 years at
the Muntau Hospital can be given. Initially the
hospital was small, with limited facilities. The
young unknown physician, in a new setting,
needed to orient himself and earn the trust of the
constituency. Erich Tavonius soon achieved
this trust.
In 1900, the year of his arrival in the
region, he married Margarethe Baumann,
daughter of a pastor from Prischib, the German
village across the Molochnaya River from
Halbstadt.
The Muntau Hospital published annual
137
reports, which were sometimes printed in the Mennonite periodicals. The 1903 statistics showed
that it was a very active hospital. In all there had been 3,239 patient days, with 1 9 1 patients in the
hospital. A total of 95 operations were done, of which 80 were major, 1 5 minor surgery. Of these
operations 72 were done with chloroform general anaesthesia, 12 with local, the rest without
anaesthesia. There was resection of tumour in 20 operations, resection or scraping of bone in 12,
seven hernia repairs, five major amputations and even four cataract removals. Tavonius probably
took care of most of the admissions to hospital, and certainly did all of the operations.
Franz Wall, founder and administrator of the Muntau Hospital, died in 1904. He was
replaced by his son Franz Wall Jr. Several months after Wall’s death terrible tragedy struck in
Prischib. In a robbery the parents and sister of Margarethe Tavonius, Pastor Baumann, his wife and
daughter were killed. Both Erich and Margarethe were shattered, to the extent that they took a
prolonged leave to recuperate in Simferopol. Erich decided never to return to the region again, as
a matter of fact to give up surgery entirely. The family returned to Erich’s home in the Baltics.
When he had recovered to some extent he went to the University of Koenigsberg, where he studied
“Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat” with the intention of going out as a missionary doctor. When,
however the efforts to go to foreign fields were not successful, and the position in Muntau was still
vacant, he allowed himself to be persuaded to return. Tavonius came back in the spring of 1906,
and resumed his
work with vigour.
The total
number of patients
grew, and the
medical facilities
were soon too
small. The hospital
was remodelled and
enlarged, to have a
60 bed capacity.
The small nursing
school of the
hospital was also
expanded by the
establishment of
Morija Deaconess
Home, which was
dedicated in 1910.
Dr. Tavonius was one of the founders of this home, and then was involved in the work of teaching
in the home. When Morija was modified to be a medical institute in the 1920s he continued to
carry much of the work load.
When World Weir I broke out, Tavonius was mobilized, being called to serve in the spring
of 1 9 1 5. He served on the front as the administrator of a reserve field hospital. He suffered a riding
accident, and having a serious injury, was admitted to the military hospital in Zarskoye-Sselo.
After his recovery he was posted to a hospital in Aschabad, east of the Caspian Sea, where he
served until he was discharged in the summer of 1 9 1 8 . The surgery he had practiced in his military
stint was helpful, but the heat had not been good for him. He had some heart trouble in 1905; this
combined with his serious injury and the heat, caused his health to deteriorate.
Erich came back to Muntau after the war and courageously began his work again. The
vicissitudes of civil war, epidemics and famine did not leave him unscathed. In 1920 he himself
138
contracted typhus, but “Thanks to God’s Grace” recovered, although the sequels of a weakened
heart and a nervous tremor remained. He was able to continue his work in several months, while
still a partial invalid. Despite his disability the work load increased dramatically over the next few
years. He took only short holidays, although in the last years these came more frequently, since
his fatigue due to chronic insomnia almost overpowered him.
In 1 922 Tavonius wrote a letter enquiring of an A. A. Friesen about the medical conditions
requiring special attention before people could migrate to Canada, presumably so he could help
them. He also made a personal enquiry about the possibility of his own migration to that country.
In July of 1923 he wrote a letter to the Mennonitische Rundschau thanking the American
Brethren for food packages that had arrived. He also thanked for medical supplies - many patients
were arriving at the hospital, some on foot, others riding on cows or horses. There were operations
every day; the nurses were working hard. It was expected that the salaries for hospital personnel
would be paid from the proceeds of a crop off the 20 dessiatines of land the hospital owned.
Tavonius hoped that the supplies of chloroform, ether and iodine would not run out!
Also in 1923 an influenza epidemic included Tavonius among its victims. He recovered,
but the disease further weakened his heart. Since the work itself seemed to go well in 1 926 he took
a holiday in the Caucasus to regain his strength. Unfortunately it was not successful, so he planned
another holiday for Germany, where he hoped to undergo further treatment, combined with some
additional study he had arranged in Zwickau. He was filled with hopes and plans for the future.
But his duty called Tavonius to Melitopol, and with the unpredictable spring weather he
caught a cold. He finally arrived home on Good Friday,1927, an ill man. He improved somewhat,
the fever subsiding by Easter Monday. The following day he had a relapse, likely a heart attack,
and this together with the fever was too much. He died on Friday, April 29, 1927.
Even right to the end Tavonius was dedicated to his work. January 22, 1 927 he wrote a
letter to the Mennonitische Rundschau describing the nursing school that still functioned, inviting
young ladies to register. The letter was published June 8, 1 927, more than a month after his death.
In his personal life Erich had accepted Christ as his saviour in the first years of his
activities in the Molotschna. It was his desire to serve the Lord with his life. His faith was
foundation for difficult times, and helped him to fulfill his very responsible position. He was active
in the life of the Molotschna Colony, often contributing to various charities, and of course helping
develop the medical programs and facilities. It is likely, however, that he never actually joined a
Mennonite church, possibly fellowshipping in the German churches of the Prischib area.
Erich and Margarethe had four children, all daughters. They were Ingeborg, Karin [who
became a physician, and for a few years worked at the Muntau Hospital], Sigried and Erika [she
also became a physician, and later worked in Filadelfia, Paraguay]. The murder of Margarethe’s
parents and sister, while having a serious effect on Erich, undoubtedly was even harder on her.
After the birth of the second child, Karin, she had what was most likely post-partum depression.
This was, at least in part, the reason for their extended leave from the hospital in 1904-1905.
Margarethe improved for a time, but after the birth of the fourth child, Erika, in 1908, her mental
instability became more chronic. She was taken to Mitau [now Jelgava, Latvia], where she was
admitted to the mental hospital Guentershof. With the help of his mother and sister, Erich raised
the four daughters, and despite difficulties, they turned out well.
The funeral of Erich Tavonius was held on May 3, 1 927. Thousands of people came from
far and wide. Before the body was taken to the Halbstadt Mennonite Church Minister Heinrich
Harder preached a sermon on the grounds of the Muntau Hospital, text being “Now, how will I be
comforted?” In the church, beginning at 10 AM, visitors were allowed one last look at their
beloved and much appreciated doctor. At 2 PM the funeral began on the church yard, there being
too many mourners to have the service in the church building. Pastor Hahn of Hochstaedt spoke
139
on the text “I have fought the good fight”[2 Timothy 4:7], followed by Elder A. Klassen of
Halbstadt, who spoke on “Blessed are the dead.. .their deeds will follow them” [Revelation 14: 13],
then Pastor Theo Kludt with text “Blessed by God, the Father of your Lord, Jesus Christ.” There
were words from a representative of the 1 Commission fuer Kirchenangelegenheiten [KfK], Minister
Komelius Martens from Grossweide. His text was “I know that my redeemer lives” [Job 19:25].
He told a number of stories from the life of the deceased and wondered “Who will now be the
sunshine full of love which will visit the sick each morning?” A Russian cleric from Tokmak
described how many tears Tavonius had dried up, and how friendly he had been to all people.
Three times Dr. Tavonius had been very ill, and three times all the Russian churches and even the
Jewish synagogue had prayed for him. God had heard their prayers. This time they had not known
that the good doctor was sick, so they had not had the opportunity to pray! Between the various
sermons and comments the choir sang appropriate songs.
The funeral procession then went back toward Muntau. It stopped opposite the hospital,
where patients came out to pay their last respects. One man, the last to have been operated on by
Dr. Tavonius, spoke so movingly that no eye remained dry. Hospital board representatives, friends
and colleagues reminisced about the life of the deceased. Dr. Ketat, who had worked with Erich
for many years, mentioned that in 27 years he had done well over 10,000 operations [slightly
apocryphal?]. Yet he had maintained an interest in scientific developments and in training other
medical personnel.
From there the last leg of the journey was to the Muntau cemetery, where Erich Tavonius
was buried up on a hill. “There rests his body,” remarked a friend “but the memory of the righteous
remains a blessing.”
Sources:
Feature Article, Doktor Erich Tavonius , Unser Blatt, July 1927, pp 307-311, Biography,
possibly written by Komelius Martens, picture of the grave site and a poem
dedicated to Dr. Tavonius
Friesen, A. A., Personal letter to Dr. Tavonius, 3 November 1922
Letter, Dr. Erich A. Tavonius, Der Bote, 10 April 1973, pp 1,2, sent in by someone who had
experienced the help of Dr. Tavonius
Lohrenz, Gerhard, Heritage Remembered, CMBC Publications, Winnipeg, Canada, 1974, p 79
News Report, Mennonitische Rundschau, 1 June 1927, p 2
News Report, Dr. med.. E. Tavonius 1872-1927, Mennonitische Rundschau, 25 June 1958, p 1 1
Tavonius, Erich, Personal letter to A. A. Friesen, 19 June 1922
Tavonius, Erich, Letter, Mennonitische Rundschau, 19 September 1923, p 10
Tavonius, Erich, Letter, Mennonitische Rundschau, 8 June 1927 pp 5, 8
Thiessen, Heinrich, Letter, Mennonitische Rundschau, 6 May 1903, p 9
140
WALTER L. JACK
[1878- 1939]
Guest Speaker at the Morija Dedication
Walter Jack was bom in Magdeburg, Germany, on August 15, 1878. The family soon
thereafter moved to nearby Halberstadt, where he lived most of his childhood. He must have
completed the usual undergraduate schooling, then likely entered university, where as a young
student he lived totally in the spirit of liberal theology. He attended a fellowship conference in
Wemigerode am Harz, where he met an old friend, D. Lange. This man was used by God to bring
Walter to Christ, a decision he never doubted in later life. For several years he was a teacher in the
school of Pastor Jellinghaus in Lichtrode, and was there when he received a call to Russia in 1906.
The Deutsche Orient Mission was founded in 1 897 by Pastor Dr. Johannes Lepsius. Under
the auspices of this small mission Walter Jack, the Reformed theologian, was asked to start a
seminary in Astrakhan. He was also to work with the evangelical groups among the Russian
Molokans. Some of the Molokan villages and estates were near the Molotschna Mennonite Colony.
Jack participated in two conferences in St. Petersburg in 1907, as well as an additional conference
of Lutheran representatives.
The proximity of some of his activities to the
Molotschna led to acquaintances among the Mennonites,
one of them being Jakob Kroeker, Mennonite Brethren
minister and publisher. In 1 908 God gave Walter a wife,
likely a Mennonite, and a relative of Jakob Kroeker. She
went through all the trials and tribulations with Walter, but
also shared his joys. Of their four children a boy died at
the age of one year, leaving a long lasting sorrow.
Probably through his friendship with Jakob Kroeker he was
invited to be the principal guest speaker at the dedication
of the Morija Deaconess Home, on May 23, 1910. He used
the partaking of Christ’s blood and flesh at communion as
an encouragement to serve God through helping the fellow
man.
When the Astrakhan seminary closed in 1 9 1 1 Jack
stayed in Russia, and together with Jakob Kroeker and
others established a tent mission among the Russian
population.
In 1914, with the outbreak of World War I, Jack
and his family were interned [ verbannt ]. In July of 1918,
after the collapse of the front in the east, they came out of
Russian banishment, and went home to Halberstadt. He
was drafted as a divisional chaplain until the end of the war, after which he returned in 1919.
Jack and Jakob Kroeker still had an interest in witnessing to the Russian people.
Immediately after the war the best way to do this seemed to be to do evangelistic work among
Russian prisoners of war in Germany. The two of them established a mission named Licht im Osten
[Light in the East], based in Wemigerode am Harz. To accomplish their goal they distributed
Russian New Testaments and other literature in the camps. With excellent response, and the
concern that prisoners were to return to Russia without Bibles, they established a Bible school and
Walter L. Jack [1878 - 1939]
141
wrote correspondence courses. In 1920 they also began a publication Dein Reich Komme [Your
Kingdom Come], which is still being printed [1999]. Apparently there were about 2,000 converts
among the returning Russian prisoners of war.
This mission and its various activities were the focus of Walter Jack for the rest of his life.
He tried to interest groups in the ministry within the Soviet Union, and worked closely with
organizations such as the Swedish “Society for the Spreading of the Gospel in Russia.” He
travelled far and wide, both to encourage missions and to minister to groups of believers. It is
mentioned that he often preached in Switzerland, and attended a number of conferences in Poland.
He was a prolific writer, especially for Dein Reich Komme, often describing various aspects of
church life in the Soviet Union. “The Evangelical Movement in Russia in the Eyes of its
Opponents’ll 928] and “On the Religious Situation in Russia”[1929] are examples of his articles.
Walter Jack and Jakob Kroeker seem to have worked together well - Walter as Missions
Inspector with particular interest in Russia, and Jakob as Director. They did not attempt to
establish churches or to align themselves with a specific denomination [although Jack was a
Reformed Pfarrer, Kroeker a Mennonite Brethren minister, and many of their other co-workers
Lutherans], They did help churches as the needs arose and were involved with the founding of a
Russian seminary. Their personal motto and the motto of the mission was “But we do not preach
ourselves, but Christ” [a loose quotation, likely from 1 Corinthians 2:1].
Both Jack and Kroeker participated in many conferences, church services and seminars.
Through their contacts they were, at a convention held in Warsaw in 1937, asked to be on the
executive ofthe Band der Evangeliums christen [Society ofEvangelical Christians], Jack to be vice-
president, Kroeker president. Both declined the offer. Jack was then named Honorary President
of the society to recognize the participation and love he had shown.
Jack as a young man was strong and healthy. With the passage of years, however, he
suffered from heart disease. He had completed an extensive trip to Bulgaria when his condition
became more serious. Walter Jack died suddenly the night of January 6-7, 1939. To the end he
had been full of hopes and plans for the future, yet he wanted to be wholly within the will of God.
The funeral was held on January 10, 1939 at 3 PM in the Liebfrauenkirche, Burgstrasse,
Wemigerode. The coffin was placed in front of the altar of the church, surrounded by flowers
which had been sent by his many friends. Pastor Hans Brandenburg of Berlin-Lichtenrade, as one
of the senior mission board members, presided over the service, and a Russian Evangelistic choir
sang. Jack’s wife had died in 1 926, so relatives at the funeral were his sister and surviving children.
Jakob Kroeker addressed the congregation as did representatives from a number of mission
organizations. Pastor Brandenburg closed the service at the church with prayer and a blessing. The
body was then taken to the cemetery, where Walter was buried beside his wife.
After completion of the ceremonies the “mission family” and other guests gathered at the
mission Erholungsheim [rest home], where the large number of letters and telegrams were read.
There was a message from Prince Bemadotte of Sweden, thanking the Lord for everything that
Pastor Jack had accomplished in the Kingdom of God. Superintendent Gensichen, representing the
city of Wemigerode, bemoaned his loss. Dr. Zoeckler of Stanislovov, Poland, felt the loss deeply,
as did A. L. Haig of the British and Foreign Bible Society based in Prague. Pfarrer D. E. Staehelin
of Basel, Switzerland stated that both he and his wife were deeply moved, and that the wanderer
would now behold the face of the Lord whom he had served. Professor Dr. Benjamin Unruh of
Karlsruhe sent his condolences to both the Mission and the family.
The work of the Mission had to carry on, so Joachim Mueller was appointed Mission
Inspector of the Russian section. His helper was to be Jakob Dyck, who for years had been Walter
Jack’s secretary and coordinator.
142
Sources:
Kroeker, Jakob, Zum heimgang unsers Missions-Inspectors Pastor W. L. Jack, Dein Reich
Komrae, February 1939, pp 17-36
News item, Einweihung des Diakonessenheims Morija, Friedensstimme, 5 June 1910, pp 3, 4
Sawatsky, Walter, Soviet Evangelicals Since World War II, Herald Press, Kitchener, Canada,
Scottdale, USA, 1981, pp 38, 395
Schwarzkopf, C., Bei den Bruedern in Bulgarien, Dein Reich Kormne, February 1939,
pp 36-39
Wardin, Albert W., Evangelical Sectarianism in the Russian Empire and the USSR: A
Bibliographic Guide, The American Theological Library Association and The
Scarecrow Press, Inc., Lanham. USA, and London, 1995
143
21. THE FLOOD OF 1912
There had been floods in the Halbstadt region of the Molotschna Colony on a
number of occasions, notably 1 893 and 1909, but the flood of 1912 was the worst in living
memory. The winter of 191 1 to 1912 was relatively mild, with very changeable weather.
There were four heavy snowfalls followed by warm temperatures and considerable melting.
Because of the variation in temperature the ground became frozen; with a sudden melt the
water could not soak into the ground, but had to run off.
There was heavy snowfall for several weeks, then again warm temperatures on
February 24-26, 1912. This caused rapid melting and widespread flooding of the
Molochnaya River and its tributaries, especially the Tokmak and the Begim-Tschokrak
Rivers.
Flooding was recorded well up the Tokmak River at Klippenfeld. The houses and
bams were not inundated because they were on higher ground, but the low lying gardens
towards the river were. Agnes Thiessen [Fast], five years old at the time, recalls that just
the tips of some of the trees showed above the water. She was terrified by the loud
crunches of ice flows colliding. Two wooden bridges in the village were swept away.
After a few days the Fast family travelled downstream to see what had happened to
their relatives in Liebenau. Chairs and dead cats were strewn on the street. Heinrich and
Lena Fast, uncle and aunt of Agnes, had been sleeping peacefully when their small child,
Lena, had cried. The aunt, getting up to tend Lena, had stepped into water. She woke her
husband, who discovered that there was water in the whole house. When he opened the
door to see what was going on outside he was unable to close it again because of the rush
of water. The whole family climbed up to the loft for safety. Several days later the children
were still upset because they had lost some toys and dolls in the flood.
Heinrich Gaede also reported about Liebenau, perhaps the hardest hit Mennonite
village. The water of the Tokmak River rose very rapidly, possibly due to ice jams. There
was soon a fast flowing stream down the main street of the village carrying straw, wood,
and ice flows up to 2 1 inches thick.
Heinrich and his family were trying to secure the house and bam from rising waters
when he heard shouts coming from the street. A man was standing on his buggy calling for
help. His driver had cut the horses loose and escaped himself, leaving the man stranded on
his vehicle. He now demanded that Heinrich bring him a horse. Heinrich shouted back that
it would be impossible to get a horse from the bam, and besides, they were already all wet,
so he himself would also have to get into the water. The stream pushed the buggy close to
the fence, so the man jumped into the water and escaped to Gaede’s house. Heinrich told
him “You have come to our house to be rescued, while we ourselves are planning to leave!”
“No,” the man replied, “ I am staying here!” He was given dry clothing, and the family
continued to dam off the doors of their home.
A friend of the Gaedes, Abram Kroeker of Wemersdorf, managed to reach the yard
through the garden, where the flood stream was not so strong. He rescued four of their
youngest children on his wagon. Heinrich, in the meantime, had decided to stay on his farm
as long as possible in an attempt to save his cattle and horses. The water reached the back
shed, but had not flooded the main house when he noted that it was no longer rising. By
144
evening the crest had been reached, and the water level was falling.
Some of the immediate neighbours of the Gaedes had evacuated or were sleeping
up in the attics. The eastern end of the village must have been lower, since the flooding
there was more severe. The house of Gerhard Doerksen [No. 2] was flooded to the
windows, and subsequently collapsed. The shop of Martin Hiebert [No. 3] was also ruined.
Jakob Neufeld’s house [No. 4] caved in due to damage and was later replaced by a new
home, this time built on a high foundation. No. 5, flooded to the windows, also collapsed.
Farther downstream flooding and subsequent damage was very severe in the
Ukrainian town of Tokmak. A large wooden bridge was destroyed by the ice and pushed
against a more sturdy stone bridge. About 200 houses were flooded and collapsed, with
considerable damage to many more. The police asked a Jewish couple to evacuate their
home, but the husband was afraid to
have his very ill wife moved, the
cool air might hurt her. When the
water poured into the windows it
was difficult to reach the house, and
by the time rescuers arrived, the
lady had died.
In Halbstadt, on the
Molochnaya River, many
basements were flooded, and at
least one house collapsed. This
house was noted to be constructed
of fired bricks; they must have been
a construction material prone to
disintegration with flooding. Two
telegraph poles were knocked down
by the ice, tearing the wires. It was
dangerous to travel across the river to
Prischib not only because of the high
level of the water, but because of the
strength of the raging current. Travel
was disrupted sufficiently to make it
impossible to deliver the mail on
February 27.
Other tributaries of the
Molochnaya River, such as the
Begim-Tschokrak, also flooded. At
Waldheim, well up the stream,
considerable damage was reported.
The river overflowed its system of
dikes, and forced at least one family to evacuate; many orchards were extensively damaged.
While there was fairly widespread destruction in the northern Molotschna, one
Flooding in Halbstadt, likely in 1912. At the
left is the residence of Benjamin Unruh
Flooding in Halbstadt, likely in 1912
145
village saw the possible bright side of the flood. At Fischau, downstream from Halbstadt
on the Molochnaya River, there was also flooding, but obviously quite limited. It was
reported that the inundation of the lowlands would ensure that there would be a good crop
of hay for that year!
Sources:
Bergmann, Peter and Helena, Letter, Mennonitische Rundschau, 15 May 1912, pp 14, 15
Gaede, Heinrich and K., Letter, Mennonitische Rundschau, 22 May 1912, pp 15, 16
Harder, Jakob Johann, Letter, Mennonitische Rundschau, 22 May 1912, p 15
Huebert, H. T., Hierschau: An Example of Russian Mennonite Life, Springfield Publishers,
Winnipeg, Canada, 1986, p 360
Lohrenz, Gerhard, Heritage Remembered, CMBC Publications, Winnipeg, Canada, 1974, p 53.
Lohrenz has labelled the flood pictures as 1 9 1 5 . News reports from the Molotschna during
that time record only mild weather with very little snow. There is absolutely no
mention of a flood. We are presuming the pictures are actually from 1912.
Mennonite Historical Atlas, p 34
News Reports, Friedensstimme, 29 February 1912 p 9; 7 March 1912, p 4; 14 March 1912, p 9
Thiessen, Agnes, Personal Letter, 29 October 1 998
Background Information:
Map: Northwestern Molotschna Colony... the flood of 1912
146
147
22. DEDICATION OF RESERVISTS
SEPTEMBER 1, 1914
Dates in this article are according to the Julian, or Old
Calendar; war was therefore declared on July 16, 1914
Following the defeats in the Crimean War, the Russian government felt that
revamping of the military structure was necessary. As a result universal conscription
eventually became a law in 1 874. Mennonites, fearing that their principle of non-resistance
was being compromised, negotiated an agreement on September 19, 1880, whereby young
men could serve their military time in forestry camps [Forstei]. The usual complement of
about 1 ,000 men was chosen by lot, to serve four years. Initially there were six, then eight,
and just before World War I a total of eleven camps.
With the outbreak of World War I the alternate services were expanded to include
medical orderly [ Sanitaetsdienst ], road building, additional forestry duties and other
services. Initially volunteers were called for, and Mennonites responded. Elder Heinrich
Unruh of the Halbstadt Mennonite Church, for example, encouraged men to join up. He
wrote “Go with God, wherever duty will call you, and spend all your energy, and if called
upon, your life, in this holy service.” By August 19, 1914 over 400 young men had
volunteered as medical orderlies, of which 190 came from the Chortitza region, and 130
from the Halbstadt and Gnadenfeld districts.
On August 24 a group of 29, including five trained nurses, left Halbstadt for
Simferopol. Prior to departure they participated in a service of dedication in the Mennonite
church. Teacher Benjamin Unruh and Elder Heinrich Unruh delivered sermons
admonishing those departing to cling to the everlasting rock, Jesus Christ. In reporting the
event the editors of Friedensstimme sent them off with “With God for Czar and the
Fatherland.”
August 25, obviously before this group of 29 had reached its destination, a letter
was sent from Simferopol. On station there were already 51 Mennonite medical orderlies
and five nurses from the Muntau Hospital. They were preparing the local hospital to receive
three to four hundred casualties in the next few days. Conditions were good, there was
plenty of food, with five meals a day.
Also on August 25 a telegram was received, certainly in Halbstadt and presumably
in all volost headquarters, that a universal draft was to be implemented. All reservists bom
1 896 or earlier [up to the age of 43], were to report to Ekaterinoslav by September 2. Those
from the Halbstadt Volost were to collect in Halbstadt on September 1, those from the
Gnadenfeld Volost in Gnadenfeld, the others were to travel directly to Ekaterinoslav.
* * *
Word was received that a train of empty fourth class coaches would pick up the
Mennonite reservists on September 1 , and would arrive at the railroad station at 8 AM. At
6:45 AM that morning, on the yard of the Mennonite Church at Halbstadt [the building
itself could not have accommodated all the participants] a farewell dedication service was
148
held. Minister Heinrich Braun [Mennonite Brethren] used the passage Acts 20:32 as text
for his sermon. It reads “Now I commit you to God and to the word of his grace.” Elder
Heinrich Unruh [Mennonite Church] spoke on Romans 12:12 “Be joyful in hope, patient
in affliction, faithful in prayer.” He especially emphasized the need for persistent prayer.
The closing song, Jesu geh voran, [Jesus Guide Our Way] provided a gripping and awe
inspiring atmosphere. After the blessing was pronounced the national anthem was sung.
Then everyone headed for the train station, with automobile, wagon or on foot; it
was estimated that there were several hundred vehicles present. Many a quiet tear was shed,
mostly by those being left behind. There was no loud weeping, likely because of the
consciousness that it was necessary to serve the Fatherland in its great hour of need.
Similar farewells were being said at Gnadenfeld with a 322 man contingent leaving
Waldheim [Stulnevo] early in the morning. When the train pulled into Halbstadt, the eleven
cars of Gnadenfeld reservists were joined by those from Halbstadt, the total of 700 to 800
men then heading north to Ekaterinoslav. On September 2 most of these reservists were
assigned to be medical orderlies.
* * *
By March 1,1915a total of 3,093 Mennonites were serving as medical orderlies,
increasing to 6,548 by 1916. Service in the medical corp was often well behind the front,
but sometimes involved battle fields, so there were injuries and deaths, as well as diseases
such as typhus. Casualties [deaths] numbered about 125. In all about 14,000 Mennonite
men were mobilized, of which 7,000 were medical orderlies, a few hundred built roads, and
the majority of the others served in forestry camps. Women were not actively conscripted,
but a number of nurses from the Mennonite hospitals participated in medical care of the
wounded.
Sources:
Huebert, H. T., Hierschau: An Example of Russian Mennonite Life, Springfield Publishers,
Winnipeg, Canada, 1986, pp 229-233
Mennonite Historical Atlas, pp 59, 136, 137
News Report, Kriegserklaerung, Friedensstinune, 23 July 1914, p 4
News Report, Aufruf Friedensstinune, 23 July 1914, p 7
News Report, Friedensstinune, 9 August 1914, p 6
News Report, Friedensstinune, 13 August 1914, p 6
News Report, Friedensstinune, 27 August 1914, p 5
News Report, Abfahrt mennonitischer Reservisten von Halbstadt, Friedensstinune,
3 September 1914, p 5
News Report, Von unsern Sanitaetern, Friedensstinune, 3 September 1914, p 5
News Report, Mennonitische Rundschau, 18 November 1914, p 13
Unruh, Elder H. Mennonitische Reservisten und Ratniki!, Friedensstinune, 16 August 1914,
Beilage, p 9
Background Information:
Elder Heinrich Peter Unruh
Heinrich Jakob Braun [see Bible Conference in Halbstadt]
149
HEINRICH PETER UNRUH
[1845-1928]
One of the Speakers at the Dedication of the
Reservists, September 1, 1914
Heinrich Peter Unruh was bom on March 23, 1 845 in Alexanderwohl, Molotschna Colony.
He was the eldest of the seven children of Peter and Sara [Schroeder] Unruh. The family moved
a few verst to the newly established village ofNikolaidorf, likely in 1851. In school Heinrich had
excellent teachers, H. Richert and J. Toews, but mostly he was a self taught man. He mastered
German through the use of a grammar book he had purchased himself. A Russian grammar book
he received as a gift from his former teacher, J. Toews, helped him to gain a good grasp of Russian.
He learned theology on his own and acquired a wide range of other knowledge.
At a young age Heinrich was appointed teacher in Mariawohl, a village near Gnadenfeld
in the Molotschna Colony. Then, when he was 26, he was elected minister by his church, the
Neukirch congregation. Elder Johann Harder presided at his ordination. Heinrich was known for
his thought provoking, yet calm, warm and elegant sermons.
Heinrich was married twice; his first wife, Helena Loewen, died in 1885. He then married
Maria Loewen. Members of the Unruh family, including Heinrich’s parents and four siblings
[Peter, Anna, David and Katharina] had emigrated to Kansas in 1874. In 1885, probably after the
death of his first wife, he went on an extended trip to the United States to visit his family.
After his remarriage, Heinrich and his new wife Maria moved to Muntau, near Halbstadt.
At that time he became leader of the Halbstadt Mennonite
Church. In 1896 the Halbstadt affiliate of the larger Ohrloff
congregation voted for independence, and also elected Heinrich
as elder. Elder Heinrich Dirks of Gnadenfeld organized the
election, and carried out the installation service several weeks
later. Throughout his term as elder Heinrich Unruh was known
for his attitude of servanthood; he applied Christian principles of
operation to the function of the church.
Heinrich not only served his own congregation, but also
the wider Mennonite community. He was chairman of the board
of the nursing school Morijcv, he was on the Molotschna School
Board [Schulrat], which supervised the teaching of German and
religion in the schools, serving for 3 1 years. He was chairman of
the Molotschna Church Conference for many years. He, together
with Heinrich Braun, conducted an open air farewell service for
departing reservists on September 1, 1914. Heinrich referred to
Romans 12:12 “Be joyful in hope, patient in affliction, faithful in prayer.” He also participated in
delegations that travelled to St. Petersburg to make presentations to government officials, and even
had an audience with the Czar.
In 1916 Heinrich retired as elder of the Halbstadt congregation because of poor health.
Soon thereafter he suffered a stroke which made him an invalid for the rest of his life. This did not
spare him mistreatment at the hands of Makhno terrorists, who threw rotten apples into his face and
pulled his beard, mockingly calling him a “German Archbishop.”
After several days of increasing fever and periods of shaking, Heinrich Unruh died at 4 AM
on November 4, 1 928. He was 83 years and seven months of age.
■ r' \
Heinrich Unruh [1845-1928]
150
The funeral was held on November 6, at the Halbstadt Mennonite Church. Elder Abraham
Klassen, who had followed Unruh as elder of the congregation, delivered the funeral oration. He
used the words of Simeon found in Luke 2:29 to express his sentiments “...you now dismiss your
servant in peace.” He described Heinrich as a human being, as a Christian, and as someone who
had suffered. L. Harder, daughter of the famous poet Bernhard Harder, dedicated a poem to
Heinrich.
Four of the Unruh children had left Russia for Canada in 1924. Heinrich’s widow Maria
and some of the other children tried to emigrate from Russia in 1 929, but were forcibly deported
to central Asia.
Sources:
Friesen, P. M., pp 530, 541, 659
Goerz, Heinrich, Die Molotschnaer Ansiedlung, Echo-Verlag, Steinbach, Canada, 1950U951
pp 136, 137
Hiebert, Clarence, Brothers in Deed to Brothers in Need, Faith and Life Press, Newton, USA,
1974, p 170
Huebert, H. T., Hierschau: An Example of Russian Mennonite Life, Springfield Publishers,
Winnipeg, Canada, 1986, pp 29, 230
Janz, H. B., Letter, Der Bote, 29 November 1928, p 1
Letter from daughter of H. Unruh, Der Bote, 13 December 1928, p 2
Mennonite Encyclopedia
Mennonite Historical Atlas, p 34
News Report, Friedensstimme, 3 September 1914, p 5
It should be noted that in some of the indexes all references to “Heinrich Unruh” are lumped
together, or attributed to the wrong person. There were at least three church leaders by that name
active at roughly the same time, Elder Heinrich Peter Unruh of the Halbstadt Mennonite Church,
Heinrich Unruh of the Kuban, and Missionary Heinrich Heinrich Unruh.
151
23. CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS
FEBRUARY 1917 - MARCH 1919
Prelude of events leading up to March 11, 1919
February, 1917 Overthrow of Czar Nicholas II
Provisional government established by Kerensky, which
promised to broaden freedoms of minority groups
June 6-8, 1917 All-Mennonite Conference held at Neu-Halbstadt
Passed resolutions to undergird Mennonite schools, welfare
institutions, inner life of the church
August, 1917 All-Mennonite Congress in Ohrloff, outlining civil side of
Mennonite life: minority legal status, Mennonite press,
land redistribution
October 25, 1917 Revolution bringing Bolsheviks to power
Early 1918 Halbstadt and Gnadenfeld Volosts came under control of
local Soviet
February 5, 1918 Red Army troops reached Halbstadt, beginning the “Halbstadt
Days of Terror.” Requisitioning, robbing, some murders
by the roving bands of soldiers
March 3, 1918 Treaty of Brest-Litovsk signed, allowing Austro-German
occupation of Ukraine
April 19, 1918 Occupation of Halbstadt by German troops. Mennonites
welcomed them cordially. Traditional volost
government re-established.
Molotschna part of independent Ukraine
May, 1918 German military parades, drills, Ludendorf festivals started to
attract Mennonite youth
Selbstschutz, consisting of armed, para-military units
organized in Halbstadt, Gnadenfeld, Tiege, Tiegenhagen.
Military drills held throughout the summer
June, 1918 Recovery of some of the previously requisitioned property,
sometimes by force
A few executions of previous oppressors
152
June 30 - July 2,
1918
Summer 1918
October 1918
November 1918
Late 1918
Early 1919
March 6 - 10, 1919
March 8, 1919
March 11, 1919
All-Mennonite Conference in Lichtenau, Molotschna.
Issue of Selbstschutz sidestepped by upholding the
Mennonite belief in non-resistance, but recommending
tolerance for those not sharing this view. Argument for
needing protection, especially against violence and
rapine of Makhno bandits
More active Selbstschutz with German withdrawal imminent
Some intimidation against those who disagreed
Four Molotschna villages refused to set up units
Early Makhno attacks
German troops evacuated. Formal agreement establishing
the Selbstschutz signed between contingent leaders of
Halbstadt, Gnadenfeld and Prischib. Total force of
about 2,700 infantry and 300 cavalry. Leadership
mainly from a few remaining German officers
Makhno’s banditry increasing. Irregular Red Army units in
the area. White Army under General Denikin advanced
and occupied the Halbstadt and Gnadenfeld volosts.
Whites attempted to incorporate the Selbstschutz. They
collaborated in two battles, one south of Gnadenfeld,
the other the occupation of Chemigovka on the week-end
of December 5. Selbstschutz insisted on its defensive role
White Army retreated southward. The Selbstschutz tried to stem
the tide against Makhno. Red Army headed southward
on the heels of the retreating Whites. Makhno joined
them. First skirmishes north of Molotschna on March 2
Final battle north of the Molotschna, Selbstschutz against the
combined Red Army and Makhno. Very little strategic
planning. Said to have “hundreds of enemy dead” and
light Selbstschutz casualties. Selbstschutz front collapsed.
Many Selbstschutz members fled south to the Crimea
the night of March 9-10
Heinz von Homeyer, a German officer, appointed commander of
the Selbstschutz two days before it collapsed
Red Army troops invade Gnadenfeld
153
GNADENFELD MERCY
MARCH 11, 1919
While sustaining heavy casualties, perhaps up to 760 men, the combined might of
the Red Army, Thirty-third Division under General Dobenko and the Makhno bandits
prevailed over the Selbstschutz. In a battle north of the Molotschna on March 6-10, 1919,
the Selbstschutz front eventually collapsed, with many of its members escaping south to the
Crimea the night of March 9-10.
The Red Army troops swooped southward into the Molotschna and into Gnadenfeld.
The terrifying sound of artillery fire came from all sides. General Dobenko stormed into the
village to the volost headquarters.
Two men meekly came out to meet him, one being Komelius Martens, rector of the
Gnadenfeld Handelsschule and minister of the Sparrau Mennonite Brethren Church.
Komelius humbly pled “Mr. Dobenko, forgive us!”
Then the general let them have it. “You damned renegades from the faith of your
fathers! For 400 years you could not take arms, but now for your damned Kaiser
Wilhelm...” Three times the men had to hear “You damned renegades from the faith of
your fathers!”
Certain they were about to die, Martens earnestly pled once more “Comrade
Dobenko, forgive us!”
General Dobenko finally replied “I will not kill all, but my soldiers may plunder for
three days, and where they find Selbstschuetzler, they may execute them.”
Heinz von Homeyer had taken command of the Selbstschutz two days before its
collapse. While not changing the final outcome, he did deploy the troops in such a way that
they were not encircled by the Red Army. As a consequence a fair number of the
Selbstschuetzler had been able to escape southward to the Crimea, and were not executed.
After the March 1 1 episode a special delegation headed by Benjamin H. Unruh
approached the communist authorities, pointing out that the Selbstschutz had been defined
as a civilian, protective, peace-keeping force. Molotschna Mennonites were therefore
promised immunity from reprisal if they would surrender all their guns within three days.
Again, after intercession on their behalf by Benjamin Unruh and J. J. Janzen, a group of
eleven Halbstadt students was freed, on the understanding that their Selbstschutz activities
had been on the basis of upholding the civil order.
Sources:
Huebert, H. T,, Hierschau: An Example of Russian Mennonite Life, Springfield Publishers,
Winnipeg, Canada, 1986, pp 242, 243, 247-249
Huebert, H. T., Komelius Martens: Our Skillful Advocate, Springfield Publishers, Winnipeg,
Canada, 1986, p 8
Toews, John B., Czars, Soviets & Mennonites, Faith and Life Press, Newton, USA, pp 79-94
Background Information:
Komelius Martens
154
KORNELIUS MARTENS
[1880-1940?]
A Gnadenfeld Intercessor
Komelius Komelius Martens was bom in Wemersdorf, Molotschna, on November 15,
1 880. He was the first of five children of Komelius and Helena [Wolff] Martens. Soon after his
birth the couple moved to Spat in the Crimea. Early settlement years were hard, the family
sometimes having only thin watery soup to eat.
In August of 1887 father Komelius died as a result of an accident, leaving Helena as a
widow with five children. That same year Komelius started school. He was a good student, being
blessed with an excellent memory. He also had a sense of responsibility and was proud to help his
mother, being the oldest “man” in the house.
David Huebert, a widower living in Margenau, Molotschna, proposed marriage to Helena
by mail. This was refused, but the quest was more successful when David personally appeared in
Spat. The couple was married on October 18, 1892 in Rueckenau. The family moved to a
Kleinwirtschaft in Margenau. To the five children of David Huebert, the five children of Helena,
another eight were added through this marriage.
Komelius was a good student at the village school in Margenau, then with his family
skimping and saving, he continued his education at the Gnadenfeld Zentralschule. With the help
of a scholarship he completed the two year teacher training school in Halbstadt. He first taught
school in Siberia, then Samara and Alexanderpol.
In Alexanderpol the young teacher met Sara Friesen, daughter in one of the households
where he boarded. Despite his poverty, they were married on July 3, 1 904. The couple had eight
children, Komelius, Sara, Helena, Tusnelda, Alexander, Heinrich, Elfriede and Anneliese.
In 1906 the Martens family moved to Nikolayevka [No. 5] in the Ignatyevo Colony, where
Komelius again taught school. He helped establish a Zentralschule which opened its doors in the
autumn of 1 907 with 23 students. Komelius was one of the teachers, instructing religion, German
and Russian.
In 1 9 1 1 Komelius developed a throat condition which for a time forced him to give up
teaching. The Martens family then moved to St. Petersburg in 1912, where Komelius worked as
bookkeeper for a branch office of the publishing house Raduga. He attended night school at the
university, completing courses in economics as well as European languages. He seemed to have
a special facility for languages, to varying degrees mastering German, Russian, French, English,
Latin, Ukrainian and of course Low German.
After two years of studies in St. Petersburg Komelius was appointed inspector of schools
for the Gnadenfeld Volost, and Rector of the Gnadenfeld Handelsschule [business college].
At the age of 19, after completing the teacher training, Komelius became a Christian, and
that summer joined the Rueckenau Mennonite Brethren Church. At the age of 26 he was elected
minister. When he was appointed at Gnadenfeld he joined the Sparrau Mennonite Brethren Church,
where in time he was elected elder. During this time the family lived in Gnadenfeld, so this often
meant a lot of travel, in later years sometimes on foot.
In the Martens household it was said “He taught us to pray and to work.” When spending
was required on the farm, things had to be thought through carefully, but for books there was
always money! Even illness did not dampen Komelius’ enthusiasm for knowledge. He contracted
typhus, and could lie on only one side because of bedsores. He spent the time conjugating French
verbs to take his mind off the pain.
155
After the abdication of the Czar and during
the Kerensky government, Komelius was elected head
of the Gnadenfeld Volost, a position he occupied for
about one and a half years. On one occasion in the
unsettled times that followed, the Handelsschule was
surrounded by armed men. Martens and another
teacher, Rempel, were apprehended for helping a
female colleague. Both were to be shot in the
schoolyard, when a cleaning lady asked for mercy for
the teachers. Finally, for a pair of warm winter
underwear and after a stem admonition to mind their
own business, the two men were released.
Later, when the Selbstschutz protective force
collapsed, the Red Army stormed into Gnadenfeld on
March 11,1919. Komelius Martens and another man
stepped forward to face the angry General Dobenko.
He pleaded with the general ”Mr. Dobenko, forgive
us!” Finally Dobenko agreed to allow plunder, but not
killing, except for Selbstschuetzler.
Eventually the Soviet government took control
of the area. Komelius was released from his position
as rector of the school and was required to pay a substantial fine within 48 hours. January 6, 1 922
the family moved from Gnadenfeld to Grossweide, where Komelius started to farm, although he
still continued his church activities. He was appointed the official land surveyor for the village of
Grossweide.
Because Komelius understood economics and the laws of the land he was often asked for
help and advice. His well known peace position enabled him to represent Mennonite youths when
they appeared at court hearings to establish their non-resistant status.
Komelius participated in various inter-Mennonite activities. He was at the General
Conference of Mennonite Churches in Russia held in Moscow in January, 1925, and was elected
secretary. During this time he was also elected secretary-treasurer of the KfK [Kommission fuer
Kirchenangelegenheiten ]. When a new publication Unser Blatt was initiated, again at this
conference, Komelius was chosen as secretary-treasurer. He also contributed articles and poetry
to this paper.
During these years the family often considered emigration. Difficulty in paying for the
passage as well as the poor medical condition of Sara made them reluctant to resettle. Komelius
reasoned “It is the Lord’s way, he still needs me here.”
On July 7, 1929 Komelius and Sara Martens celebrated their silver wedding anniversary.
Their seven surviving children [one died at an early age], almost the entire Sparrau congregation,
the whole village of Grossweide and many friends participated. Reminiscing about the past 25
years Komelius could say “Praise be to God for everything. I have kept faith with the good
principles of our Mennonite heritage, faith in our just cause, and in God’s promises.”
Komelius was often taken to the police station in Melitopol during this time to account for
his various church and related activities. The authorities sometimes detained him for up to two
weeks; on at least one occasion his travel was restricted to the borders of his owm village of
Grossweide. In 1930 the collectivization of the Molotschna began, but since Komelius was a
minister he was not allowed to participate in the collective farm. Gradually his land was taken from
Komelius Martens [1880 - 1940?]
156
him, until he had only 16 dessiatines [43.2 acres], yet he was forbidden to sell the farm. Soon an
ever increasing tax was demanded, and when the family tried to have an auction to raise the money,
authorities cancelled it. One Sunday morning, while Komelius was preaching, a car could be heard
entering the village. This was usually bad news. When the Martens reached their home after the
service they were informed that they had to leave the region within 24 hours. Sara and the youngest
children were immediately taken to stay with relatives, Komelius and the older four left by wagon
the next day. For a time the family was scattered among relatives or lived in Russian villages.
In the spring of 1 93 1 Komelius obtained a position as teacher of Latin and German at a
medical institute in Stalino [later Donetsk], When he found accommodations for his family they
gradually all moved to Stalino as well. Circumstances were difficult, but they survived.
After steadily declining health, then more serious illness for five months, Sara died on
February 28, 1934, of heart failure. Despite trying hard, Komelius concluded that it was difficult
to run a household without a mother. Anna Klassen, originally from Ekaterinoslav [now
Dnepropetrovsk] had in the past impressed Komelius. She had contributed some articles to Unser
Blatt. She was asked to come and visit the family, with marriage in mind. The responsibility was
too great, she thought, so she left having given a negative answer. Soon after, with a change of
heart, she wrote back to Komelius and accepted his proposal. They were married in August, 1 934.
Both Komelius and Anna worked in the medical institute, the economic situation of the family
improving with this added income.
In Stalino Komelius could not ignore his commitment to God, and so continued to work
as minister. He led Bible studies, and also preached on occasion. In the spring of 1937 he was
once again asked to report to the police headquarters. Komelius had a premonition of impending
trouble, for he said “Soon my turn will come, and my only crime is that I have faithfully served my
Lord and Saviour.”
On the night of August 6, 1937, the police searched their rooms, and confiscated some of
his papers. Komelius was jailed in Stalino, in a cell so small that only one of the occupying three
prisoners could sleep at a time. Once a month a package of food or clothes could be sent to him
or money designated for his use. Anna was able to see and speak to him on only one occasion. By
then he was very thin.
When parcels sent to Komelius were returned, the family knew that after one year of
imprisonment in Stalino, he had been transferred. On persistent questioning Anna was informed
that he was sentenced to ten years exile, no exchange of letters allowed. Some time after World
War II a son received the information that Komelius had died of pneumonia two years after his
arrival. No specific location or date of death was given.
Sources:
Huebert, H. T., Komelius Martens: Our Skillful Advocate, Springfield Publishers, Winnipeg,
Canada, 1986, pp 1-19
Janz, Heinrich, Prediger Komelius Martens, Mennoblatt, 16 November 1991, p 7
News Report, Mennonitische Rundschau, 18 September 1929, p 12
Personal Interviews: Gerhard D. Huebert [half-brother of Komelius Martens], Anna Huebert
[half-sister], and Tusnelda Volkmann and Elfriede Martens, daughters of Komelius Martens
Toews, John B., Czars, Soviets & Mennonites, Faith and Life Press, Newton, USA, 1982, p 90
Volkmann, Tusnelda, Lebenslauf meines Voters Komelius Komelius Martens, in Mennonitische
Maertyrer edited by Aron a Toews, 1949, pp 207-213
157
24. MASSACRE IN MUENSTERBERG
NOVEMBER 29 - DECEMBER 1, 1919
Withdrawal of German troops from the Ukraine in November, 1918, resulted in
anarchy for the region. An all-out civil war began in which White Army units under
General Denikin, Red troops, a Ukrainian National Army and various local partisans ranged
back and forth. Nestor Makhno, using his home in Gulyaipole as base, organized a band
of anarchists, an irregular army of 5,000 - 8,000 men, of which 1 ,500 were cavalry. His ten
“regiments” [bands?] ravaged the countryside, their basic philosophy being destruction,
with particular emphasis on kulak peasants and the urban middle class.
Unfortunately the major Mennonite colonies were caught in the middle of this
confusing struggle. Some attempts at defence were made by the Mennonites with the
formation of Selbstschutz units, but with the collapse of the front after the skirmish of
March 2 and the battle of March 6- 1 0, 1 9 1 9, the situation for the Mennonites may only have
been aggravated. For the “army” of Makhno plunder, burning and rape were standard
treatment; killing followed at the slightest provocation. Many Mennonite villages were
occupied, a few were virtually destroyed, many people losing their lives. Principal time of
uncontrolled terror by the Revolutionary Insurrection Army of Ukraine [commonly called
Makhnovtse by the Mennonites] was from October to December, 1919.
On October 26, Eichenfeld of the Yazykovo Colony was attacked, and 82 people
left dead. Hochfeld had 1 9, Nikolaifeld 13, Franzfeld 1 1 and Petersdorf seven dead. In the
Molotschna, Blumenort had 20 people killed on November 1 1, with 1 1 in Altonau, and six
in Ohrloff. The Chortitza Colony had 97 people killed by the Makhnovtse in 1919, 21 in
Nieder-Chortitza, 14 in Kronsweide, 13 each in Neuendorf and Chortitza.
*
*
*
The Sagradovka Colony seems to have been singled out for unusual punishment.
A band of Makhnovtse used the neighbouring towns of Shestemaya and Zagradovka as
bases to stage a number of raids into the colony. The bandits were fuelled by an
uninterrupted supply of Samogonka, a home brew which was being produced in
Shestemaya. The local Russians joined the activities, often taking vehicles into the colony
to cart off stolen goods. Perhaps playing a role in the proceedings was a general resentment
the local population had against Mennonites and other Germans. The war was over, but
they were still basically the enemy. The fact that they had done well economically added
a feeling of hostility. Even more specifically, the village of Shestemaya wanted more land,
so it is possible that the bandits had been asked to totally destroy the neighbouring
Mennonite settlement of Muensterberg to make room for expansion.
*
*
*
158
Raids into the Sagradovka Colony started on November 29, and continued until
December 1,1919. In Orloff there was murder, rape, robbing and burning of property, with
a total of 45 deaths. Similar events occurred in a number of the other villages. In Tiege
there were at least 17 deaths, in Reinfeld 16 and Gnadenfeld 12. Schoenau appeared to be
spared, but was finally attacked on December 1 , with 1 1 deaths.
*
*
*
Muensterberg, although relatively poor, yet pious, was subjected to the most brutal
and repeated attacks. On November 29 at 2 PM a droshky filled with armed men and
accompanied by six armed outriders came into the village to speak to the mayor. The men
were dressed as, and pretended to be White soldiers. The village administration remained
strictly neutral, so as not to give offence to anyone. The visitors left, having been
unsuccessful in their attempt to produce a “provocation.” The dye had, however, been cast.
The raid was already planned.
Late that same afternoon the village street was suddenly filled with riders and
wagons. A band with a loud drum was set up in the middle of the village, and played jolly
music. With this eerie accompaniment the destruction commenced.
Bandits rushed into each yard and began the slaughter. In other villages most of the
victims had been the men - but not in Muensterberg! From the child in the cradle to the
tired old grey head, all were hacked to pieces, and many burned. Peasants who had come
with their wagons boldly entered the houses, and took whatever they pleased. Many houses
were set on fire, incinerating anyone who was inside. Bams were also torched, with many
animals perishing.
Wilhelm Martens, mayor of the village, had been threatened. His wife, fearing for
the life of her husband, urged him to hide. This he did, in the back garden. From this
vantage point he saw the fires, heard the wild shouting and shooting, as well as the
penetrating grotesque blaring of the band and the beat of the drum. As soon as things had
quietened down, and the bandits seemed to have gone, Wilhelm sneaked back to his home.
In the darkness he stumbled over the body of his dead wife. Throughout the house lay the
bodies of his six children, the oldest eleven years of age, all badly mutilated. In despair
Wilhelm left his home and ran to the neighbours. There the heads of their children were
set on the window sills, as if they were flower pots.
In another home the bandits had killed the mother and her seven children, and had
placed their heads on chairs around the table. That is how the husband found them.
In his own residence the teacher, Johann Martens, had been badly wounded. While
he lay on the floor, dying, the bandits sat down at his table, ate and drank the home brew
they had brought with them. The second teacher, Heinrich Wolf, had his throat cut. He was
found later, having tried to stem the flow of blood with his shirt - but to no avail.
During the night many of the people who had been able to hide returned to their
homes, but early the next morning the bandits and peasants returned. The robbing, burning
159
and killing continued. A number of people had crossed the Ingulets River, seeking refuge
with their Russian friends in Shestemaya. Most of them were betrayed and also murdered.
The bandits took some women with them to Shestemaya, and if they offered any resistance
to being raped, simply murdered them.
Finally, on the evening of the third day, Sunday, December 1, the bandits were
frightened off. They had seen the beam of a light of an approaching column of Denikin’s
troops. Defenceless civilians were easy to deal with, but they had no stomach for armed
disciplined soldiers! The bandits rapidly broke camp and fled in a south-east direction to
Kronau, and from there towards Nikopol.
When the violence finally stopped a total of at least 98 people had been murdered
in Muensterberg. All the houses except one had been burned to the ground. The one house
remaining was dismantled by the peasants and carted away. Muensterberg had become a
large cemetery. Only eight to ten small huts remained amidst the desolate abandoned piles
of ashes.
Going beyond statistics, the human loss and suffering caused by this brutal tragedy
cannot be calculated. Entire families were annihilated: Abraham Reimers[5], Jakob
Dueckmanns[5] , Minister Abram Regehrs[5], Heinrich Thiessens[8], Johann Wiebes[3],
Jakob A. Regehrs[8], Bernhard Langemanns[7], Gerhard Reimers[3], Bernhard
Giesbrechts[6]. In a number of families only one spouse survived the wholesale slaughter:
Wilhelm J Martens[6], Maria Martens[7]. At least three victims were infants, and were
either hacked to death or left to be burned alive in their cribs.
December 4, when it was known with certainty that the bandits had left, people from
other villages came to Muensterberg to help find and bury the dead. Only 37 bodies could
be positively identified, the others had been burned beyond recognition in the conflagration.
The following Sunday “7ote«/e,s,te”[fimeral services] were held in the three churches of the
colony.
One person observed that even the worst tragedy can have benefit - some of the
survivors may have been drawn closer to the Saviour, and could find peace beyond that
which the world would give. “The Lord has given” they might say, “The Lord has taken,
his name be praised.”
From the vantage point of 80 years distance in history, it is difficult to be certain that
anything can be learned from this event except to realize the total depravity to which
mankind can sink.
Sources:
Mennonite Historical Atlas, pp 46, 63, 131, 132, 138
Lohrenz, Gerhard, Sagradowka, Echo-Verlag, Rosthem, Canada, 1947, pp 94-103
Lohrenz, Gerhard, Fire over Zagradovka, Steinbach, Canada, 1983, pp 44-54
Background Information:
Map: Sagradovka Colony
Nestor Makhno
160
Sagradovka Colony, showing the number of deaths in six of the villages
161
River
NESTOR IVANOVICH MAKHNO
[1889- 1934]
Anarchist
Nestor Ivanovich Makhno was bom October 27, 1889 in Gulyaipole, a Ukrainian village
about 65 kilometres northeast of the Molotschna Colony. Despite coming from a poor peasant
family he completed his public school, then in his youth worked as a shepherd and drove oxcarts
for German landowners. He also worked in a foundry, and at one time in a small Kroeger plant.
In 1906 Makhno joined a group of Ukrainian anarchists, was arrested in 1908, and
eventually served time in the Butyrki Prison in Moscow. He was released with the general amnesty
of March, 1917, and returned home to Gulyaipole. When German troops occupied the region in
early 1918 he temporarily left for Moscow, then returned in July to organize small bands of
anarchists which employed hit and run tactics against local chutors [estates].
When the German troops withdrew in November, 1918, there was total anarchy in the
region. This allowed Makhno and his rag-tag army virtually free reign. Using his home Gulyaipole
as base, he and his “irregulars” raided the surrounding countryside. Officially called the
Revolutionary Insurrectionary Army of Ukraine, the roving groups were commonly called
“Makhnovtse” by the Mennonites. For the Makhnovtse plunder, burning and rape were standard
practice; murder followed the slightest provocation.
The major Mennonite colonies were caught in
the middle of this confusing struggle. They were
likely singled out for additional treatment because
they were from a minority group, German and among
the more wealthy. The Makhnovtse were not
disciplined troops, so they likely favoured the
relatively easy prey of generally non-resistant
villages. There may also have been an element of
personal revenge on the part of Nestor Makhno
himself.
The principal time of uncontrolled terror was
from October to December, 1919. In Yazykovo there
was plunder, burning and rape, with at least 1 32 dead.
The Molotschna had relatively few casualties, 37. In
Chortitza there were 97 murders. November 29, 30
and December 1 witnessed repeated raids into
Sagradovka, with a total of 199 deaths.
In December, 1919, the Red Army gained
control of the area; in time the Communists felt that the partisans were no longer needed, even
posing a threat. As a result Makhno felt it wiser to escape across the Dniester River to Romania
on August 28, 1921. Then he went to Danzig, Berlin and finally Paris. There he died July 25,
1 934, likely from excessive drink and tuberculosis. A motley crowd of several hundred anarchists,
emigrants and sympathizers accompanied his coffin to the Pere-Lachaise Cemetery. His body was
cremated, and the urn holding the ashes marked by a name plate.
Sources:
Mennonite Historical Atlas, pp 63, 132, 138
Peters, Victor, Nestor Makhno: The Life of an Anarchist, Echo Books, Winnipeg, 1970
Nestor Makhno [1889 - 1934]
162
25. MOLOTSCHNA BATTLE
JUNE 20, 1920
After withdrawal of the German troops in late 1918, civil war raged in Ukraine. The
Whites, the Reds, the Makhnovze and other partisans rampaged around the land in dizzying
confusion. Sometimes one end of a village would be controlled by one group, the other end
by their enemies!
In the spring of 1920 the White Army, under the command of General Wrangel,
began a new offensive which started in the Crimea and reached the Molotschna by early
June. For weeks the battle lined seesawed back and forth in this area, villages repeatedly
changing hands. Wrangel, in his memoirs, described some of the battles.
On June 10, 1920, there was a lull in the fighting, the Whites consolidating their
positions, the Red Army reorganizing and bringing in new recruits. At that point the White
Army, holding a line from the Sea of Azov to Waldheim in the Molotschna, consisted of
the Second Don Division, then the Don Cossack Division under General Abramov. From
Waldheim through Tokmakto Station Popovo on the Dniepr River were the 13th and
34th Infantry Divisions of the Second Army Corps under General Slashchev. Other troops,
including the Kuban Cossack and the Kornilov Divisions, held the line along the left bank
of the Dniepr back along its course to the delta on the Black Sea. Facing these forces were
the various cavalry and infantry divisions of the 13th Red Army.
In a few days serious fighting resumed. On June 17 the White Army in the
Waldheim sector pulled back under pressure by the Red cavalry under General Zhloba,
moving in a south west direction. Zhloba apparently preferred to move his troops at night
because of the losses inflicted by White aircraft during the daylight hours. The White pull¬
back, likely a planned ruse to obtain a more strategic position, continued until June 19. By
then the main forces of the Red cavalry occupied the south central portion of the
Molotschna, including Friedensdorf, Margenau, Tiegerweide, Kleefeld and Alexanderkrone.
Total forces of the 1 3th Red Army in the region were 25,000 infantry and 12,000 cavalry.
Facing them in a semicircle were various elements of the White Army totalling 15,000
infantry and 6,500 cavalry.
At 6 PM on June 19, General Wrangel sent out directives to his generals ordering
an offensive to begin against the enemy before dawn on June 20, in the direction of
Gnadenfeld. At 5 AM the Second Don Division began the attack, joined by the others by
the time the light of dawn broke the horizon. Pressed on all sides, pounded by artillery,
strafed by machine guns of White aircraft, the Red Army started to panic. A large portion,
at least two divisions under the command of Zhloba, broke through the lines in the direction
of Halbstadt and Tokmak. Here they were met by the 13th Infantry Division and the
armoured trains, so Zhloba again turned south, where his fleeing cavalry encountered the
Drosdovze Division. Finally a full scale retreat of all Red units began in the direction of
Chemigovka, with the White cavalry in hot pursuit. Around Hierschau they caught up with
the Red rearguard and a battle resulted. After further losses the Red Army retreat
continued. Many Red cavalrymen abandoned their exhausted horses and fled on foot,
163
hiding where they could. In all the Whites captured 40 cannons, 200 machine guns, almost
3,000 horses, and took 2,000 prisoners.
Meanwhile General Wrangel and his staff, with headquarters in Melitopol, anxiously
awaited news from the battlefield. The rumble of the unending artillery fire could easily be
heard, yet there was no direct communication with the various units on the field. Finally
a new sound appeared, the approaching drone of a propeller. An aircraft skimmed low over
the railroad, dropping a note which said, “The enemy has been struck on the head, encircled
by our warriors. General Tkechev reports a complete destruction of the enemy.”
The following day, on June 21, a church service was held in Melitopol, thanking
God for the victory.
*
*
*
Many of the Red troops fleeing from the field of battle followed the road through
Friedensdorf, Landskrone, Hierschau, then on to Waldheim and Chemigovka. Johann Epp
and his sons were working on their fields outside the village of Hierschau on June 20, 1920.
They could hear the sounds of the battle in the Rueckenau area, then they saw the retreating
Red Army streaming along the road, through
Hierschau and Waldheim. First came the artillery,
each cannon pulled by four or six horses. Then
came the supply wagons and the kitchen. The
kitchen consisted of a big barrel of borscht on two
large wheels pulled by a camel. Masses of
infantry followed, then finally came the cavalry.
As mentioned, around Hierschau the White
cavalry caught up with the Red rearguard, the Red
Army suffering further losses.
As the battle proceeded, and then as the
Red retreat continued, 15-20 soldiers hid
themselves in the Willms bam in Hierschau. As
the Whites occupied the village they rode down
the street shouting onto each yard to give up any
prisoners they had, otherwise it would cost their
own lives. A group of Cossacks came riding onto
the Willms yard, swords drawn, demanding that
the Willms give up anyone hidden there. Hearing
this from the hayloft, possibly not wishing their
hosts to suffer, the Reds came down onto the yard with their hands up. They, together with
other soldiers hidden in the village, were marched off in the direction of Waldheim. The
Willms never discovered what happened to these prisoners.
After the dust of battle had settled some of the local men were organized to help in
Communist Soup Kitchen
164
the cleanup operation. Many Red soldiers had been killed in action, and their bodies had
to be disposed of. Crews of men went around the countryside with their wagons, picking
up the corpses. Many were found close to horses, probably meaning that they had been in
the cavalry, and many also had large scalp lacerations, the common trademark of Cossack
swords.
When the crew came upon a body, each man would grasp a leg or an arm, and with
a “1-2-3-4" they would swing it onto the wagon. When they had six or seven bodies, they
would take them to a mass grave which had been dug, and would unload them in a similar
manner. Half a dozen bodies commonly shared a grave. No identification was made, and
no memorial stones were erected. The men participating in this macabre work now and
then did wonder who would be waiting for the return of a loved one, waiting in vain.
Sources:
Braun, Heinrich, Personal Interview
Epp, Peter, Personal Interview
Huebert, H. T., Hierschau: An Example of Russian Mennonite Life, Springfield Publishers,
Winnipeg, Canada, 1986, pp 250-255
Mennonite Historical Atlas, pp 64, 65, 138, 139
Wrangel, P. N., The Memoirs of General Wrangel. The Last Commander-in-Chief of the
Russian National Russian Army, Duffield, New York, USA, 1930
Background Information:
Map: Molotschna Colony June 20, 1920
165
166
Molotschna Colony June 20, 1920
[Based on a map by General Peter Wrangel]
26. LICHTENAU DEPARTURE
JUNE 23, 1924
The day of departure for the first group of emigrants from the Molotschna Colony
bound for Canada was set for June 17, 1924. The medical commission, which was to
determine the health of the emigrants, had arrived in Halbstadt, so people streamed there
to be examined. Family after family was called into the rooms, and when they had finished
came out to the yard where they were peppered with questions - “How are you?” “What
do they look for?” The results of the examinations could be seen on the faces. They were
beaming when the whole family had been declared healthy. Faces were downcast in many
an instance when a family member was declared to have the eye disease trachoma,
especially if all belongings had already been sold in anticipation of departure.
Those declared healthy then proceeded with liquidation of all remaining property,
that which was left after the revolution and the following civil war. Prices were low, in part
because of an anticipated poor crop. There had been a long drought with very high
temperatures, up to 40°Celsius in the shade. That which was to be taken to the new home
in Canada was packed. Food for the trip within Russia was prepared. Necessary documents
were obtained, such as exit permits, visas, certificates of church membership, medical
certificates, with the required fees being paid.
When everything was prepared it remained only to await the day of departure, and
to say farewell to friends and relatives who were staying behind. There was time to
contemplate the past, the sad events, the struggle for very existence, the repeated
disappointments. Some felt that these had been definite signs given by God signifying that
it was time to move on. Was it possible that the planned departure on June 1 7 could be
delayed, or even cancelled? The way things had gone in Russia this was a definite
possibility!
Suddenly the anticipated disappointment became a reality. Departure would be
delayed one week. Why the delay? “The government is checking the emigration lists,” was
the unsettling answer. “Only a technicality,” said others, “the men of military age have to
be released... only a formality!” Be that as it may, somewhere, out of the control of the
emigrants, events were happening which impacted directly on each one. Then suddenly the
order came. Sunday [June 22] at noon, all emigrants must be at the train station in
Lichtenau.
In one hour all remaining arrangements were made. Relatives and neighbours
staying behind collected on the farmyards to say their farewells. The wagons required to
go to the train station were ready. Farewells were more difficult than expected, and tended
to go on and on. Finally, with iron resolve, the travellers got onto the wagons and prepared
for departure. They pulled off the yards and proceeded onto the village streets, then out
along the roads. On many yards scarves were waved in final farewell, and here and there
tears were wiped away. Once actually on the road the travellers noticed that it was a
beautiful Sunday morning; there was an expectant joy in the air.
Even before arrival at the station most emigrants had been divided into train car
167
groups. Each group then elected a representative. A “Train Committee” of three had been
established. To these were added a CPR [Canadian Pacific Railway] representative and a
member of the VBHH [Verband der Buerger Hollaendischer Herkunft ], who was a teacher
from Tiegenhagen, J. J. Thiessen. He would accompany the group to the Russian border.
The “Train Committee,” these representatives, and the train car representatives constituted
the “Train Administration.”
Every train car group, for a few rubles, had its freight car washed clean. The train
was actually to leave on Monday, June 23. Those who lived nearby stayed the last night
with their loved ones, those from far away stayed with acquaintances in Lichtenau or
Blumstein, others bunked overnight in the train cars.
Monday, June 23, the whole crowd of emigrants gathered at the railroad station in
Lichtenau. Over 1 , 1 00 people were leaving, but those saying farewell were many more than
that! Several church choirs had come to sing a farewell, but were prevented from carrying
out their plans by the authorities.
One departing person wrote “Now it is time to bid adieu and leave one’s hearth,
village, customs, relatives and friends. People took leave of one another. Even the strong
wept, some sobbed. Perhaps not all were aware of the significance of the day, but a deep
seriousness was written on all faces. Parting is painful.” It was time for the train to leave.
Songs wafted from a few cars. When the train finally started to move the whole crowd, as
if on cue, sang one last song to those departing. Friendly words were shouted back and
forth “Good bye. Come after us!” “Reunion in eternity!” Scarves were waved until the
train disappeared down the track.
Once departed, the dreams of the emigrants seemed to be approaching reality. A
plan was finally working out! Now to the business at hand. It was rumoured that it was
best to change rubles to American dollars. In Melitopol and Tokmak the exchange rate had
been 1 dollar for 1.25 and up to 1.50 rubles. Now in Lichtenau speculators had driven up
the price to 1 .94. At some of the stations along the way it was even higher, for example 2.3
in Polotsk. Later at the border, the official exchange was actually 1 dollar for 2 rubles.
The trip through Russia went very well. The travellers, especially the young people,
had time to observe and compare the landscape in the various regions - the forests, rivers,
cities and villages. The only complaint was about the long station stops. The emigrants had
taken along their own provisions, with hot water for tea being provided at the stations, as
much as they wanted. Some of the stops were so long that the families could actually cook
their meals on the platforms! The train travelled through Alexandrovsk[Zaporozhye],
Kursk, Orel, Smolensk, Vitebsk[Vicebsk], Polotsk[Polack], then finally approached the
Russian border at Sebej[Sebez].
The wait at Sebej was about 24 hours. Most of the time was taken to complete the
final emigration lists, after that the passes were checked. Then the baggage was inspected.
Some people feared that they had taken along too much, but the customs officials, though
thorough, were not particularly strict.
The night of June 29 to 30 the train passed the Russian border into Latvia, stopping
at Zilupe. The strange uniforms of the officials, the different language, and the peculiar
writing on the signs showed them that they were in a foreign country. Many who had gone
168
through difficult experiences in their former homes could now finally breathe a sigh of
relief! Early in the morning, in the open air, a service of thanks to God was held,
expressing gratefulness for his merciful leading. With joyful hearts the group sang “Nun
danket alle Gott ” [Now Thank We All Our God],
The day was overcast, with a fine drizzle, and cool. All emigrants had to transfer
to a Latvian train, which was also a freight train. There were only two differences. The
cars were dirty, since they had not been washed out, and there were only 40 cars instead of
the previous 50. Ten car groups therefore had to be dissolved, with the travellers joining
other groups. Understandably this led to some inconveniences. In Zilupe the Latvian
officials confiscated ladders, axes, hammers and other such tools [considered to be
weapons?] which the emigrants had hoped to use in their new home country.
From Zilupe the train travelled to Rezekne [Ryejitsa] on June 30. This was actually
the first official Latvian border post, and here the emigrants were detained for one and a half
days. The baggage was treated for several hours in a disinfection room. Most people
moved out of the train and spent the night in some barracks. The CPR officials prepared
their final lists of passengers, boarding passes were distributed for the steamship Marglen,
and the landing passes were issued for Quebec City. Everyone over eight years of age had
to sign their own cards - for the children that were younger the parents could sign.
A number of people used the stay in Rezekne as an opportunity to go shopping. The
city itself was a few kilometres from the station. Those who went bought clothing and
footwear, at very reasonable prices. Good shoes cost $3.00 to $3.50, excellent boots were
only $5.00.
On July 2 the train continued in the direction of Riga. The CPR had promised to
supply the passengers with food between Rezekne and Libau. In Rezekne there was plenty
of rye bread, but after that the arrangements were not satisfactory. In most stations there
was not even enough hot water for tea! The group noticed that the train did not stop for any
length of time in the larger cities, such as Riga, but then waited for long periods at
insignificant stops. July 3, without serious mishap, the train arrived in the port city of Libau
[Liepaja], The travellers had to unload their baggage immediately, and label the packages
appropriately. They took their hand luggage with them as they boarded the S. S. Marglen,
while the larger pieces were loaded using large nets lifted by cranes. Some of the boxes
were unceremoniously dumped into the hold [nicht eben sanft in dem Rumpf des Schiffes
befoerdert...]. Later it was discovered that many of the larger boxes had been smashed.
That same day, before evening, the Marglen left port, being helped by three tug
boats. It then steamed of into the Baltic in a south west direction. Some of the women and
children were in clean cabins, but most families had to sleep on the lower deck. That
evening many people actually sat on the upper deck, discussing their new experiences and
watching the shipping. In time, though, everyone went off to bed. The following day the
Marglen passed the islands of Bornholm and Ruegen, and on the morning of July 5 reached
the Kaiser Wilhelm [Kiel] Canal. On the passage through the canal it was quite easy for the
travellers to make comparisons, the German, as contrasted to the Russian countryside.
German circumstances certainly looked to be much better.
Having passed through the Kiel Canal the Marglen headed into the North Sea, where
169
the waves were considerably higher. A little rocking of the ship was enough to induce sea¬
sickness for some, although most passengers were quite well throughout. They passed the
island of Helgoland, then went up the Dutch coast to the Schelde Delta, then up a large
branch to Antwerp. While on board passengers were periodically subjected to medical
examinations. Almost daily, sometimes in the open air on the upper deck or in the second
class dining room, there were church services. Leaders were Ministers Jakob P. Friesen,
Jakob P. Wiens, Peter F. Goertzen and Elder Heinrich Martens. One evening there was
even a musical program organized by conductor Gerhard J. Enns.
When the Marglen arrived in Antwerp on July 7, and the passengers saw the ocean
liner on which they were to travel, they were disappointed. The Marglen was a 1 0,3 1 9 ton
vessel, the S. S. Minnedosa, their proposed ocean liner, was only marginally larger at 13,972
tons. With the wind and waves anticipated for the North Atlantic it was expected that most
of the travellers would succumb to sea-sickness. Early on July 8 the transfer of baggage and
the resettling of passengers began. Before the emigrants could board the Minnedosa ,
however, a new thorough medical examination was required [by now one would have
reason to believe that the medical authorities did not know exactly what they were looking
for]. The result was that 64 people had to remain under quarantine in Antwerp, while the
others could proceed.
After the medical examinations a certain limited number of people were allowed to
go into the city of Antwerp to shop. This was an excellent opportunity, for, while prices
were not as low as in Rezekne, they were not as high as they were later to be found in
Canada.
On July 9 the Minnedosa weighed anchor, and by 10 AM the voyage had begun.
The first stop was at Southampton, where the ship arrived the night of June 9-10.
Continuing on the
10th the next port of
call was Cherbourg in
France, where the
CPR representative
left the ship. He was
a former Russian
estate owner named
Mr. Pickel, who had
accompanied the
group since the port of
Libau. The actual
ocean voyage began
after Cherbourg.
Some found it to be
frightfully long and
exceedingly boring, punctuated largely by sea-sickness. Others were perfectly healthy
throughout, and lost neither their good mood nor their appetites.
Again on the Minnedosa the emigrants held regular church services, and also again
t
i
Canadian Pacific ocean liner S. S. Minnedosa
170
the endless medicals examinations were carried on, especially for those people noted as
questionable on the Halbstadt lists. At first the ship followed the warm Gulf Stream, but
then came to the cooler Labrador Current. There the passengers were amazed to see huge
animals in the water - they shot steam and water into the air, showing head, rump, and
occasionally the whole body. The local wisdom of the group was that they had seen
whales, an opinion confirmed by the crew.
On the evening of July 1 7 the Minnedosa docked in Quebec City. The lights of the
city and harbour were beautiful. A number of North American Mennonites greeted the new
arrivals, P. P. Epp of Morden, J. Elias of Rosthem and C. Coffman. The following day,
Friday, July 1 8, the immigrants left the ship and were transferred onto trains. This time the
trains provided by the CPR did not consist of freight cars, but regular passenger cars,
considered to be a luxury by the weary travellers. The usual medical examinations that
preceded departure meant that 50-60 people were detained in Quebec, but the rest continued
on into Canada, accompanied by the hosts who had greeted them. Most of this initial group
of immigrants from the Molotschna went to Ontario, 52 to Vineland and the rest to the
Waterloo area, with a smaller number going to western Canada.
Saturday, July 19, the largest contingent arrived in Waterloo. Many people had
arrived at the station to see the “Russians” arrive. The immigrants were taken, together
with their hand luggage, to the yard of a local Mennonite church. Here, to help in the
recovery from the long journey, they were given a meal, coffee, baked goods, meat and
cheese. A platform had been set up in the middle of the yard. Members of the local
arrangements committee greeted the newcomers, while ministers Jakob Friesen and Jakob
Wiens thanked their hosts for the help, for sharing of the discomfort of their Russian
brethren. They pointed out that God had been gracious and had led the way; they had
perceived his nearness throughout the whole trip.
The local committee then reminded the hosts and the immigrants of their
obligations, mentioning the guidelines which were expected to be followed. Then hosts
and guests, as prescribed in previously prepared lists, met, and the immigrants were taken
to their new homes.
Newspaper reports gave the number of immigrants settling in Ontario at 1 ,083, with
101 travelling further west, largely because they had close relatives living there.
Sources:
Epp, Frank H., Mennonite Exodus, Canadian Mennonite Relief and Immigration Council,
Altona, Canada, 1962, pp 150-153
News Report, Der Mennonitische Immigranten-Bote [Der Bote], 27 August 1924, pp 1, 2, 3 and
continued 3 September 1924, pp 1, 2, 3. This is the principal source used to describe
the trip. Name of the writer is not given, nor the home village in the Molotschna
Toews, David, Nachrichten ueber die Einwanderung, Letter, Mennonitische Rundschau
20 August 1924, p 10
Toews, J. B., Lost Fatherland, Herald Press, Scottdale, USA, 1967, pp 162-165
171
Background Information:
Behind the Scenes
Map: The First Molotschna Group Travel in the USSR
Map: The First Molotschna Group Travel by Sea
Benjamin B. Janz
David Toews
Emigration of Mennonites from the Soviet Union
Trachoma
Canadian Pacific Ships
BEHIND THE SCENES
Unknown to most of the travellers, there had been a great flurry of activity both in the
Soviet Union and Canada, to make this trip possible. There was a trickle of escapees from the
Soviet Union in the early 1 920s, but attempts were now being made to allow a more large scale
emigration. For this purpose the VBHH [ Verband der Buerger Hollanischer Herkunft - Union of
Citizens of Dutch Lineage], with the very active and dedicated chairman B. B. Janz, convinced the
authorities that the Mennonite colonies could better recover from the deprivation of civil war if the
excess poor population would be allowed to emigrate. Under this supposition lists of potential
candidates were made, and the efforts to migrate were initiated. Negotiations were complicated
by the dual, and sometimes competing interests of the central government in Moscow, and the
regional officials in Kharkov. Janz was a master diplomat, and exceedingly persistent. Finally
some of the arrangements came to fruition. A group had left Chortitza in 1 923 , so now the pressure
was mounting to also have departures from the Molotschna. With many intricate and delicate
negotiations departure of the first group was originally planned for June 1 7, then finally allowed
on June 23, 1924.
In the meantime, following the dealings of 1923, arrangements were being made with the
CPR in Canada to negotiate a second contract for 1924. Eventually the contract called for 5,000
credit passengers to be allowed into Canada, and 2,000 cash passengers. Considering the
delinquent Reiseschuld [Travel debt] payments and poor crop prospects, this was later downgraded
to 4,000, which, however, was exceeded by 1,048. Negotiators for the Mennonite Board of
Colonization were David Toews, E. S. Hallman and A. A. Friesen.
The greatest miracle of the migration was that the Soviet negotiations, the long trip, and
the Canadian arrangements actually combined to bring thousands of Mennonites to Canada in such
an hour of need.
Sources:
Epp, Frank H., Mennonite Exodus, Canadian Mennonite Relief and Immigration Council
Altona, Canada, 1962, pp 150-153
Toews, J. B., Lost Fatherland, Herald Press, Scottdale, USA, 1967, pp 162-165
172
173
The First Molotschna Group Travel in the USSR
174
The First Molotschna Group Travel by Sea
BENJAMIN B. JANZ
[1877- 1964]
The Russian Negotiator
Benj amin Benjamin Janz was bom in Konteniusfeld, Molotschna Colony on September 25,
1 877, the first of seven children of Benjamin and Helene [Penner] Janz. His siblings were Heinrich
[died at age of seven], Margaretha, Jakob, Maria, another Heinrich [died at age of one] and Helena,
all of whom were also bom in Konteniusfeld. The parents were poor, having purchased a small
farm and windmill, and needed to borrow horses and implements to plant the first crop. To
supplement the farm income father Benjamin worked as a carpenter in the surrounding villages.
Benjamin completed the village school, then went to Zentralschule in Gnadenfeld from
1892-1895. His father likely decided that Benjamin’s “delicate and fragile physique” would not
allow him to operate the family farm and mill in any case. Benjamin’s teacher had been impressed
by his academic abilities, so when a loan of 150 rubles per year became available, he could afford
to attend. Despite sharing a room with a dozen students Benjamin was able to concentrate on his
studies. During his time in Gnadenfeld he decided on a career of teaching. Father Benjamin,
however, decided that further education was not necessary, so the young Benjamin did what was
allowed. He could teach the elementary grades in village schools without having attended teachers’
college. In the summer of 1 896 he accepted a teaching position in Yalantusch, Crimea.
In the meantime Benjamin had been struggling in his spiritual life. He read and studied the
scriptures with increasing frustration, but eventually on January 1 9, 1 897, was able to grasp the
truth of salvation. This came partly through the words written in Isaiah 43, also through the advice
of his host Heinrich Dueck and through prayer. Baptism by immersion was a thorny question in
the Janz household, but despite parental opposition Benjamin was baptized in the Juschanlee River
on August 8, 1 897, and joined the Mennonite Brethren Church. Janz saw the Mennonite Brethren
as being a voluntary body of believers, practicing radical ethics, using strong discipline,
emphasizing study of, and acceptance of scripture, including such beliefs as non-resistance. After
his baptism he became actively involved in the Sparrau congregation, joining the choir, helping in
the Sunday school, and eventually preaching.
Through additional studies Janz in time obtained his
certificate as teacher. In 1900 he accepted a position as tutor
on a large estate near Kleefeld, then after three years he
became the principal of the village school in Sparrau.
While at a teachers’ conference in the Memrik Colony
Benjamin was introduced to Maria Rogalsky; the couple
married on September 25, 1905. They had six children: Peter
[1906], Helena [1908], Gertruda [1909], Maria [1910], Jakob
[1912] and Martha [1920]. Wife Maria, throughout their
married life, was a “quiet, patient, praying, concerned and
active support.”
In 1908 Janz accepted a new teaching position in
Tiege. He again became active in the local Mennonite
Brethren congregation. His ministry was well accepted,
resulting in his ordination as minister on September 25, 1 909,
and his election as leader of the Mennonite Brethren
congregation in Tiege.
Benjamin B. Janz in 1914 When World War I broke out Janz, as a conscientious
175
objector, was drafted into the non-combatant alternative service, the Forstei. He was stationed at
the Alt Berdyansk Forestry Station, where he was a supervisor and also functioned as a chaplain.
In 1917, after Russia had lost the war, he returned to his work in Tiege as teacher and minister.
Because of the difficult circumstances he suffered ill health from overwork, but in time gradually
recovered.
After the civil war and the final victory of the Bolsheviks, Mennonite young men, who
traditionally could perform alternate non-combatant service, were drafted into the Red Army. At
an All-Mennonite conference held in Alexanderwohl, Molotschna, on February 19, 1921, the
Verband der Mennoniten Sued-Russ lands [VMSR] [Union of South Russian Mennonites] was
established in an effort to help the situation. Janz was elected chairman, but only accepted after
those present unanimously accepted the principle of non-resistance. This was the start of Janz's
“career” of negotiating with officialdom. He developed a strategy which in times of crisis served
him and the Mennonite constituency well. He remained unobtrusive; he dealt only with the highest
levels of government, if necessary waiting for days for a high level interview; he negotiated with
as many government departments as possible, allowing the ones favouring his cause to convince
the opponents; he gave out as little information as possible, so that colleagues would not disrupt his
carefully laid plans.
Janz then set to work to assure the legal status of the VMSR. Eventually it was suggested
by a government official that the name “Mennonite” needed to be eliminated, so it was changed to
Verband der Buerger Hollandischer Herkunft [VBHH] [Union of Citizens of Dutch Lineage],
Ratification of its charter was of great significance, allowing the Mennonites to continue to function
as a national minority. While the attempts to prevent the draft of Mennonite young men was not
particularly successful, other fields of action soon became apparent.
During the time of desperate famine in 1921 and 1922, Janz helped men such as Alvin J.
Miller to negotiate for the American Mennonite Relief [later the MCC], with both the Moscow and
the Kharkov governments. Eventually this allowed food, clothing and even tractors to alleviate the
situation in the Mennonite colonies. At the same time he negotiated with various Soviet officials
for the reconstruction of the devastated Mennonite communities. A strategy linked to this was that
the poor needed to be siphoned off, to emigrate out of the country, to allow this reconstruction to
proceed. Thus began the protracted and exceedingly complicated series of negotiations with the
Moscow and the Kharkov governments which eventually allowed thousands of Mennonites to
emigrate [a total of about 26,000, of which 22,500 in time reached Canada]. It should be pointed
out that often Janz was not alone in his struggles; men such as P. F. Froese, C. F. Klassen and
B. H. Unruh also played significant roles.
In 1 926 Janz had the feeling that his usefulness as negotiator was coming to an end, and that
he had legitimate concerns regarding his own personal safety. He officially resigned as chairman
of the VBHH on March 1 1, 1926, and was replaced by H. F. Dyck of Halbstadt. On May 14 he
took leave at the Kommission Fuer Kirchenangelegenheiten [KfK] [Commission for Church
Affairs] meeting in Margenau. May 24 he said farewell to his own Mennonite Brethren Church in
Tiege. Fearing that despite official permission [he was granted an exit visa on April 24] he would
not be allowed to leave, Janz had special agents purchase his railroad tickets and carry his baggage
to the train. His journey went without mishap, and he crossed over to Latvia on June 4. His family
followed [son Peter had preceded them and was already in Canada], as did his parents, although his
father was detained for some months in Atlantic Park, England, because of trachoma.
The Janz family at first resided in Winnipeg, but after a letter from the Department of
Immigration asking Benjamin to settle on a farm, they moved to Coaldale, Alberta. The teacher
then had to become a farmer. He purchased land on long term credit, eventually moved a small
cottage onto their property, and began life in the new country.
176
Janz continued his efforts on behalf of the Russian immigrants, for example travelling to
the Mennonite Brethren churches in the United States in March, 1 927, to appeal for funds to help
the sick and ailing newcomers. He also helped the Canadian Mennonite Board of Colonization and
Immigration to liquidate the debt owed the Canadian Pacific Railway.
The Coaldale Mennonite Brethren Church was founded on May 23, 1926, largely by
immigrants. In the summer of 1 928 Janz was asked by the church to negotiate a loan, to attend the
General Conference, and to spend two months on deputation work. In September Elder Frank
Friesen resigned as leader of the church, and Janz was elected to succeed him for an indefinite
period. Two weeks later the building of a new church began, with official dedication of the new
sanctuary on January 27, 1929. A more serious problem facing Janz was the spiritual integration
of the congregation. They were all Mennonite Brethren, but from widely diverse areas of the Soviet
Union, with various usages and customs. The congregation was fiercely democratic, and evaluated
its leadership on a yearly basis - it admonished, legislated and occasionally humiliated its
shepherds. Janz continued as leader until 1948.
Seeing a need for Mennonite young people to be prepared to enter secular society, Janz
became instrumental in founding the Coaldale Bible School [1929] and the Alberta Mennonite High
School [1946] in Coaldale, and the Mennonite Brethren Bible College [1944] in Winnipeg.
As war with Germany seemed to be
more and more likely Janz tried to prepare
the way for Mennonite young men to be
involved in some type of alternate service. In
this regard he was frustrated, for some
Mennonite groups wanted absolutely nothing
to do with any service to the government.
When World War II did break out he was
able to negotiate some accommodation for
conscientious objectors. His most significant
work, however, was probably in counselling,
particularly through his friendly and personal
letters to all who requested his help.
After World War II Janz was asked
to minister in South America, in Paraguay
and Brazil, on a mission consisting largely of
reconciliation. From February to September
in 1947 he preached, cajoled and confronted
in an effort to bring forgiveness and unity to
the churches, particularly the Mennonite
Brethren.
Janz, throughout his life, maintained
a wide correspondence “admonishing, correcting, and encouraging.” His interests and concerns
were broad, and he was direct and articulate in the expression of these concerns. He was also
directly involved with many boards and committees at all levels of church governance. Janz was,
for example, a member of the Board of Reference and Counsel and the Board of Welfare and Public
Relations of the Mennonite Brethren General Conference, and of similar boards on the Canadian
and Alberta conferences. His involvement was ecumenical, attested to by his work with the
Mennonite Central Committee and the Canadian Mennonite Board of Colonization and
Immigration.
In time age and health caught up with even the B. B. Janz family. In 1945, partly because
4?.
B. B. Janz writing his memoirs
177
of the health of his wife Maria, they retired to a modest cottage just north of Coaldale. Maria’s
health wavered, but suddenly in 1953 her high blood pressure led to a heart attack. She died
October 13, at 4:30 PM.
Starting in 1952 Benjamin’s own health took a turn for the worse, beginning with an
appendectomy. He recovered to some degree, and resumed his correspondence as well as his
attendance at conferences, but in 1957 he had a “recurrence of an old malady.” He did manage to
get to the forty-seventh General Conference of the Mennonite Brethren Church of North America
held in Yarrow in 1957. He expressed the wish to retire from public service; he was eighty years
old and his health was deteriorating. The Conference thanked him for his long and faithful sendee.
In subsequent years Janz attended conferences as he was able to, but his plans were often
disrupted by hospital admissions and occasionally operations. Towards the end of 1962 it became
obvious that he could not manage alone, so he accepted his daughter’s invitation to move to
Abbotsford, British Columbia, to stay with her. In time, needing specialized care, he was admitted
to the Menno Private Hospital in November, 1 963 . Gradually the body deteriorated, leaving Janz
frustrated at not being able to participate in the mainstream of Mennonite life. On October 14,
1964, he was visited by H. F. Klassen, and sent greetings to all his friends and acquaintances. His
struggles ceased when he died October 16, 1964 at 1:30 AM. He had been predeceased by his wife
Maria, and his eldest son Peter who died tragically in an automobile accident in 1957.
The funeral was held in the Coaldale Mennonite Brethren Church on October 20. People
from all over Alberta and beyond attended; many old friends came to pay their last respects. The
service was led by David Pankratz, leader of the Coaldale congregation. Granddaughter Viola
Wiens was organist, the German radio choir sang. Five ministers and a deacon were pallbearers.
Sermons were delivered by Elder P. Schellenberg of the Coaldale Mennonite Church, J. A. Toews,
faculty member at the Mennonite Brethren Bible College, Elder J. J. Thiessen of Saskatoon, and
David Pankratz. The obituary was read by son-in-law David Wiens. Various board representatives
made presentations. G. H. Sukkau of the Mennonite Brethren Board of General Welfare
summarized ,“His unwavering interest in the spiritual and also physical welfare of his fellow man,
of his Mennonite community, and particularly the Mennonite Brethren made a deep impression on
us.” D. K. Duerksen, Canadian Conference secretary, echoed the same sentiments “We are
thankful to our heavenly father for the service that B. B. Janz has rendered to our conference and
the whole Mennonite community. He may now rest from his labours, and now gazes upon him in
whom he believed and trusted.”
Benjamin Benjamin Janz was buried in the cemetery behind the Coaldale Mennonite
Brethren Church. Jakob Siemens, long time assistant of Janz at the Coaldale church, delivered a
brief message and prayed at the grave side.
The sentiments of many present at the funeral will certainly have echoed the words of
Janz’s friend A. A. Wiens when he wrote “In the darkest hours of our Mennonites in Russia, God
gave us the man to rescue us, the recently departed B. B. Janz. The choice was God’s, and to many
he became the one who rescued them in the time of great need.”
Sources:
Coaldale Mennonite Brethren Church Fiftieth Anniversary Book, 1926-1976, p 40
Dick, B. J., Prediger B. B. Jam , Mennonitische Rundschau, 4 November 1964, pp 1, 4, 5
Epp, Frank H., Mennonite Exodus , Canadian Mennonite Relief and Immigration Council, Altona,
Canada, 1962, many references, pp 39-435
Mennonite Encyclopedia [Volume V]
178
News Report, Mennonitische Rundschau, 21 October 1964, p 1
News Report, Mennonitische Rundschau, 28 October 1964, p 1
Thiessen, Richard, Winnipeg, Canada, Janz Family Tree
Toews, J. A., pp 108, 1 1 1, 1 19, 120, 166, 208, 266, 277, 292, 311, 327, 341, 354, 355, 384
388, 423
Toews, John B., Lost Fatherland, Herald Press, Scottdale, USA, 1967, pp 51-195
Toews, John B., With Courage to Spare. The Life ofB. B. Janz [1877-1964], The Board of
Christian Literature of the General Conference of the Mennonite Brethren Churches
of North America, Hillsboro, USA, and Winnipeg, Canada, 1967, pp 1-185
Wiens, A. A., Nachruf meinem lieben Lehrer, Freund und Mitarbeiter, B. B. Janz,
Mennonitische Rundschau, 1 1 November 1964, p 2 , 1 8 November 1964, p 2 and
25 November 1964, p 2
The memoirs which B. B. Janz was working on, and was even photographed writing, have
apparently never been completed.
179
DAVID TOEWS
[1870- 1947]
The Canadian Negotiator
David Toews was bom on February 9, 1 870, in Lysanderhoeh, Am Trakt Colony, in Russia.
He was the fifth of eight children of Jakob and Marie [Wiebe] Toews. Jakob and Marie had moved
to Russia from the Marienburger Werder of West Prussia in 1 869. When David was ten years of
age his father, a minister, was convinced that Klaas Epp’s interpretation of the end times was
correct, and embarked with Epp on a long trek to central Asia to the place where Christ was to meet
his followers. After four years of severe hardships in Turkestan the Toews family joined with other
disillusioned people to leave the ever more fanatical Epp. Twenty families, via Saratov, Moscow,
Smolensk, Berlin and an ocean voyage, emigrated to Newton, Kansas. David completed public
school, graduated from highschool, then studied at the Halstead Seminary near Newton. His
dreams were fulfilled when he obtained a teaching position. He taught in Elbing and Whitewater
near Newton, and in Newton itself. He then continued his studies at Halstead, where he graduated
in 1 893 . David really wanted further education at the newly established Bethel College in Newton.
A letter from H. H. Ewert, who had been his teacher in Halstead, instead invited David to
the adventure of heading north to teach at Gretna, Manitoba. Here he taught in public schools a
number of years, boarding with the Ewert family, then attended Wesley College in Winnipeg,
followed by Normal School. After that he taught one year at Burwalde, near Winkler. Being ever
more the pioneer, he moved to Tiefengrund, Saskatchewan, in 1898, as homesteader and teacher.
In Tiefengrund David met the nineteen year old Margaret Friesen. They were married on
September 20, 1900, and settled on the homestead. The couple had a total of nine children, Marie,
Benno, Margaretha, Elsa, Dora, Louise, Elma, Anna and Irene [eight girls and one boy].
In 1888 David had been baptized upon his
faith at Newton, by his father. He was ordained as
minister in Tiefengrund on August 18, 1901. He
took his faith and his responsibilities very seriously.
One bitterly cold day he was supposed to preach in a
school about five miles from his home. Unable to
obtain a team of horses he walked through the storm.
Upon arriving he found no one there, but a note on
the blackboard announced “There will be no service
because the minister cannot come.” David added a
few words “David Toews was here.” Then he
walked home again. In 1913 he was ordained as
elder of the large Rosenort congregation, retaining
the position until he retired in 1 946. The government
and the CPR officials called him “Bishop” although
he was never given that title by the church. From
1914 to 1935, then again from 1937 to 1940 he was
chairman of the Conference of Mennonites in
Canada, and for many years held a great variety of
executive positions.
From 1901 to 1904 Toews taught school in
Eigenheim, but always with a feeling that there
needed to be further education for Christian young
David Toews [1870 - 1947]
180
people in the area. These dreams came to fruition, with Toews playing a significant role, when the
German-English Academy was established in Rosthem. Opening of the school was held on
November 14, 1905, with 24 students the first year. Herman Fast was the first teacher, but within
a year Toews joined the staff, continuing as teacher until 1917. He was not only a teacher, but also
the chief fund raiser. New facilities were desperately needed for the school. A new two story red
brick building was dedicated in 1910, funds largely derived by the personal efforts of Toews. In
1946 the name of the school was changed to Rosthem Junior College.
When World War I broke out in 1914 David had an additional burden to deal with - the
problem of non-resistant Mennonites in a country at war. He advised many young men on the
proper Christian course of action, he wrote articles explaining the principle and spoke at public
meetings. His position made him some fierce enemies in the surrounding community.
Those with a heavy work load often experience the joy of having further challenges thrust
upon them. Three delegates sent from the USSR asked for initiation of arrangements for a large
number of Mennonites to leave the Soviet Union, and to possibly settle in Canada. After a series
of meetings David was elected chairman and chief executive officer of the newly formed Canadian
Mennonite Board of Colonization, with Rosthem designated the administrative centre. With this
appointment began a long and arduous task.
David’s negotiations included direct meetings with Prime Minister William Lyon
Mackenzie King in Ottawa, who helped rescind the order-in-council prohibiting Mennonite
immigration. He also became well acquainted with Colonel J. S. Dennis, Chief Commissioner,
Department of Colonization and Development of the Canadian Pacific Railway, with whom he
eventually worked out agreements which would allow a large number of Mennonites to come to
Canada on credit. July 21, 1923, was a great day when a long passenger train pulled into Rosthem
with the first group of 700 immigrants. Through the negotiations of David Toews and those
working with him, also through the tireless work of B. B. Janz and others in the Soviet Union, about
22,500 Mennonite refugees were able to come to Canada in the 1920s.
After the migration was complete the debt [ Reiseschuld] owed the Canadian Pacific
Railway still had to be paid off. Total credit advanced by January 1, 1 93 1 , including principal and
interest was $ 1 ,924,727. A total of $884,000 had been paid, leaving a balance of $ 1 ,040,727. Most
refugees, despite the difficult times during the depression, tried as hard as they could to pay their
share. Gathering funds was a personal crusade for David, since he in good faith had negotiated the
loan in a time of need. The work of collecting for the debt eventually was taken up by others, and
on November 19, 1946 he could be told that it was paid in full.
A number of personal events affected the life of David Toews. In 1926 tragedy struck the
Toews family. One December morning fire broke out in their home, and all escaped except the five
year old Irene. She was so burned before she was rescued by David that she died the following day.
In the attempt to save Irene, David himself was also injured, and had to be hospitalized. He was
still there four days later when Irene was buried.
David Toews, together with C. F. Klassen, travelled to the second Mennonite World Relief
Conference, held in Danzig in 1 930. He himself delivered two lectures dealing with the emigration
of the Mennonites from Russia. He also attended the next world conference held in Amsterdam
in 1936, again with C. F. Klassen. His topic on this occasion was “The Mennonites in Canada in
History and at the Present Time.”
In 1937 David Toews achieved something that he had long desired, but in a different way.
When he had left for Canada his intentions were to return to Bethel College in Newton for further
studies. Bethel College now conferred on him an honorary Doctor of Divinity degree in recognition
of his many years of selfless service to the Mennonite community.
By the 1940s David Toews was a tired man. He had problems with deafness, kidney
181
ailments and diabetes. His wife Margaret died from cancer on July 14, 1941, leaving him very
lonely. She had always been the centre of family activities, especially when David had been away
on his many trips. In 1946 David’s health was failing rapidly, to the extent that he was hospitalized
for some periods. In February, 1947, he suffered a stroke, and he died on Tuesday, February 25,
in his own home in Rosthem.
In his funeral address J. J. Thiessen, close friend of David’s and at that time moderator of
the Conference of Mennonites, gave a good summary of the contribution of this Canadian
negotiator. “Because of his tolerant attitude he enjoyed the confidence of other Mennonite
denominations, which was particularly meaningful, as the resettlement of the Russian Mennonites
was planned and executed. ..many supported him with their prayers, gifts and
hospitality.. .Leadership in immigration and the liquidation of the Reiseschuld as well as other tasks
connected with his work brought him many a sleepless night, much work, and heavy burdens, but
also a deep satisfaction.”
No wonder David Toews was called the “Moses of the Mennonites.”
Sources:
Dyck, Cornelius, J., Twelve Becoming, Faith and Life Press, Newton, USA, 1973, Chapter Five,
David Toews, 1870-1947, pp 51-60
Epp, Frank H., Mennonite Exodus , Canadian Mennonite Relief and Immigration Council,
Altona, Canada, 1962, many references, pp 60-481
Friesen, Helene Sarah, David Toews: A Brief Sketch of His Life and Work, 1870-1947 ,
Mennonite Heritage Centre, Winnipeg, Canada, 1997, pp 1-16
Lohrenz, Gerhard, Heritage Remembered, CMBC Publications, Winnipeg, Canada, 1974, p 192
Mennonite Encyclopedia
Mennonite Historical Atlas, pp 53, 75, 78
Springer, Nelson P., and Klassen, A. J., Mennonite Bibliography 1631-1961, Herald Press,
Scottdale, USA, and Kitchener, Canada, 1977, p 28
182
EMIGRATION OF MENNONITES
FROM THE SOVIET UNION
In the 1920s and Early 1930s
YEAR
Escaping prior to
CREDIT
PASSENGERS
CASH
PASSENGERS
TOTAL
1923, many as
fleeing soldiers
About 500
1923
2,759
-
2,759
1924
3,894
1,154
5,048
1924-26 Mexico
-
-
About 500
1925
2,171
1,601
3,772
1926
2,479
3,461
5,940
1927
340
507
847
1928
408
103
511
1929
1,009
10
1,019
1930
1929-32 via
294
11
305
camps in
Germany
1930-33 via
About 4,000
Harbin, China
-
-
About 800
TOTAL
TOTAL TO
CANADA
[directly or
indirectly]
13,354
6,847
About 26,000
About 22,500
Sources:
Epp, Frank H., Mennonite Exodus , Canadian Mennonite Relief and Immigration Council,
Altona, Canada, 1962, p 282
Huebert, H. T., Hierschau: An Example of Russian Mennonite Life , Springfield Publishers,
Winnipeg, Canada, 1986, p 288
183
TRACHOMA
Trachoma was the single most common disease which complicated the emigration of
Mennonites from Russia to Canada. At the time of emigration there was no known effective cure
for the condition.
Trachoma is a chronic inflammatory disease of the eye caused by Chlamydia trachomatis ,
an organism in character somewhere between bacteria and virus. The disease occurs especially in
crowded circumstances, with poor sanitation, being transmitted by personal contact with infected
eye secretions or by the common use of towels. It is almost universal in the Middle East [especially
in Egypt], and has spread to Asia including India, Africa as well as Central and South America.
It is one of the oldest diseases known to man, and the largest single cause of blindness in the world.
In trachoma the conjunctiva [the lining inside the eyelids and over the white of the eye]
becomes thickened and roughened. Later little lumps, like grains of sand, appear, and scars form.
This may cause the eyelids to buckle, especially the upper one. The condition may also spread to
the cornea [the clear part of the eye over the iris and pupil], causing blood vessels and scarring to
grow in. Both the deformity of the eyelids and the corneal involvement may cause blindness.
In 1957 the trachoma organism was first grown in the laboratory, allowing study and
development of treatment modalities. Sulfa drugs are curative for this condition as well as some
antibiotics. Tetracycline and erythromycin may be used orally [pills, by mouth] or topically
[ointment], often requiring up to 1 8 months of treatment. The only treatment available in the 1 920s
was prevention, such as improved sanitation, and strict quarantine [especially prohibiting the use
of common towels]. One can certainly understand the reluctance of the Canadian government to
accept immigrants with active trachoma at that time. Surgery would consist of removing the
deforming scar tissue from the eyelid ’ but it was definitely not a cure for the disease.
Sources:
Encyclopaedia Britannica, 15th Edition, Macro, 7, p 118; Micro, X, p 80
Wilson, Louis A., Editor, External Diseases of the Eye, Harper and Row, Hagerstown, USA,
1979, pp 64-69. Apparently there have been few new developments since that time
184
CANADIAN PACIFIC SHIPS
Most of the emigrants from the USSR to Canada in the 1920s travelled by arrangements
made with Canadian Pacific. The first group to leave the Molotschna actually boarded ship in
Libau, Latvia, and disembarked in Quebec City, having spent the entire time on Canadian Pacific
vessels.
The group boarded the S. S. Marglen on July 2, 1924, and going through the Kiel Canal
landed in Antwerp on July 7. This ship was built by Harland & Wolff Ltd., of Belfast. She was
10,3 19 gross tons, 515 feet long, 60 feet wide. There was one funnel and two masts. Her speed
was 14 knots. She had been launched May 7, 1 899 as the Statendam for the Holland America Line.
In 191 1 she was acquired by the Allan Line, being renamed Scotian, and was used as a troop ship
in 1914. In 1915 Canadian Pacific bought the vessel, refurbishing the cabins and engines in 1920.
There were 304 cabin and 542 third class berths. On November 16, 1922 she was renamed the
S. S. Marglen. She was obviously used on the Baltic Sea and the North Sea in the 1920s, but then
on December 30, 1927 she was sold to D. L. Pittaluga of Genoa, for scrap.
From the S. S. Marglen the Molotschna group boarded the S. S. Minnedosa in Antwerp, the
voyage across the ocean to Quebec City lasting from July 9 to July 17. The S. S. Minnedosa was
built for Canadian Pacific by Barclay Curie & Co. of Scotstoun. She was 13,972 gross tons, 520
feet long by 67 feet wide. She had two funnels and two masts. Her speed was 17 knots. There
were 490 cabin and 1,300 tourist berths. She was launched October 17, 1917 and used initially to
transport troops. She was refitted in 1925, then in time sold for scrap in 1935. Before hitting the
scrap yard, however, she was bought by the Italia Line for use as a troop ship under the name
Piedmonte. In November of 1942 she was torpedoed near Messina, but survived. On August 15,
1943 she was scuttled in Messina, presumably by the Germans, to prevent her capture by the Allies.
Then in 1949 she was raised, and on July 27 towed to Spezia for scrap.
The S. S. Minnedosa had a sister ship, the S. S. Melita, also owned by Canadian Pacific,
and also used by many Mennonites to cross the ocean. The ships were of identical appearance, and
had identical passenger capacity, although for some reason the Minnedosa had a slight weight
advantage, 5 gross tons. In 1935 Melita was also sold for scrap, was also bought by the Italia Line.
She served as a troop ship under the name Liguria. She was scuttled January 22, 1941, after being
set on fire by an air attack at Tobruk. She was raised and in September, 1 950 towed to Savona for
scrap.
Sources:
Canadian Pacific Archives, Jo-Anne Colby, System Co-ordinator, Letter, 26 July 1999
185
27. MURDER AT MIDNIGHT
AUGUST 24, 1926
Emigration was in the air. Some Mennonites definitely felt that the only safety lay
in Canada, as far as possible from the Bolsheviks. Others still hoped for improvement in
their situation, and were willing to wait. Each family in Hierschau, Molotschna Colony,
had its own struggle, its own set of circumstances to deal with, its own decision to make
regarding emigration.
Gertrude Willms, owner of Wirtschaft 30, had come to the conclusion that it would
be better for her family to grow up in Canada. Before Gertrude died in 1 924 she discussed
emigration with Peter Dyck, who lived in the third Wirtschaft down the street. The families
would travel together. After she died her children, despite strong opposition from relatives,
continued working on plans to leave. Eventually, in August of 1 926, these plans came to
fruition. The extended family which intended to leave were Aron and Maria Wall [Maria
was Gertrude’s daughter], and their children Johann and Katharina Wall, as well as
Elisabeth, Gertrude, Johann, Katharina and Aganetha of the Willms family. One brother
Heinrich had previously escaped to the United States via Yugoslavia, another brother,
Gerhard, was unable to accompany the family because he was of military age.
Peter and Katharina Dyck of Wirtschaft 27, their ten children, as well as Peter’s
mother Margaretha and his sister Aganetha also planned to depart at the same time.
Another family, the Peter Spensts had also decided to emigrate.
The three families held a combined auction. Since the Willms yard was the largest,
the auction was held there. The Willms Wirtschaft had already been sold, as well as the
stationary engine, so the sale involved only the household goods, furniture and farm
machinery.
August 24, 1926, was a beautiful sunny day. The air was filled with excitement as
a large crowd of Mennonites and neighbouring Ukrainians and Russians gathered for the
auction. Susanna Peters, a relative from Landskrone, had even come to the Willms farm
to make borscht; she then sold bowls of the delicious steaming soup to the hungry
participants. Articles sold well. One beautiful doll, no longer needed by an owner grown
up, fetched 18 rubles. Various items brought good prices, perhaps helped by the
predominant attitude in Hierschau that conditions would eventually improve. In the crowd
a few enquiries were made as to who was the boss of the operation, and what did he look
like, but no one paid any attention.
In the evening, after the last customer had left the yard, the money was taken to the
Grosse Stube of the Willms house, and the counting began. Aron Wall, Peter Dyck and two
other relatives, Gerhard Plett and Johann Neufeld worked hard to complete the task. With
night falling preparations were made to settle everyone down. Four or five Russians, far
from home, were put up in the Nebenhaus. The Wall family, as well as Susanna Peters,
were in the Sommer Stube. Others were distributed in various rooms as space could be
found, since there were almost 20 people to be accommodated.
In the meantime, knowing there would be a large amount of money in the house,
and knowing that others far and wide would be aware of this, security measures were taken.
186
Quite a few of people were staying at the Willms place, hoping for safety in numbers; Peter
Dyck and his son Franz, for example, intended to stay for the night. Four young men were
to watch the door - Johann Willms, Franz Dyck, the night watchman Franz Siemens, and
a Neudorf boy. They would let the people in the house know if anything was happening.
Peter Dyck and Aron Wall would lie down on a bench in the Grosse Stube.
Some of the Willms girls visited their cousins that evening, staying quite late since
it was likely their last visit. They walked home and got to bed at midnight. Just as they
were falling asleep, Aron Wall came into the room and pushed a box containing the auction
money under one of their beds. The counting had been completed, Gerhard Plett and
Johann Neufeld headed for home and Aron Wall and Peter Dyck lay down in the Grosse
Stube. Before going to sleep Peter Dyck thanked his heavenly Father for the blessings of
the day, and requested protection for his family for the night.
The Neudorf boy had gone home, so the three remaining watchmen stayed outside
the front door, sitting on the porch benches. Through the night air they heard the creaking
of a wagon off in the distance in the direction of Waldheim. They were discussing what to
do should it come closer to Hierschau when suddenly they were attacked. It was pitch dark,
so the group of men had no trouble sneaking around the front comer of the house to surprise
them. Franz Siemens, the official night watchman, got up and ran. He was shot in the
middle of the yard, but survived, for the bullet just grazed his scalp. Johann Willms and
Franz Dyck tried to wake up those inside the house by pounding on the front door, and also
tried to get into the house, but all the doors had been bolted from the inside. The thieves
clubbed both of them with the butts of their guns, until they fell unconscious and were left
for dead.
By this time Aron Wall and Peter Dyck were awake, and Aron asked Peter to follow
him. Aron ran through the various rooms waking people. He came through the Kleine
Stube and cried out “Girls, get up and save your lives! Rim for your lives!” Hearing all the
screaming, cursing, shooting and flying glass, Katharina wondered in a dazed state, if she
may have awakened in hell ! But Elisabeth took her younger sisters Katharina and Aganetha
by the hand and headed for the back door. As they reached it they heard a shot, then a
falling body. Obviously the back door was not the way to go. They headed toward the
hallway which led to the bam. They tried to hide up in the attic, but Gerhard Willms,
shotgun in hand, barred the way. He would not let them go up because of the danger to
their lives, should the house be set on fire. “Try to get out through the bam,” he said. They
ran into the bam and hid among the horses. By that time there were bandits in the house
and bam, probably coming through a broken window. They were screaming at the girls,
telling them to come out. There was only one escape - through the door leading to the
Scheme, and the bandits were shooting at it. With the bandits coming ever closer and the
horses increasingly restless, the three girls made a break for it. They somehow got through
the door, then hid under a threshing machine in the Scheme. From there they squeezed
through a gap in the boards of a side wall, then ran out to the back garden. They could still
hear the shooting and screaming, so they ran behind the gardens to the home of the Peter
Warkentins, old friends of the family. Peter Warkentin knelt down and prayed that
somebody else might survive, for at the time the girls thought that they may have been the
187
only ones alive.
Maria Wall and her two young children, Johann and Katharina, were rudely
awakened by the noise, the children frightened and crying. Susanna Peters took Johann in
her arms, Maria took Katharina. Maria tried to calm down the infant and headed for the
bam. There she managed to quieten Katharina enough, so that the two of them remained
undiscovered.
Susanna Peters, with Johann in her arms, in the meantime headed for the back door,
where she was attacked by bandits. Little Johann called out for “ Papa en de Somma Stov ”
[Low German: Father in the summer room]. Obviously understanding Low Gemian, and
wanting to find the man in charge, the bandits headed for the Somma Stov. In the meantime,
Johann still in her arms, Susanna headed out the back door. When the bandits found,
however, that there was no one in the Somma Stov, they caught up with Susanna in the front
garden. They beat her about the head, pulled her by her long hair, and fired off a gun near
her head. This undoubtedly ruptured Susanna’s eardrums, thereby causing deafness.
Falling unconscious, she dropped Johann, who had also received some of the blows. With
bloody head and back the two-year-old Johann crawled to the neighbouring hedge to hide,
and kept calling out for help.
Aron Wall and Peter Dyck, hearing the first sounds of the bandit attack, headed from
the Grosse Stube to the Eck Stube, from which Aron proceeded to the Kleine Stube. Peter
Dyck had not followed him all the way, but tried to escape through the window of the Eck
Stube. Obviously the whole house was surrounded by bandits, for as he was jumping
through the window a shot rang out, and Peter was hit in the head. Probably dead
instantaneously, his body fell out through the window, fragments of his brain and skull were
spattered inside the house. This was almost surely the shot and falling body the Willms
girls had heard.
Gerhard Willms, in the meantime, still in the attic with his shotgun, hearing the
screaming, cursing and shooting below, fired a shot through the front window. The bandits
heard this shot, and possibly recognizing that it was not one of their own guns, became
wary. They had not counted on finding so many screaming occupants around every comer
of the house. As suddenly as they had attacked, they now departed. Without having found
the boss or the money, they hopped into their wagon, possibly dragging one of their number
along [a trail of blood was later discovered in the house; it was thought that perhaps one of
the bandits had been hit by one of their own stray bullets]. The wagon headed in the
direction of Waldheim. By this time the whole village had been awakened, and from the
amount of shooting that had occurred, it was assumed that there were few survivors. The
rumour spread that the entire Willms family had been murdered.
When it became apparent that the bandits had left for good, each individual or small
group, thinking that maybe they were the only survivors, started coming out of hiding. This
included the Russians who had been sleeping in the Nebenhaus. At first suspected of being
part of the bandit group, they had actually been as terrified as everyone else. Some of them
had hidden inside the bake oven, pulling the grate shut behind them for protection. Johann
Willms and Franz Dyck regained consciousness, although they were still bleeding from
their head wounds. Young Johann Wall was rescued from the hedge. But the body of Peter
188
Nebenhaus, where the
Russians slept, then
hid in the stove
Money was counted here,
then Aron Wall and
Peter Dyck lay
down on the . a c= =
Bandits came around
the comer, surprising
the three watchmen
Grosse
Stube
Kleine
Stube
Franz Siemens got up
and ran, but was shot
in the middle of the yard
Johann Willms, Franz Dyck and
Franz Siemens sat on the
benches on the porch and
talked. Johann Willms and
Franz Dyck, when they were
attacked, were clubbed with
gun butts and left for dead
Sommer Stube
[Somma Stov\
■' Bam
- Peter Dyck tried to jump
out the window. He was
shot in the head, his
body fell outside
■ Money hidden under a
bed in the Kleine Stube
Front Garden
Susanna Peters,
holding Johann Wall,
tried to escape out
the back door, but
was caught and
beaten. Johann
crawled into the
hedge
Scheune
Garden
Elisabeth with Katharina and
Aganetha tried the back door, then
escaped through the bam and
Scheune to the garden, then to the
Peter Warkentins
189
Dyck remained still, and was covered where it lay.
The police were summoned, and soon arrived. They wanted everything left the way
it was, including the body of Peter Dyck, until a bloodhound arrived from Melitopol. When
the dog was finally brought later in the day, he followed the trail to Waldheim, then
northward. Arriving at a house apparently occupied only by an elderly lady, the hound lost
interest in the trail when she gave him a large piece of meat.
Together with the police, medical help came from Waldheim to administer first aid
to the victims. With the first light of day the more seriously bruised and bleeding were
loaded onto three wagons and taken to Dr. Wiebe in Lichtfelde. Other patients were already
waiting for the doctor, but when they saw the condition of the new arrivals, they allowed
them to be attended first. Bleeding was stopped, wounds were cleansed, and heads were
bound up.
Katharina Dyck, wife of Peter, had heard the shots and screaming at the Willms
Wirtschaft, and was told that Aron Wall had been shot. When she came to see what had
happened and to offer condolences, she found to her horror that her own husband had been
killed. After the bloodhound had arrived, and the police were finished with their
investigation, Peter’s body could finally be moved and prepared for burial. He himself had
been the village mortician; now someone else had to perform that duty.
Plans had previously been made for the Willms and Dycks to leave for Canada a day
or two after the auction. These plans were now changed. The Willms decided to wait so
that they could be at the funeral of Peter Dyck, while the Dyck family had to update the
documentation before they could depart. The funeral was held on August 27, with
widespread participation. Mrs. Dyck put on a brave front, but the younger children cried
uncontrollably.
The Willms family was afraid that the bandits might strike again, so they stayed in
hiding with relatives and friends, although they did go to Peter Dyck’s funeral. On
September 6 they gathered, and were taken to a more distant railroad station, since they
were afraid of being spotted at Stulnevo, the nearest, most convenient point of departure.
Gerhard Willms, the one brother who was staying behind, drove them to the station. From
there they headed north to Moscow, then on to Canada.. They arrived in Rosthem,
Saskatchewan, on October 6, one month after they had left Hierschau.
The Dyck family, minus Peter, had their documents changed and followed one week
later. They also arrived in Rosthem, on October 1 2, with son Franz being delayed several
months.
In 1970, about forty-four years after the murder of Peter Dyck, an anonymous
request came from Russia through a third party, requesting the forgiveness of the Dyck
family. By then the wife, Katharina, had died, but the Dyck children gladly accepted the
apology of a man whose conscience was bothering him for having participated in the
attempted robbery which resulted in the tragic death of their father.
190
Sources:
Dyck [Dueck], Aganetha, letter, Der Herold, 23 September 1926
Dyck, Ernest, son of Peter Dyck, Personal letter and Interview
Huebert, H. T., Hierschau: An Example of Russian Mennonite Life, Springfield Publishers,
Winnipeg, Canada, 1986, pp 291-299
News Reports, Mennonitische Rundschau, 22 September 1926, p 8; 6 October 1926, p 10
Personal Interviews, the Willms siblings; Maria Wall, Johann Willms, Gertrude Baerg,
Katharina Huebert and Aganetha Toews
191
28. AT THE GATES OF MOSCOW
SEPTEMBER TO DECEMBER, 1929
“Mennonites refused admission to Canada; Germany in doubt as to policy in regard
to them, so Soviet ships them back to Siberia.” This headline from the New York Times
of December 1 , 1 929 in a few words encapsulates the fate of many Mennonites during that
period. Over thirteen thousand refugees, including many Mennonites, but also Lutherans
and Roman Catholics, gathered in Moscow in a desperate attempt to leave the USSR.
Obtaining exit visas was one problem, but finding entrance into another country presented
another obstacle. Canada was unwilling to accept more refugees, Germany was near
economic collapse, so the Soviets simply shipped those not accepted back home, or into
exile.
When the Bolsheviks first swept into power they immediately began implementing
their basic philosophy, such as confiscation and collectivization of land, taking over the
schools, preaching the atheist doctrine. When the economic state of the country seemed to
be heading toward disaster, the New Economic Policy was implemented; it brought a
temporary relaxation of these policies. Hopes for reconstruction even interested some of
the Mennonites. Two organizations were involved in the Mennonite reaction, the Verband
Buerger Hollandischer Herkunft [VBHH] representing the 60,000 Mennonites in Ukraine,
and the All-Russischer Mennonitischer Landwirtshaftsverein [AMLV] covering the
Mennonites of all other regions of Russia. Two German language papers were begun,
Unser Blatt in Ukraine, and Der Landwirt as a publication of the AMLV.
Even while the New Economic Policy was in effect, the State Planning Commission
was drafting strategy for the first Five-Year Plan. This plan was to come into operation at
the end of 1928, but unofficially was begun in 1925-1926. There were increasing
restrictions on religious freedom, and ever decreasing exemption from military service. The
VBHH and the AMLV were dissolved by government action, and as early as the spring of
1926 it was becoming increasingly difficult to secure passports to leave the country. With
additional roadblocks for departure only 847 Mennonites reached Canada in 1927, and 511
in 1928.
The first Five-Year Plan was officially introduced on October 1, 1928. The
objectives most affecting the Mennonites were collectivization of the land, renewed attacks
on religion, continued control of the schools, with the indoctrination that entailed. Those
who owned land or businesses were declared kulaks , and were totally disenfranchised or
sent into exile. Now almost all Mennonites felt that they had no future in the Soviet Union.
Requests for help poured in to people such as B. H. Unruh in Germany, David Toews in
Canada and to the Mennonite Central Committee.
In desperation 29 families, largely from Siberia, fled to Moscow in November of
1928. They moved into housing in the Moscow suburbs, spending most of their last rubles
on bread and rent. They worked at getting their visas for six months, apparently with great
perseverence. Probably to get rid of these very insistent refugees they were granted
passports! Those who passed the medical examination were free to go to Canada, the rest
192
were detained in Hamburg. The leader of this group was P.B. Epp, and Peter G. Smidovitch
the government official who granted the passports. He warned the that it was unlikely
that additional passports would be issued. The group left Moscow on August 30, 1929.
News of the 29 families spread like wildfire. Other Mennonites felt that this was
probably their only chance to escape. They came from Siberia [as far away as the Amur
region], the Crimea, the Caucasus, the Kuban, Molotschna, Sagradovka, Memrik, Alt and
Neu Samara, Am Trakt and Ufa. They found housing in the Moscow suburbs of Perlovka,
Tayninka, Klyazma and Pushkino. Many also found temporary housing in summer villas.
On September 18, 1929 there were 250 families, about 1,000 persons in the environs of
Moscow. Ten days later there were 400 families, a week later 600.
Peter Fast described the long trek to Moscow. “People would sell their belongings
at public auction sales and then leave, not knowing whether they had any chance of
successfully leaving the country. But with nothing to lose and everything to gain there was
but one choice. Soon auction sales were declared unlawful and detachments of mounted
police were patrolling the countryside to disperse the crowds... In desperation whole groups
of families fled secretly by night, leaving all they owned...” In time at least 13,000 [some
say up to 15,000] refugees flocked to Moscow, including many Mennonites, but also
Lutherans, Catholics, and even a few Baptists and Greek Orthodox Russians.
German and American journalists visited the refugees and promised to draw the
attention of the world to this tragedy. On October 10 B. H. Unruh, through the Soviet
embassy in Berlin, asked for permission to investigate. Permission was denied, but a
government commission was appointed, which recommended that all the refugees should
be allowed to emigrate. On October 1 9 the German embassy received the information that,
provided another country was willing to accept them, refugees could leave the Soviet
Union. All of them wanted to go to Canada, but Canada was reluctant to accept additional
immigrants. Germany at the time was in no economic condition to help.
The Soviets were now ready to send up to 1,000 refugees via Leningrad to
Hamburg, another 5,000 via Riga. Without a favourable decision by the government of
Canada, however, neither the Canadian Pacific Railway nor Germany were willing to
proceed. In the mean time the Soviets were threatening to send the refugees back to their
homes or into exile. One group of 324 for some reason had already departed from Moscow
and arrived at Kiel, Germany, on November 3, where they were lodged temporarily. On
November 4 Unruh continued his negotiations with the German government in Berlin. He
also asked the German Mennonite and Evangelical churches for help. Through the newly
formed Brueder in Not [Brethren in Need] relief agency an appeal was made to the whole
German nation, “...in spite of our difficult economic situation [we ask] for an offering for
the afflicted brethren.”
Reich President von Hindenburg donated 200,000 Reichsmark, and 6,000,000
Reichsmark were appropriated by the Reich cabinet for the rescue. Other agencies and
individuals also contributed.
In the mean time the government of Canada gave its final negative answer on
November 25, basically sentencing thousands of people to hardship and death. German
generosity and hospitality stepped in and allowed at least temporary refuge to a number of
193
those in Moscow. Between
December 1 and 1 1 , a total of
5,671 were admitted to that
country. Of these 3,885 were
Mennonites, 1,260 Lutherans,
468 Catholics and 51 Baptists.
Including births, those who
escaped by other means, and
other close relatives who were
allowed to leave, the sum
eventually came to 6,278
persons. They travelled via
Riga, where they paused at least
long enough to express their
thanks to God in prayer, to
On arrival in Riga the Moscow refugees prayed and
sang “j Nun danket alle Gotf
sing "Nun danket alle
Gott" [Now Thank We
All Our God], and to have
a steaming hot bowl of
soup. They were then
sent to three camps in
Germany.
After previous
warnings the Soviet
government, through the
GPU, the secret police,
was beginning to send the
remaining refugees back.
Under torture the men
were forced to sign
documents that they went
voluntarily; more than 300 had already been arrested and sent into exile.
Heinrich Martens graphically described the conditions and consequences. The
women and children were thrown onto trucks, loaded onto freight cars, then shipped back.
Many children suffered broken arms and legs from the brute force used. Pregnant women
gave birth on pavements or on trucks, and both mother and child often died within hours.
Many families were tom asunder. About 8,000 were sent back. The trip back to the Crimea
took nine days, to Siberia about three weeks, through the bitter cold. Many people died on
the way. At one station the bodies of 37 children were taken from the train, at another
Siberian station the count of bodies was 60. When they arrived back “ home” they had
nothing to eat, and no roof over their heads.
Refugees served hot soup in Riga
194
Those refugees
who had been allowed into
Germany were taken to
three camps, in
Hammerstein, Moelln and
Prenzlau. Many started
their sojourn by
celebrating Christmas in
the new, if somewhat
crowded circumstances.
Life in the camps was
made as pleasant and
profitable as possible.
School at the Prenzlau camp There were kindergartens,
schools, Sunday schools,
choirs, libraries and even sewing classes. In time the refugees left for various destinations,
to Brazil 2,529, Paraguay 1,572, Canada [surprisingly] 1,344, Argentina six, Mexico four,
USA four,
and 458
stayed in
Europe. By
November,
1932, there
were only
70 persons
left in the
camp at
Moelln.
With
the aid of
the German
A meeting at the Moelln camp
government
as well as
the Dutch
Mennonites, migration to Brazil was made possible. This country did not guarantee non-
resistant status, so the Mennonites who chose Brazil tended to be those who considered this
principle to be of marginal importance. The first group of 33 families sailed for Brazil on
the Monte Olivia on January 16, 1930. They settled on land in the upper Krauel River
valley near the German city of Blumenau. Eventually 2,529 Moscow refugee Mennonites
settled in Brazil.
Of those refugees going to Paraguay, the first group crossed the ocean on a German
vessel Bayern, then transferred to a river boat in Buenos Aires. After travelling some
distance up the Paraguay River they disembarked at Puerto Casada, then were transported
195
by railroad for 145 kilometres. This was followed by a 100 kilometre trek westwards
deeper into the Paraguayan Chaco on oxcarts provided by the Menno Colony. They
established the Femheim Colony, consisting of 13 villages, with Filadelfia laid out as the
centre.
The fate of the “other eight thousand” was that which usually occurred to those who
challenged the Soviet government. Some were undoubtedly imprisoned and executed,
others were exiled to the far north, many were returned to their homes penniless to manage
as best they could.
Sources:
Epp, Frank H., Mennonite Exodus, Canadian Mennonite Relief and Immigration Council,
Altona, Canada, 1962, pp 221-239
Fast, Peter, Mennonites on the Move, Mennonite Life, January 1959, pp 14-16
Martens, Heinrich, Refugee in Moelln camp, Letter, 29 December 1929
Mennonite Historical Atlas, pp 145, 149
New York Times, Headline, 1 December 1929, Section 3, p 2
Toews, John B., Czars, Soviets & Mennonites, Faith and Life Press, Newton, USA, 1982,
pp 130-134
Willms, H. J., Editor, Vor den Toren Moskaus, Komitee der Fluechtlinge, Yarrow, Canada,
pp 15-147
Background Information:
Benjamin H. Unruh
196
BENJAMIN H. UNRUH
[1881 - 1959]
The German Negotiator
Benjamin Heinrich Unruh was bom on September 4, 1881 in Temir-Bulat [Philippstal],
Crimea. He was the ninth of ten children of Heinrich Benjamin and Elisabeth [Wall] Unruh. His
father was a farmer, but also a minister and elder in the Karassan Mennonite Church. Two older
brothers, Heinrich and Komelius, went to India as missionaries. Gerhard became a respected
minister in the Mennonite Brethren Church, and Abraham, just three years older than Benjamin,
was a well known Bible teacher in Russia and later in Canada. His father Benjamin died of
pneumonia at an early age, in 1883, leaving the family in difficult circumstances. His brother
Abraham, in order to give him better educational possibilities, was sent to live with his uncle
Komelius Unruh in Ohrloff, Molotschna.
After four years of rather indifferent elementary schooling at Temir-Bulat, Benjamin was
sent to the home of his grandfather, Benjamin Unruh, in Tokultschak [Johannesruh], also in the
Crimea. Here his excellent teacher was Johann Fehderau, who taught the young Benjamin enough
in three years to make it easy to enter the Zentralschule in Ohrloff in 1 895. Here his teachers were
also excellent, among them his own uncle, Komelius Unruh. From there he went to the Teachers’
College in Halbstadt. He particularly appreciated his well educated and very dedicated teacher,
Wilhelm P. Neufeld, and also his religion teacher, brother Abraham.
During this time in Halbstadt Benjamin came to a personal faith in Jesus Christ at the age
of 18, and was baptized and joined the Mennonite Brethren Church of Spat, in the Crimea. After
completion of his courses he passed the examination for the Russian subjects in Simferopol, for
Religion and German in Halbstadt, and later in 1909 the state
examinations in Kharkov. His Ohrloff and Halbstadt studies
had been financed by a member of the Comies family, but
because of difficult circumstances this funding ran out.
Benjamin had received an offer to teach when three new
benefactors enabled him to continue his studies.
As a result of his financing Benjamin was able to
study in Basel, Switzerland from 1900 to 1907, first at the
Evangelisches Predigerseminar of Wilhelm Arnold, then at
the University of Basel. He graduated from the faculty of
theology in June of 1907 with a licentiate in church and
dogma history [equivalent of a Ph. D.]. He turned down a
position in Basel to go back to his own Mennonite people,
accepting a post as teacher of Religion and German in the
newly established advanced teachers’ college [Ober-
Realschule\ in Halbstadt.
On August 18, 1907, before he returned to Russia,
Benjamin married Frieda Hege, of Breitenau, Germany. She
was daughter of Christian Hege, a Mennonite elder. The
couple had eight children, four boys and four girls. They were
Rudolf [1908], Martha [1909], Hans [1910], Heinrich [1911], Liesel [1914], Olga [1915], Maria
[1917] and Fritz [1919], After over 38 years of marriage Frieda died on December 27, 1945.
Benjamin married Paula Hotel in 1948; she was the daughter ofElder Johannes Hotel of Batzenhof.
In Halbstadt Benjamin dedicated himself to excellence in teaching for over a decade. He
Benjamin H. Unruh [1881-1959]
197
taught Religion and German at the advanced levels, including the Maedchenschule. Katherine
Rempel, one of his students, says of him “I must mention my esteemed teacher Benjamin Unruh,
to whom I dedicate some words of acknowledgment and gratitude. ..when Mr. Unruh discussed a
drama with us.. .everybody paid attention and no one was bored. He knew how to uncover hidden
treasures and connect them to everyday life. ..This gift was also evident in the Bible
classes... difficult passages... would be carefully explained...” During this time Benjamin also
published a book “ Lehrbuch fuer den Religionsuntericht ’’[Manual for Instruction of Religion] for
secondary schools, in 1913. He was a leader among Mennonite educators and spoke at many
conferences. In 1919 he chaired a congress of teachers held at Prischib.
But Benjamin’s interests extended beyond education. On August 14-18, 1917, he was one
of three chairmen of the All-Russian Mennonite Congress held in Ohrloff. A Mennozentrum
[Mennonite Centre] was established, headquarters in Halbstadt, and Benjamin was chosen to head
this organization. In 1920 Benjamin was appointed as a member, and also the secretary of the
Studienkommission, which was to deal with the famine that was decimating the Mennonite colonies,
but also to explore the possibility of emigration to foreign countries. In this capacity, in early May
of 1920, he travelled to Holland, Switzerland and Germany, then to the United States and Canada.
Upon returning he played a significant role in founding a German Mennonite relief agency. He
then remained in Germany, his wife and children eventually joining him in 1922. He settled in
Rueppurr, a suburb of Karlsruhe, Germany. From this base he taught Russian language, literature
and history at a technical college in Karlsruhe, but more importantly became an advocate for
Russian Mennonite causes, particularly as it related to emigration and relief work.
Benjamin was intimately involved in the negotiations for the emigration of 1923 to 1928,
with a major concern for those Mennonites who were quarantined en route because of the eye
disease trachoma, first in Lechfeld, Germany, then in Atlantic Park, near Southampton in England.
In the 1929 cry for help by the Mennonite refugees in Moscow, Benjamin Unruh was one
of the principal negotiators. On October 10, 1929, he asked the Soviets, through their embassy in
Berlin, if he could go to Moscow to investigate the situation. This was denied, but he continued
his efforts in dealing with the German government. He asked the German Mennonites and
Evangelical churches for help. Finally, through the newly established “ Brueder in Not ” [Brethren
in Need] relief agency he appealed to the whole German nation. Eventually, to a considerable
degree through the efforts of Unruh, Germany accepted 6,278 [5,671 plus additional relatives] of
the 1 3,000- 1 5,000 desperate refugees massed in Moscow. He also played a part in their settlement
in three camps in Germany, and the final departure for Paraguay, Brazil and Canada. Benjamin
assisted in the travel of some of the AmurVHarbin refugees via France to South America. In the
early 1 930s it was less and less possible to intervene directly for his Russian brethren, but for a time
he could help to encourage and coordinate the sending of much needed relief packages.
Benjamin was prominent in the 1930 Mennonite World Relief Conference held in Danzig.
He delivered three talks relating to the relief and the emigration of Russian Mennonites. At the
third Mennonite World Conference held in Amsterdam in 1936 he again spoke about the
Mennonites in Russia, but also, together with Fritz Kliewer, informed the delegates about the
Mennonites in Paraguay. Nearer home, one of Benjamin’s concerns was the reorganization of the
German Mennonite churches in the 1930s. For years he also helped them deal with the question
of the oath, especially as it related to the Third Reich. He had a personal interview with Heinrich
Himmler on this subject.
While living in Germany Unruh seems to have been strongly influenced by the rising tide
of German nationalism, and with it perhaps had an idealistic evaluation of the National Socialist
movement. He later commented on the 1929-1930 refugees, seemingly with approval, “many of
these farmers were able to take with them overseas impressions of the National Socialist militant
198
movement.” According to Thiesen, discussing the various influences on the South American
Mennonites, “Nazis offered a language that came not only directly from German sources but
through Mennonites’ own intellectual leaders... and respected Mennonite spokesmen such as
B. H. Unruh.” This is a chapter of Unruh’s life on which he himself and his biographers were later,
not surprisingly, silent.
When, after the conclusion of hostilities of World War II, the Soviets began invading the
Western Allied zones of Germany to repatriate their former citizens, Benjamin played a part in
helping the refugees who were trying to escape. He provided many Mennonites with desperately
needed documentation such as birth, baptismal and
marriage certificates. He also compiled an extensive
list of about 8,000 names which enabled the
Mennonite Central Committee to trace and help a large
number of Mennonite refugees.
During his career Benjamin wrote many
essays on a wide variety of subjects. One hundred of
his publications are listed in “ Mennonite Bibliography
1631-1961.” Many of these had earlier been lectures
given on various occasions. He wrote on subjects
related to his teaching profession, such as “Ein Beitrag
zur Geschichte der russland deutschen Schulen .” He
frequently covered various aspects of Mennonite
history, “ Die Revolution 1525 und das Taeufertum”
and included biographies of Mennonite leaders,
“ Johann H. Willms and “ Peter J. Braun. ” Much of
his attention was focused on Mennonites in Russia and
their plight, “Die Mennoniten in Russland in
Geschichte und Gegenwart" and “Wie Koennen wir
den Mennoniten in Russland helfen?” He discussed
theological issues as well, “ Gewissenfreiheit ” and
“Die Mennonitische Konfession.” He also liked to
recall his own past, and published a four part autobiography in Der Bote. As mentioned previously
Benjamin published a manual for instruction in religion in 1913, and had a number of additional
manuscripts ready, which unfortunately were not printed because of the unsettled times in Russia.
Luckily a long time major work of his was completed shortly before his death. “Die
niederlaendisch-niederdeutschen Hintergrunde der mennonitischen Ostwanderungim 16., 18., und
19. Jahrhundert” was published in 1955, and is indispensable for any serious student of Mennonite
history. “ Fuegung und Fuehrung im mennonitischen Welthilfswerk 1920-1933 ,” is a collection of
his materials regarding the work among refugees which came to print after his death, in 1966.
While Benjamin was a baptized member of the Mennonite Brethren Church, he was never
elected a minister. He preferred to fellowship in the wider community of believers, his motto
being, “I do not wish to have less brothers than Jesus Christ did.” In 1927 he was a Mennonite
delegate to a world church conference in Lausanne, Switzerland. He was active in relief of
suffering, with interests wide enough for him to be honoured by the German Red Cross. He
received the “ Verdienstkreuz 1. Klasse, ’’presented by President von Hindenburg himself. Because
of his Russian studies and various theological works, the theological faculty of the University of
Heidelberg bestowed an honourary doctorate of theology degree on him in 1937. In 1957 he was
made an honourary member of the “ Landmanschaft der Deutschen aus Russland ’ [Society of
Germans from Russia].
199
Benjamin Unruh worked almost to his last days. In January of 1959 he submitted a
manuscript for publication “ Humanity from the Christian Perspective A few months later his
health failed. Suffering from arteriosclerosis, he was seriously ill for four weeks, then he died on
May 12, 1959 in a hospital in Karlsruhe. The funeral service was held in the Resurrection Church
in Karlsruhe-Rueppurr. He was buried on May 1 5 in the local cemetery. Benjamin was survived
by his second wife Paula and seven children.
Benjamin Heinrich Unruh impacted the lives of many people. To academics and church
officials he was “ ueberkonfessioneller und uebernationeler , allchristlicher nnd allmenschlicher ”
[interconfessional, international, all-christian and all-human]. But to many of those who had
personally been saved from misery or even death by his dedicated work he was “ Ohm Benjamin ”
[Father Benjamin].
Sources:
Dyck, Arnold, Mein Besuch bei Ohm Benjamin , Mennonite Life, January 1960, pp 8-10
Epp, Frank H., Mennonite Exodus, Canadian Mennonite Relief and Immigration Council
Altona, Canada, 1962, pp 40, 44, 45,46, 52,61,62, 65-67, 117, 158, 159, 176, 177,
209, 230-232, 257, 269, 276, 277, 283, 365, 368, 426, 446
Ewert, David, Stalwart for the Truth , Board for Christian Literature, General Conference of the
Mennonite Brethren churches of North America, Winnipeg, Canada, 1975, pp 19-23
Klassen, H., One of the Last , Mennonite Life, January 1960, pp 4-5
Krahn, Cornelius, Benjamin H. Unruh heimgegangen, Der Bote, 7 May 1959, p 5
Krahn, Cornelius, Biographical Sketch of Benjamin H. Unruh, Mennonite Life, January I960, p 6
Mennonite Encyclopedia
Mennonitisches Lexikon Vol 4: 389-390
News Report, Mennonitische Rundschau, 20 May 1959, p 1
News Report, Mennonitische Rundschau, 3 June 1959, pp 1, 5
Quiring, Horst, Benjamin H. Unruh zum 70. Geburtstag, Mennonitische Geschichtsblaetter,
March 1952, pp 26-29
Regehr, Peggy, Descendents of Benjamin H. Unruh, Unruh Family Tree, Winnipeg, Canada
Rempel, Katherine, Glimpses from My Life, translated by Dorothy Huebert, Winnipeg, Canada,
1997, p 10
Schleuning, Johannes, Professor Lie. theol. D. h. c. Benjamin Heinrich Unruh zum Gedaechtnis,
Heimatbuch der Deutschen aus Russland, 1960, pp 102-108
Schnebele, Christian, Aus Benjamin Unruh' s Taetigkeit, Mennonitisches Jahrbuch, 1952,
pp 45-47
Springer, Nelson P., and Klassen, A. J., Mennonite Bibliography 1631-1961, Herald Press,
Scottdale, USA, and Kitchener, Canada, 1977, p 512, listing a total of 100 articles
and books
Thiesen, John D., Mennonite and Nazi?, Pandora Press, Kitchener, Canada, pp 25-37
Unruh, Benjamin H., Benjamin H. Unruh, Der Bote, 5 September 1951, pp 1, 2;
12 September 1951, pp 1,2; 19 September 1951, p 2; 26 September 1951, pp 2, 3
Unruh, B. H., Peter J. Braun, Mennonitisches Jahrbuch 1952, pp 29-32
Unruh, Benjamin Heinrich, Fuegung und Fuehrung im mennonitischen Welthilfswerk 1920-1933,
Mennonitischen e. V. Weierhof, West Germany, 1966, pp 3-68
200
29. AMUR CROSSING
DECEMBER 16, 1930
Prior to World War I most Mennonite colonies were in European Russia. Those
Mennonites going beyond these confines settled mainly in western Siberia, near Omsk, or
in the Slavgorod region. After the revolution, when it became obvious that collectivization
or exile were in store, many Mennonites migrated to Canada. Some of those who could not
leave accepted the Soviet offer to settle in the distant, largely uninhabited land along the
Amur River, hoping to avoid the harsh reality of communist rule. They were promised 400
rubles per family, about 1 5 hectares of land per family member, reduced freight rates, and
no taxes for three years. The first settlers left Slavgorod on March 24, 1 927, 42 families
taking household goods, farm implements and animals on the long trek eastward by train.
They, and those who soon followed, established the Usman settlement near the city of
Blagoveshchensk. Other colonies established in the area were Savitaya, Muchino,
Nevzorovka and Shumanovka, total population over 2,300. Most settlers came from
western Siberia, but some also arrived from European Russia.
The settlements had barely been established when collectivization was forced upon
even this distant outpost. As was the practice elsewhere, the more successful farmers were
declared kulaks, and were disenfranchised. The GPU [the Soviet secret police] had moved
in to ensure cooperation, and spies reported those who did not. Heavy grain tax was levied
on all crops despite the promise of three tax-free years.
The four villages of Shumanovka, Kleefeld,
Friedensfeld and New York were combined to form a
collective farm, with Jakob Siemens of Shumanovka
appointed the leader. In the spring of 1 929 seeding was
done in a collective fashion. Thanks to the energy of
the leadership and the settlers this farm was named a
model collective, which of course then was connected
with greater responsibilities and higher demands. In the
autumn the crops were harvested, again everyone
working most diligently.
Despite seeming collaboration with the
authorities, this was only a ruse. The communist
system went against the heart and soul of the
Mennonite settlers. Most were looking for some way
out of the situation, preferably to settle in North
America, the land of freedom.
In the autumn of 1 929 the word was spread that
some Mennonites had obtained exit visas in Moscow, and so had been able to emigrate.
Mennonites from all over the Soviet Union gathered in Moscow in desperate hopes that
they might escape. But of the over 1 3,000 who applied, only about 6,000 were successful.
The others were sent back to their homes empty handed, or worse still, banished to the
201
north. A number of people from the Amur area also went to Moscow. Peter Mantler was
actually able to emigrate to Canada, but minister Heinrich Loewen was sent back.
What was to be done? The wide Amur River was immediately south of the
Mennonite colonies, forming a natural boundary between Soviet Siberia and Manchuria
[China], Roughly parallel to the Amur River in this region of China lies a low mountain
range “Kleine Chingan” [Lesser Khingan Range or Xiao Higgang], These mountains were
visible from the Mennonite villages, hovering on the south west horizon, and were often
referred to as “The Blue Mountains of China.” Behind that, they imagined, was a land of
fairytale oriental splendour. It is no wonder that in time the thoughts of the Mennonites
turned to these blue mountains as a possible route of escape. True, it would mean going
into a heathen land, where the next big city, Harbin, was far away, but was it perhaps
possible?
As early as 1 927 a few young men had crossed the border, then later under the cover
of darkness came back to get their families. Later the border patrols were strengthened, but
even so a number of groups were able to escape in the winter of 1928-1929 over the ice of
the frozen river. The border patrols became increasingly active and sometimes shot and
killed people trying to escape. Chinese traders, who often smuggled goods across the
border, also offered to lead groups to China, but occasionally became traitors and turned
these people over to the Soviet patrols instead.
The local GPU chief periodically came riding through the Mennonite villages to
observe activities; local individuals were also recruited to spy on each other. Knowing this,
people were very secretive. So it was that others were not aware of an escape plan of 12
Shumanovka families on the night of March 25, 1 930. They left their homes in the dark of
night to a rendevous that had been decided on seven verst from the village. A Chinese
guide was to meet them there, and would lead them across the river. They waited, and
waited. No Chinese guide. Finally, fearing that the guide may be intending to turn them
over to the GPU, they returned home. In the morning the GPU chief came into the village
to “discuss some important questions.” But there were no signs of the night’s activities.
This time the 12 families were fortunate. It seemed that further thoughts of escape were
unrealistic.
The citizens of Shumanovka and the neighbouring villages were excellent farmers.
The collective, with its able leader Jakob Siemens, satisfied the authorities in all possible
ways, and even did more than was prescribed. They worked tirelessly and prepared
elaborate plans for the future, showing that even Mennonite farmers could work the system
of insane agricultural policies. The harvest in the autumn of 1930 was brought in
efficiently, the grain tax was paid without argument. The farmers even built a mill where
their own grain as well as that of neighbouring collectives could be ground.
In November of 1930 the leadership of the collective contemplated possible work
for the winter. The members of the collective should not spend the winter months lying
around on bear rugs or pretending they were in Schlaraffenland [a land of milk and honey].
No, they should work! They wanted to be loyal citizens. To this end the whole collective
would like to do forestry work near the city of Chabarovsk, about 800 kilometres away.
They would need to buy horses and build sleighs and make preparations for this long trip.
202
The Soviet authorities, pleasantly surprised by this offer, nevertheless consented. So the
plans proceeded. Little did the authorities guess that these same horses and sleighs could
also head south over the Amur River!
Leaders and members of the collective, at least the village of Shumanovka and its
neighbour New York, agreed that while risky, perhaps irresponsibly insane, the plan was
worth a try. The leadership, for security reasons, was somewhat vague about its plans. The
teacher and one of the villagers were known to be communist collaborators, so they were
kept completely in the dark.
Two villagers from Shumanovka, Isaak Wiens and Wilhelm Federau, who were
especially diligent, were asked to scout out the possibilities. On November 2, led by a
reliable Chinese guide named Alexander, they crossed the border under cover of darkness.
Reaching the Chinese village of Kani-Fu, they received valuable information about border
crossings from some horse traders. They also negotiated terms under which the Chinese
village would accept the refugees when they arrived. Since the return to Siberia might be
difficult they purchased a number of items in China so that, should they be captured by the
border patrols or the GPU, they could give the excuse of having been in China to purchase
goods. In a week, again at night and with some fortunate fog, Wiens and Federau returned
safely to Shumanovka. They reported to the collective farm leadership, feeling that with
proper precautions the escape would be possible.
Now it was time to put the plans into action. It was decided to leave in the middle
of December. Under promise of extreme secrecy and caution each villager of Shumanovka
and New York [except, of course the two spies in Shumanovka] was informed of the
specific plans, and the leadership asked everyone to make necessary preparations. The
secret, but feverish work began. The sleighs, designed for freight, had to be converted to
accommodate passengers. The sides and backs were built up so that women and children
could be packed in warmly, a feature especially needed in the extreme cold. This work was
done behind the straw stacks so as not to be seen from the street. The collective distributed
flour and sun flower oil to each villager. Ham, other meat, and baked goods were also
prepared. How fortunate that the authorities had been convinced that preparations for a trip
into the forest needed to be made, otherwise some suspicion might have been aroused.
Even those villagers who ordinarily had forgotten how to pray were driven to their knees,
praying quite earnestly for God’s guidance and protection.
The date was set for December 15. The village of Shumanovka was informed as
well as New York. Those who had close relatives in neighbouring villages could also invite
them to join. Everything was ready. The sleighs were packed. Besides food and clothing
a few settlers also packed additional items from which they could impossibly part - such
as a sewing machine, a milk separator, an incredibly valuable musical instrument.
The leadership again chose the Chinese guide Alexander to lead them. They felt
that he was trustworthy, besides being known to most of the settlers. He was, of course, not
willing to risk his life for nothing, but seemed to value the sound of gold even more than
his life. Being in a poor bargaining position, the villagers agreed that each family would
give Alexander their best horse once they were safely in China. A fair payment for the
work of a single night!
203
Now the 15th of December was there. Every settler made sure that everything in
the household was ready. It was hard to wait through the long hours of the day. Towards
evening a number of the men dropped in to see the teacher and the farmer suspected of
being a GPU spy. They outlined the escape plans to each and gave them a choice. They
could join the group, or they could be tied up and be left lying in their homes - to make sure
that they could not report events to the GPU. They both chose to join the flight to China.
They were given some extra clothing and quickly made preparations to leave.
Now the cold winter night settled in. The plan was to leave about nine o’clock.
Tension mounted, there were pounding heartbeats, and there was little appetite for supper.
Then the news arrived. It would not be possible to leave that night! What had happened?
A message had come from New York asking for a delay of eight days. That village was not
yet ready to depart, among other things they wished to sell their flour. Jakob Siemens pled
with the New York representatives. The tension of waiting another eight days would be
unbearable, and besides the chances of some leak in security during that time would be too
great. He practically fell on his knees, but to no avail. If Shumanovka did not wait, the
New Yorkers would inform the Soviet authorities! This convinced Siemens that they had
to comply. But the New Yorkers were suspicious, so they left a number of men behind as
guards, just to be certain.
The next day, December 16, the Shumanovka settlers held a secret meeting. They
decided that it was almost criminal to wait so long, the risk was just too great. The decision
was to leave that night. Again the message was passed from household to household.
Evening arrived, and the people were waiting anxiously for the proposed ten o’clock
departure time. Again supper was hard to keep down. The guards from New York were
still there, observing activities.
Shumanovka posted two young men just south of the village on the road to
Konstantinovka, where the GPU headquarters were located, to see if there was any traffic
from that direction. It was bitter cold, minus 40 0 Reaumur [minus 5 0 0 Celsius] . The air was
still, so sound carried very well, but from the south it was a quiet as a cemetery. The two
were about to turn back when the sounds of a sleigh reached their ears. The crisp crunching
of snow under the runners became louder and louder. A sleigh came into view carrying
three passengers who, all bundled up, were not recognizable. Fortunately it did not come
from Konstantinovka, but from the neighbouring village of Friedensfeld. It headed straight
into the village. The people were some Friesens from Friedensfeld who had come to join
the escape. What a relief! By now it was 12 midnight. The guards from New York had,
assuming the terrible cold would make it impossible to travel, headed for home. Now that
the shock of the new arrivals had passed, and the New Yorkers had gone home, the message
to prepare for departure arrived.
The cattle were freed from the bams. The wall clocks were wound up, the lamps
were left burning, and the supper dishes were left on the table. Valued furniture was left
behind as a symbol of willingness to part with everything to save their souls from the
Bolshevik Babel and to escape communist atheism.
Now everything was ready. After an agreed upon sign was given the sleighs passed
through the yard gates onto the street where they formed a long train, about 60 sleighs in
204
all. The Chinese guide, Alexander led the way, the next in line was Isaak Wiens, one of the
leaders, then followed the rest. A number of armed outriders protected the train and helped
maintain order. Many of the young men walked beside the sleighs. The word had been
passed along to maintain quiet, so as not to attract attention, so each one was left to his own
thoughts. Even the Amur region had become home, so it was with a feeling of some regret
that the group was leaving the familiar, and striking off into the dark unknown.
At first the caravan headed straight down the road southward, but then to avoid
possible detection by the border patrol it veered off to the side, into knee deep snow. The
night was getting colder still. The snow crunched under the sleigh runners, so loud that
some were afraid that they would be heard. The horses of the lead sleigh, breaking the path,
had the hardest work. After about three kilometres they passed by the Russian village of
Voyko vo, the first guard post of the border patrol. They skirted it by going half a kilometre
around, and soon the village was left far behind. The further they went, the more difficult
the trail. There were hills and valleys, both hard for the horses to navigate. Sometimes the
sleigh runners hit tree stumps and tipped over, on occasion the pole of the sleigh broke, and
had to be repaired. One horse became uncontrollable, breaking up the sleigh. Eventually
the horse was controlled and the sleigh fixed. The cold was so severe that the travellers
often checked for frostbite - noses, ears, fingers and toes. They rubbed them with snow if
they feared they were frostbitten.
One family had brought along an entire butchered cow, but together with wife and
children the load was too heavy; the sleigh broke down and could not be repaired. Quickly
the family members were transferred, and the broken sleigh was pulled off the trail together
with its delicious sides of beef. “May the wolves, ’’said one observer, “or the border patrol,
have a good meal!”
After a long, very difficult trip with many delays, which increased the chances of
meeting up with border patrols, they were close to the Amur River, but had to pass the
Russian village of Orlovka. Here there were 20 members of the border patrol, with a
machine gun. The first streaks of dawn were beginning to show on the eastern sky.
Roosters were crowing in the village. The path got even rougher, more sleighs broke down.
They were either repaired or pushed aside off the path. The caravan continued around the
village, the miracle being that they were not detected.
Finally the first sleigh reached the shore of the Amur. But then another problem
faced the group. There was a three metre drop from the bank to the ice level. The lead
horses were frightened and began to back up. Yet something had to be done. Women and
children got off the sleighs; half the men pushed from above, the other half tried to break
the fall at the bottom. The work was so hard that the men were sweating, and despite the
terrible cold had to take off their coats. Even with all the precautions some of the sleighs
broke on impact with the hard ice surface, with all the contents rolling out into the snow.
Those sleighs that could be repaired were quickly patched up and reloaded.
The sky was becoming lighter and lighter, and still some of the sleighs were up on
the shore. Orlovka was only one kilometre away, yet nothing was seen of the border patrol.
Had Alexander possibly paid them off? Finally the last sleigh was down, and the
procession travelled across the ice. The outriders turned a worried eye toward Orlovka, but
205
no one appeared. The sleighs proceeded at full trot, the ice being covered by only a light
blanket of snow. The Siberian banks of the Amur were more and more distant. After
travelling one and a half kilometres they had to twist and turn between islands. The horses
were urged onward, and when the first rays of the sun appeared, the caravan reached the
Chinese shore. Since they were soon surrounded by curious Chinese people, the
Mennonites assumed they had reached China, but so great was the fear of possible GPU
reprisal that the refugees found it difficult to believe.
The group entered the Chinese village of Kani-Fu, where according to the previous
arrangements, they received a friendly reception. Now the hard ice of their fear could melt,
their doubts could be eased, prayers of thanks could go up to God.
A total of 217 people fled across the Amur that night, of which 175 were from the
village of Shumanovka. But there was one tragedy. When the women and children were
unloaded in Kani-Fu it was discovered that one two year old, the daughter of Aron
Warkentin, had died of suffocation because of the heavy blankets she was wrapped in.
Several men had severe frostbite, which was discovered during the warming up phase, when
they had severe pain. Later, in Harbin, a number of their gangrenous toes had to be
amputated.
They were safe, but the adventures were not over as yet. Alexander, the Chinese
guide needed to be paid. The refugees feared that if he really stuck to his bargain, they
would not have enough horses to proceed further. He finally allowed the smaller families
to combine in their payment, accepting the 22 best horses the Mennonites had as full
recompense. They then had to pay five rubles tax to the Chinese authorities for each of the
remaining horses. When the group obtained official permission to stay in China, they left
Kani-Fu on December 27, and travelled the eight kilometres to the larger town of
Kotshuricha on their sleighs. From there eight buses picked them up, and with many
frustrating episodes along the way, delivered the refugees to Qiqihar. They then travelled
to Harbin by train, arriving on February 12, 1931.
Other groups escaped to Harbin in a similar manner, so that soon hundreds of
refugees were put up in the city. In time, to a considerable degree through the efforts of the
Mennonite Central Committee, but even using the intervention of the League of Nations,
they were accepted into the United States, Brazil and Paraguay. The last refugees did not
leave until 1934.
Apparently those remaining in the Amur villages were forced to leave the border
area, and many were imprisoned. A few families headed even further eastward, to the
island of Sakhalin. Unfortunately the Bolsheviks followed them even to this remote region.
Sources:
Ewert, Isaak, Blumenort, Amurgebiet, Unser Blatt, January 1928, pp 89, 90
Fast, Gerhard, In den Steppen Sibiriens, J. Heese, Rosthem, Canada, 1953, pp 152-155
Loewen, Abram J., and Friesen, Abram, Die Flucht ueber den Amur, Echo-Verlag, Rosthem
and Steinbach, Canada, 1946, pp 5-55. This account is the principal basis for the
story as presented here
206
Loewen, Harry, Flight Across the River, Chapter 29 in No Permanent City, Herald Press,
Waterloo, Canada, and Scottdale, USA, 1993, pp 134-138
Martens, Wilfred, River of Glass, Herald Press, Scottdale, USA, 1 980
Mennonite Encyclopedia
Mennonite Historical Atlas, pp 66, 67, 139
Wiens, Fr ,,Blumenort, Amurgebiet, Letter, Unser Blatt, January 1928, p 91
Background Information:
Map: Amur Mennonite Colonies including Escape Route
Map: Escape over the Amur to Harbin
207
208
Amur Mennonite Colonies including Escape Route
209
Escape over the Amur to Harbin
30. THE PURGE
THE GREAT TERROR OF 1936-1938
Joseph Stalin had apparently become dissatisfied with the brutality of Genrikh G.
Yagoda, so on September 26, 1936 he appointed Nicholas I. Yezhov to be the People’s
Commissar of Internal Affairs. His job as head of the NKVD was to end all real opposition
to the Communist Party, all potential opposition to the Party, and of course all possible
threats to Stalin himself. He was known to lack all moral qualities, was cruel and
uncompromising. Pravda called him the “nation’s favourite,” and claimed that he had a
will of iron and exceptional intelligence.
Victims of “The Purge” which Yezhov unleashed included party functionaries -
seventeen of them being tried in early 1 937, charged with collaborating with Germany and
Japan. The Red Army was decimated by many arrests, calling into question the potential
effectiveness as a fighting force. Despite the high profile given to these victims, the real
tragedy involved millions of ordinary, totally innocent Soviet citizens. Minority groups
definitely were singled out for special treatment, especially religious groups. Within the
context of the general purge, there were also special initiatives - for no apparent reason
except that more arrests were demanded. In February, 1 938, Yezhov travelled to Kiev for
an NKVD conference, and then ordered 30,000 more executions in Ukraine. It seems that
files were kept on every one. When an order came in for 1 ,000 more imprisonments in an
area, the officials simply called in the next 1 ,000 people on the list under virtually any
pretext. They were quite precise, and insisted on following the proper order on the list, even
if it meant a few return trips to ensure that the chosen person was arrested.
Most Mennonite victims were arrested and sentenced under Article 58 of the
Russian Criminal Code [Article 54 in Ukraine]. This law prohibited any propaganda or
agitation, anything containing an appeal for the overthrow, subverting or weakening of
Soviet power. Having considered emigration, any criticism of conditions in the USSR, or
receiving letters from abroad were broadly interpreted as weakening the Soviet state.
The specific number of arrests and executions which occurred between the autumn
of 1936 and late 1938 is under some dispute. It is difficult to obtain accurate evidence since
the current keeper of the archives is still basically the same organization that perpetrated the
crimes in the first place. It is felt by many that there may have been about seven million
arrests, with about one third being executed fairly promptly. Many of the others died
within a few years in labour camps, most of starvation. Very few survived to return to their
families.
The overall percentage of persons arrested in all of the USSR was about 4.3%.
Mennonites, being both a racial minority and a religious group had a rate double that, 8-9%.
During the Purge 8,000 to 9,000 Mennonite men and a small number of women were
arrested, with most occurring between June, 1937 and August, 1938. There was
considerable variation in the number from place to place, for example in Kondratievka
[Borissovo Settlement] 75 men [18%] were taken, often including fathers and sons, while
in Rosengart [Chortitza Colony] only ten were taken [3.3%]. Sometimes other factors
210
played a role. It is likely that authorities were less brutal in the Rosengart area because it
was part of a collective farm used as a model to display to foreigners who came to see the
neighbouring dam and hydroelectric facilities.
In the autumn of 1938 it became obvious to the government that the scale of
repression was having a serious effect on the economy of the country. The collectivization
of the early 1930s had concentrated on the agricultural system. While striking in all
directions, the Purge was more seriously involving the industrial sector. November 17 the
Soviet Central Committee ordered a slowdown in arrests. On December 8, 1938 it was
announced that Y ezhov had, at his own request, been released from his position. It was said
that he was arrested in 1939, and shot on February 4, 1940. Stalin was able to shift the
official blame to his direct appointee, so that the Purge or the Great Terror was known as
“The Time of Yezhov.”
It is the human tragedy that one paranoid leader, and one ruthless follower, can
impose so much suffering and death on so many in such a short time.
The numbers are absolutely terrifying, but mean little without recognizing that each
numeral represents a life, a family with wife and children, with untold pain and heartache.
We will present a few stories of specific people who were victims in this dark period of
human history.
Sources:
Huebert, H. T., Hierschau: An Example of Russian Mennonite Life, Springfield Publishers,
Winnipeg, Canada, 1986, pp 309-310
Letkemann, Peter, Mennonite Victims of the ‘Great Terror, ' 1936-1938, Journal of Mennonite
Studies, Volume 16, 1998, pp 33-58
Letkemann, Peter, Mennonites in the Soviet Inferno, Preservings, Number 13, December 1998, p 1 1
Toews, John B., Czars, Soviets and Mennonites, Faith and Life Press, Newton, USA, 1982
pp 163-176
Toews, John B., Journeys: Mennonite Stories of Faith and Survival in Stalin 's Russia, Kindred
Productions, Winnipeg, Canada and Hillsboro, USA, 1998, pp 9-10
Background Information:
Joseph Vissarionovich Djugashvili
Nikolai Loewen
Franz Teichrieb
Nikolai Huebert
Map: Dnepropetrovsk Oblast
Map: Central Crimea
Map: USSR
211
“You were always a great friend of mine, Joseph”
JOSEPH VISSARIONOVICH DJUGASHVILI
[1879- 1953]
In 1913 he adopted the name “Stalin”
meaning “man of steel”
This cartoon by Herblock appeared in the Winnipeg Free Press on March 7, 1953,
and likely in many other papers that same day. It was chosen as cartoon of the
year by Time Magazine.
212
NIKOLAI LOEWEN
[1910- 1937?]
Nikolai Loewen had begun training as a veterinarian, was unable to complete his education,
but had enough knowledge to work in this field. He practiced in Friedensfeld [a village near
Nikopol] and the surrounding villages as well as in the local collective farm.
Nikolai and his wife Anna lived in the middle of Friedensfeld with their three young
children, Harry, Hans and the infant Helen. There were some ominous clouds on the horizon.
Nikolai's father, Johann Loewen, had been arrested in June of 1937, and imprisoned in Nikopol.
He had been tortured and forced to sign a confession that he had destroyed vineyards and orchards
on the collective farm. Even more unsettling was the rumour that Nikolai had heard that his own
wife Anna was on the list for arrest. He had come home crying one day because of this fear.
Late one night in mid September the family was rudely awakened by loud knocking. Anna
whispered to Nikolai “Now they have come to get you.” They got up, dressed and lit a lamp.
Nikolai went to open the door. Two NKVD officers in plain clothes came in and searched drawers
for letters and other documents. They told Nikolai to get ready to go with them.
Anna cried, pleading that her husband, the father of three young children, should not be
taken. One of the officers sneered “Don’t cry so much, your husband will soon come back”. Anna,
courage aroused, snapped “Don’t give me that! You know he will never come back. I will never
see him again!”
Nikolai was led away between the two NKVD officers. Anna, still crying, rushed after him
with his overshoes. “Kolya,” she wept, “You’ve forgotten your galoshes \”[Kolya is the Russian
abbreviation for Nikolai]. Nikolai turned, went back to his wife and embraced her one last time.
He went to the bed of his oldest son, the six year old Harry, put a hand on his head and said “Harry,
I may not see you again. Be good to mother and help her as much as you can.” Then he went with
his captors. The motor of the “black raven” car started, and they were off.
For the next few weeks Anna visited Nikolai and his father Johann in the prison in Nikopol.
She brought them food, and hoped to hear news about what might happen to them. Nikolai was
also tortured and forced to sign papers documenting trumped up charges. As a veterinarian he was
accused of having poisoned cattle on the collective farm.
After three or four weeks both Nikolai and his father were moved - either to the far north
or Siberia, or to the place of execution. Neither were heard from again. The family was later
informed that Nikolai had died in 1940, although the strong suspicion is that he was executed long
before that.
Altogether 28 men were arrested in Friedensfeld in 1937, another 10 in 1938; this
represented almost all of the able bodied Mennonite men of the village.
Sources:
Dorfbericht, Friedensfeld, Der Reichsminister fuer die besetzten Ostgebiete, abgefasst den
Monat August 1942
Loewen, Harry, 'Can the Son Answer for the Father? ’ Reflections on the Stalinist Terror,
Journal of Mennonite Studies, Volume 16, 1998, pp 76-90
Loewen, Harry, Personal Interview
Toews, A., A., Mennonitische Maertyrer, Volume 2, 1954, Article written by Helene Loewen,
Johann Loewen, pp 121-123
213
FRANZ TEICHRIEB
[1895 - 1940?]
Franz Teichrieb with his wife Susanna, and children Elvira, Arnold, Anneliese and Gerhard
lived in the village of Spat, Crimea. Franz taught geometry and cabinet making in the local high
school, but when the
collective farm needed
his skills, his services
were transferred there.
There was no
active church in Spat,
there were no Bible
studies. Once Franz and
his wife sat in their house
and sang the old gospel
songs. He had really
enjoyed that.
It was November
24, 1936. The first snow
had fallen; it was a
beautiful evening. Franz
suggested to his wife
“lets go visit Tante
Gretchen, "who lived at the other end of the village. Franz’s mother, Mrs. Elisabeth Wall, watched
the children, while he and Susanna walked to their destination.
No sooner were they gone when a policeman came to the door asking for Franz. He was
told that the couple had gone for a visit. The policeman came back in half an hour, this time with
a German shepherd police dog. Franz was still not at home. Would the Teichriebs be drinking,
Mrs. Wall was asked. No, she said, but since they were staying such a long time they were
obviously having a good time.
Finally returning home, Franz wanted to stop in at his cabinet shop to check his tools, but
the police saw him on the street, and told him not to bother. This time there were two policemen.
They escorted Franz into the house and told him to put his hands up. The whole family had to sit
around the table while the police searched the house. They found a picture of Elvira as a small girl,
but after some pleading, left it with the family. They told Susanna to get Franz some warm
clothing, blankets and a pillow. Then, by this time about 1 1 PM, Franz was ordered to go with the
two policemen.
Susanna cried. Franz said goodby, that the family should be brave and not worry. When
Franz and the policemen were gone the family moved all their beds together - feeling slight comfort
with the close company.
Franz was taken to a prison in Simferopol. The crimes he was accused of were singing
religious songs and receiving mail from Canada. Susanna went to visit him periodically, usually
taking along food, with leaves of the Bible tucked in. The eldest daughter, Elvira, went along on
one occasion. They were in the same room, but there were two tables between them, and a
policeman watching at all times.
Then Franz told his wife that he would likely be sent away fairly soon, and this would be
by train. He had written a number of letters to the family which he was unable to give them. He
The Teichrieb Family in 1932 or 1933
214
would pack them into a box, and throw them off the train at a certain bend of the railroad track
near Spat.
Imprisonment in Simferopol continued for about one year, then the inevitable occurred, and
Franz was sent away, presumably to the far north or to Siberia. Elvira and a friend were sent to
search the track around the designated area and actually found the box of letters! Susanna and her
family carefully
read each line
that Franz had
written. He was
worried about
how he and the
family would
manage the five
year separation
[presumably he
had received a
five year
sentence for his
crimes against
the state]. He
asked Susanna
to greet their
relatives, for
Elvira to help
her mother. He
encouraged
Susanna to bring
up the children in the fear of the Lord. The family knew no new address, so it was impossible to
communicate.
Finally after a year a letter arrived, from Magadan, on the Sea of Okhotsk, well north of
Vladivostok, about 6,600 kilometres from home as the crow flies. Franz was sick, his teeth were
falling out, obviously from malnutrition. Despite their own poverty the family quickly packed
together what food they could find as well what they thought would be the most nutritious - bacon,
garlic, halva and onions, and sent it off.
Then there was silence. The next letter came from a friend of Franz’s. Franz had died.
The family should contact Simferopol about details. There they were told that Franz had died of
a heart attack, although their own presumption was that the true cause was starvation.
atui tJl otcxx QtAdnt v .. atix.
A 4c/ rtt su. ,
rt
• ***** h
am atu tut
tMteudaHte*" mu**#' fcAMmv, ,<
•Yht.ihUt.~L fCet'iCutJbtiMS m ttn. % tuxh £ct£x4- aitt Mln-i
'titbit. I.
eiix •yt-’L-V C'h‘! J’.l'it C^tdxX.it4tt tttUfL&C&Jl* .ami*. •
tst/lt Out-tAy cx.pl.. itfJA tfti. t- fr.
7 i 'Pnet/?
ix 'X/c
fh.1 OU’.-n.fzeu %■ ittf.t, V/a.'t ASA-GAm- sU!.*jjL.,
4u.ii.tX.yiTi.pyr , V tkfr WMA 'vrx.iAAi. k. Ct&
hx. 4-&&U'- , dxxVr.x (gpt ek c&1iSx.xi4 tCt 1 -‘XX-tit.
'luhSstfit.t* f tfewt. i kicpU£ tpHxftsu Aitb.t AAMoUtk. ’Tutfk a6(y n,
H*A*\sMty .ha&t . 4* uSvt jfi’b-f' 4t.i4t.ti
*9**vh. H'i'l *ne <Ui jtAstvyyfltf, dit. 3 m 'MiVidle.n. 11‘ttjdyi J6eJ.~
tU'plt yi ‘U.i i .In ’'jpcxC.H- il-CO 1-. jytvxfft. *4 ty t r Jtt SfJ. 1 (/pH. n.
Xt U fix.
* &{(• &Mia.
« ,
/XiJ- /i&zX&d. Qjyit “^4 '^4
ft vn-i/i. tfiuy &/f& tuxA a&ttfa.
:k£ _ /. ■'*. . * me '
j6* -tnist tfotiliai /U4ut. <x#< m. xCM. iay /c rytiit. ai‘tl 1 4, ff 04r
, /■. ki'“i uxdti c,'/.rxj ou£i/*.t. <tt4yt „
• v
tt-ft HI t<
Letter written by Franz Teichrieb in prison in Simferopol, dated July 23
Sources:
Loewen [Teichrieb], Elvira, Personal Interview
Teichrieb, Anneliese, Personal Interview
215
NIKOLAI HUEBERT
[1905 - 1939 orl940]
Nikolai Huebert with his wife Elisabeth and children Maria, Louise and Nikolai lived in
Tchongrav, Crimea, in the home of his parents, the Heinrich Hueberts. Nikolai seems to have been
a jack of all trades, fixing such things as tractors, but he was assigned to the pumping station of the
collective farm.
Seventeen men from Tchongrav were notified that they had to appear in court in
Simferopol, the neighbouring large city. They left early on the morning of January 30, 1937. They
arrived in Simferopol later that day, and were promptly imprisoned.
Elisabeth had been pregnant at the time when Nikolai was arrested; a daughter, Agnes, was
bom April 23. Elisabeth, together with Maria and the newly arrived Agnes went to visit Nikolai
on at least two occasions. They first walked 20 kilometres to the station at Biyuk-Onlar, where
they stayed overnight, sleeping on straw, then went on by train the rest of the way to Simferopol
the next day. On one occasion Elisabeth was asked to sign an innocent looking paper. She read
the contents, found no incriminating evidence, and signed as requested.
When Nikolai’s case came to the court he was accused of trying to poison the whole
village, through the pumping station. The authorities had found half a bottle of poison in the
household. The fact was that there were many flies in the family bam. It was common to set out
little dishes, with a touch of fly poison in the water. Nikolai, the court was told, was going to
poison the whole village with this weak fly poison! They had also added to the paper that Elisabeth
had signed, so that it was claimed that she had confirmed in writing that her husband was guilty.
Nikolai was sentenced to seven years in prison, and was sent off to Vladivostok, then further north
to Okhotsk.
Elisabeth wrote Nikolai a letter in 1938, telling him that his mother had died. The letter
came back a year later, unopened, with a note stating that he had died. Elisabeth applied to
Simferopol for more information, and after a year was informed that Nikolai was alive and working,
but that his sentence had been extended from seven to ten years. That is the last the family ever
heard of Nikolai. Their suspicion is that he likely died soon after reaching Okhotsk, sometime in
1939 or 1940.
All of the seventeen men who went to Simferopol that fateful January 30 were imprisoned
and tried. With the peculiar twists of the sadistic cruelty of the Stalin era, most were sentenced to
jail terms with the usual trumped up charges, but a few actually were declared innocent by the court
and returned home after some months.
Sources:
Klassen [Huebert], Mary, Personal Interview
216
The USSR showing the cities near which Nikolai Loewen, Franz Teichrieb and Nikolai
Huebert lived in Ukraine and the Crimea, and the final destinations of Franz Teichrieb and
Nikolai Huebert in the far eastern part of Siberia
217
31. STULNEVO
OCTOBER 2-8, 1941
World War II began when Germany invaded Poland on September 1, 1939. The
Soviet Union showed its true imperialist colours by participating in the destruction of its
neighbour by also invading, and occupying the eastern part of Poland. So Hitler and Stalin
were, although somewhat wary, allies.
This illusion was broken at 4 AM on June 22, 1941, when German forces smashed
across the border with 140 divisions, 3,300 tanks and 2,770 aircraft. Three initial thrusts
were to the Baltic states by the Northern Army, toward Moscow by Army Group Centre,
and to the wealth and industry of Ukraine by the Southern Army. On July 9 the success of
the German invasion was so dramatic in all sectors that General Haider, Chief of the
German Army General Staff, considered the war as good as won. By August, German and
Romanian forces pushed deep into Ukraine, by the end of the month occupying all areas
west of the Dniepr River. Here they halted for some time to regroup for the push further
eastward. The Chortitza Colony had been occupied, but not the Molotschna.
It was the Soviet policy to evacuate as much industry as possible, together with the
required labour force, away from the areas about to be occupied by the enemy. They were
moved to the Volga, to the Urals, to Siberia as well as Kazakhstan. Whenever enough
transport was available as much of the population as could be crammed onto trains was also
shipped eastward. This applied particularly to minority groups which had been persecuted
by the Soviets, who therefore might welcome German occupation. The Mennonites,
although a small and relatively insignificant group, were one of these minorities.
To help in the war effort first men and then also women were requisitioned from the
Molotschna to dig trenches and tank traps. First 30, then another 35, 50 and then 80 were
demanded from Gnadenfeld. This despite the fact that many men had previously been
“taken” during the Purge and the added immediate need for people to harvest the fields.
News was hard to come by, but obviously the front was approaching. About September 30
all remaining men from the Molotschna villages between the ages of 16 and 65 were
ordered to report to the administrative centres. They were marched off, put on trains and
taken away to the far north or Siberia, presumably to work in the newly established
industrial areas. Altogether 1,547 men were carried off from 23 Molotschna villages [the
numbers from the other 36 villages were not recorded, but extrapolating the percentage, the
total number taken would have been 3,968]. Many of these men were never seen again.
As the invading forces came nearer the Soviets tried to evacuate the whole
Molotschna population. With the German pause for regrouping on the western banks of the
Dniepr, the Soviets managed to spirit away many of the documents and some of the factory
machinery, but the people remained. On October 2 all villages were ordered to evacuate.
Each person was allowed a total of 200 kilograms [which included food, clothing and
bedding], and was to be ready on the street in two hours. Preparations were made in haste,
sometimes trading with neighbours for needed items, such as warm clothing. Special troops
came to every house to make sure that absolutely no one stayed behind. Tractors pulling
218
trains of ladder wagons appeared on the street, and everyone was packed onto these wagons
with all their worldly possessions. Then it was off to one of three railroad stations. The
western and southern villages were taken to Lichtenau, those in the north-west area went
to Halbstadt, the northern and eastern sector collected at Stulnevo, near Waldheim. At
Halbstadt there were about 10,000, at Stulnevo about 6,000 people. The latter group
included the villages of Gnadenfeld, Nikolaidorf, Margenau, Gnadenthal, Gnadenheim,
Friedensdorf, Landskrone, Hierschau, Waldheim, Hamberg, Klippenfeld, Wemersdorf,
Liebenau, Schoensee, Paulsheim, Mariawohl, Konteniusfeld and part of Sparrau.
The crowd arriving at Stulnevo consisted almost exclusively of women, children and
old men. They settled just south of the railroad tracks, near the station and warehouses, in
a fenced in area. Here they were told to wait until a suitable train came through. People
tended to stay in village groups, each family trying to construct a cubicle with its belongings
forming small walls around its territory. Luckily the weather was pleasant. With nightfall
coming the children started to cry, and the mothers tried to make meals. Facilities for
cooking consisted only of what had been brought along, and firewood was in short supply.
People wandered through the surrounding area, and scrounged whatever they could fmd ;
boards from fences were soon all gone. Hot water was available if there was a steam
locomotive in the station, with a compassionate engineer. Toilets were not available, so the
people had to go to the neighbouring fields to relieve themselves.
Many trains went through the station, freight trains with grain and other goods
heading eastward. There were also trains with people from the western and southern
Molotschna villages sitting on top of grain on open freight cars. The passengers called out
greetings “Follow us, we are being shipped to central Asia, to Kazakhstan!” Others greeted
friends and relatives. But there was no train for the Stulnevo crowd.
So it went for several days. The good weather continued. Children went out to
search for firewood. Mothers tried to prepare food. Boys formed gangs to protect their
village turf. One evening someone started to play guitar and sing hymns. At first, likely
fearing the guards, the singing was hesitant, then it increased in strength and confidence.
Soon the air was filled with song.
On the fourth day the people were told to move further away from the station. They
all dragged their belongings over the “polluted” area near the camp onto the open fields
beyond. On the sixth day Soviet troops were seen moving eastward, a tank rumbled by and
some of the soldiers hid in a nearby cornfield. High in the air a dogfight between fighter-
planes erupted. One Soviet aircraft escaped, but another was hit. The burning plane
crashed into a hedge near the refugee encampment, ammunition on board exploding and
causing quite a fireworks. The pilot was dead.
Station personnel had fled, the guards were gone. An army unit had moved in to
destroy what they could. The station and railroad track were blown up, sending debris
flying. Railroad tracks, ties and bricks rained down on the camp, killing at least one
refugee, a Mrs. Ebert from Gnadenfeld. Then the grain elevators and gasoline and oil
storage tanks were blown up, the resulting fires creating quite a spectacle, lighting up the
night sky. Explosions could also be heard from the direction of Waldheim, where factory
buildings were being demolished.
219
Towards morning it started to drizzle, and with the cool temperature there was soon
a crust of ice on the makeshift bed covers. Some tried to start fires to warm up. But there
was a bright side to the miseiy! The guards were nowhere to be seen. With no one to stop
them some adventuresome women had gone back to their villages, and finding no
roadblocks, came back to move their families home. Around noon some people came with
horses and wagons, others with hand carts to help in the move. By evening many had
moved to the neighbouring village of Waldheim, using the wagons or even walking. The
following day they headed for their own home villages.
No traces were found of Soviet soldiers, with German and Romanian troops
occupying the region. There had been bomb damage to some of the Molotschna villages
during the battle for the area. The Jakob Loewen family from Gnadenfeld, for example,
found some bomb damage in the village, but most of the houses were intact. German
soldiers had moved in to their home, but gladly doubled up to give the family some room
as well. They even allowed the Loewens to eat in the army mess kitchen, which provided
them with much needed nutritious food.
The people in Gnadenfeld cleaned out a previously unused church, and a Lutheran
army chaplain conducted the first service to be held in the village for seven years.
Sources:
Huebert, H. T., Hierschau : An Example of Russian Mennonite Life, Springfield Publishers,
Winnipeg, Canada, 1986, pp 313-317
Loewen Schmidt, Agathe, Gnadenfeld, Molotschna, Kitchener, Canada, pp 31-33
Loewen, Walter, personal account and interview
Background Information:
Map: Northeastern Molotschna
220
the Stulnevo Station on October 2, 1941
221
32. THE GREAT TREK
1943 - 1945
With its retreat back westward after the capitulation at Stalingrad, the German Army
was ordered to take with it the remaining population of Soviet Germans, numbering
approximately 350,000. This included 35,000 Mennonites.
The initial phase of the Great Trek was relatively well organized and orderly. The
first Mennonite colony to evacuate was the Molotschna, on September 12, 1943. As the
front swept further westward, with the Reds crossing the Dniepr River, the Chortitza was
evacuated, some people travelling by railway, others joining the Molotschna wagon trains.
By late October Sagradovka wagons also joined the long columns of evacuees. With much
hardship, and several stops along the way, the refugees reached the Warthegau area of
Poland. Here they remained in relative peace for almost a year.
The relentless Soviet advance continued, so in January, 1945, the front had reached
Poland and East Prussia. The resulting evacuation, the “Flight,” less organized, was a mad
scramble for everyone to flee farther westward. The Polish and Danzig Mennonites also
joined the refugees, some trying to flee northward via the Baltic Sea.
People fled on trains, some with wagons, many on foot. People tried to stay
together as families and village groups, but were often separated. Many were killed with
the Soviet advance and the aircraft bombing and strafing of the refugee columns. The two
most common factors which drove the refugees onward were the fear of rape of the women,
and the threat of repatriation.
When the refugees did reach Germany some had the misfortune of not getting quite
far enough. The Elbe River was the magic dividing line between east and west decided on
in Yalta, but this was not communicated to the fleeing hoard of refugees! Often the lives
of people, families and whole village groups depended on exactly where they were at the
time. Many people who did make it to the western zones were still forcibly “repatriated”
by the Soviets, often with the complicity of Allied forces.
As mentioned, 35,000 Mennonites started on the Trek. A total of 12,000 escaped
to, and stayed in the Allied zones of occupation. About 23,000 were recaptured by the
Soviets and transported “home” - often to the far north or the far reaches of Siberia.
The Trek, among Mennonite migrations, was unique in a number of ways. It was
certainly the most brutal, the most associated with hardship, terror and death. Many people
died of disease along the way, or were killed by the Soviets or partisans. Most migrations
were to some anticipated land of plenty and freedom. This one was simply a desperate
attempt to escape. The Mennonites who went on this migration had already suffered many
deprivations, with most of the able-bodied men having been murdered or exiled. The
families were therefore fragmented and consisted of a disproportionate number of women.
The Gnadenfeld contingent of 673 individuals, for example, consisted of 227 married or
widowed women, only 31 married men, 222 single females, 148 single males, and 45
individuals of unknown gender. The Hierschau group, while smaller, had similar
percentages. There were 36 adult women, seven men, 25 girls and 19 boys, with over 21
222
being children, gender not mentioned. By and large the Mennonite refugees, therefore,
consisted of old men, women and children.
The best way to outline what happened on the “Great Trek” is to present a
chronology of events.
CHRONOLOGY OF THE GREAT TREK
June 22, 1941 German invasion of Soviet Union, with three main thrusts, the southern
into Ukraine
September, October, 1941
German occupation of area where major Mennonite colonies were
situated, Sagradovka, Chortitza, Molotschna.
In some areas Soviets evacuated the Mennonites before Germans arrived
Relative peace in the area for two years
1942 German advances and retreats, the farthest east advance to Stalingrad
February 2, 1943
German Sixth Army surrounded and capitulated in Stalingrad. Slow, but
relentless retreat began
Summer, 1943
German Army ordered to retreat, and to take the remaining Soviet
German population with them
September 9 and 10, 1943
Mayors of all Molotschna villages received word to obtain wagons for
every family. Covers added, food prepared
September 1 1 and 12, 1943
Full scale Trek began from the Molotschna. Ten kilometre long caravan
headed southwest
September 1 9 Arrived at Kachovka on the Dniepr River
Crossed to Berislav on two pontoon bridges
Late September
Reached Sagradovka area.
Stayed about one month. Helped with the crops
Chortitza also evacuated. 1,200 fled by train, the rest joined the Trek
Late October Red Army crossed the Dniepr River
223
October 25 Resumed the Trek, with Sagradovka refugees joining
Conditions terrible with rain, snow, rutted muddy roads, trouble finding
fodder for horses and cattle
Chortitza wagons joining the Trek
“Winter was coming, and with it never ending rains... Often up to the axles in mud. The
horses would slip and fall... We would push the wagon, walking deep in mud ourselves.
Faces, hands, clothing, shoes - everything full of mud and wet. We were cold and wet,
hungry and had little strength left...”
November, 1943
Stopped three or four days in Vinnitsa
Many women and children put on trains, men continued by “road” with
remaining wagons
December, 1943
Various groups struggled into Podolia area, on the Russian-Polish border
224
“We were cold and wet, hungry and had little strength left...”
Late February, 1944
Front again approaching, very few wagons left
Most refugees put onto trains. Last trains almost captured by Soviets
Middle of March, 1944
200,000 Soviet Germans, including the 35,000 Mennonites, reached the
Warthegau area west of Warsaw. They were distributed in
villages and farms in the area
Were offered, and many accepted German citizenship
September, 1944
Total mobilization in Germany, almost all men between ages of 16
and 65 drafted, including Mennonite refugees. Some fought in
the Battle of the Bulge on the Western Front
January 17 and 18, 1945
Soviet armoured columns smashed through German defences
Refugees ordered to evacuate. Impossible to organize orderly retreat
Trains irregular, roads clogged, cold, people with poor clothing
Columns of refugees strafed and bombed by enemy aircraft
Some refugees overrun by Soviets, killed or captured. Survivors
collected into camps in Poland
“There were no more trains, the Russians had surrounded everything... so mother, daughter
and I started off on foot in the middle of the night. Handbag at my side, my five year old
daughter, my 71 year old mother and I walked through storm weather, snow and ice. The
German police put mother onto a wagon, then I also pushed my daughter on, and continued
to walk until finally I could also ride...”
225
February-March, 1945
Refugees headed westward, as far from the Russian front as possible
Polish and Danzig refugees also joined, some trying to flee northward
via the Baltic Sea. Treacherous ice and Soviet submarines a
threat
Most common fear was rape of the women and repatriation to Russia
May 8, 1945 Unconditional surrender of the Third Reich
Refugees east of the Elbe River were in Soviet occupied territory. They
were rounded up into camps and repatriated to Russia, often not
to their homes as promised, but to the far north or Siberia. Even
some who had reached the Allied zones were rounded up by the
Soviets, initially with Allied cooperation
The 12,000 Mennonites fortunate enough to stay in the Allied zones
were quartered in areas of Germany such as Schleswig-Holstein
or the Lueneburger Heide. Others stayed in refugee camps,
such as the Mennonite Central Committee camps in Gronau and
Backnang
1946-1948 After long waits, and many negotiations, approximately 6,000 of the
refugees emigrated to Canada, and about 6,000 to South America,
to Paraguay, Uruguay and Argentina
Sources:
Dyck, Peter, and Dyck, Elfrieda, Up from the Rubble, Herald Press, Scottdale, USA, and
Waterloo, Canada, 1991, pp 87-99
Epp, Frank, Mennonite Exodus, Canadian Mennonite Relief and Immigration Council, Altona
Canada, 1962, pp 351-390
Epp, Marlene, Moving Forward, Looking Backward: the ‘Great Trek ’from the Soviet Union,
Journal of Mennonite Studies, Volume 16, 1998, pp 59-75
Huebert, H. T., Hierschau: An Example of Russian Mennonite Life, Springfield Publishers,
Winnipeg, Canada, 1986, pp 329-335
Mennonite Historical Atlas, pp 68, 139, 140, 147
226
227
The Great Trek 1943-1945
33. BERLIN ESCAPE
JANUARY 30 - 31, 1947
Yalta is a beautiful Crimean resort city on the shore of the Black Sea. Here the
major leaders of the Allies, Franklin D. Roosevelt, Winston Churchill and Joseph Stalin,
met on February 4-1 1 , 1 945, to decide the fate of Europe after the demanded “unconditional
surrender” of Nazi Germany would go in to effect. A few words and signatures affected the
lives of millions of people, condemning many to endless suffering or death. The Elbe River
was designated as the dividing line between East and West. There were to be American,
British, French and Russian zones of occupation. Berlin itself, while well within the
Russian zone, would also be divided into similar zones. The principle of repatriation of
citizens was accepted. Of course all displaced people would want to go back to their
country of origin. It did not seem to enter the thinking of the Western Allies that there
might be thousands, likely millions of refugees who would like to escape from their
oppressive “homes.”
When the war ended it finally dawned on some of the occupying forces that the
relationship between the Soviets and many of the displaced refugees was anything but
cordial! The Russians were, of course, sending everyone from within their own zone back
to their homes or into exile. They were also swooping through the western zones and
repatriating citizens, usually definitely against their will, and often by force. The American
military then put into force the actual stipulations of the Yalta Conference. This clearly
stated that forced repatriation could only take place for those refugees found in German
military uniforms, those who had deserted the Soviet armed forces after the start of the war,
those who had provided direct aid to the German military, and those who had committed
war crimes. The Soviets would have to provide written proof of these charges in each
individual case.
A continual problem for refugees in the confusion of post-war Europe was that few
actually knew the actual facts of the Yalta agreement. The newly restated guidelines of the
American military were not effectively enforced until early in 1946, and certainly were not
common knowledge among the refugees. The Soviets, knowing both, tended to ignore
them whenever they could get away with it. Rumour and fear abounded.
While many of the 35,000 Mennonites who had managed to get to central Europe
on the Great Trek were forcibly repatriated, there were still those who had escaped the
Soviet net, even in the Eastern zones.
It is in this context that the “Berlin Escape” occurred.
*
*
*
John Kroeker, son of the Russian Mennonite theologian, Jakob Kroeker, had moved
to the United States, and married there. He returned to Germany in 1939 to visit his aging
228
parents, then was unable to leave because of the start of the war. He had lived in Berlin
since 1940, working for the SS in some clerical capacity. In 1944 he visited many of the
recently arrived Mennonite evacuees, likely in the Warthegau area. At the end of the war
he continued his contacts with the Russian Mennonite refugees, and worked hard to register
as many of them as he could. He established a small office in Berlin, called it the “Merino
Centre,” and gave himself the title of “Provisional Representative of the Mennonite Central
Committee.” Through his personal contacts and extensive travel throughout the Soviet zone
Kroeker managed to collect a large number of refugees in the relative safety of the
American zone. He had a card printed with his name and office on it, which seemed to
function as identity card to help the refugees in their travels. Kroeker housed the increasing
number of refugees in a partially destroyed building at Viktoria Luise Platz, but also
obtained help from the United Nations Relief and Rehabilitation Administration [UNRAA],
as well as the American and British military officials. He contacted the Mennonite Central
Committee headquarters in North America. Kroeker, however, could not solve the long
term problem for the Mennonites, especially arranging for transport to another country.
C. F. Klassen came to Berlin in December of 1945, and promised that the MCC
would do what was possible, particularly in the sending of relief supplies. Robert Kreider
visited in April of 1946 and negotiated with the American military authorities and with
Kroeker. He pointed out that Kroeker could not be officially appointed by the MCC
because of his blemished SS related work record, and his problem with alcohol. Kreider
assumed that the American military was not about to turn the refugees over to the Soviets,
despite the demands for repatriation. He also felt that someone needed to be appointed by
the MCC to work on the only satisfactory long term solution, emigration.
In the meantime more and more refugees were collecting in Berlin. A total of 21 1
had been admitted to a UNRAA camp in Zehlendorf in Berlin, but more were arriving at
Viktoria Luise Platz all the time, by June of 1946 another 125.
One day Peter Dyck received a telephone call at the MCC office in Amsterdam. It
was from an American, Lieutenant Colonel W. B. Stinson, Chief of the Displaced Persons
division in Berlin. He had cut the red tape for Peter to get a temporary permit to come to
Berlin to help solve the refugee problem. This would entail looking after the refugees while
they were in Berlin, but more importantly arranging for a country for them to emigrate to,
and transportation to get them there. Peter arrived in Berlin on June 12, 1946, his wife
Elfrieda followed on July 4.
Peter and Elfrieda set about their almost unsurmountable task with enthusiasm.
Elfrieda stayed at the camp, and played a key role in its day to day management. Peter tried
to achieve the long term goals, making arrangements for the eventual emigration.
As the number of refugees grew, more and more housing was required. The
American military simply took Peter to an area of Berlin and asked him which houses he
wanted. The first was Ringstrasse 107, but eventually a total of 12 houses were needed for
the camp. An office was arranged, a central kitchen was set up. Since they had no ovens,
arrangements were made with a local baker to bake bread. His payment, much more useful
than money, was with MCC flour. Obtaining relief supplies from the Amsterdam MCC
warehouse was a problem until a deal was made with the Dutch Red Cross. Their
229
ambulances needed to go to Berlin to pick up patients, but they travelled there empty! So
now they went to Berlin loaded with MCC supplies, then went back to Holland with
patients. Refugee watchmen were arranged - who also kept an eye and an ear open to
anyone who might be lurking on the surrounding streets. If they spoke Plautdietsch they
were undoubtedly “ours.” Elfrieda worked on the menus, to vary them as much as possible
within the scope of the MCC supplies.
There were 300 children in the camp, as well as refugee teachers. A bombed out
school in the area was obtained. The teachers worked out curriculum and lesson plans. All
children from age six to fifteen were in classes every week day. But there were no supplies.
Younger students began by learning to count and memorizing the alphabet, the teachers
illustrated history and geography to the older ones by telling stories of the countries they
had come through. They memorized scripture passages and songs, and did mental
arithmetic.
One of the smallest houses was converted into a hospital, with one room for men,
another for women, one for children and one for infectious diseases. Refugee nurses and
some additional girls volunteered their services. Seriously ill patients were sent to the
regular city hospitals.
While Peter Dyck was not a minister, he was still asked to officiate at funerals, and
even at a wedding. With continued stay at the camp religious life needed to be organized
more officially. There were few ministers among the refugees, since they had been special
targets of Communist suppression. Added to this was the complication of having two major
groups represented - Kirchliche and Mennonite Brethren. A church council was elected
consisting of five ministers, 3 Kirchliche, 2 Mennonite Brethren. After lengthy discussion
it was decided that communion should be celebrated together, but that Peter Dyck should
preside. They could not obtain wine or grape juice, and did not want to use ersatz coffee,
milk or water, so they settled on something they could easily purchase at the US Army PX
store - Coca Cola!
The group planned a Thanksgiving service, decorating an old gym. Sunday
morning, November 21, 1946 was an exciting time. Children and young people recited
poems, there was special music and a sermon. Even more special was the celebration of
Christmas. The women obtained permission to use the bakery from 12 midnight to 4 AM
to bake cookies and peppemuts. Dough was mixed in the camp kitchen, then every night
a different group went for the special privilege of baking. Young adults made gifts for the
children with the very limited tools and materials they had. Large boxes of gifts had also
arrived from a Glick family in Pennsylvania. On Christmas Eve the choirs sang, youngsters
recited poems, there was a short drama, the Christmas story was read from Luke chapter 2
and there was a sermon. For many of the younger people this was their first Christmas
program ever. Two Americans, Colonel Stinson and Major Thompson, who were standing
at the back of the gym, could not keep their eyes dry.
But the time had come to resettle the refugees. Peter Dyck had left no stone
unturned for all possible negotiations, but there were difficulties at all levels - to get the
refugees out of the Russian zone, to find a country for them to go to, and to find
transportation to get them there. Dyck and Colonel Stinson sent in lists of the refugees to
230
the Russians, pointing out that if they could not individually prove that there were war
criminals, deserters or collaborators they should, according to the Yalta Conference, be
allowed to leave. Not a word from the Soviets.
In December of 1 946, with an ever increasing number of mouths to feed, it was time
for action. C. F. Klassen and Peter Dyck went to the US Army headquarters in Frankfurt.
After a long meeting a three part deal was hammered out. The military would transport the
refugees by train, through the Soviet zone, to any port in Europe that would be designated.
The MCC would find a country that would accept the refugees, and would arrange for ocean
transportation. As soon as the MCC was ready they were to notify Stinson, and “Operation
Mennonite” would begin.
Klassen, Dyck and the MCC office in Akron, Pennsylvania, immediately went into
action. First choice of the refugees was Canada, but Canada refused to accept them without
careful individual scrutiny. The reactions of USA and Mexico were the same. Only poor
Paraguay, having had good experience with previous Mennonite immigrants, accepted the
challenge.
Now to find
an ocean transport.
Ships were hard to
come by, a large
amount of shipping
having been sunk
by submarines
during the war.
Finally, through the
intervention of
Queen Wilhelmina
of the Netherlands,
arrangements were
made with the
Holland- America
Line to charter the Volendam. The ship was large, with a capacity of several thousand
passengers. The charter fee was $375,000. The MCC would not, even if every Berlin
refugee were aboard, send a ship across the ocean only half full. Dyck and Klassen went
to the Funkkaseme camp operated by UNRAA at Munich and asked the Mennonite
refugees if they were willing to go to Paraguay. Surprisingly there were soon 1,000 names
on the list of those prepared to go. This thousand, plus several hundred from Holland and
the Berlin refugees would nicely fill the Volendam. Things were falling into place.
Back in Berlin work started on preparing travel documents. Peter and Elfrieda were
called in to see the American military, and the arrangements were confirmed. The military
would obtain the train, the MCC would have the travel documents completed and have the
people packed, ready to go - but to keep the plans secret. The following Sunday all the
baggage was inspected just to be sure.
Six days later, on Saturday, Colonel Stinson called with the shattering news, “The
The Ocean Liner Volendam
231
deal is off!” At a subsequent meeting Peter was informed that General Lucius Clay, a
higher ranking four-star general, had called off the deal. Peter drafted a careful letter to
General Clay, pointing out the events that had led up to the situation, mentioning that in 400
years of Mennonite history there had been key individuals that had determined the fate of
many people. He requested that General Clay now be the person to help the 1 ,200 refugees
trapped in Berlin. Peter hand delivered the letter to General Clay’s office, and waited.
After an hour or two he was invited in. Clay pointed out the risks of an “incident”if the
train rescue were attempted, with the possible loss of lives. Airlift was discussed, but when
all the obstacles were reviewed, was abandoned. Finally the mutually agreed upon decision
was to consult Washington. The answer came back quickly, “You have permission to move
the Mennonite refugees, who are Russian citizens, through the Soviet zone, provided the
Russians agree.” Was this a “yes” or a “no”? Would the Russians ever agree?
Then Peter and
Elfrieda went back to
the refugees in Berlin
and outlined what had
happened. The meeting
began with prayer, then
Peter discussed the
problem, breaking down
crying. Three hundred
or so refugees had
already boarded the
Volendam before it left
Rotterdam for
Bremerhaven. A train
was carrying 1,000
refugees north from
Munich, and they were
to board the ship at
Bremerhaven. As it stood the Berlin group would obviously not reach Bremerhaven. Peter
was comforted by the very disappointed refugees. Some spoke of God’s leading in their
lives, of the blessed time they had in Berlin, and that they ought not despair.
The next morning Peter took a train to Bremerhaven. The Volendam was already
docked, with the Dutch refugees and MCC personnel on board. Soon the Munich train
arrived and those refugees were added to the passengers. Would the Volendam have to
leave half empty? Should the MCC find other refugees to fill the empty berths? The
captain announced that he was ready to lift anchor. But there was still time - they had 36
hours in port before penalties had to be paid. The people were gathered on the top deck for
a farewell service - without the Berlin group. It was to be a joyous occasion, but the
singing was half-hearted, with many people crying. C. F. Klassen and Peter found it hard
to find appropriate words.
Meanwhile in Berlin Elfrieda had tried to carry on. Sadness overshadowed all
Peter and Elfrieda Dyck, pictures from an MCC brochure
printed in 1946
232
activities in the camp. At a meeting with Colonel Stinson, Elfrieda was asked that just in
case they should still go, how long would it take the refugees to be ready? “Just give me
one hour!” she replied.
That evening the people asked Elfrieda around supper time if it would be alright to
have a prayer meeting. “That’s a very good idea, ’’she answered. The refugees earnestly
prayed for a miracle. The Volendam was to leave the next day, so only a miracle would do!
That night, as Elfrieda was going from house to house she noticed an elderly man, a Mr.
Sawatzky, setting his suitcases out into the corridor. She asked him what he was doing.
He replied that since he had prayed for a miracle he may as well get ready for it to happen.
Word of Sawatzky’s faith spread, so others also began packing.
The next day, Thursday, January 30, Colonel Stinson called early in the morning.
General Clay was going to see Marshal Sokolovsky, his Russian military counterpart, that
day. Stinson suggested that Elfrieda should stay in her apartment near the telephone.
Finally at 3:40 PM a call came from Captain Allen, General Clay’s secretary, asking for
Peter Dyck. Told that he was in Bremerhaven, she hung up. If they could not reach Peter
Dyck there, they would call back.
In Bremerhaven the joyless farewell service had just concluded when about 4 PM
two American Military Police came marching up. “Are you Mr. Dyck?” they asked. They
took him down the gangplank, onto a jeep and to a hotline telephone at their harbor post.
The woman on the telephone asked if the Volendam was still there. “Yes,” Peter replied,
“the Volendam is still here...” “Can you hold it?” she asked, “...your Mennonite people in
Berlin are cleared. They can go along on your ship. Just hold it. Wait for them!” Peter
raced back to the ship with the news . The captain was asked to delay departure until further
notice. Peter announced over the ship intercom so everyone could hear, “God is now going
to do a miracle. The Berlin group is coming!”
Then Peter and a number of others hopped onto a car and raced for Berlin, happy
that the autobahn had no speed limit. They were stopped at the Border crossing at
Helmstedt. “Is one of you Peter Dyck?” enquired the British officer. “I have a message for
you,” he continued, “The train is gone.” Nothing more. Not sure of exactly what was
meant they raced on.
In Berlin Elfrieda had waited. Since nothing seemed to be happening, and it was
almost 6 PM, she ran warm water for a bath. The telephone rang. It was Colonel Stinson’s
secretary. “You are to report to headquarters immediately!” When she got to the office
over the icy streets she was ushered in. Ten or twelve officers were already in the room.
Stinson said, “Mrs. Dyck, you probably won’t even want to sit down before I tell you what
it’s all about. The Mennonites are leaving Berlin tonight. You asked for one hour to get
your people ready; I’ll give you one and a half.” He continued, “At 8:00 PM tonight you
will have all your people with their baggage standing outside their houses. Army trucks
will pick them up and take them to the railroad station Lichterfelde West. Please have men
organized into work groups to help with the loading and unloading of the baggage.. .and
please tell your people to be quiet: if possible no talking in the streets.”
Stinson then announced to the men in the room, “This is Operation Mennonite, and
two things are of utmost importance: speed and a low profile.” Lichterfelde West railroad
233
station was to be cordoned off, twelve ten-ton trucks were to report to Ringstrasse 1 07 not
later than 8:00 PM. Two days rations were to be made available for 1,115 passengers.
Large cans were to be supplied so that each train car had an “emergency” toilet. As Elfrieda
was leaving the office C. F. Klassen telephoned. He informed her that Peter was on his way
to Berlin.
Elfrieda sped to the camp; she had to notify 1,115 people in a hurry. At the first
house everything was dark - electricity had been turned off in that sector of the city to
conserve energy. In the darkness she informed the refugees of the good news. God had
answered their prayers! Now they had to abandon their half eaten suppers and pack in
darkness, to be ready with their suitcases, out on the street, by 8 PM. All the houses and
the sick bay were notified, and work gangs were organized. The group was ready when the
trucks and two ambulances arrived. One ambulance was sent to a city hospital to pick up
a Mrs. Janzen, who was on the maternity ward, in labour. Perhaps the appearance of the
soldiers frightened her so much that the labour pains stopped. She delivered a week later.
A technical problem delayed departure. The trucks were too big. They could not
turn around at the railroad station, so smaller ones were sent for. Then one of them
developed a flat tire, and blocked the way to the station. Robert Kreider was at the station,
fitting batteries into forty flashlights, to be distributed to the forty boxcars. He telephoned
the border with the message for Peter Dyck, that the train was leaving. Stinson and Elfrieda
went back to the camp to make sure that nobody was left. Every house was empty. They
arrived back at the station; all the people were on board. Departure was set for 1 2 midnight.
Having received the message of the train departure at Helmstedt, Peter had
continued on to Berlin. When he arrived at Ringstrasse 107 it was empty. He and his
companions woke up the German housekeeper at the office and asked her to cook them a
fast meal. They were going to head back to Bremerhaven, hopefully beating the train to its
destination. Suddenly the telephone rang. It was Robert Kreider. “We’re at the
Lichterfelde West railroad station. If you hurry you’ll make the train.” he said. Rushing
past the astonished house keeper, who had plates full of food in her hands, they headed for
the station. Peter greeted Colonel Stinson and jumped onto the train.
Large loaves of bread were stacked inside the boxcars. There were bails of straw
and cans of water. Stove pipes stuck through the partially open doors. Just behind the
locomotive was the only passenger car, with the sick people and Elfrieda on it. Moments
after Peter boarded there was a short whistle, a jerk, and they were off! It was 2 AM,
Friday, January 3 1 .
Peter Reimer, a 1 7 year old boy at the time, remembers that evening. “The last
evening we were eating supper. Suddenly, bang, it came. You can go! It didn’t take long.
The military trucks came by and we were loaded on, and away we went to the train station.
We were loaded onto train boxcars. An American soldier was standing at the door of each
car. The train left late in the evening.”
The train stopped; it was bright sunshine outside. Peter jumped out of the train and
landed knee-deep in snow. He inquired of the engineer where they were. “Helmstedt,” he
answered. Peter asked “...how far are we from the border?” The engineer replied, “Two
metres. ..if I go two more metres my cow catcher will be in the British zone.” Peter then
234
wondered out loud if it would not be possible to go ahead just a little further. He received
a long lecture about the meaning of red and green lights, and that there was the additional
safety of a little arm that gave signals. Peter suddenly thought that even engineers might
be hungry, and tossed him a few loaves of bread. He still did not move the train, but was
much more friendly.
Up ahead on other tracks the Dycks could see men wearing heavy coats and broad
lapels checking the trains, car by car. What would these Soviet inspectors say when they
reached the Mennonite refugees?
Then there was a click. The arm came down, and the light turned green! The
engineer nodded and reached for the throttle. A slight jerk, and the train moved ahead.
Peter jumped onto the train, and it moved ahead perhaps half a mile, then stopped. They
were now in the British zone. Peter jumped off the train again and ran from boxcar to
boxcar. “We are out!” he shouted forty times. The entire train started singing “Nun danket
alle Gotf ’ [Now Thank We All Our God].
By 2:30 AM the next morning the train pulled alongside the Volendam in
Bremerhaven. It was decided to let the passengers and the ship crew sleep until morning.
They boarded early on Saturday, February 1 . This time it was truly a happy event. Each
person received a hot steaming mug of cocoa, and was escorted to the appropriate berth.
The Munich and Holland groups were eager to meet their relatives and friends. In all, of
the 1,115 people who escaped from Berlin, 928 boarded the Volendam for Paraguay, the
others remaining in West Germany. At 4 PM on February 1 the Volendam lifted anchor and
sailed out of Bremerhaven, heading for Buenos Aires. On board were 2,203 refugees,
accompanied by Peter and Elfrieda Dyck.
Siegfried Janzen stayed in Berlin to clean up after the hurried departure. MCC food
supplies were disposed of. Houses were de-requisitioned, and arrangements were made for
any late stragglers who might show up.
Peter Dyck sent a letter of thanks to General Lucius D. Clay, and received this reply,
“Your letter of 9 July made me very happy, not because I was able in a small way to help
the Mennonite refugees to leave Berlin, but to know they have found a home. They are fine
people and deserve the opportunity to live as free men.”
*
*
*
To Peter and Elfrieda Dyck, and to the 1,1 15 Mennonite refugees, it appeared that
God had directly intervened, and had done a miracle. The Red Sea had been parted and
crossed. Exactly how God accomplished this miracle is not certain. Others feel that there
is a logical explanation of the anatomy of this miracle. There is documentation to suggest
that General Lucius Clay and Marshall Sokolovsky were on reasonably cordial terms. Did
the Soviet allow the refugees to be transported as an unofficial act of mutual respect and
cooperation, or did he actually sign a document at a party, partially under the influence, to
allow the passage? In any case General Clay perceived that he had met the terms stipulated
235
by Washington. Once the consent, apparent or actual was obtained, he moved swiftly. All
necessary preparations were made, including the placing of armed guards on the train in
case an incident might occur. Probably both interpretations of the episode are correct. God
performed a miracle, and used people to do it!
Sources:
Dyck, Peter and Elfrieda, Up From the Rubble, Herald Press, Scottdale, USA, and Kitchener,
Canada, 1991, pp 132-223. This was one of the principle sources of information.
Epp, Frank H., Mennonite Exodus, Canadian Mennonite Relief and Immigration Coucil,
Altona, Canada, 1962, pp 369, 376-383
Regehr, T. D., Anatomy of a Mennonite Miracle: The Berlin Rescue of 30-31 January, 1947,
Journal of Mennonite Studies, Volume 9: 1991, pp 1 1-33. The question of what
sources to believe becomes an issue. One would have to be naive to assume that all
military documentation is accurate
Reimer, Peter, Winnipeg, Canada, Personal Interview, August, 1999
Smucker, Barbara, Henry’s Red Sea, Herald Press, Scottdale, USA, and Kitchener, Canada,
1955, pp 1-108
Background Information:
C. F. Klassen
“Nun danket alle Gott”
236
CORNELIUS F. KLASSEN
[1894 - 1954]
Cornelius Franz Klassen was bom on August 3, 1894, in a sod hut on a chutor along the
Tok River, near the Neu Samara Colony. He was the eldest of fourteen children of Franz F. and
Justina [Wiebe] Klassen. A younger brother Heinrich [1900] became editor of the Mennonitische
Rundschau and manager of the Christian Press in Winnipeg. His youngest sister Elfrieda [1917]
married Peter Dyck, and was, together with Cornelius, intimately involved with the rescue of 1 , 1 1 5
Mennonite refugees from Berlin in 1947. Soon after the birth of Cornelius the family moved into
the Neu Samara Colony, to the village of Donskoye, where Franz began operation of a general
store, which he continued to run successfully until 1918.
Cornelius enjoyed his youth in the midst of a growing family. He and his parents
apparently attended the dedication service of the new Lugovsk Mennonite Brethren sanctuary in
1901, being some of the 3,000 guests who participated. He was a good student, so after having
completed the elementary village school in 1907, his parents sent him to the Zentralschule in
Karassan, Crimea, where he could board with his aunt. He graduated in 1 9 1 0, then stayed at home
for one year to work in the family business. While at home in Donskoye he committed his life to
Christ, a commitment which was the mainspring of his subsequent endeavors. He was baptized in
the Tok River by Johann Braun on the basis of his faith, and joined the Lugovsk Mennonite
Brethren Church.
In the autumn of 191 1 Cornelius went to Moscow where, hoping to study on the side, he
worked in the office of the gas motor company of Otto Deutz. His work was successful, but he had
little time to study. Wanting to prepare himself for university to enter medical studies, he moved
to St. Petersburg. Here he met Peter F. Froese, an engineering student, with whom he was later to
collaborate in attempting to help the Mennonites in Russia.
Studies were interrupted by the outbreak of World War I. Cornelius was drafted early in
1915 and chose alternative service in the Schwarzwald Forestry Camp. The first year, because of
his poor health, he worked as a gardener, the second as secretary to the chief forester, and during
the third year his comrades elected him as their representative to the government and to Mennonite
conferences. In this capacity he attended the All-Russian Mennonite Congress held in Ohrloff in
August, 1917. There he met Benjamin Unruh, with whom he later worked. At a meeting of
forestry and medical orderly representatives in Moscow, Cornelius and Peter Froese were asked
to approach the Kerensky government to affect the release of a number of Mennonite medical
orderlies who had been imprisoned as spies. They were successful in the negotiations.
Cornelius was demobilized in December, 1917, and retumedhome. In 1918herepresented
the Neu Samara and Orenburg Mennonite Colonies in negotiations with Moscow, then in 1919 he
went to the capital of the Bashkir Republic for similar negotiations. In 1920 the representatives of
the Ural and Siberian Mennonite Colonies elected Cornelius and Peter Froese to plead their causes
in Moscow. Here Klassen and Froese also worked with an all-Russian relief committee. One of
its meetings in 1921 was raided by the secret police, and Cornelius was jailed in the famous
Lubianka Prison, but then, after interrogation, released. On the day of his release Alvin J. Miller,
of the MCC, arrived in Moscow, attempting to arrange the flow of relief supplies from the North
American to the Russian Mennonites. Cornelius acted as his translator in negotiations with the
Kremlin, and in time became his helper and colleague in the work of feeding and clothing
thousands of Mennonites in their time of need.
In 1923 the Mennonites organized the Verband der Buerger Hollaendischer Herkunft
237
[VBHH] to represent the Ukrainian colonies, where B. B. Janz was the chief executive. Those from
the Ural region and Siberia formed the Allrussischer Mennonitischer Landwirtschaftlicher Verein
[AMLV], with Cornelius, Peter
Froese and H. F. Dyck on the
executive. The two organizations
attempted to improve the conditions
in the Mennonite colonies, but in
time increasingly, together with
David Toews in Canada, worked to
pave the way for the mass migration
of the mid 1920s. They worked
tirelessly to overcome innumerable
obstacles; about 22,500 Mennonites
eventually emigrated to Canada.
During this time Cornelius
travelled widely, but was based in
Moscow. His brother Gerhard was
staying with him to receive medical
help in Moscow, but died April 22,
1923, of tuberculosis. Back in Neu
Samara his father Franz died January
21, 1924. In 1925 he accompanied his mother and seven younger siblings to London on their way
to Canada, but then returned to Moscow because he felt the work for his people was not yet
completed.
The MCC had an office in Moscow, and one of its workers was Mary Brieger, Alvin
Miller’s secretary. She was of Baltic German Lutheran descent, and a devout Christian. She had
married, but soon after the birth of the first child it became obvious that her husband was unfaithful,
so a divorce resulted. As Cornelius and Mary became better acquainted, they fell in love. They
were married on September 11, 1 926 in the Menno Center
of Moscow. Johannes Klassen, Mennonite Brethren
minister from Alt Samara performed the marriage
ceremony. Realizing the difficulty a member marrying a
divorced person would present to the church, Cornelius
withdrew from the Lugovsk Mennonite Brethren
congregation. It should be noted that in 1929, when he
was already in Canada, Cornelius received a warm letter
from the leader of the Lugovsk church, Bernhard Bargen,
informing him that by unanimous decision he had been
reinstated into the church.
Cornelius and Mary had a total of five children.
Harold [1923] was Mary’s son by the previous marriage,
then there were Walfried [1927], Herbert [1929], Irmgard
and Justina [twins, bom 1931]. Justina was bom partially
paralyzed and died at the age of two and one half years.
By 1928 it became evident that there was not
likely to be any further significant help for the colonies, nor emigration, so the Klassens applied
for exit visas. To their surprise the applications were granted, and on September 23 they left Russia
with their two sons, Harold and Walfried. They visited Riga, Mary’s home, then Germany,
The executive of the AMLV [left to right] H. F. Dyck,
Peter Froese and Cornelius Klassen
238
eventually sailing for Canada from Liverpool on November 30. They arrived in Winnipeg,
Manitoba, on December 12, and joined the rest of the Klassen family in a rented house on Donald
Street. Much later Cornelius was informed that shortly after their departure his co-worker and
close friend Peter Froese had been arrested and sentenced to ten years in prison. The GPU could
not understand how Cornelius had slipped through the net.
Cornelius could not remain inactive for long. In 1929 he attended an MCC meeting, and
thereafter visited many American churches on its behalf. In 1 930 he went to the second Mennonite
World Relief Conference held in Danzig, tavelling with David Toews. They both made
presentations, Cornelius about the situation of the Mennonite churches in Russia since 1 920, Toews
about the immigration of Russian Mennonites to Canada. Upon his return Cornelius received the
difficult assignment by the Canadian Board of Colonization and Immigration to help collect the
Reiseschuld [travel debt]. This was a taxing, sometimes thankless and unpleasant, but often
rewarding work. In 1 936 Cornelius again travelled to the Mennonite World Conference with David
Toews, this time to Amsterdam. He took the opportunity to visit Mennonites in Holland, Germany
and Switzerland, and also renewed acquaintances with friends and relatives in Latvia.
The Klassens had, in the meantime moved several times in Winnipeg, finally living at 476
Powers Street. On June 26, 1933 mother Justina Klassen died. On August 4, 1935 Mary was
baptized upon confession of her faith, Rev. C. N. Hiebert performing the baptism in the Assiniboine
River. Cornelius and Mary then both joined the North End [later Elmwood] Mennonite Brethren
Church.
With the outbreak of World War II the question of the non-resistant status loomed for the
Mennonites of Canada. Together with David Toews, B. B. Janz and other Mennonite leaders,
negotiations were carried on with the Canadian government, opening the way for alternative
service. At the same time the Mennonite Central Relief Committee [MCRC] was organized, with
Cornelius elected as secretary treasurer. During the war years Cornelius was therefore occupied
by the work of the MCRC, alternative service for military draftees, and the collection of the
Reiseschuld.
By 1 94 1 the MCRC had sent the first of many shipments of clothing to help the war victims
in Britain. In August of 1 945 the MCC
[the parent agency of MCRC]
commissioned Cornelius to go to
Europe to help deal with the refugee
situation. He was to look for and help
Mennonite refugees, to set up camps,
and to deal with organizations such as
the United Nations Relief and
Rehabilitaion Administration
[UNRRA]. In this capacity he travelled
widely in Britain, Holland, Belgium,
Denmark, Germany and France. This
brought him directly into negotiations
for the Berlin Mennonite refugees,
where he, together with Peter and
Elfrieda Dyck [Elfneda, his youngest
sister] played a significant part in the
miracle of the escape of 1 , 1 1 5 across the Soviet zone . He worked tirelessly with the emigration of
thousands of refugees to Canada, Paraguay, Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay.
While Cornelius was busy in Europe the family moved to British Columbia, arriving in
239
Mission on April 23, 1948. His time was divided between his family, visits to the churches in
North America, and travels to Europe. By 1952 he was dealing with the Canadian authorities
regarding entry visas for the more difficult refugee cases.
Cornelius spoke at the closing program of the
European Mennonite Bible School in Bienenberg,
Switzerland on January 28, 1954, then in March took the
family with him on a trip to Geneva and the Swiss Alps. On
May 7 he was driving from Bremen in Germany to a peace
conference which was to be held in Heerewegen, Holland,
where he was to give a lecture. On the way he felt some
chest pain, but continued to drive [very fast, as he apparently
usually did], until he reached Gronau, Germany. There he
saw a doctor, and was immediately admitted to hospital with
a mild heart attack. Treatment seemed to improve his
condition, and that evening he had a one and a half hour
meeting with Wilhelm Regehr, director of a refugee home.
He read and prepared his lecture until 10 PM, telling the
nurse that he needed to reach Heerewegen the following day.
Then he fell asleep. At 12 midnight he had another, much
more serious heart attack. His condition worsened, and he
died at 1 1 AM on May 8, 1954. His wife Mary had been
sent for, but arrived shortly after his death.
A memorial service was held on May 12 at the Nord-
Ost Evangelical Lutheran Church in Frankfurt. It was led by Cornelius Wall, and attended by
representatives from the MCC, and from the Mennonites of Germany, Holland, Switzerland and
France. At the burial service the following day C. N. Hiebert and Gerhard Hein spoke. Cornelius
was interred in a small Mennonite cemetery near Leutesdorf\Neuwied in Germany. Another
memorial service was held on May 16 in the Elmwood Mennonite Brethren Church in Winnipeg,
where Cornelius had long been a member. Speakers paying tribute included A. H. Unruh,
B. B. Janz, J. J. Thiessen, C. A. Defehr, J. A. Toews and H. H. Janzen. Telegrams and flowers
flowed in to both Germany and Winnipeg from many parts of the world.
Dr. Walter Quiring aptly assessed the life and work of Cornelius Franz Klassen. He wrote,
“The history of our people after the war will portray C. F. Klassen as a man who, in times of crisis,
has served with skill and sacrificial dedication, and that often bordering on self sacrifice... at his
grave side stand not only his wife and children, but also an uncountable crowd of sorrowing people
from the wide world, from wherever there are Mennonites.”
As mentioned previously, a firm faith in Jesus Christ was the mainspring of Cornelius’
thoughts and actions. His motto “Gott kann” [God is able] inspired many with whom he came in
contact.
Sources:
Epp, Frank H., Mennonite Exodus, Canadian Mennonite Relief and Immigration Council,
Altona, Canada, 1962, many references throughout, especially pp 376-427
Klassen Family book, The Franz and Justina Klassen Family Book, 1998, pp 9-24
Klassen, H. F., Cornelius Klassen, Mennonitische Rundschau, 19 May 1954, pp 1, 4, 5
Klassen, Herbert and Maureen, Ambassador to His People, Kindred Press, Winnipeg, Canada,
and Hillsboro, USA, 1990, pp 19-36
News Report, Mennonitische Rundschau, 12 May 1954, p 1
Cornelius F. Klassen [1894-1954]
240
News Report, Gedenkfeier in Winnipeg fuer Bruder C. F. Klassen, Mennonitische Rundschau,
19 May 1954, p 8
Quiring, Walter, C. F. Klassen, Mennonitische Rundschau, 19 May 1954, pp 1, 5
Springer Nelson P., and Klassen, A. J., Mennonite Bibliography 1631-1961, Herald Press,
Scottdale, USA, and Kitchener, Canada, 1977, p 28
Toews, J. A., pp 92, 1 19, 121, 355, 388, 395, 396, 399
Tributes to C. F. Klassen, Mennonitische Rundschau, 26 May 1954, pp 2, 3
241
“NUN DANKET ALLE GOTT”
[Now Thank We All Our God]
This hymn seems to have been a theme song for Mennonites leaving the Soviet Union. It
is specifically mentioned as having been sung on a number of occasions, and appeared to have
expressed musically what was in the souls of the people.
The first group of Molotschna refugees had left Lichtenau by train on June 23, 1 924. They
travelled through Alexandrovsk, Kursk, Orel, Smolensk, Vitebsk, Polotsk, the finally approached
the Soviet border at Sebej. There they waited for 24 hours to complete the emigration lists, and the
baggage was inspected. The night of June 29-30 the train passed the Russian border into Latvia,
stopping at Zilupe. Many who had gone through difficult experiences in their former homes could
now finally breathe a sigh of relief. Early in the morning in an open air service of thanks to God
was held, expressing gratefulness for his wonderful leading. With joyful hearts the group sang
“Nun danket alle Gott. ”
A total of 13,000 to 15,000 desperate Mennonites collected in the suburbs of Moscow in
late 1929, hoping to get exit visas. Of these, somewhat over 6,000 were accepted by Germany.
They travelled from Moscow to Riga, then on to three camps in Germany. On arrival in Riga they
prayed, and sang “ Nun danket alle Gott” and each had a warm bowl of soup.
When the train, loaded with 40 freight cars full of Berlin refugees pulled out of the Soviet
zone in January, 1947, into the British zone of occupation at Helmstedt, it stopped. Peter Dyck
jumped off the train and ran from car to car shouting “We are Out!” The entire train then started
to sing “Nun danket alle Gott.”
Words of the hymn were written by Martin Rinkart [1586-1649], probably in 1636. Music
was composed by Johann Crueger [1598-1662] in 1648. The scriptural base for the words is found
in I Chronicles 29:13
Now therefore, our God, we thank thee,
And praise thy glorious name.
This hymn was long a part of the Lutheran choral tradition, ft is quite possible that
Mennonites heard their Lutheran neighbours in Prussia singing this hymn, liked it, and incorporated
it into their own tradition. The Geistreiches Gesangbuch published by Gerhard Wiebe in 1767
contains 150 Psalms, and 505 spiritual songs, including “Nun danket alle Gott ” in the first section.
Mennonites brought this songbook, and this song with them from Prussia to Russia. At least seven
editions of Geistreiches Gesangbuch were published in Russia.
The emigrants took this hymn along with them when they moved to North America. It was
originally in German, but the current hymnals of the Mennonite Brethren and the General
Conference of Mennonites have the English version. Translation into English was by Catherine
Winkworth [1829-1878]. Her dates indicate that the English version likely existed before the
Mennonites brought the German original of the hymn to North America. A commonly used
harmonization is by Felix Mendelsohn [1809-1847].
Sources:
Letkemann, Peter, The Hymnody and Choral Music of Mennonites in Russia, 1789-1915,
unpublished Doctoral Thesis, University of Toronto, 1985, pp 266, 500
242
The “Red Gate,” on the Russian-Latvian border, through which
many Mennonites passed when they left the Soviet Union
243
244
INDEX
This index lists all geographic names and all personal names mentioned in this
book. Many other subjects are also listed. The text and the maps are indexed, as well as
special notes that follow some of the chapters, but of course not the bibliographic
references. Some publications are mentioned in the text; these are then indexed, but not
when they occur in the bibliography.
“Mennonite” has not been indexed, it being such a ubiquitous word in this
manuscript, nor has “Russia\USSR\Soviet,” again because it would occur on almost every
page. Russia\USSR has been indexed only where it is directly mentioned on a map.
“Europe” has not been indexed, because of its frequent and often non-specific use.
Generally specific congregations have not been listed, rather the townWillage in
which they are located, unless there is an extensive description, for example Friedensfeld
Mennonite Brethren Church.
The principal person is usually listed without additional description, whereas this
person’s father, if they have the same name, is listed as Sr.[senior], and the son as
Jr.[junior]. Sometimes there are a number ofpeople with the same name who may not even
be related. If it is certain that they are different people, they are simply listed in order of
appearance in the book.
One can not always be sure of titles which have been given to people. An instance
may be the title “Pastor,” which may actually have originally been Pfarrer, or Minister. In
this index we have used the term which occurred in the original source material.
Bold numbers are used to designate an article written specifically about that person,
occurrence or subject.
Abbreviations used in the index:
Chortitza Colony - Chor
Molotschna Colony - Mol
Neu Samara - Neu S
Sagradovka Colony - Sag
Savitaya Colony - Sav
Shumanovka - Shu
Usman Colony - Usm
245
A
Abbotsford, 178
Aberdeen, 74
Abramov, General, 163
Ackerman, 1 1 1
Afforestation, 28
Afghanistan, 63
Africa, 184
Agricultural Society, 25, 27, 28,
29
Aigun [Xigangzil], 208, 209
Aiwasowsky, artist, 114
Ak Metchet, 60, 61, 63
Akron, 23 1
Alberta, 176-178
Alberta Mennonite High School,
177
Alexander, Chinese guide, 203,
205, 206
Alexander I, Czar of Russia, 8,
14-19
Alexander II, Czar of Russia, 17,
19, 35,43
Alexander III, Czar of Russia, 19
Alexanderfeld, Kuban, 35, 43
Alexanderfeld, Sag, 161
Alexanderheim, 69
Alexanderkrone, Mol, 54, 104,
131, 163
Alexanderkrone, Sag, 161
Alexanderpol, 155
Alexanderpol, Memrik, 69
Alexandertal, Mol, 23, 69, 96
Alexanderthal, Fuerstenland, 64
Alexanderwohl, Mol, 16, 23, 35,
41,49,51,52, 119, 122, 150,
176
Alexandra, Czarina of Russia, 17
Alexandrovsk [see Zaporozhye]
Alf, Baptist Minister, 46
Allen, Captain, 233
Allies, 185, 199, 222, 226, 228
Alma Ata, 63, 82
Alt Berdyansk Forestry Station,
176
Altonau, Mol, 14, 16, 18, 108,
109, 111, 158, 166
Altonau, Sag, 161
Alt Samara Colony, xv, 104, 193,
238
AMLV, 192, 238
Amsterdam, 181, 198, 229, 239
Am Trakt Colony, xv, 59, 62,
180, 193
Amudar’ya River, 60, 63
Amur River, 129, 193, 198,
201-206, 208, 209
Anabaptist, 10, 11, 32, 79, 82, 84
Anadol Forestry Camp, 77, 84
Andrea, Inspector, 35, 43
Andreasfeld, Cor, 47, 69, 71, 73,
79
Anglican Church, 128
Annafeld, Borozenko, 87
Annenskoye, Neu S, 98
Antwerp, 55, 56, 170, 174, 185
Apanlee Estate, 135
Arab River, 166
Aral Sea, 62, 63
Argentina, 195, 226, 239
Aries River, 63
Arkhara, 209
Arctic Ocean, 217
Arkadak Colony, xv
Armenschule, 45
Arnold, Wilhelm, 197
Aschabad, 138
Asia, 59,61-63,99, 151, 180,
184,219
Assiniboine River, 239
Astrakhan, xv, 126, 133, 141
Atlantic Ocean, 170, 174
Atlantic Park, 176, 198
Aulie Ata [Dzhambul], 63
Aulie Ata Colony, 59, 60, 63
Aussiedler, 98
Australia, 68
Austria, 30, 104, 152, 227
Azov, Sea of, xv, xvii, 38, 62,
163, 173
B
Baden Baden, 131
Bachtchi-Sari, 3
Backnang, 37, 226, 227
Baedeker, Dr. Friedrich, W., 126
Baerwalde, West Prussia, 27
Bahndorf [Orlov], Memrik, 82
Bakersfield, 105
Bakhchisaray, xvii
Balkhash, Lake, 63
Baltic Sea, 6, 7, 126, 132, 135,
137, 138, 169, 173, 174, 185,
218,222, 226,227, 238
Balzer, Heinrich, 12
Baptism, Immersion, 45, 46, 49,
175
Baptist, 46, 71,89, 120, 122,
129, 193, 194
Baratov Colony, xvii
Bargen, Bernhard, 238
Bartel, Heinrich, 46
Bartel, Wilhelm, 33, 39, 46
Bartsch, Christina [Philipsen], 9
Bartsch, Jakob, 9
Bartsch, Jakob, 9
Bartsch, Johann, 1-8, 9
Bartsch, Magdalena [Laemmert],
9
Bartsch, Susanna [Laemmert], 9
Barvenkovo, 101
Basel, 104, 127, 142, 197
Basel, University of, 197
Bashkir Republic, 97, 237
Battle of the Bulge, 225
Batum, 120
Batzenhof, 197
Baumann, Pastor, 138
Becker [Bekker, Boecker], Jakob,
33, 36, 38,43,46
Begim-Tschokrak River, 144,
145, 147
Bekker, Benjamin, 36, 46
Belarus, xv
Belaya River, xv
Belfast, 185
Belgium, 239
Belgrade, 173,227
Belo Beryesovka, Shu, 208
Belogorsk, 209
Berda River, 38
Berdyansk, xvii, 32, 38, 42, 112,
137
Bergmann, Peter, 101
Bergthal Colony, xvii
Berislav, xvii, 2, 6, 7. 223, 227
Berlin, 30, 101, 104, 125, 142,
162, 174, 180, 193, 198,227,
228-236, 237, 239, 242
Bemadotte, Prince, 142
Berne, 132
Bestvater, William, 75
Bethel College, 180, 181
Bezborodko, Count Alexander,
4,7,9
Bible Conference, 117-118, 119,
122, 125, 126, 128, 129, 131
Biermann, Pfarrer, 37
Bienenberg, 240
Birobidzhan, 209
Biyuk-Onlar, 216, 217
Black Sea, xv, xvii, 6, 62, 65,
163, 173,227, 228
Blagoveshchensk, 201, 208
Blankenberg, 126
Bluecher, General Gebhard von,
48
Blue Mountains of China, 202
Blumenau, 47
Blumenau, Brazil, 195
Blumenfeld, Nepluyevka, 84, 90
Blumenhof, Borozenko, 87
246
Blumenort, Manitoba, 10
Blumenort, Mol, 158
Blumenort, Sag, 161
Blumenort, Usm, 208
Blumstein, Mol, 11, 14, 18, 51,
54, 108, 109, 168
Bochum, 120
Boese, David, 64
Boese, Peter, 54
Bogajewsky, Dr., 137
Bogomasov, Neu S, 98
Bogomasov, Owner, 97
Bohnsack, 1, 5, 7, 9
Bolsheviks [Communists], 130,
152, 162, 176, 186, 192, 201,
204, 206, 210, 230
Boone County, 55
Borissovo Colony, xvii, 210
Bornholm Island, 169, 174
Bom, Isaak, 68, 71, 77, 106
Boschmann, Elder Daniel, 97
Bote, Der, 199
Borozenko Colony, xv, xvii, 12,
64,81,87,217
Brandenburg, 32
Brandenburg, Pastor Hans, 127,
142
Brauer, Friedrich, 69
Braun, District Representative,
31
Braun, Abraham, 120
Braun, Elisabeth, 186, 187, 189
Braun, Franz, 92
Braun, Heinrich, 106
Braun, Heinrich, 106
Braun, Heinrich, 186
Braun, Heinrich J., 117, 118,
119-121, 122, 123, 132, 134,
135, 149, 150
Braun, Helena [Baergen], 119
Braun, Helena [Peters], 1 19, 120
Braun, Jakob, 1 19
Braun, Johann, 237
Braun, Maria, 135
Braun, Maria [Peters], 119
Braun, Martha [Siever], 120
Brazil, 177, 195, 198, 206, 239
Brietenau, 197
Bremen, 73, 101, 227, 240
Bremerhaven, 232-235
Brenkenhofswalde, 40
Brest-Litovsk, Treaty of, 152
Bristol, 132
Britain, 174, 228, 229, 233, 234,
235, 239, 242
British Columbia, 123, 178, 239
Brucks, J. H., 93
Bruderschule, 40-42, 45
Butyrki Prison, 162
Bucharest, 227
Budapest, 173, 227
Buenos Aires, 195, 235
Bugger, 112
Buhler, 57
Buhler, Jakob, 28
Bukhara, 63
Bukhara [city], 63
Bukhara, Emir of, 60
Bulgaria, xv, 142, 227
Bureya River, 208, 209
Burwalde, 180
Busuluk Region, 97
C
Cahir, 128
California, 57, 74, 101, 105
Canada, 17, 48, 72, 73, 75, 85,
97, 120, 123, 127, 139, 151,
167, 170, 171, 172, 176, 177,
180-186, 190, 192, 193, 195,
197, 198,201,202,214,226,
231,238, 239,240
Canadian Mennonite Board of
Colonization and Immigration,
177, 181,239
Canadian Pacific Railway [CPR],
168-172, 177, 180, 181, 185,
193
Caspian Sea, xv, 62, 138
Catherine n, Czarina of Russia,
1,3,4, 5, 7, 9, 16, 17, 19
Catholic, 38, 192, 193, 194
Caucasus Mountains, xv, 35, 43,
62, 139, 193
Central America, 184
Chabarovsk, 202
Chardzhou, 63
Cherbourg, 170, 174
Chemigovka, 153, 163, 164, 166
Chesnovkovo, 208
Chicago, 74, 101
Chimkent, 63
China, 63, 183, 202-206, 208,
209
Chingul River, 166
Choral Conductors’ Workshop,
77-80,81,84, 85, 88,90
Chord [Khorol], 82
Chortitza, Chor, 3, 158
Chortitza Colony, xiii, xv, xvii,
8, 9, 11,27, 29,35, 44, 47, 49,
73, 87, 88, 99, 101, 103, 148,
158, 162, 172,210,218,222,
223, 224, 227
Chortitza Island, 5, 7, 8
Chortitza River, 7
Christiania [Oslo], 174
Christlicher Familienkalender,
14, 16, 114, 115, 125
Churchill, Sir Winston, 228
Cincinnati, 38
Claassen, Catharina [Schmidt],
44
Claassen, David, 44
Claassen, Johann, 33-36, 38, 40,
41,42-44, 45,46, 47
Claassen, Katharina [Reimer], 43,
45
Claassen, Maria, 44
Clay, General Lucius D., 232,
233, 235
Coal dale, 176, 177, 178
Coaldale Bible School, 177
Coffman, C., 171
Communion, 33, 40, 42, 45, 46,
88, 99, 101
Communists [see Bolsheviks]
Constantinople, 120
Contends [see Kontenius]
Com, 44
Comelsen, Abraham, 33, 34, 35,
40, 42, 43, 45
Comies, Agnes [Klassen], 25, 26,
27, 29
Comies, David, 25
Comies, Johann, 12, 16, 25-29,
32,42,51
Comies, Johann [Jr.], 25, 27, 29
Comies, Johann [Sr.], 27
Comies, Maria, 27
Cossacks, 8
Crighton-Stuart, James Esq., 128
Crimea, xv, xvii, 2, 3, 5, 6, 14,
19,27, 38, 55, 88, 92, 93, 97,
111, 114, 117, 120, 122, 125,
126, 132, 153, 154, 155, 163,
173, 175, 193, 194, 197,211,
214,216,217,227,228,237
Crimean War, 53, 148
Crueger, Johann, 242
Crystal Palace, London, 104
Czechoslovakia, 173, 227
D
Dakotas, 101
Danube River, xv, 173
Danzig, 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 27,
162,173,174, 181,198,222,
226, 227, 239
Daqing, 209
Defehr, Cornelius A., 240
Dein Reich Komme, 126, 142
247
Denikin, General Anton I., 153,
158, 160
Denmark, 226, 239
Dennis, Colonel J. S., 181
Deutsch-Wymyschle, 88, 89
Deutz, Otto, 237
Devlakanovo, Ufa, 93, 104, 106
Dick, David J., 135
Diphtheria, 64, 65, 66
Dirks, Elder Heinrich, 150
Dirksen, Jakob, Minister, 54
Dnepropetrovsk
[see Ekaterinoslav]
Dnepropetrovsk Oblast, 211,217
Dniepr River, xv, xvii, 2, 7, 163,
173,218, 222,223,227
Dniestr River, xv, 162, 173
Dobenko, General, 154, 156
Doerksen, Gerhard, 145
Dolinsk, Neu S, 98
Donetsk [Stalino], xvii, 157
Donets River, xv
Don River, xv, 27, 62, 122, 173
Donskoye, Neu S, 94, 97, 98, 237
Dorpat [Tartu], 137
Drayton Park N., 129
Dresden, 104
Dublin, 128
Dubrovno, 2, 6, 7
Dueck, Abram, 81
Dueck, Abram, 81, 82, 88, 89
Dueck, Agatha [Thielmann], 81,
88
Dueck, Bernhard [Jr.], 81
Dueck, Bernhard [Sr.], 81, 87, 88
Dueck, Bernhard B., 64, 68, 69,
71,77, 79, 80, 81-83, 84, 86
88, 89, 90
Dueck, David, 137
Dueck, Gerhard, 81
Dueck, Greta, 81, 82
Dueck, Heinrich, 175
Dueck, Isaak, 65
Dueck, Jacob, 81
Dueck, Johann, 81
Dueck, Katharina, 81, 82
Dueck, Lena, 8 1
Dueck, Margaretha [Wiebe], 81,
82, 83
Dueckmann, Jakob, 160
Duerksen, Anna [Martens], 99,
100
Duerksen, David, 1 00
Duerksen, Elder David G., 92, 93
94, 97, 99-100, 101, 125
Duerksen, David K., Minister,
178
Duerksen, Gerhard, 100
Duerksen, Johann, 100
Dukhobors, 25, 29
Dushanbe, 63
Dutch [see Netherlands]
Dvina River, xv, 6
Dyck, Aganetha, 186
Dyck, Elfrieda [Klassen],
229-235, 237, 239
Dyck, Franz, 187-190
Dyck, H. F., 176, 238
Dyck, Jakob, 142
Dyck, Katharina, 186, 190
Dyck, Margaretha, 186
Dyck, Peter, 186-190
Dyck, Peter, 229-235, 237, 239,
242
Dyck, Wilhelm, 71, 77, 79
Dyck, Wilhelm, 120
E
Earthquake, 24
East Prussia, 137, 173, 222, 227
Ebenezer [city], 63
Ebenezer M. B. Church, Kansas,
55, 56, 57
Ebenfeld, 69
Ebert, Mrs., 219
Ediger, H., Ill
Egypt, 184
Eichenfeld, Yazykovo, 158
Eichenfeld, Usm, 208
Eigenheim, 180
Einlage, Chor, 47, 48, 50, 53, 87,
103
Ekaterinoslav [Dnepropetrovsk],
xv, xvii, 6, 8, 120, 148, 149,
157, 173
Ekaterinoslav Province, 12, 45,
47, 187
Elbe River, 222, 226-228
Elbing, 180
Elgersheim, 37
Elias, J., 171
Elisabetthal, Mol, 33, 34, 40, 42,
43,45
Emmental, 131
England, 68, 104, 117, 128, 129,
132, 176, 198
Enns, Gerhard J., 170
Enns, Elder Jakob, 1 1
Enns, Jakob, 64, 118
Enns, K„ 111
Enns, Klaas, 54
Ens, Isaak, 64
Epidemic, 64-65
Epp, Elder, 69
Epp, Elisabeth, 59, 61
Epp, Johann, 164
Epp, Klaas [Jr.], 49, 59-63, 180
Epp, Komelius, 10,
Epp, Margareth, 59
Epp, Elder Peter, 1,7, 10
Epp, P. B„ 193
Epp, P. P., 171
Escondido, 57
Estland, 135
Estonia, xv, 129, 137, 227
Ewert, H. H„ 180
Excommunication, 11, 46, 47, 60
Exposition, 111-112, 114, 115
F
Fairmead, 105
False Humility Movement, 12
Famine, 22, 176
Fast, Elder Bernhard, 26, 31, 32,
35,40,51
Fast, Heinrich, 144
Fast, Elder Jacob, 1 1
Fast, Jakob, 92
Fast, Johann J., 54, 56
Fast, Lena, 144
Fast, Peter, 87
Fast, Peter, 193
Federau, Wilhelm, 203
Fehderau, Johann, 197
Fehr, Elder Komelius A., 93, 94,
103
Fehr, Margaretha [Koslowsky],
103
Fellman, Pfarrer Walter, 127
Felsenbach, Borozenko, 87
Felsenthal, 43, 54, 56
Feodorovna, Maria, 4
Feodosiya, xvii, 3, 6, 114
Femheim Colony, 195
Filadelfia, 139, 196
Finland, 174
Fires, 107-109
Fire Insurance, 108, 1 10
Fischau, Mol, 11, 29, 146, 147
Five-Year Plan, 192
Flemish Mennonite Church, 7, 8,
11,33,40,42,45
Flood, 144-146
Forestry Service [Forstei], 53, 84,
148, 176
Forstei [see Forestry Service]
France, 68, 170, 174, 198, 228,
239, 240
Frankfurt, 231,240
Franz, David, Minister, 103
Franz, Heinrich [Sr.], 33, 40, 42,
45, 106
248
Franz, Heinrich, 52
Franzfeld, Yazykovo, 158
Franztal, Mol, 23, 24
Friedensdorf, Mol, 23, 163, 164,
219, 221
Friedensfeld [Miropol],
Borozenko, 12, 47, 56, 64,
68-71, 77, 79-81, 84, 87,
88, 89, 119, 122,213,217
Friedensfeld, Sag, 161
Friedensfeld, Shu, 201, 204, 208
Friedensfeld Mennonite Brethren
Church, 80, 81, 82, 84, 87-91
Friedensruh, Mol, 49, 51
Friedensstimme, 72, 111, 113,
115, 117-120, 125, 126, 129,
131-134, 148
Friesen, 204
Friesen, A. A., 139, 172
Friesen, Elder Abraham, 12
Friesen, Elder Abraham, 31
Friesen, Abraham, 119
Friesen, Daniel, Minister, 92, 94
Friesen, David, Oberschulze, 35,
43
Friesen, Elder Frank, 177
Friesen, Heinrich, 89, 90
Friesen, Isaak, Minister, 101
Friesen, J., Ill
Friesen, Jakob, Minister, 134
Friesen, Jakob P., Minister, 170,
171
Friesen, Elder Johann, 12
Friesen, Peter, 20
Friesen, Peter M., Historian, 17,
41,44, 47,48,51,57,81,84,
87, 89,92, 95, 119, 122, 125
Friesen, Rudy P., Architect, 95
Frisian Mennonite Church, 8, 9,
11
Froehlich Richtung
[Joyful Faction], 43, 46, 47
Froese, G. P., 122
Froese, Johann, 71, 77
Froese, Peter F., 176, 237-239
Frunze, 63
Fuersorgekomitee, 12, 26-30, 35,
41,43
Fuerstenau, Mol, 15, 18, 53-56,
87
Fuerstenland Colony, xvii, 64
Funkkaseme Camp, 231
Funk, Peter, 88
G
Gaeddert, Minister, 49
Gaede, 112
Gaede, Heinrich, 144, 145
Galicia, 30
Gavel, Agronomist, 27
Gebhardt, Ernst, 71, 73, 77
Geneva, 240
Genoa, 131, 185
Gensichen, Superintendent, 142
Georgia, xv
German-English Academy [see
Rosthem Junior College]
Germany, 37, 77, 88, 98, 99, 105,
106, 120, 125, 126, 127, 131,
139, 141, 152, 153, 162, 163,
169, 174, 177, 183, 185,
192-195, 197-199,210,218,
220, 222, 223, 225-228, 234,
235, 238-240, 242
Giesbrecht, Bernhard, 160
Giesbrecht, Peter, 64
Gilchin River, 208
Gluchow, 137
Glick, 230
Gnadenfeld, Aulie Ata, 59, 63
Gnadenfeld, Mol, 29, 32-34,
38-42, 45, 46, 48, 56, 64, 69,
70, 96, 114, 131, 148-150,
152-156, 166, 175,218-222
Gnadenfeld, Sag, 159, 161
Gnadenfeld Volost, 99, 148, 152,
153, 155, 156
Gnadenheim, Mol, 16, 219, 221
Gnadental, Aulie Ata, 59, 63
Gnadenthal, Mol, 64, 108, 109,
125,219, 221
Goertzen, Peter F., Minister, 170
Goossen, Peter, 107, 110
Gorchakov, General Prince
Michael, 15
GPU, 194, 201-204, 206,
239
Great Britain, 128
Great Wall of China, 209
Greek Orthodox, 193
Greenwich Mean Time, 24
Gregorian Calendar, 1, 4, 91
Gretna, 180
Gronau, 226, 227, 240
Grosse Gemeinde, 1 1
Grossweide, Mol, 24, 140, 156
Grubb, George Carleton, 128
Grubb, Reverend Harry Percy,
117, 118, 126,128
Grubb, Margaret
[Crighton-Stuart], 128
Grubb, Maria, 128
Grubb, Richard, 128
Gruenfeld, Borozenko, 12, 87
Gruenfeld, Shu, 208
Grunau, 38
Guenther, Heinrich, 133
Gulyaipole, xvii, 158, 162
Gur’yev, 62
H
Hahn, Pastor, 139
Hahnsau, Am Trakt, 59
Haig, A. L., 142
Halstead, 180
Halstead Seminary, 180
Halberstadt, 141
Halbstadt, Mol, 11, 23, 24, 28,
35,41,42, 47,49,51,52, 54,
56, 88, 109-115, 117, 119,
120, 122, 125, 126, 128-131,
133, 137, 139, 140, 144-155,
163, 166, 167, 171, 176, 197,
198,219
Halbstadt, Sav, 208
Halbstadt Days of Terror, 152
Halbstadt Volost, 148, 152, 153
Haider, General Franz, 218
Hallman, E. S„ 172
Hamberg, Mol, 64, 99, 107, 109,
219, 221
Hamburg, 119, 122, 174, 193,
227
Hamburg Baptist Theological
Seminary, 119, 122, 125
Hammerstein, 195
Hannover, 227
Harbin, 183, 198, 202, 206, 209
Harder, Abraham, 5 1
Harder, Bernhard, Minister, 49,
50, 51-52, 151
Harder, Gerhard, 52
Harder, Heinrich, Minister, 139
Harder, Helena [Ewert], 52
Harder, Elder Johann, 150
Harder, Katharina [Boschmann]
52
Harder, L., 151
Harder, Marie, 5 1
Harder, Peter, 52
Harvey County, 55
Hausknecht, Dr., 134
Heerewegen, 240
Hegang, 209
Hege, Elder Christian, 197
Heihe, 208
Heidelberg, University of, 199
Hein, Gerhard, 240
Heine, F. R., 1 12
Heinemann, Dr., 64
Helgoland Island, 170, 174
Helmstedt, 233, 234, 242
249
Helsinki, 6, 174
Hepburn, 74
Herbert, 74
Herblock, Cartoonist, 212
Herzenberg, 54
Heuboden, Borozenko, 87
Hiebert, Agatha, 14, 15
Hiebert, C. N., Minister, 239, 240
Hiebert, D. D., 57
Hiebert, David, 14, 15
Hiebert, Martin, 145
Hiebert, N. N„ 75
Hierschau, Mol, 29, 107, 109,
163, 164, 166, 186, 187, 190,
219, 221,222
Hillsboro, 57
Himmler, Heinrich, 198
Hindenberg, President Paul von,
193, 199
Hitler, Adolf, 218
Hochfeld, Yazykovo, 158
Hochstaedt, 139
Hoeppner, Christina [Bentz], 7
Hoeppner, Jakob, 1-9, 7-8
Hoeppner, Jakob [Sr,], 7
Hoeppner, Sara [Dyck], 7, 8
Hofacker, Ludwig, 5 1
Hohendorf, Aulie Ata, 59
Holland [see Netherlands]
Homeyer, Heinz von, 153
Hotel, Elder Johannes, 197
Hottmann, Joseph, 39
Huebert, Abram, Missionary, 1 23
Huebert, Agnes, 216
Huebert, David, 155
Huebert, Elisabeth, 216
Huebert, Elder Heinrich, 35, 43,
46,47,56
Huebert, Heinrich, 216
Huebert, Johann, 54
Huebert, Johann, Missionary,
117, 118, 131
Huebert, Louise, 216
Huebert, Maria, 216
Huebert, Nikolai, 211, 216, 217
Huebert, Nikolai [Jr.], 216
Huguenot, 128
Hungary, 30, 173, 227
Hutterites, 29
Huttertal, 29
Hyderabad, 122
I
Ibersheim, 120
Ignatyevo Colony, xv, xvii, 155
Ildshik, 63,
Ili River, 63
India, 63, 119, 122, 123, 184
Ingulets River, xvii, 160, 161
Ingul River, xvii
Inzov, General, 28
Ireland, 30, 128
Irgiz, 62
Isaak, Peter, 91
Ishalka, Neu S, 98
Issyk Kul, Lake, 63
Italy, 30, 227
Ivanovka [near Neu Samara], 92
Ivanovka [Amur region], 208
Ivanovka River, 208
J
Jack, Walter L., Pastor, 126, 127,
133, 136, 141-143
Jangaon Station, 122
Jantz, Benjamin, Minister, 87
Jantz, Elder Jakob, 56, 82, 87-90
Jantz, Margareta [Toews], 88, 90
Janz, Benjamin [Sr.], 175
Janz, Benjamin B., Minister, 172,
175-179, 181,239, 240
Janz, Gertruda, 175
Janz, H„ 112
Janz, Heinrich, 175
Janz, Heinrich, 175
Janz, Helena, 175
Janz, Helena, 175
Janz, Helene [Penner], 175
Janz, Jakob, 175
Janz, Jakob, 175
Janz, Margaretha, 175
Janz, Maria, 175
Janz, Maria, 175
Janz, Maria [Rogalsky], 175, 178
Janz, Martha, 175
Janz, Peter, 175, 176, 178
Janzen, Mrs., 234
Janzen, Cornelius, Minister, 1 1
Janzen, Daniel, Pastor, 98
Janzen, Elisabeth, 115
Janzen, Greta, 1 15
Janzen, Hans, 1 15
Janzen, Elder Heinrich, 1 1
Janzen, Heirich H., 240
Janzen, Heinrich J., 114
Janzen, Helene, 115
Janzen, Hermann, 56
Janzen, J. J., 154
Janzen, Jakob, 59
Janzen, Jakob, 114, 115
Janzen, Johann H., 112, 113,
114-116
Janzen, Lene [Goerz], 115
Janzen, Maria, 1 15
Janzen, Nikolai, 115
Janzen, Siegfried, 235
Japan, 24
Java, 131
Jellinghaus, Pastor, 141
Jews, 25, 89, 140, 145
Jiamusi, 209
Jixi, 209
Johannesruh, 29
Joseph II of Austria, 3
Joyful Faction [see Froehliche
Richtung]
Judenplan villages, 88, 89
Judson, Ann Hasseltine,
Missionary, 45, 48
Julian Calendar, 1, 20, 24, 91,
148
June Reform, 47
Jung-Stillig, Johann H., 59
Juschanlee Estate, 27, 5 1
Juschanlee River, 27, 175
K
Kachkova, 223, 227
Kadushovka, 91
Kaiser Wilhelm Canal [see Kiel
Canal]
Kaltanka River, 92, 98
Kaltan, Neu S, 98
Kamenetz, Neu S, 98
Kamenka, Orenburg, 93, 103
Kamenka [near Nikopol], 217
Kampen, Jakob von, 1, 7, 9
Kani-Fu, 203, 206, 208
Kansas, 12,55,56,57, 74, 101,
150, 180
Kaplan Bek, 63
Kappes, Teacher, 33, 39
Karabutak, 62
Kara Kul, 63
Kara Kum Desert, 62, 63
Karassan, xvii, 197, 217, 237
Kargel, Johann [Ivan], Baptist
Minister, 89
Karl Marx Collective Farm, 98
Karlsruhe, 127, 142, 198, 200
Katta Kurgan, 63
Kazakhstan, xv, 218, 219
Kazalinsk, 62, 63
Kazan, xv
Kedung, 131
Kegel, 129, 133
Kerch, xvii
Kerensky, Alexander F., and his
government, 152, 156, 237
Keswick Convention, 128
Ketat, Dr., 140
250
Khabarovsk, 209
Khanka, Lake, 209
Kharkov, xv, 38, 172, 173, 176,
197, 227
Kherson, xv, xvii, 2,3,6
Khiva, 60, 62, 63
Khiva, Khan of, 60
Kiel [city], 193
Kiel Canal, 169, 174, 185
Kiev, xv, 3, 6, 173, 210, 227
King, Prime Minister William
Lyon Mackenzie, 181
Kipchak [Nukus], 63
Kipriyanovka, 208
Kirchliche [Mennonite] Chuch,
11,51,68,69,94, 95,230
Kirgiz Steppe, 62
Kiselyov, Count P. D., 31
Klassen, Elder A., 140
Klassen, Elder Abraham, 151
Klassen, Aganetha [Penner], 42
Klassen, Cornelius, F., 127, 176,
181,228, 231,232,234, 236,
237-241
Klassen, David, 42
Klassen, David, 135
Klassen, Dietrich, Minister, 88
Klassen, Franz F., 237, 238
Klassen, Gethard, 238
Klassen, Harold, 238
Klassen, Heinrich F., 177, 237
Klassen, Herbert, 238
Klassen, Irmgard, 238
Klassen, J., 94
Klassen, Johannes, Minister, 238
Klassen, Justina, 238
Klassen, Justina [Wiebe], 237,
239
Klassen, Katya, 135
Klassen, Mary [Brieger], 238,
240
Klassen, Walfried, 238
Kleefeld, Mol, 119, 163, 175
Kleefeld, Shu, 201, 208
Kleine Gemeinde, 10-12, 32, 87
Kliewer, Fritz, 198
Kliewer, Johann, 54
Klinok, Neu S, 98
Klippenfeld, Mol, 53, 56, 144,
147, 219, 221
Kludt, Theo, Pastor, 140
Klyazma, 193
Kobe, Japan, 24
Koehn, Peter, Minister, 92
Koenigsberg, 6, 137, 138, 173
Koeppental, Aulie Ata, 59, 63
Kommission filer
KirchenangelegenheitenfKfK],
120, 140, 156, 176
Kondratievka, Borissovo, 210
Konstantinovitch, Prince Dimitri,
137
Konstantinovka [near Ignatyevo],
xvii
Konstantinovka, Amur region,
204, 208
Kontenius, Samuel, 15, 29
Konteniusfeld, Mol, 24, 29, 175,
219,221
Koop, Jakob, 43
Koop, Johann, 54, 55
Koop, Isaak, 34, 35, 43
Koop, Isaak, Minister, 101
Kotlyarevka, Memrik, 68
Kotshuricha, 206
Koudashovka, 89
Krasnodar, 173
Krassikov, Neu S, 98
Krassikov, Owner, 97
Krauel River, 195
Krause, Franz, 89
Kreider, Robert, 229, 234
Kremenchug, 2, 3, 6, 7, 137
Krivoy Rog, xvii
Kroeker, Abraham, 14, 16, 39,
114, 125
Kroeker, Abram, 144
Kroeker, Anna [Langemann],
125, 127
Kroeker Jakob J., Minister, 117,
118, 125-127, 128, 129, 133,
134, 135, 141, 142
Kroeker, Johann, 228
Kroeker, Peter, 12
Kronau, 160
Kronsgarten, 45
Kronstadt, 69, 70, 73
Kronsweide, Chor, 8, 158
Kronsweide, Mol, 120
Kuban Colony, xv, 35, 43, 44,
47,56, 57,62, 69,81,84, 87,
124, 193
Kuban River, xv, 137
Kuma River, xv
Kungrad, 62
Kurman, Ill
Kur River, 209
Kursk, 168, 173, 242
Kuterlya, Neu S, 98
Kysyl Kum Desert, 63
L
Ladekopp, Mol, 23, 47, 64
Landskrone, Mol, 29, 164, 166,
186,219, 221
Landwirt, Der, 192
Lange, D., 141
Lange, Friedrich, 38
Lange, Johann, 41
Lange, Wilhelm, 32, 40
Langemann, Bernhard, 160
Langemann, Johann, 125
Langnau, 131
Latvia, xv, 81, 117, 139, 168,
169, 173, 176, 185,227, 239,
242, 243
Lausan, 63
Lausanne, 199
League of Nations, 206
Lechfeld, 198
Leningrad [see St. Petersburg]
Lenzmann, Elder August, 32, 33,
36, 39, 40-41, 42, 45, 56
Lenzmann, Hermann, 41
Leonide Meteorite Shower, 20
Lepp, Elder Aron, 48, 73, 87, 99,
101, 103
Lepsius, Pastor Dr. Johannes, 141
Leschkarovo Volost, 87
Lesser Khingan Mountains, 202
L eutesdorfN euwi ed , 240
Libau [Liepaja], 169, 170, 173,
174, 185
Lichtenau, Mol, 131, 153, 167,
168, 173,219,242
Lichterfelde West Station, 233,
234
Lichfelde, Mol, 112, 190
Licht im Osten, 126, 127, 141
Lichtrode, 141
Liebenau, Mol, 42, 144, 147,
219, 221
Liederperlen, 68, 78, 94, 106
Lindenau, Mol, 11, 12, 14, 15,
16, 18, 23, 107
Lissner, A., Ill
Lithuania, xv, 129, 173, 227
Liverpool, 239
Livingston, 74
Lodi, 74
Lodz, 73
Loewen, Anna, 84
Loewen, Anna, 213
Loewen, Hans, 213
Loewen, Harry, 213
Loewen, Heinrich, 54
Loewen, Heinrich, 84
Loewen, Heinrich, Minister, 202
Loewen, Helen, 213
Loewen, Helene [Friesen], 84
Loewen, Jakob, 220
Loewen, Johann, 84
Loewen, Johann J., 77-82, 84-86,
251
90,91,213
Loewen, Nikolai, 84, 85, 211,
213,217
Loewen, Wilhelm, 54
Lohrenz, H. W„ 74
Loma-Prieta Earthquake, 24
London, 104, 117, 128, 174, 238
Louis-Philippe, 30
Lubianka Prison, 237
Lucerne, 131
Luenenburger Heide, 226
Lugovsk, Neu S, 92-99, 101, 103,
104, 106, 237, 238
Lutheran, 15, 32, 38, 40, 42, 48,
141, 142, 192, 193, 194, 220,
238, 240, 242
Luther, Martin, 39
Luxemburg District, 97
Lvov, 227
Lysanderhoeh, Am Trakt, 1 80
M
Magadan, 215, 217
Magdeburg, 141
Makhno, Nestor 1, [or his men],
90, 150, 153, 154, 158, 160,
162, 163
Manchuria, 202
Manitoba, 12,53,74, 95, 101,
180, 239
Mantler, Peter, 202
Margenau, Mol, 55, 99, 108, 109,
125, 155, 163, 176,219, 221
Margenau, Omsk region, 8 1
Marglen, S. S., 169, 170, 174,
185
Mariawohl, Mol, 150, 219, 221
Marienburger Werder, 180
Mariental, Mol, 23, 24
Mariupol, xvii, 24, 33, 38, 39
Martens, Abram, 92, 93, 94, 97
Martens, Alexander, 155
Martens, Anna [Klassen], 157
Martens, Anneliese, 155
Martens, Elfriede, 155
Martens, Franz, 48
Martens, G., 64
Martens, Heinrich, 155
Martens, Elder, Heinrich, 170
Martens, Heinrich, 194
Martens, Helena, 155
Martens, Helena [Wolff], 155
Martens, Johann, 159
Martens, Komelius [Jr.], 155
Martens, Komelius [Sr.], 155
Martens, Elder Komelius K.,
140, 154, 155-157
Martens, Maria, 160
Martens, Maria [Reimer], 48
Martens, Sara, 155
Martens, Sara [Friesen], 155,
156, 157
Martens, Tusnelda, 155
Martens, Wilhelm J., 159, 160
Martyr’s Mirror, 10
Massacre, 158-161
Matthies, Abraham, 38
McPherson County, 55
MCC [see Mennonite Central
Committee]
Medical Orderly Service
[Sanitaetsdienst], 148, 149,
237
Meier, Major, 2
Melita, S. S„ 185
Melitopol, xvii, 28, 42, 139, 156,
164, 168, 190
Memrik Colony, xv, xvii, 68, 69,
82, 88, 175, 193
Mendelsohn, Felix, 242
Menno Colony, 1 96
Mennonite Brethren Bible
College, 177, 178
Mennonite Brethren Church, 17,
32-35, 38, 39,41,43,45-50,
52-54, 56, 57, 59, 68, 69, 79,
87,90, 92, 93,96, 98, 113,
119, 120, 122, 125, 175, 199,
230
Mennonite Central Committee
[MCC], 127, 176, 177, 192,
199, 206, 226, 229-232, 235,
237-240
Mennonite Church
[see Kirchliche]
Mennonite Heritage Village, 8,9
Mennonite World Conference,
127, 181, 198, 239
Mennonitische Rundschau, 65,
135, 139, 237
Mennozentrum, 198
Mergentheim, 37
Merino sheep, 28
Messina, 185
Meteorite, 20
Mexico, 183, 195, 231
Michailovka [near Mol], 54, 56,
107
Michailovka [near Friedensfeld],
88
Michailovka [Amur area], 208
Michelson, Vera, 134, 135
Middle East, 184
Mierau, Johann, 64
Mierau, Johann, 64
Miller, Alvin J., 176, 237, 238
Millerovo, xv, 96
Miloradovka, 88, 89
Minlertschick, 125
Minnedosa, S. S., 170, 171, 174,
185
Minnesota, 65, 74, 101
Minsk, xv, 173, 227
Mirgorod, 137
Mission, 240
Mitau [Jelgava], 132, 139
Moelln, 195
Moldavia, xv, 30
Molochnaya River, 45, 47, 109,
137, 144-147, 166
Molokans, 25,29, 141
Molotschna Colony, xv, xvii, 11,
12, 14, 16, 17, 18,20,21,22,
24, 27, 28, 30-35,38,40,41,
42, 43, 45-49, 53-57, 59, 62,
64, 68,71,84, 87, 88, 92, 97,
99, 101, 104, 107-111, 114,
117, 119, 123, 125, 128, 131,
132, 139, 141, 144, 147, 150,
153-156, 158, 162, 163, 165,
166, 167, 171-176, 185, 186,
193, 197,218, 220-223,227
242
Morden, 171
Morija Deaconess Home, 120,
126, 130, 132-136, 137, 138,
141, 150
Moscow, xv, 3, 6, 85, 97, 104,
156, 162, 172, 173, 176, 180,
190, 192-195, 198, 201,202,
217,218, 227, 237, 238, 242
Moundridge, 56, 57
Muchino Colony, 201
Muehlhausen, 127
Mueller, Georg, 132
Mueller, Joachim, 142
Muensterberg, Mol, 11, 23, 54,
107, 109
Muensterberg, Sag, 158-161
Munich, 227, 231,232, 235
Muntau, Mol, 22, 23, 24, 111,
132, 133, 138, 140, 150
Muntau Hospital, 132, 137-140,
148
Murrhardt, 37
Muslims, 123, 131
Musterwirte, 29
Muyunkum Desert, 63
N
Nachtigal, David, Minister, 92
Nalgonda District, India, 122
252
Napoleon Bonaparte, 11, 19
Nast, Wilhelm, Minister, 38
National Earthquake Information
Center, USA, 24
National Socialist Party [Nazi],
198, 199,228
Nebraska, 12, 55, 74, 101
Nehe, 209
Nemor River, 209
Nen Jiang River, 209
Nepulyevka Colony, xvii, 84, 89,
90
Netherlands [Holland, Dutch],
68, 170, 195, 198,229-232,
235, 239, 240
Neudorf [boy], 187
Neuendorf, Chor, 158
Neufeld, District Representative,
31
Neufeld, 79
Neufeld, Widow Peter, 107
Neufeld, Gerhard, Minister, 103
Neufeld, Jakob, 64
Neufeld, Jakob, 145
Neufeld, Johann, Minister, 87
Neufeld, Johann, 186, 187
Neufeld, K., Minister, 70
Neufeld, Katharina, 16
Neufeld, Komelius, 105
Neufeld, Komelius G., 75, 93,
94, 104-105, 106
Neufeld, Lillian, 105
Neufeld, Louise [Schapansky],
105
Neufeld, Maria, 105
Neufeld, Maria [Friesen], 105
Neufeld, Peter, Minister, 25
Neufeld, Peter, 119
Neufeld, Wilhelm, Minister, 69
Neufeld, Wilhelm P., 197
Neu-Halbstadt, Mol, 28, 29, 47,
52, 106, 113, 117, 120, 152
Neu-Halbstadt, Sag, 161
Neuhoflnung, 32, 38, 39, 45
N euhoffn ungstal, 38
Neukirch, Mol, 101, 150
Neunhuben, Vistula Delta, 10
Neunkirchen, 37
Neu Samara Colony, xv, 92, 94,
97-98, 99, 104, 237, 238
Neu-Schoensee, Sag, 161
Neustaedter, Abraham, 90
Neustuttgart, 38
Nevzorovka Colony, 201
Newton, 180, 181
New York, Shu, 201, 203, 204,
208
New York, USA, 73, 101, 105,
192
Nicholas I, Czar of Russia, 19,
30,31
Nicholas n, Czar of Russia, 17,
19, 150, 152
Nickel, Franz, Minister, 54
Nickel, Elder Johann, 89
Nieder-Chortitza, Chor, 158
Nierstein\Rhein, 120
Niessen, Wilhelm, 73
Nikolaidorf, Mol, 150, 219, 221
Nikolaifeld, Sag, 161
Nikolaifeld, Yazykovo, 158
Nikolaipol, 119
Nikolaipol, Aulie Ata, 59, 63
Nikolaithal, Borozenko, 87
Nikolajevitch, Count Konstantin,
16
Nikolayev, xvii
Nikolayevka, 155
Nikopol, xvii, 12, 83, 85, 87,
160,213,217
NKVD, 85,210,213,214
Nobel, 9
Nogaies, 25, 29
Non-Resistence, 53, 148, 156,
177, 181,239
North America, 12, 20, 53, 68,
72, 87, 106, 125, 127, 139,
171, 178, 201,229, 237,240,
242
North Dakota, 74
North Sea, 169, 174, 185,227
Norway, 174
Nottinghamshire, 128
Novo-Wassiljewka, 137
Novopodolsk, 89
O
Oak, The Old, xiii, 7
Oberursel, 120
Odessa, xv, 29, 35, 41, 52, 65,
120, 173, 227
Odesser Zeitung, 65
Ohio, 38
Ohrloff, Aulie Ata, 59
Ohrloff, Mol, 24-27, 32, 35, 40,
41,49,51,56,64, 88, 104,
110,112,114, 123,150,152,
158, 166, 197, 198, 237
Ohrloff, Sag, 159, 161
Ohrlofiferfelde, 42
Ohrloffer Gerstenstreit, 41
Oka River, xv
Okhotsk, 216, 217
Okhotsk, Sea of, 215, 217
Oklahoma, 44, 74
Omsk, 81, 82, 201
Ondra, Pastor Karl, 71
Ontario, 171
Operation Mennonite, 231, 233
Orechov, 14
Orechov, Sav, 208
Oregon, 101
Orel, 168, 173,242
Orenburg, xv, 62
Orenburg Colony, xv, 93, 97,
103, 104, 237
Orlovka, 205, 208
Orsk, 62
Osemoye, Shu, 208
Ottawa, 181
Ottoman Empire, 7, 9
P
Paetkau, David, Minister, 103
Pankratz, David, 178
Paraguay, 120, 139, 177, 195,
198,206, 226, 231,235,239
Paraguayan Chaco, 196
Paraguay River, 195
Paris, 30, 162, 174
Paul I, Czar of Russia
[Feodorovna], 4, 8, 16, 19
Paulsheim, Mol, 219, 221
Pavlograd, 47
Pendjalin, 131
Penner, Bernhard, 46
Penner, Cornelius, 107, 110
Penner, Peter, Minister, 12
Penner, Wilhelm, 60
Pennsylvania, 230, 231
Perlovka, 193
Perm, 129
Perovsk [Kzyl Orda], 63
Peters, Elder Abraham, 49, 59
Peters, Franz, Minister, 88, 122
Peters, Isaak, 119
Peters, Peter, 10
Peters, Susanna, 186, 188, 189
Petersfeld, Yazykovo, 158
Petershagen, Mol, 11,12, 23
Petershagen, Vistula Delta, 10
Petro-Alexandrovsk [Turtkul], 63
Pfalz, 131
Philadelphia, 55, 56
Phillips, Dirk, 10
Pickel, Mr., 170
Pietist, 37, 38, 59
Pleshanov, Owner, 97
Pleshanovo Colony [see
Neu Samara]
Pleshanovo, Neu S, 94, 97, 98
Plett, Gerhard, 186, 187
253
Podin, Adam K., Minister, 117,
118, 126, 129-130, 133
Podolia, 224, 227
Podolysk, Neu S, 94, 98
Poettker, Elisabeth, 55
Poettker, Johann, Minister,
53-56
Poland, 30, 68,71,73,77,81,
88, 142, 173, 174,218, 222,
224-227
Polotsk [Polack], 168, 173, 242
Poltava, 6, 82, 90
Poltava Province, 137
Popovo, Station, 163
Pordenau, Mol, 54
Potemkin, Prince Grigory A., 2,
3,7
Poyarkovo, 208
Poznan, 227
Prague, 30, 142, 227
Prenzlau, 195
Pribrezhnoye, Sav, 208
Pripyat River, xv
Prischib, 112, 137-139, 145, 147
153, 198
Privilegium of 1800, 4
Prussia, 7, 9, 11, 15, 16, 25,32,
40, 48, 52, 242
Psebaj, 137
Puerto Casada, 195
Purge, The, 91, 210-217, 218
Pushkino, 193
Putschkovo, 82
Pyandzh River, 63
Q
Qiqihar [Zizikar], 206, 209
Quakers, 128
Quebec City, 169, 171, 185
Quiring, Dr. Walter, 95, 240
R
Radstock, Lord
[see Waldgrave, G. W. A.]
Raduga, 112, 119, 120, 125, 155
Ratzlaff, Elder Benjamin, 31,41
Raychikhinsk, 208
Reedley, 105
Red Army, 101, 153, 154, 156,
158, 162-166, 176,210,219,
222,223,225, 235
Red Gate, The, 243
Regehr, Abram, Minister, 1 60
Regehr, Jakob A., 160
Regehr, Wilhelm, 240
Regentrop, Preacher, 117, 126
Regier, Johann, Minister, 53, 55,
56
Regier, Maria [Schellenberg], 55,
56
Reimer, 123
Reimer, Abraham, 160
Reimer, Abram, 10
Reimer, Aganetha, 1 0
Reimer, Agatha [Epp], 10
Reimer, Cornelius, 42, 45
Reimer, David, 43, 45
Reimer, Gerhard, 1 60
Reimer, Heinrich, 10
Reimer, Heinrich, 10
Reimer, Helena, 10
Reimer, Helena [van Riesen], 10
Reimer, Jakob, Minister, 69, 101
Reimer, Jakob C., 100
Reimer, Jakob D., 32-34, 36, 38,
40-43, 45-48, 92
Reimer, Katharina [Duerksen],
100
Reimer, Elder Klaas, 10-12
Reimer, Klaas [Jr.], 10
Reimer, Margaretha, 1 0
Reimer, Maria [Epp], 10
Reimer, Maria [Neufeld], 45
Reimer, Peter, 10
Reimer, Peter, 234
Reimer, Wilhelmine [Strauss], 48
Reinfeld, 69
Reinfeld, Sag, 159, 161
Reinfeld, Sav, 208
Reiseschuld, 172, 181, 182, 239
Rempel, Teacher, 156
Rempel, Elder H., 103
Rempel, Katherine, 198
Rempel, R. P., 74
Rono County, 55
Reservists, 148-150
Reval [Tallin], 38, 132, 135
Rezekne [Ryejitsa], 169, 170,
173
Richert, Minister, 49
Richert, H., 150
Rietenau, 37, 38
Riga, xv, 1,4,6, 7,81,88, 132,
169, 173, 174, 193, 194,227,
238, 242
Ringstrasse, 229, 234
Rinkart, Martin, 242
Romania, xv, 162, 173, 218, 220,
227
Rome, 104, 227
Roosevelt, Frankli D., 228
Rosedale, 105
Rosen, Baron Fedor von, 26, 30,
31
Rosenfeld, 33, 38, 39
Rosenfeld, Borozenko, 87
Rosengart, Chor, 210, 21 1
Rosenort, Mol, 69
Rosenort, Sag, 161
Rosenort, Saskatchewan, 180
Rosenthal, 3, 5, 9
Rosthem, 74, 171, 181, 182, 190
Rosthem Junior College, 181
Rostov, xv, 62, 122, 173
Rotterdam, 232
Roux, 66
Royal Russian Fruit Growers
Association, 111, 112
Rudnerweide, Mol, 38
Rueckenau, Mol, 49, 51-57, 64,
68, 69,71,73,79, 87, 92, 93,
99, 101, 107-111, 119, 155,
164, 166
Ruegen Island, 169, 174
Rueppurr, 198, 200
Rupp, Preacher, 127
Russia [USSR], map references
only, xv, 63, 173,208, 209,
211,217, 227
Russia, South, xvii, 5, 9, 27, 28,
30, 32, 42, 45, 64, 69, 71, 77,
81,84, 106, 111, 114, 117,
119, 122, 126, 131
Russian Revolution, 130, 152
Russification, 19, 53, 56
Russische Saengervereinigung,
71, 77
Rybinskoye Reservoir, xv
S
Saenger-Bote, 74
Saengerfest, 68-70, 71, 73, 85,
90,91
Saengergruss, 68, 70, 71, 77, 78
Sagradovka Colony, xv, xvii, 52,
88, 89, 104, 117, 119, 122,
158-162, 193,222-224,227
Saizevo, Station, 47
Sakhalin Island, 206
Samara [Kubyshev], xv, 62, 97
Samara River, xvii
Samarkand, 63
San Francisco, 24
Sanitaetsdienst [see Medical
Orderly Service]
Santa Cruz, 24
Saratov, xv, 62, 180
Saskatchewan, 74, 101, 180, 190
Saskatoon, 178
Savitaya Colony, 201, 208, 209
Savitaya River, 208
254
Savona, 185
Sawatzky, Mr., 233
Sawatzky, Aron G., 69-71, 73-76,
77, 106
Sawatzky, Elisabeth [Niessen],
73, 74
Sawatzky, Gerhard J., 73
Scarlet Fever, 64, 65, 67
Scotstoun, 185
Schelde Delta, 170
Schellenberg, Elder Abraham, 41,
49, 50, 53-55, 56-58, 87, 101
Schellenberg, Abraham [Jr.], 56
57
Schellenberg, Abraham [Sr.], 56,
101
Schellenberg, Elder David, 54,
55, 56, 68, 69, 93, 94, 99,
101-102, 125
Schellenberg, Elisabeth, 56
Schellenberg, Katharina
[Lohrenz], 55-57
Schellenberg, Dr. Katharina, 56,
57
Schellenberg, Lena [Ens], 101
Schellenberg, Maria, 56
Schellenberg, Maria [Pauls], 56,
101
Schellenberg, Sara [Koop,
Klassen], 101
Schellenberg, Susanna [Flaming],
57
Schellenberg, Elder P., 178
Schellenberg, Peter, 56
Schilovo, 89
Schlachtin Colony, xvii, 89
Schleswig-Holstein, 226
Schmidt, Christian, 84, 87
Schmidt, Nikoli, 40
Schmidt, Peter, 132, 133
Schoenau, Mol, 87
Schoenau, Sag, 159, 161
Schoendorf, Borozenko, 87
Schoenfeld Colony, xvii
Schoensee, Mol, 64, 95, 219, 221
Schoensee, Sav
Schoental, Crimea, 99
Schoenwiese Church, 1 1
Schroeder, Heinrich, 112
Schroeder, M., 1 12
Schwarzwald, Forestry Camp,
237
Schweiger, Friedrich, 67-70,
71-72, 73, 77
Schweiger, Mrs. [Wedel], 71
Sebej [Sebez], 168, 173, 242
Selbstschutz, 152-154, 156, 158
Sergey evka, 87
Sevastopol, xvii, 3, 6, 47
Shatter, 74, 75, 105
Sharinchatin, 63
Shestemaya, 158, 160, 161
Sholokhovo, 217
Shumanovka, Shu, 201-204,
206, 208
Shumanovka Colony, 201, 208,
209
Siberia, 8, 11,82, 88, 97, 103,
129, 155, 192-194, 201-203,
206,213,215,217,218,222,
226, 237, 238
Siemens, Franz, 187, 189
Siemens, Jakob, 178
Siemens, Jakob, 201, 202, 204
Siemens, Peter P., 125
Sikhote-Alin Mountains, 209
Silberfeld, Usm, 208
Simferopol, xvii, 42, 111, 138,
148, 197,214-217
Simons, Menno, 10, 34, 35
Slashchev, General, 163
Slavgorod, 201
Smallpox, 64
Smidovitch, Peter G., 193
Smolensk, 168, 173, 180, 242
Sokolovsky, Marshall, 233, 235
Songhua River, 209
South America, 120, 177, 184,
198, 199, 226
Southampton, 170, 174, 198
Sparrau, Mol, 20, 23, 69, 154,
155,156, 175,219, 221
Spat, xvii, 55, 99, 103, 122, 125,
126, 155, 197,214,217
Spenst, Peter, 186
Spezia, 185
Spurgeon’s Pastors College, 104
SS[Schutzstaffel], 229
Stackelberg, Baron, Minister, 129
Staehelin, Pfarrer D. E., 142
Stahl, Baron von, 2
Stalin, Joseph, 97, 210, 211, 212,
216,218, 228
Stalingrad [see Volgograd]
Stanislov, 142
Steinau, Nepluyevka, 84
Steinbach, Borozenko, 87
Steinbach, Manitoba, 8, 9
Steinfeld, Sag, 161
Steinfeld, Schlachtin, 89
Steintal, 131
Stiller, Music Instructor, 73
Stinson, Lieutenant, Colonel,
W.B., 229-234
Stockholm, 6, 1 74
Strauss, Gottlieb, 48
St. Paul, Minnesota, 74
St. Petersburg [also Leningrad],
xv, 3, 4, 6, 7, 9, 14, 35, 38, 42,
43,46, 52, 53, 89, 104, 117,
126, 128, 129, 141, 150, 155,
193,217, 237
Stulnevo, 149, 166, 190, 218-221
Stuttgart, 32, 37, 38, 127, 227
Sudermann, Jakob, 137
Sudermann, Jakob J., 135
Sudermann, Leonhard, 38
Sukkau, 108
Sukkau, G. H., Minister, 178
Suvorovka Colony, xv
Swabians, 39
Sweden, 68, 137, 142, 174, 227
Switzerland, 68, 79, 82, 104, 106,
126, 127, 131, 132, 142, 197,
198, 199, 239, 240
T
Tabor College, 57
Taganrog, xvii
Talus River, 59
Tashkent, 59, 63
Taunus, 120
Taurien Province, 106
Taran Island, 2
Tavonius, Dr. Alexander, 137
Tavonius, Alexander, 137
Tavonius, Alexandra [Schulinus],
137
Tavonius, Dr. Erich A., 132-136,
137-140
Tavonius, Dr. Erika, 139
Tavonius, Ingeborg, 139
Tavonius, Dr. Karin, 139
Tavonius, Margarethe
[Baumann], 137-139
Tavonius, Sigrid, 139
Tayninka, 193
Tchemigov Province, 137
Tchongrav, xvii, 120, 216, 217
Tchongrav Bible School, 120
Teichrieb, Anneliese, 214
Teichrieb, Arnold, 214
Teichrieb, Elvira, 214, 215
Teichrieb, Franz, 211, 214-215,
217
Teichrieb, Gerhard, 214
Teichrieb, Susanna, 214, 215
Temir-Bulat [Philippstal], 122,
197
Tempel-Tuttle, Comet, 20
Templar Movement, 39, 40
Terek Colony, xv, 88
Thielmann, Martin, 88
255
Thiesen, John D., 199
Thiessen, Agnes [Fast], 144
Thiessen, Heinrich, 107
Thiessen, Heinrich, 1 60
Thiessen, J. J., 168
Thiessen, Elder J. J., 178, 182,
240
Third Reich, 198,226
Thompson, Major, 230
Tiefengrund, 180
Tiege, Mol, 56, 64, 69, 70, 84,
152, 175, 176
Tiege, Sag, 89, 119, 122, 159,
161
Tiegenhagen, Mol, 54, 107, 109,
126, 152, 168
Tiegenhof, West Prussia, 42
Tiegenhof Estate, 64, 118
Tiegerweide, Mol, 56, 57, 108,
163
Time Magazine, 212
Tipperary, 128
Tirmalajah, 123
Tkechev, General, 164
Tobruk, 185
Toews, Abraham, Oberschulze,
31
Toews, Anna, 180
Toews, Aron P., Minister, 90
Toews, Benno, 180
Toews, Elder David, 172,
180-182, 192, 238, 239
Toews, Dora, 180
Toews, Elma, 180
Toews, Elsa, 180
Toews, Elder Heinrich, 31
Toews, Irene, 180, 181
Toews, J., 150
Toews, Jakob, 180
Toews, John, A., Minister, 178,
240
Toews, Louise, 180
Toews Margaret [Friesen], 180,
182
Toews, Margaretha, 180
Toews, Marie, 180
Toews, Marie [Wiebe], 180
Toews, Nicholas, 94
Tokmak, xvii, 112, 140, 145,
147, 163, 166, 168
Tokmak River, 144, 147, 221
Tok River, 97, 98, 237
Tokultschak [Johannesruh], 197
Topkotshna River, 208
Totleben, Count Eduard von, 52,
53
Trachoma, 167, 172, 176, 184,
198
Trans Siberian Railroad, 209
Trappe, Georg von, 1, 4, 5, 7
Trek, the Great, 222-227, 228
Trinity College, 128
Truderung, 71
Tsaritsyn [see Volgograd]
Tshu River, 63
Tuberculosis, 64, 162, 238
Tuebingen, 32, 37
Turkestan, 52, 59, 60, 88, 180
Turkestan [city], 63
Turkey, 30
Typhus, 64, 103, 123, 149
U
Ufa, xv
Ufa Colony, xv, 89, 93, 104, 106,
193
Ukraine, xv, 38, 145, 152, 158,
162, 163, 186, 192,210,217,
218, 223,238
Unger, Elder Abraham, 47, 50,
87
United Nations Relief and
Rehabilitation Administration
[UNRAA], 229, 231,239
United States of America, 38. 53,
55,56, 60, 66, 75,99, 101,
105, 122, 150, 177, 186, 193,
195, 198,206, 228-234, 239
Unruh, Abraham H., Minister,
101, 122, 197,240
Unruh, Anna, 123
Unruh, Anna, 150
Unruh, Anna [Peters], 122, 123
Unruh, Arthur, 122
Unruh, Benjamin, 197
Unruh, Benjamin H., 122, 127,
142, 145, 148, 154, 176, 192,
193, 197-200, 237
Unruh, David, 150
Unruh, Elisabeth, 123
Unruh, Elisabeth [Wall], 122,
197
Unruh, Frieda [Hege], 197
Unruh, Fritz, 197
Unruh, Gerhard, Minister, 197
Unruh, Hans, 197
Unruh, Heinrich, 122
Unruh, Heinrich, Minister,
Kuban, 124
Unruh, Heinrich, 1 97
Unruh, Heinrich B., 122, 197
Unruh, Heinrich H., Minister,
117-119, 122-124, 197
Unruh, Elder Heinrich P., 120,
124, 133, 135, 148. 149,
150-151
Unruh, Helena [Loewen], 150
Unruh, Katharina, 150
Unruh, K., Minister, 70
Unruh, Komelius, 122
Unruh, Komelius, 122, 197
Unruh, Komelius, 197
Unruh, Liesel, 197
Unruh, Maria, 122
Unruh, Maria, 197
Unruh, Maria [Loewen], 150, 151
Unruh, Martha, 122
Unruh, Martha, 197
Unruh, Olga, 197
Unruh, Paula [Hotel], 197, 200
Unruh, Peter, 150
Unruh, Peter, 150
Unruh, Rudolf, 197
Unruh, Sara [Schroeder], 150
Unser Blatt, 135, 156, 157, 192
Ural Mountains, xv, 62, 98, 217,
218, 237,238
Ural River, xv, 62
Ural’sk, 62
Urmi River, 209
Uruguay, 226, 239
Usman Colony, 201, 208, 209
Ussuri River, 209
Ustyurt Plateau, 62
V
Vassilievka, 90
VBHH. 168, 172, 176, 192, 237
Vereinsschule, 32
Vienna, 30, 227
Viktoria Luise Platz, 229
Vineland, 171
Vinnitsa, 224, 227
Vistula Delta, 1, 7, 10, 32
Vistula River, 6, 173
Vitebsk [Vicebsk], 168, 173,
242
Vladikavkas, 43
Vladimirov Forestry Camp, 161
Vladivostok, 209,215-217
VMSR, 176
Volendam, S. S„ 231-233, 235
Volga River, xv, 52, 62, 218
Volgograd, xv, 62, 222, 223
Volhynia, xv
Voth, Andreas, 46
Voth, G. G„ 97
Voth, Johann, 5 1
Voth, Tobias, 32
Voykovo, 205, 208
256
w
Walachia, 30
Waldgrave, G. W. A., [Lord
Radstock], Evangelist, 128
Waldheim, Mol, 29, 55, 59, 69,
90,92, 112, 114, 147, 149,
163, 164, 166, 187, 188, 190,
219-221
Wall, Abram, Minister, 77, 88,
89, 90
Wall, Aron, 186-190
Wall, Cornelius, 240
Wall, Elisabeth, 214
Wall, Fr., Ill
Wall, Franz, 132, 138
Wall, Franz F., 132, 135, 138
Wall, Johann, 186, 188, 189
Wall, Katharina, 186, 188
Wall, Maria, 134, 135
Wall, Maria, 186, 188
Warkentin, Aron, 206
Warkentin, Elder Dirk, 3 1
Warkentin, Elder Jakob, 14, 16
Warkentin, Peter, 187, 189
Warsaw, 6, 16, 68, 142, 173, 174,
225, 227
Warthegau, 222, 225, 227, 229
Washington D. C., 232, 235
Waterloo, Ontario, 171
Waterloo, Battle of, 48
Wedel, Elder Peter, 31, 41
Wemersdorf, Mol, 23, 144, 147,
155,219, 221
Wemigerode am Harz, 126, 127,
141, 142
West Prussia, 27, 42, 180
White Army, 153, 158-160, 163,
164, 166
Whitewater, 180
Widmer, Evangelist, 117
Wiebe, Dr., 190
Wiebe, Agnes [Comies], 25, 27,
29
Wiebe, Gerhard, 242
Wiebe, Heinrich, Minister, 12
Wiebe, Johann, 26
Wiebe, Johann, 160
Wiebe, P„ 111
Wiebe, Philipp, 25
Wieler, Franz, 89
Wieler, Gerhard, 46
Wieler, Johann, Minister, 54, 87
Wiens, A. A., 178
Wiens, David, Minister, 178
Wiens, Franz, Missionary, 123
Wiens, Isaak, 92
Wiens, Isaak, 203, 205
Wiens, Jakob, 108
Wiens, Jakob P., Minister, 170,
171
Wiens, Komelius, 33
Wiens, Komelius, 40, 42, 45
Wiens, Viola, 178
Wiesenfeld, 47, 48
Wilhelm n, Kaiser of Germany,
154
Wilhelmina, Queen of the
Netherlands, 231
Willms, Aganetha, 186, 187, 189
Willms, Gerhard, 186-188, 190
Willms, Gertrude, 186
Willms, Gertrude, 186
Willms, Jakob, 64
Willms, Johann, 164, 189
Willms, Johann, 186-189
Willmsm Katharina, 186, 187,
189
Winkler, 180
Winkworth, Catherine, 242
Winnipeg, 95, 176, 177, 180,
237, 239, 240
Winnipeg Free Press, 212
Winton, 74
Wohldemfuerst, Kuban, 35, 43,
44
Wolf, Heinrich, 159
World War I, 59, 84,90, 125,
126, 132, 135, 138, 141, 148,
175, 181,201,237
World Warn, 120, 127, 157,
177, 199,218, 239
Wrangel, General Peter, 163,
164, 166
Wuerttemberg, 32, 37-39, 131
Wuest, Pfarrer Eduard, 32, 33,
36,37-39, 40,42,45,46,51
Wuest, Johann J., 37
Wuest, Katharina, 37
Wuest, Pauline [Liesching], 38
X
Xunke, 208
Xiao Higgang Mountains, 202,
209
Xun He River, 208
Y
Yagoda, Genrikh G., 210
Yalantusch, 175
Yalta, xvii, 228
Yalta Conference, 222, 228
Yarrow, 178
Yazykovo Colony, xv, xvii, 84,
158, 162
Yersin, 66
Yezhov, Nicholas I., 210, 211
Yichum, 209
Yugoslavia, 186, 227
Yugovka, Neu S, 98
Yuzhnyy Bug River, xvii
Z
Zagradovka, 158, 161
Zaporozhye [Aiexandrovsk], xv,
xvii, 7, 112, 168, 173,242
Zarskoye-Sselo, 138
Zehlendorf, 229
Zeravshan River, 63
Zeya River, 209
Zhloba, General, 163, 166
Ziffem, 70,71, 106
Zilupe, 168, 169,173,242
Zionsbote, 57, 68, 74, 77, 84, 90,
101
Zoeckler, Dr., 142
Zwickau, 139
Zyrardow, 68-71, 73, 74, 77, 81
257
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Helmut T. Huebert is a practicing orthopaedic surgeon in
Winnipeg, Canada. He was bom in Alberta, but then as a boy
moved from place to place during the time his father intermittently
taught Bible school and received further education. In 1948 the
family settled in Winnipeg, where Huebert obtained his high
school, university and most of his post-graduate education.
While actively pursuing his chosen profession, he also has
a deep commitment to Jesus Christ. This has been expressed by his
participation in the local congregation, the Portage Avenue
Mennonite Brethren Church, as well as provincial and national
boards, and a number of international medical assignments.
One of Huebert’s longstanding interests is history,
particularly that of his own heritage, Mennonite history. He has
published “Hierschau: An Example of Russian Mennonite Life,”
and “Komelius Martens: Our Skillful Advocate.” The editing and
publishing of “Mennonite Historical Atlas” is further evidence of
this interest.
Helmut and his wife Dorothy have three children, Karen,
David and Susan.
258
Events
Events In
Russian Mennonite History
And The People
That Made Them Happen
Helmut T. Huebert
Springfield Publishers
This book has something for
everyone who is interested in
Russian/Soviet Mennonite history
— and maybe even for others! It cuts
a wide swath.... Huebert treads
where angels fear to tread and
makes no apologies for his selections
and methodology.... His keen
interest in history and biography,
as well as science, medicine,
geography, agriculture, music
and other subjects is demonstrated
by the range of topics selected.
Dr. Abe Dueck, Director
Centre for Mennonite Brethren Studies
Winnipeg, MB Canada
The “Events and People” kind of
telling of the Russian Mennonite
story will indeed commend this
volume to many readers. The stories
are simply told, and fitted into the
larger context of the total account
of Mennonite life in Russia....
Huebert’s book will not make the
regular works of history irrelevant;
instead it will persuade some readers
to read other works as well.
Dr. Lawrence Klippenstein,
former Historian/Archivist
Mennonite Heritage Centre
Winnipeg, MB Canada